They never saw it coming
- February 12, 2007 12:44 PM |
- By Paul Jay
by Paul Jay, CBC News Online
After 28 years of studying ESP (extra-sensory perception) and telekinesis, the Princeton Engineering Anomalies Research (or PEAR) laboratory will shut down at the end of the month, The New York Times reported.
For almost three decades the lab was an embarassment for the university and an outrage to the scientific community. And lab founder Robert Jahn has decided to call it quits.
As he told the Times:
"For 28 years, we’ve done what we wanted to do, and there’s no reason to stay and generate more of the same data," said the laboratory’s founder, Robert G. Jahn, 76, former dean of Princeton’s engineering school and an emeritus professor. "If people don’t believe us after all the results we’ve produced, then they never will."
Jahn was able to stay open mostly through private donations totalling more than $10 million US.
The Times also outlines a typical experiment, which is amusing in the absurdity of its conclusions:
In one of PEAR’s standard experiments, the study participant would sit in front of an electronic box the size of a toaster oven, which flashed a random series of numbers just above and just below 100. Staff members instructed the person to simply “think high” or “think low” and watch the display. After thousands of repetitions — the equivalent of coin flips — the researchers looked for differences between the machine’s output and random chance. Analyzing data from such trials, the PEAR team concluded that people could alter the behaviour of these machines very slightly, changing about 2 or 3 flips out of 10,000.
Oddly enough the decision to close shop comes just as researchers in Germany, Japan and the U.K., announced they have found a way to decode people's intentions through brain scans with 70 per cent accuracy.
We can't help but think of the staff at the lab and what will become of them. Perhaps they will bounce back in the private sector like their fictional counterparts Spengler, Stantz and Venkman. Speaking of Ghostbusters, we came across this lineup while looking up the movie on the Internet Movie Database. It's an appropriate epitaph for the Princeton program:
Dean Yeager: This university will no longer continue any funding of any kind for your group's activities.
Dr. Peter Venkman: But the kids love us.
Categories
All News blogs
Most Commented
Most Recommended
Tech Bytes
Most Commented
Most Recommended
Recent Entries
- Universe hates Higgs boson, Chicago Cubs
- By John Bowman, CBCNews. A physicist working on the Large Hadron Collider doesn't think much of the theory that the universe is sabotaging the project to prevent the discovery of the Higgs boson. Might as well say that Nature hates... Continue reading this post
- Large Hadron Collider goes Back to the Future
- By Peter Evans, CBCNews.ca. Two respected physicists have put forward the theory that the Large Hadron Collider's stated aim of finding the Higgs boson might be so abhorrent to nature that mysterious forces are traveling back through time and sabotaging... Continue reading this post
- Multi-touch concept for desktops: 10/GUI
- By John Bowman, CBCNews.ca. I'm a fan of alternative ideas for human-computer interaction, so this video caught my attention. It shows an idea for a ten-finger touchpad interface and associated changes in the way a computer would handle multiple windows.... Continue reading this post
is a multimedia producer for CBCNews.ca.
Comments (3)
In the name of scientists everywhere: Thank you for ending this ridiculous research. It isn't science: If you cannot disprove the theory, it cannot be science. Science is based upon theories which can be disproved.
Science is based upon theories which can be PROVED or disproved. Yes, it's true. Perhaps what they are doing is not science. We are very far away from being able to prove a lot of things. I have yet to see the theory of evolution actually proven. Yet, science accepts this theory as fact. We are so selective and the rules do not seem to apply to all theories consistently... which would be a scientific thing to do, don't you think?
As a scientist, I often wonder how far we (as a scientific community) have drifted, from the basic tenets of 'Science'; If we continue to deride, dismiss out of hand, and demand a priori "proof" before we can even approach a subject of investigation, then we will go no farther in learning many of nature's secrets--
Too bad that PEAR has closed---it's one less set of research that we, as a society, have lost access to.