CES: Taking a ride in a robot car
Wednesday, January 9, 2008 | 03:12 PM ET
by Peter Nowak, CBCNews.ca
There's a lot about CES to dislike – the crushing crowds, the waves upon waves of hype, the unabashed consumerism. But there are the sublime moments that almost – almost – make it all worthwhile.
I was lucky enough to experience one of those moments yesterday when I rode in the Carnegie Mellon/GM robot car. I rode in the passenger seat and was rendered thoroughly breathless as the steering wheel turned by itself while the car wheeled around its test track.
It's the sort of thing I had imagined since I was a kid, and there I was, being chauffeured around by a machine. I've often looked at technologies – Google Earth and the iPhone are recent examples – and thought "wow that's cool," but riding in a robot car... this was something truly special.
While the "Boss", as the car is known, was doing its thing, I couldn't help but imagine the possibilities. All those science-fiction movies I had watched were all suddenly far more real, more achievable. It's not often that technology can make a person truly think and reflect.
But then, a funny thing happened to disturb my reverie – the Boss, the most sophisticated vehicle on the planet, crashed. After careening around a garbage can, placed on the track as an obstacle, the vehicle lurched and ran over a set of pylons set up on the side on the side of the track. "That's never happened before!" Chris Urmson, head of the project, exclaimed.
I must be cursed, I thought.
The vehicle did redeem itself by smoothly backing up and resuming course, but still – it was enough to get me thinking of various I, Robot, Maximum Overdrive scenarios.
A GM executive later explained the flub happened because the test track had no lane markings, which the vehicle normally uses to avoid such mishaps. That made sense. My faith and wonder in the future of cars has been restored.
[Update] In response to the question, lane markings could be painted with a special type of paint that car sensors could detect through snow and ice. - pnowak
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
Post a Comment
Tech Bytes »
Recent Posts
- Jesse Brown: Worldwide copyfight heats up down under
- Wednesday, February 25, 2009
- Alas, that’s not Atlantis, Google says
- Monday, February 23, 2009
- Jesse Brown: Government strangely closed about open source
- Thursday, February 19, 2009
- Is traffic management working?
- Thursday, February 19, 2009
- Jesse Brown: Last chance to chime in on Net Neutrality
- Wednesday, February 11, 2009
- Subscribe to Tech Bytes
Archives
- February 2009 (10)
- January 2009 (12)
- December 2008 (10)
- November 2008 (10)
- October 2008 (9)
- September 2008 (4)
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (16)
- June 2008 (9)
- May 2008 (12)
- April 2008 (15)
- March 2008 (13)
- February 2008 (13)
- January 2008 (47)
- December 2007 (12)
- November 2007 (12)
- October 2007 (17)
- September 2007 (18)
- August 2007 (17)
- July 2007 (27)
- June 2007 (18)
- May 2007 (28)
- April 2007 (25)
- March 2007 (28)
- February 2007 (25)
- January 2007 (35)
- December 2006 (25)
Comments
Jamie
Winnipeg
What about when the lane markers are covered with snow? Into the ditch we go?
Peter Nowak's response:
Hi Jamie,
Lane markings can be painted with a special type of paint containing material that car sensors are able to detect through snow and ice.
Posted January 10, 2008 11:55 AM
Garet
Winnipeg
How credible is this considering the Volt has been supposed to come out for how many years?
Posted January 10, 2008 01:45 PM
Claudio
Ontario
While I admit the idea of self-driving cars is a fascinating concept, I certainly hope this feature (when it eventually becomes commercially available...and it will) can be disengaged for those of us who truly enjoy driving.
Also, if the lane markings can be detected through snow and ice, I assume the car's computer would be capable of driving in snowy/icy conditions...right?
Posted January 10, 2008 10:16 PM