One minute for science
- March 18, 2008 4:22 PM |
- By Paul Jay
by Paul Jay, CBCNews.ca
The U.S. Project for Excellence in Journalism came out with its state of the news media report this week, and the news was, unsurprisingly, not good for coverage of science and technology.
According to the report, science and technology news accounted for two per cent of all coverage in newspapers and network evening news, one per cent in online news and less than one per cent for U.S. cable news networks.
The cable stats are particularly ghastly: the report said that if you watched five hours of cable news, you would see about one minute of science and technology coverage. Coverage of the environment wasn't much better, accounting for one minute and 25 seconds per five hours.
The paltry coverage for those with a craving for science and technology news may be softened however, by the rise in importance of tech trade journals, bloggers and news aggregator sites devoted to all things geek.
But the numbers are less comforting for a subject less well-represented in the blogosphere like education, which accounts for less than one per cent of coverage, or one minute and 22 seconds every five hours.
The results are part of a larger trend, the study says, one in which U.S. news media interests are narrowing, and not broadening.
As the report states:
"Other than Iraq — and to a lesser degree Pakistan and Iran — there was minimal coverage of events overseas, some of which directly involved U.S. interests, blood and treasure. At the same time, consider the list of the domestic issues that each filled less than a single per cent of the newshole: education, race, religion, transportation, the legal system, housing, drug trafficking, gun control, welfare, Social Security, aging, labor, abortion and more."
It would be interesting to see how Canada's news media stacks up to similar scrutiny. But certainly, Canada's news media is no stranger to the same pressures faced in the U.S. As the report states: "Even as the media world has fragmented into more outlets and options, reporting resources have shrunk."
Categories
All News blogs
Most Commented
Most Recommended
Tech Bytes
Most Commented
Most Recommended
Recent Entries
- Universe hates Higgs boson, Chicago Cubs
- By John Bowman, CBCNews. A physicist working on the Large Hadron Collider doesn't think much of the theory that the universe is sabotaging the project to prevent the discovery of the Higgs boson. Might as well say that Nature hates... Continue reading this post
- Large Hadron Collider goes Back to the Future
- By Peter Evans, CBCNews.ca. Two respected physicists have put forward the theory that the Large Hadron Collider's stated aim of finding the Higgs boson might be so abhorrent to nature that mysterious forces are traveling back through time and sabotaging... Continue reading this post
- Multi-touch concept for desktops: 10/GUI
- By John Bowman, CBCNews.ca. I'm a fan of alternative ideas for human-computer interaction, so this video caught my attention. It shows an idea for a ten-finger touchpad interface and associated changes in the way a computer would handle multiple windows.... Continue reading this post
is a multimedia producer for CBCNews.ca.
Comments (2)
Reporting resources have not shrunk - editors and producers are simply choosing to give us stories that are sensational rather than informative.
Just take a look at the 'headline' pages on this site - certain stories seem to stay perpetually at the top of the page, while newer and far more interesting stories are shuffled in below. That story about the woman in jail in mexico was in the top 3 headlines on the Ottawa page for days, despite the fact that the story itself never changed.
Do they count crap you read or watch about some guy claiming he made a perpetual motion machine, buring seawater as fuel, or other blatantly unscientific claims, as science coverage?