Selig serves up little substance
Friday, December 14, 2007 | 11:02 AM ET
First thing I thought of upon hearing Roger Clemens accused of being a steroid cheat: his first workout in Toronto after signing with the Blue Jays. It was the winter of 1997, at SkyDome. Another accused steroid cheat, Benito Santiago, was there to catch him.
The Raptors used the building back then, so a temporary pitcher’s mound was set up behind the court. The Heat were in town for a game that night, and two of their trainers walked up to watch. As Clemens fired fastballs to Santiago (who was not wearing a jock; obviously performance-enhancers don’t help the mind), one of the trainers looked at the pitcher’s stomach and said, “Looks like Roger needs an abdominal routine.”
It was pretty funny.
Anyway, the baseball world is in an uproar today because Clemens - and 87 others - were named in the Mitchell report as linked to performance-enhancing substances. I’m sorry, but I find all of this hilarious. Just like in 1998, when commissioner Bud Selig ignored the steroid outbreak so the home run chase could re-ignite interest in baseball, the sport is going out of its way not to tarnish the present.
Of the 88 named Thursday, only 32 played in 2007. (I should point out that the Mitchell report claims 34 of those named played last season, but baseball-reference.com, an incredible statistical database I double-checked, shows that only 32 did.) Wow. This $20 million US report could only find evidence that approximately three/four per cent of active players ever used illegal steroids. That’s real hard-hitting stuff. Does anyone believe that?
Bud Selig sure wants you to. Several times during his Baghdad Bob-esque media conference, he spun some version of, “We’ve got a tough policy, we’ve identified the cheaters, and we can move on.”
Yes, he can, because the biggest names in Mitchell’s report are at the ends of their careers. Just two of the accused were all-stars last season. One was Barry Bonds. The other was Brian Roberts, who was named on the flimsiest of evidence: ex-teammate Larry Bigbie (also identified as a user) said Roberts told him he’d injected “once or twice.”
Must be nice to convict by hearsay, without any actual eyewitnesses.
I’ve written before that I hate the fact Hall-of-Fame voters did Selig’s dirty work last year by punishing Mark McGwire. Now, they can act as his hitmen again by going after Bonds and Roger Clemens. (To a lesser degree, they can also reject Gary Sheffield, Jason Giambi and Andy Pettitte.) Thanks to Selig’s ostrich act on steroids, McGwire, Bonds and Clemens played major roles in restoring the sport after 1994. Now that he doesn’t need them anymore, he can hold his nose and pretend they deserve to be punished.
Nowhere in this report is one of baseball’s current or upcoming superstars. Seems like a mighty big coincidence, doesn’t it? Unless, of course, you believe all are clean.
After the Big Five, the most tantalizing names are those of three fading stars: Miguel Tejada, Troy Glaus and Eric Gagne. Tejada is 31, five years removed from his MVP season. His power numbers dropped significantly last season and the Astros must be thrilled they just traded five prospects to get him. Glaus, 30, is, as Blue Jays fans know, gutsy, but injury-prone and totally immobile. Gagne, who will be 32 in January, shows little resemblance to the guy who won the Cy Young Award in 2003. You root for the Canadian, but more for the Brewers, since they just gave him $10 million. A few years ago, a positive test for any one of those three players would have been severely damaging. Now, it’s not as bad.
Gary Matthews Jr. and Jose Guillen will only hurt their teams, which gave them ridiculous contracts. Jay Gibbons and Derrick Turnbow have hurt their own careers, not the sport.
Nine others - Rondell White, Gregg Zaun, Ron Villone, Jerry Hairston Jr., Paul LoDuca, Matt Herges, Mike Stanton, Paul Byrd, Scott Schoeneweis, Ryan Franklin and Brendan Donnelly - are veteran journeymen nearing the end. Hairston is the youngest (31) and Schoeneweis is the only other under 35 (he’s 33, but falling apart). Byrd is coming off an All-Star season, but a repeat performance would be a surprise, considering his career. Again, not damaging for baseball.
Five - Howie Clark, Nook Logan, Gary Bennett Jr., Stephen Randolph and Ryan Jorgensen - are fringe players. Their names will be the first forgotten, which isn’t exactly a bad thing for them.
The only real damage is to two of baseball’s best feel-good stories of 2007. Jack Cust played 70 major-league games in six years before hitting 26 homers for Oakland. And, Rick Ankiel came back from his pitching failures to hit 11 HRs in just 47 games as an outfielder. But Ankiel and Cust will be overshadowed in all of this.
By including Bonds and Clemens, Selig & Mitchell made sure of that.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.
Post a Comment
From the Pressbox »
About the Author
Elliotte Friedman is the host of the CFL ON CBC. Prior to being named host in 2006, Friedman worked on the CFL on CBC broadcasts for the three seasons as a sideline reporter. A Toronto native, Friedman is well known for his additional work on Hockey Night in Canada, as well as his presence on the Torino 2006 Winter Games telecasts as a hockey reporter. Prior to joining the CBC, Friedman worked at The Score network and was widely regarded as one of the best reporters in the country. Friedman used his reporting skills to break stories and file feature reports for high profile events including six Stanley Cup Finals, four Grey Cup Championships, two World Series and one Olympic Games. He is also a regular on the nationally syndicated Prime Time Sports radio telecast, hosted by Bob McCown.
Recent Posts
- Fall of the Argos can be traced back to Austin firing
- Friday, September 12, 2008
- Rejuvenated Matthews a good choice to revive Argos
- Tuesday, September 9, 2008
- Things I’ll never forget about Beijing 2008
- Tuesday, August 26, 2008
- Never let your emotions cloud your judgment
- Thursday, August 21, 2008
- Cheering for Priscilla Lopes-Schliep
- Tuesday, August 19, 2008
- Subscribe to From the Pressbox
Archives
- September 2008 (2)
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (5)
- April 2008 (11)
- February 2008 (3)
- January 2008 (5)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (5)
- August 2007 (3)
- July 2007 (8)
- June 2007 (3)
- May 2007 (2)
- April 2007 (3)
- February 2007 (3)
- January 2007 (2)
- December 2006 (4)
- November 2006 (10)








Comments
tim
calgary
let me get this straight...
the MLB and some fans and a particular senator are upset that some players used performance enhancing drugs even though there was no policy against there use. and the players who took advantage are now ostrasized for doing so. seems a little biggotted to me. if something is not against the rules, and it can help your performance, why not use it? and, referring specifically to steroids, you don't just take them and get better. you still need to put your time in in the gym and in training. it's not like these players sat on the couch and took steroids and became better players. they don't work that way. and here's a little known or publicized fact - steroids are legal for personal use in the united states.
if a player looked at the rules of MLB and used the rules to their advantage, good for them. shame on everyone else for insinuating otherwise.
Posted December 18, 2007 12:37 PM
Snoop
PEI
Not sure what else to say about all this garbage. A $20 million dollar report to put a few names on paper stating that tey had once used (and possibly still are) one type of performance enhancing drug. Its all a huge waste of cash if u ask me. You want drugs outta the game? Well you must take the drastic step, no matter how much it hurts the game because right now i dont think the game can be hurt too much more. People are getting sick and tired of reading and hearing all the promises like, we will find the cheaters, we will clean up the game. Gimme a break. The drastic measure is by randomally testing players throughout the year without notice. No warning that a test is coming. And the thing is, if you get caught then hey, you get suspended and fined. People will then know who is and isnt on them. I dont care who "was" on them. Nothing can be done now. Lets get a move on this.
Posted December 17, 2007 12:13 PM
Rod
Who really cares...if some guy wants to pump himself full of harmful drugs...then so be it. if baseball was more exciting then watching poker or fishing on tv, then I might care. baseball is probably the worst sport known to man. Let baseball die in flames.
Posted December 16, 2007 08:55 PM
Lindsay
Calgary
There are so many cheats in MLB that it now
puts anyone who has a good season under scrutiny. Sad. Salaries are so high anyone
will do anything to get better and hence get
the lottery. Morales and ethics can just be
parked for a while until career is over. There
just does not seem to be enough of a penalty
in place for the cheats. Selig is a joke , but
what can he realistically do. About the only
people to benefit will be all the lawyers.
Posted December 15, 2007 06:38 PM
Pete
Toronto
Base Ball. The game has basement-ed before and no doubt will find a way to fall down the steps again after it climbs out of its most recent hole. I'm not sure it matters - not sure what it means to any of the rest of us. These men are attempting to climb a ladder to the gods - but to get to the rarefied air of pro sport is such a sirens call. The money, adoration will all be yours if you can just make it to the bigs. Who can blame 'em? They want to win - be included in the winner's circle. What does it say to the kids? That everywhere are liars and mountebanks? That to get to the top you've got to dissemble and step on whomever or whatever to get there? That an astericks isn't a star at the end of your name? I don't think so. We seem destined to repeat our sins - now and all the befores. This will pass and be replaced by our next indignation . There are many in the sport who push themselves everyday in a clean way - if we need role models beyond a decent heart - maybe we should look to them.
Pete
Posted December 15, 2007 10:19 AM
Zack Lamoureux
Just because they SHOULDN'T be a role model, doesn't mean that they aren't. I hate baseball, more for the actual game than the politics, but I think that sport can provide a source of positive role models for kids. As a parent (which I'm not), I would be much more uncomfortable with my child watching any entertainment or celebrity news than a game of baseball.
Posted December 15, 2007 12:00 AM
CJ McAuley
I was born in 1958. When I was 11, the Expos came to my hometown of Montreal. I have 2 books still from that era: the official Baseball Encyclopedia,which my Father gave me; and Ball Four, which I bought myself. I loved baseball and the Expos until 1994, when things conspired to steal a championship from us. But I was jaded since I read Ball Four (by Jim Bouton. Having read that book, I was never surprised by any revelation of drug use by pro athletes. I remain incredulous that pro hockey apparently has no such issue! My interest in watching these professional cheaters has lessened every year. I will pay to watch whatever pro entertainers I like, but I will not ever pay to watch any pro athlete who purports to be anything but what he or she is: a pro entertainer! The very idea that ANY pro athlete be regarded as a role-model is an anathema to me!
Posted December 14, 2007 07:03 PM
Roadent
Toronto
That's right, Elliot - nothing to see here, move along... Shooting the messenger and ignoring the message is always a good strategy: don't want to compromise your access to locker rooms or corporate boxes, do you? Do you actually have an opinion on cheating? (yep, doping is cheating...) Ever think that the naming of 'no-name' players might be indicative of how deep-rooted the problem is? No comment on the Player's union and the office of the commissioner conspiring to suppress reports of positive tests? No comment on Frank Thomas being about the only active player to actually talk to the commission and saying "they need to test"? It's all in the report... I'm assuming that you think professional sports players aren't role models and have no effect on kids - that's why there aren't any high school football players using steriods, and why there is no way there would ever be something like, oh, let's see, eight-year-old hockey teams in bench-clearing brawls? Nope, it's just a game, and no need to apply conventional standards of right and wrong....
Posted December 14, 2007 05:32 PM
John W.
Regina
This steriods era leaves the record books in shambles and by extension the Hall of Fame is a joke too. Those in power can use this opportunity to right some wrongs now; as they struggle to keep out the McGwires and Clemens and Bonds they can undo the long standing wrong of overlooking Roger Maris for entry inot the Hall of Fame. Not one person who is untainted by steriod accusations has surpassed 61 home runs in one season.
Posted December 14, 2007 05:06 PM
Brian
Moncton
Most of the press and Mitchell are missing what the sport was suppose to identify - performance ENHANCING drugs. By not including the most abused drug in baseball (Amphetamines) in his report Mitchell proved that he just another politician looking to deceive the public. The report will do little to correct the current situation and will direct the attention of the public away from the problem - performance enhancing doping. In fairness to Bonds, Clements and the others they are being convicted on hearsay and not facts. Advanced, impartial testing is needed with attention being paid to all substances which slant the playing field.
Posted December 14, 2007 03:14 PM
Meech
NB
Big friggin deal.. the lid has blown open on the MLB.. theres juice in every sport.. some athletes have better lab techs then others.. Put yourself in their shoes... Its quite easy to get caught up in that million dollar racket..If im Greg Zaun.. yes sir.. if doing a couple rounds of juice keeps me in the majors and creates a great financial nest egg for my family..sign me up.. all you have to do is pull a Giambi and simply apologize... no one has talked about him since he said "yah.. about that... sorry.. ".. I wouldnt want to be Selig.. toughest commisioner job going.. that said.. by not testing for HGH.. he is saving alot of paper work.. THATS WHAT THEY ALL TAKE!!!!
Posted December 14, 2007 02:59 PM
Eamonn
Calgary
What crisis? So players poked themselves full of holes and augmented their training regime to increase their physical strength. It happened at a time (for the most part) when there were no rules and regulations against using physical enhancements. And, given that we can all suspect that the vast majority of players were doing it at the time, an augmented hitter going against an augmented pitcher should be viewed the same. The past is the past. We didn't have rules against it in the 80's and 90's, therefore, noone broke any rules. The rules in the game have changed over the years, and some records that were set were done so at a time when conditions favoured the opportunity. In the season of deadballs, ERA's were low. But it still takes the right person to seize that opportunity and make it their own. I have been a Jay's fan since that first game, and I hated watching Clemens tear up our lineup (all the more so because my best friend was a Red Sox fan) but you know what, he is a great pitcher and deserves his achievements and accolades. As a columnist noted once a few months ago, when Barry Bonds was the only target for this, it was really only an issue because Bonds is not a likeable person. I have a newsflash, neither was Babe Ruth and Ty Cobb.
If we decide that from this day forward a drug free league is a necessity, then do so. And implement enough testing to guarantee you will catch everyone who does it. But for heaven's sake, leave the past alone. I don't care if Clemens took steroids, he was a great batter. So it added a few extra mph to his fastball. The difference between a 90mph and 94mph fastball is not the difference which gives you 7 cy young awards. The faster it comes in, the faster it goes out, so you need some talent to do something with that.
Posted December 14, 2007 02:58 PM
P Izlle
Toronto
Hi Elliot
Good comment on Selig; when I heard the press conference I was laughing, he was speaking as if he did so much, but so little was done.
As you said, it was convenient to cover it up until the pressure was too much.
Posted December 14, 2007 02:31 PM
Muise
I could've guessed 99% of those names that were on the report. Were you really surprised that Eric Gagne was on the list? Please. It was obvious when he was on the Dodgers breaking records. The thing is, that there's so many more players that should be included that somehow didn't make the list.
Nomar? Textbook. At least there's more than one player taking the wrath of this steroid thing than Barry Bonds. Two weeks ago, 8/10 people would've only named Barry Bonds as the steroid poster boy. He's taken the heat almost exclusively yet is he any worse than Roger Clemens now? Both have been accused yet have never tested positive and both are arguably the best two players of our generation, let alone ANY generation. What are the writers going to do when either of these players are elgible for the hall of fame? They'll get in. 100%. It's time baseball wakes up and realizes they were ALL on the junk and stop whining about the past and focus on the present and future.
50 games is not going to stop anyone. If I'm a minor league player and I think I can sign an average $10 million salary for 5 years and be set for life 100 times over if I take performance enhancing drugs (good players become better players, don't wear down), it's worth the risk isn't it?
Baseball isn't the only sport people should be looking at. Shawn Merriman, Linebalcker for the SD Chargers gets SUSPENDED 4 games for taking steroids and yet he get nominated for defensive player of the year? What the heck is that? That sets a great example doens't it? Again, who cares if the league doens't only care but rewards you? It's all a joke. Selig is acting like he didn't know a darn thing. Impossible. McGwire and Sosa were built like WWF superstars out there and the stadiums were packed....again who cares if they don't?
Posted December 14, 2007 02:17 PM
a different bill
NL
Any other blue jay fans find the number of blue jays on the list either past or present alarming
Posted December 14, 2007 02:16 PM
Muise
I could've guessed 99% of those names that were on the report. Were you really surprised that Eric Gagne was on the list? Please. It was obvious when he was on the Dodgers breaking records. The thing is, that there's so many more players that should be included that somehow didn't make the list.
Nomar? Textbook. At least there's more than one player taking the wrath of this steroid thing than Barry Bonds. Two weeks ago, 8/10 people would've only named Barry Bonds as the steroid poster boy. He's taken the heat almost exclusively yet is he any worse than Roger Clemens now? Both have been accused yet have never tested positive and both are arguably the best two players of our generation, let alone ANY generation. What are the writers going to do when either of these players are elgible for the hall of fame? They'll get in. 100%. It's time baseball wakes up and realizes they were ALL on the junk and stop whining about the past and focus on the present and future.
50 games is not going to stop anyone. If I'm a minor league player and I think I can sign an average $10 million salary for 5 years and be set for life 100 times over if I take performance enhancing drugs (good players become better players, don't wear down), it's worth the risk isn't it?
Baseball isn't the only sport people should be looking at. Shawn Merriman, Linebalcker for the SD Chargers gets SUSPENDED 4 games for taking steroids and yet he get nominated for defensive player of the year? What the heck is that? That sets a great example doens't it? Again, who cares if the league doens't only care but rewards you? It's all a joke. Selig is acting like he didn't know a darn thing. Impossible. McGwire and Sosa were built like WWF superstars out there and the stadiums were packed....again who cares if they don't?
Posted December 14, 2007 02:16 PM
FC
Mississauga
Who cares?
Baseball is a boring sport that mostly occurs in a messed up country.
Is the report or the conclusions a suprise?
No way.
Does it go on in every other professional sport?
Of course it does.
We are just so desparate for heroes today, we'll cling to anyone, regardless of their actions.
PS - What about the recent revelations concerning our most "green" past PM?
Posted December 14, 2007 02:09 PM
d ganzert
Trail
The blame for this "crisis" lies in many places. Owners, commissioner, players, players association all share in the shame. Since that is the case a possible resolution would be to draw a line in the sand and from this day forward have random, comprehensive testing of all pro players followed by stiff penalties for offenders. To go after the players alone as the owners seem to want to do is unjust for the owners are partially to blame. If the owners were not so willing to turn a blind eye to the problem for the sake of profits this issue would not be in front of us today. The players can not be made scapegoats for the sins of the entire organization of professional baseball
Posted December 14, 2007 02:07 PM
d ganzert
Trail
The blame for this "crisis" lies in many places. Owners, commissioner, players, players association all share in the shame. Since that is the case a possible resolution would be to draw a line in the sand and from this day forward have random, comprehensive testing of all pro players followed by stiff penalties for offenders. To go after the players alone as the owners seem to want to do is unjust for the owners are partially to blame. If the owners were not so willing to turn a blind eye to the problem for the sake of profits this issue would not be in front of us today. The players can not be made scapegoats for the sins of the entire organization of professional baseball
Posted December 14, 2007 02:07 PM
Mike
Toronto
Hey Freege.............given what happened yesterday, do you think the people that whined about Eric Gagne not winning the 2003 Lou Marsh Award still feel he should have won?............by the way, don't you think your "About The Author" profile on this blog should be updated since you haven't been allowed to appear on Bob McCown's show for a long time?..............take care...........Mike
Posted December 14, 2007 01:25 PM
Abraham
Toronto
Is it any wonder that besides Mo Vaughan, who was implicated as a New York Met, that not one Boston Red Sox player was named on this list? Or is it forgotten that the person writing the list just happens to be on the Red Sox board of directors? To be honest the report is a joke and does nothing to rectify the problem. At the same time though at least they're getting some skeletons out of the closet unlike our National League, the CFL.
Posted December 14, 2007 12:35 PM
Bill
Elliotte,
I cannot believe such a superficial response from you - normally a thoughtful reporter and analyst.
For someone who lacked the ability to subpoena and question under oath Senator Mitchell acquired a tremendous amount of information.
You speak of convicting on hearsay rather than eye witnesses.
There was eye witness evidence especially with regard to Roger Clemens.
There are a multitude of cheques written to the former Met clubhouse employee, Kirk Radominski.
There is the direct evidence of a few players such as Larry Bigbie.
Facing a conspiracy of silence Mitchell obtained alot of evidence.
The report makes clear that HGH, currently undetectable by urine sample, has become the drug of choice.
The reliance on urine tests instead of blood tests is preventing knowledge of current players.
Where is your concern for the majority of players who were not cheating? I would have thought you would have been supporting drug testing, especially blood testing, that will go after those who use HGH and other performance enhancing drugs.
Bill
Posted December 14, 2007 12:18 PM