On NHL records & CFL predictions
Friday, November 10, 2006 | 10:26 PM ET
Before we begin the CFL portion of this entry, one quick comment about the NHL record book. It is a farce if the league does not recognize pre- and post-lockout totals when it comes to records that are affected by shootouts.
For example, I’m not really bothered by Anaheim passing the 1984-85 Edmonton Oilers by getting a point in 16 consecutive games to start the season. Yes, the Ducks do have three shootout losses and an overtime defeat, but, because the Oilers were eligible to get a point in an overtime loss of their own, this isn’t so bad.
However, Buffalo tied Toronto’s record of 10 consecutive season-opening wins thanks to three shootout victories. Now, you can’t fault the Sabres for taking advantage of the rules, but should that erase what was done before warring factions beheaded a year? And, should a team be able to, say, set a new record for points in a season thanks to new rules that guarantee a winner?
Then, there are the individual numbers. Patrick Roy goes into the Hall of Fame Monday night 100 ahead of Martin Brodeur in the career victories race. Now, Brodeur is also a sure-fire Hall-of-Famer, one of the best ever. But, what happens if he beats out Roy because of the shootout?
I don’t want to use the word tainted, because anyone who wins 552 games deserves it. But it’s not right, either.
What the NHL Guide and Record Book should do is recognize records from both eras once the old ones are broken. Don’t throw away your history, embrace it.
*****
If there is any doubt about how good a coach Pinball Clemons has become, last week’s win over Winnipeg should erase it. Clemons’ loyalty to his players is exceptional, particularly when it comes to Damon Allen. The Argonauts were annoyed in July when word of their interest in Doug Flutie became public. Clemons decided that he would appear live on the CBC pre-game – even while his team was warming up – because he wanted to answer any questions. And he was also the guy who went and told Allen, because the then-injured quarterback didn’t know calls to Flutie were made.
Clemons is Allen’s biggest defender. Two weeks ago, I asked Allen about his declining run totals. He carried just 25 times all year – lowest of his career – and averaged fewer carries per game than in any season since 1986, his second in the CFL. That’s alarming for a guy who is, theoretically, as dangerous with his feet as he is with his hands.
Allen’s response: “I am 43, you know.” That’s like a four-alarm blaze with the guy, who usually bristles at any question of age or retirement. When I asked Clemons about this, he just shrugged it off, coming back with the usual rebuttals on behalf of his quarterback.
That’s why I almost fell off my on-set stool when Clemons yanked him for Michael Bishop. (I must admit, I’m still a little skeptical. The only way you can ever get the affable Clemons to be quiet is to ask about injury information, and Allen was clobbered by Doug Brown moments before his replacement). Anyway, a good coach is supposed to make decisions like this: “I don’t care how much you mean to me, but we’re down 10 and I’ve got to do what’s best for the team.”
In came Bishop, down went the Blue Bombers. Underestimate Clemons at your own peril.
The only problem is that he probably can’t do it again as successfully. Winnipeg was clearly stunned by Bishop’s entrance, giving up touchdowns on two straight possessions. (Toronto could have also run out the clock if it wasn’t for some loopy play-calling.)
Montreal will now be prepared for this. And, the Alouettes did a masterful job on Allen in the second half of their win in Toronto two weeks ago. I also like the fact that Anthony Calvillo, who calls Montreal’s plays, had the patience to run the ball with Robert Edwards over and over again during that game. Mulching through the Argonaut defence is the best way to attack.
For those reasons, my pick is Montreal.
Flying to Vancouver, I can’t help but be reminded of last year’s Lions collapse. There was no good reason for them to lose the West final at home to Edmonton. It was self-destruction not seen since Mission:Impossible first went on the air in the 70s. Here are the Lions, again at home, again the CFL’s best, no excuse to lose.
Except, of course, that they are playing the one team that handled them all year. Saskatchewan was 3-1 against B.C., and looked very, very good in scoring 25 in a row to beat Calgary.
With apologies to my paternal grandfather Nathan – mayor of Wilkie, Sask., from 1949-59 – I don’t see it happening again. Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa – whatever you celebrate – came early for the Roughriders this year, thanks to a sackful of gift-wrapped Stampeder mistakes.
I just don’t see the Lions being as error-prone. I just don’t see Kenton Keith gaining 141 yards on 16 carries against that defence. And, I just don’t see Kerry Joseph, who was pretty erratic last week, able to score enough points, unless he starts running the ball himself more often. That’s the key. If Joseph runs well, Saskatchewan might win this.
But my pick is the Lions in a close one.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.
Post a Comment
From the Pressbox »
About the Author
Elliotte Friedman is the host of the CFL ON CBC. Prior to being named host in 2006, Friedman worked on the CFL on CBC broadcasts for the three seasons as a sideline reporter. A Toronto native, Friedman is well known for his additional work on Hockey Night in Canada, as well as his presence on the Torino 2006 Winter Games telecasts as a hockey reporter. Prior to joining the CBC, Friedman worked at The Score network and was widely regarded as one of the best reporters in the country. Friedman used his reporting skills to break stories and file feature reports for high profile events including six Stanley Cup Finals, four Grey Cup Championships, two World Series and one Olympic Games. He is also a regular on the nationally syndicated Prime Time Sports radio telecast, hosted by Bob McCown.
Recent Posts
- Things I’ll never forget about Beijing 2008
- Tuesday, August 26, 2008
- Never let your emotions cloud your judgment
- Thursday, August 21, 2008
- Cheering for Priscilla Lopes-Schliep
- Tuesday, August 19, 2008
- So, let me get this straight
- Thursday, August 14, 2008
- Sundin's future is almost too hard to predict
- Wednesday, July 23, 2008
- Subscribe to From the Pressbox
Archives
- August 2008 (4)
- July 2008 (1)
- June 2008 (1)
- May 2008 (5)
- April 2008 (11)
- February 2008 (3)
- January 2008 (5)
- December 2007 (2)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (3)
- September 2007 (5)
- August 2007 (3)
- July 2007 (8)
- June 2007 (3)
- May 2007 (2)
- April 2007 (3)
- February 2007 (3)
- January 2007 (2)
- December 2006 (4)
- November 2006 (10)








Comments
Marc
How can we compare records when every year is different. So reporters should save scratching their heads on comparing records from past decades.
Posted November 13, 2006 04:30 PM
Brett
Minneapolis
Mr. Friedman, you have your facts wrong when it comes to NHL records. The 84-85 Oilers were NOT eligible for a OT loss point. During that time, a loss in OT or otherwise was 0 points. The Oiler's run to start that season was all regulation or overtime wins (12) and ties (3). Had they lost in OT during that run, the streak would have ended.
As for the Leaf's record. I should refer you to your colleague, Scott Morrison's blog from Oct 24th. He refers to the Leaf's '93-94 run being questionable as the record because at least one of their wins required OT, unlike the run of the record they broke from the 70's - BEFORE regular season overtime came into play.
If you have the facts and interpret them rationally, the 84-85 Oiler's actually have a bigger beef then the '93-94 Leafs because their record has fallen despite the Ducks suffering an OT loss while the Sabres, in their run this year, still won all of their games (even if some came in a shootout).
If you want to talk about different era's and different records, then you have to talk about the pre-regular season OT era and what the record was then and not simply be blinded
by one of the Leaf's few decent moments in the past 4 decades when making your point.
Posted November 13, 2006 03:16 PM
Depressed Bruin fan
"Would it even be an issue. . . is a typical response of any western or non Leaf fan. If it was a Bruin record it would matter and it matters even though it's a Leaf record because the game was different.Oh ya - last I checked Manitoba didn't have a team so I guess you cheer for anyone but the Leafs. Envy- and typical Western whiner Syndrome. I know it cause I've lived in BC long enough to Know the only bigger malcontents besides Quebec separitists and people that think Quebec should have their own Hockey team in the World Championships are the BC'ers who don't care if they do. Elliot has a point and it's good to see that some of the next generation journalists are not ready to throw out tradition just cause it was made by some old guys.
Posted November 12, 2006 09:45 PM
Lee Michael
It's too bad that Dave Ritchie can't win an award because he is a HUGE reason why the Leos are where they are.Since the Lions were 2 and 3........they only lost 2 games since and the game in Regina ,known as the Buono Blunder,was a win also.All the sacks and interceptions are made by the players,but Dave has them playing that way.Hats off to Dave Ritchie and the " D ".Oh ya',the offence is pretty good too.The Lions by more than 6.
Posted November 11, 2006 04:29 PM
Max Power
Manitoba
Would it even be an issue if it wasn't a Maplelaugh's record?
Posted November 11, 2006 02:14 AM