Hockey Night in Canada's Scott Morrison delivers his insights into the world of hockey, on and off the ice.
NHL returning to old schedule
Comments (39)
Thursday, November 29, 2007 | 10:40 PM ET
By Scott Morrison
Hockey Night in Canada's Scott Morrison is in Pebble Beach, Calif., covering the NHL board of governors meetings.
As expected, the NHL turned back the clock on Thursday.
They may turn it back even further in a year or so.
Beginning next season, the league will revert back to the schedule matrix used prior to the lockout, four seasons ago. Put simply, that means every team will play each other at least once.
So, the games against division rivals will be reduced from eight to six, a merciful move for some, a concern for other teams. Games against conference rivals will remain at four apiece, with a single game against all of the other conference teams. Under the current system, teams play just 10 games against the other conference, missing five teams every year.
In the new/old system, that leaves three at-large, or wild-card games which, in the case of Canadian teams, will be played amongst themselves, which is a good thing.
On the horizon, though, is likely an 84-game season, though that is not entirely a lock.
"Our fans are telling us they want change," said Calgary Flames governor Harley Hotchkiss of the change for next season. "They want to see Crosby, Ovechkin and Kovalchuk, just like everyone wanted to see Wayne Gretzky."
Under this matrix, Crosby et al would play every team, but would visit each city every second year, rather than the current three-year cycle.
Next week, for instance, he visits Edmonton, Calgary and Vancouver for the first time in his career -- in his third season. Last year, the great schedule debate caught momentum when the Washington Capitals and Alexander Ovechkin swept through western Canada, causing quite the stir.
"This format," said Hotchkiss, "is a happy medium."
That's because several of the Canadians teams (Toronto, Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton along with the Rangers and Dallas) were keen on every team seeing the other twice in a season, home and away. But there were too many teams that covet the divisional games and don't want the extra travel and expense, so they carried the day.
The schedule change carried with a 26-4 vote, with the dissenters believed to be Anaheim, New Jersey, Boston and the New York Islanders.
"We travel enough already," said Anaheim Ducks general manager Brian Burke prior to the meeting. "Our fans didn't want to lose any division games."
What is interesting, though, is that NHLPA director Paul Kelly met with the governors and amongst the things he talked about was the players willingness and preference to play two games a year with the other conference, home-and-home, and to play an 84-game schedule as long as pre-season games are reduced from nine to five. It is a proposal the Detroit Red Wings have floated, but was never formally discussed. Yet.
Unfortunately, that information from the players didn't arrive in time to potentially be implemented next season, but commissioner Gary Bettman was quick to point out that the matrix that will be in place can easily be expanded by those two games, if the owners are willing. You can bet that discussion will take place next time the governors gather.
"It's never been formally proposed to us by the union," said Bettman, "and it's something we will talk about...the basic structure is in place, adding two extra games will fit into this matrix nicely."
The bottom line for now is that while the divisional games are important to a lot of teams, the league also has to make sure it gets maximum exposure for its top young players. The old/new system that will be in place next season doesn't get all of that, but it is better than what was in existence. And there is no fixed time frame for this matrix, unlike the existing system, which was on a three-year cycle. So, again, moving to 84 games if there is an appetite is easy.
"This was an attempt to be responsive to the fans,” Bettman said. “And we did it notwithstanding that this is likely to be the third year in a row with record attendance and the fact that divisional games are better attended than any other."
The burning question now, of course, is when will the carping begin anew about the "new" schedule and when will the 84-game season become a reality?
In other news:
- Kelly spoke with the governors for roughly 35 minutes and received applause and handshakes when he was done. Essentially, he spoke about what he thought was good and what could be done better in the current system. He said he was still evaluating the CBA, still talking to players and "it's really too early at this point to talk about a reopen at the end of next season. We're going to wait until the end of this season and see where we are.
"But I also told them, consistent with my overall view and attitude, that if there are issues and concerns that I think we ought to initiate a healthy dialogue at the end of this season and work to resolve those things through discussion and compromise and not kind of let those issues fester and put them off until the last minute when it’s too late.
"But at this point, absolutely no decisions have been made relative to the re-opening of the CBA.’’
The other music to the board's ears was a pronouncement that he doesn't believe a "cold-war approach" works, but he was quick to add that as a lawyer for 27 years, he wasn't afraid to fight the good fight, adding that "any labour interruption in this sport would be devastating...the public, particularly in the United States, would turn away in disgust."
Kelly also mentioned that the players were willing to make modifications to improve goal scoring, including reducing the size of goalie equipment as long as there was no increased risk of injury to the goaltenders.
- As expected, the sale of the Nashville Predators to a group of local investors was approved
- The governors were told that the salary cap, at $50.3 US million this season, will likely go up again for next season because revenues are expected to increase.
- On the agenda for Day 2 of the meetings is a thorough discussion on the state of the game, everything from hits to the head, hits from behind, suspensions and the drop in goal scoring for a second straight season from and average of 6.2 per game two years ago, to 5.8 last year to 5.4 this season. The league was averaging 5.1 goals per game per lockout.
There are two significant reasons for the drop off. One, players have adjusted to the new interpretation of the rules and power plays are down. Two, coaches have figured out ways to deal with the absence of the red-line and a new form of the trap, known as the wedge, is rampant.
What recommendations or thoughts emerge from the meetings remains to be seen, but the good news is the players have made it known to Kelly during his tour of the teams that they are overwhelmingly opposed to increasing the size of the nets. And that is good news.
Imagine the impact globally if the NHL increased the size of the nets. Imagine the impact on the record book. The key is to find ways to increase scoring chances and let the rest play itself out. Reduce the size of goalie equipment, but leave the nets alone.
- Beleaguered Maple Leafs general manager John Ferguson has obviously been the topic of conversation in the hallways, but he has received a lot of support at these meetings from rival club executives and general managers, most alternately amazed and appalled by what has happened in the past week, with the comments from within the organization and the speculation from outside.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
Post a Comment
Viewpoint »
About the Author
Scott Morrison, the recipient of the Hockey Hall of Fameís 2006 Elmer Ferguson Memorial Award, has been covering hockey for 25 years. The Toronto native began his career at the Toronto Sun in 1979. After spending more than 11 years as a hockey writer and columnist at the paper, Morrison became Sports Editor in 1991 and led the section to being named one of North America's top-ten sports sections in 1999 - the first sports section in Canada to receive the AP Sports Editors North American Award. Scott, a former two-term president of the Professional Hockey Writers' Association, joined Rogers Sportsnet in 2001 as Managing Editor, Hockey, and is currently both a commentator on Hockey Night in Canada and a columnist for CBC.ca.
Recent Posts
- Listen to Grapes - touch icing is dangerous
- Friday, March 21, 2008
- Pronger's suspension not enough, but not far off
- Tuesday, March 18, 2008
- NHL standings should not reward division leaders
- Wednesday, March 12, 2008
- Neck guards, like visors, will be a player’s choice
- Thursday, March 6, 2008
- Sens' problems deeper than Paddock
- Wednesday, February 27, 2008
- Subscribe to Viewpoint
Archives
- March 2008 (4)
- February 2008 (14)
- January 2008 (9)
- December 2007 (8)
- November 2007 (9)
- October 2007 (8)
- September 2007 (5)
- July 2007 (1)
- June 2007 (7)
- May 2007 (8)
- April 2007 (12)
- March 2007 (5)
- February 2007 (5)
- January 2007 (7)
- December 2006 (6)
- November 2006 (8)
- October 2006 (8)








Comments (39)
Greg G
Cobourg,ON
I hope the league allows each team to play each other twice,meaning an eastern team will have to, at least do one visit in each western teams rink.Having 4 games against a division rival is plenty enough,its boring the game down to much to have more than that.
Posted November 30, 2007 04:31 PM
hugh
ns
is it possible to revert ahead as well as revert back?
Posted November 30, 2007 04:19 PM
Paul cloutier
Winnipeg
Instead of trying to change our game with gimmicks, and recognizing the players are bigger, faster etc- JUST make the rinks bigger- 200x100 In most NHL cities where fans are at a premuim-no- one would notice- In my Canadian opinion this would help the game ?
Paul
Posted November 30, 2007 03:45 PM
Darcy
Ottawa
Lynn - Ottawa has a "better than tho" attitude? hahahaha. Me thinks you are confusing Toronto with that attitude. Which city in the entire country refused to support the only Canadian team left in the playoffs last year..... Toronto. Think about that before you post comments.
Posted November 30, 2007 03:31 PM
Lauri Ruosteenoja
A comment on the agenda for Day 2:
The size of goaltender equipment was not reduced nearly enough in 2005. Goalies still have a huge unjustified advantage over shooters by virtue of their size.
I suggest that the NHL openly look at goalie gear and streamline any piece of equipment which unduly covers the net. There is no need to sacrifice protection. Shins, knees and palms can be perfectly protected with smaller gear.
Posted November 30, 2007 02:59 PM
R. Jeffery
vancouver
Is it just me or are there many more meaningful games in the late season now? I think its because we end with so many division games. while i certainly support a schedule change that allows us to see Crosby in Vancouver again before 2011, I hope the meaningful end-of-season games will remain
Posted November 30, 2007 02:39 PM
Greg
Toronto
I love NHL hockey, but going back to the old schedule means more trips across North America meaning more fuel spent travelling. Not good. [and, Toronto fans should boycott going to Leafs' games. The whole organization needs a shakedown to the core. Very, very disappointed in anything to do with the Maple Leafs since 1968.]
Posted November 30, 2007 02:13 PM
Dan Cahill
Etobicoke
This is an excellent article, however, they (the Western teams) and the coaches kept on “Crabbing and complaining about the “distance, time and how tired they where when coming into the East to play a few games.
I love to see the “Original 6 teams”. Please leave it alone.
Mr. Dan Cahill
Posted November 30, 2007 01:52 PM
bcbear
Of course it should be changed to allow all teams to play against each other. The fans deserve it regardles of what some teams GM's think of it.
Posted November 30, 2007 01:50 PM
Gene Bonvie
I'm a Habs fan, but I don't need to see them play Toronto eight times a year. I know it's just my preference, but I actually liked it better when Toronto was in the other conference. The two times they played each other were special, and I made sure I caught those games. Now? They see them every second Tuesday. I don't thionk I caught a game yet this year.
Plus? Under the current format, Montreal and Toronto can't meet in a cup final (if they were both good enough!).
Even Christmas loses its wonder if you have it every month.
Posted November 30, 2007 01:47 PM
Stuart
Ottawa
This is to Lynne who states that everyone in Ottawa thinks they are better then everone else.
What an ignorant, stereotypical juvenile comment. Do you realize that Ottawa raised more money for charity on a % per person basis than anywhere else in Canada? Sure many of us have great government jobs, but we give back as well. I am sure I could throw out some typical garbage come-back about Toronto, but toronto is made up of Canadians just as Ottawa is, so through my experiences I have realized its about the City, its about the individual. Maybe you should learn that clumping a group together as you have, make you personally a bigot, not other Torontonians, but you.
Posted November 30, 2007 01:39 PM
Jimmy D
Kudo's to the NHL for tweaking the schedule. Increasing the number of games is well and good, how about increasing the rink size?
It's too small for twelve players, four officials and a puck. The players seem to be afraid of getting corked and rightfully so.
I suggest removing the first row of seats all around the rink. It will give the players more elbow room and should result in a safer and more creative game.
Come on NHL, just do it!
Posted November 30, 2007 12:40 PM
David Harmsworth
Two comments: 1) Why was there no discussion of the point system? I don't care if they get rid of the bonus point for losing in OT or if they add a third point for winning in regulation, but do one or the other. The system makes no sense, and if we want to increase scoring, then why do we have a point format that encourages ties?
2)How on earth would increasing the nets have a greater "impact on the record book" than other changes in the rules? I'm afraid I don't understand this comment. In any case, hasn't there already been an "impact on the record book" as a result of the improvement in goaltending equipment? Today's pads are MUCH lighter than the pads of old, and they're bigger as a result. What would be so sacrilegious about increasing the size of the goals slightly to compensate?
Posted November 30, 2007 12:30 PM
Chris Coakley
Vancouver
The schedule re-evolving into a more inclusive
balanced schedule, is a step in the right direction,but it absolutley has to include each team visiting each team EVERY year.
Every team has bona fide stars that we fans want to see, but I do not have $250.00 to spend on a pair of tickets and getting to the game,to see any team more than 2 times a year.
If the governors want more scoring, get rid of the trap/wedge which makes for very boring hockey!
Posted November 30, 2007 12:28 PM
Tim Goodison
Its a start. The NHL should now eliminate the divisions and balance the schedule so that each team plays at least one home & home with every other team in the league. The remainder of the schedule should be balanced across the team's conference. This would allow fans in every city a chance to see the league's superstars.
Posted November 30, 2007 12:27 PM
Lynne
I would be one to say I cold care less if hockey went away, but for my husband a HUGE TORONTO MAPLE LEAFS FAN!! He would not want to see that happen. But I have heard him complain since the lockout stopped and this new schedule occured and he was very upset about it, and kept saying they should revert back to the old, so I am very happy that fans like him were heard and they are reverting to the best schedule instead of the one they have now. The NHL thinking that rivals are cities that are located close to one another is ridiculous! Even I can see that just because Ottawa Montreal and Toronto are close to one another does not mean they should play each other over and over again!! Why should that make them rivals, I can see Toronto and Montreal since they are part of the original six but to throw Ottawa in the mix is plain dumb! Ottawa is a very large government city with a large population of "better than you" attitudes and it shows in the fans, but Toronto is a "stick by your side through everything" fans and that shows heart! I think that it is not the teams that are rivals but more the fans that hate each other!
Anyhow that is just my opinion and I could be wrong!
Posted November 30, 2007 11:32 AM
Lindsay
Calgary
It's about time. Owe it to the fans . A shorter
exhibition schedule also makes sense . A longer
season though is dumb , but the players want
more coin as do owners.I'm sure Leave/Hab fans
will be ticked, as less games for the "Rivalry".
Posted November 30, 2007 11:26 AM
Anth
Toronto
More Rivals for teams. Teams will face each other who are in the different conference as your team is , and the schedule is well balanced on teams you face in both conferences.
More Challenges for a good team
Posted November 30, 2007 11:25 AM
francis Manning
I am pleased that the NHL owners have seen fit to chnage the schedule so that we in the west can see more of the eastern teams. Next, they just need to do something about the brutal, silly image that hockey has in order to make it more saleable than roller derby. The senseless fighting, the very dangerous hits to the head and hits from behind need to stop if hockey is ever to be taken seriously as a major sport in North America.
Posted November 30, 2007 11:12 AM
Peter
Connecticut
Poor, poor pitiful John Ferguson Jr.?
Possibly only in Toronto where the press there is similar to the hounds who stalk Hellyweird and Royalty! Elsewhere in the NHL he is seen as a team builder! Just check and see where the Stanley Cup and other hardware is douled out. Our better yet do some personal R&D Leaf (Laughable) fans and see where your "gifted" players in limbo are headed or are now! Clue: They are not in a TML uniform for years to come.
The only reason that this organization (TML) EXSISTS is too make other teams shine, raise the Stanley Cup, etc.
Posted November 30, 2007 10:51 AM
Teri Springer
I agree with Mr. Nestransky. Why should the Eastern Conference teams dictate to the rest of the league to THEIR advantage. Presently there are two teams who suffer the most: Detroit and Columbus, being the only two teams in the Western Conference that are located in the Eastern time zone. This season the league has bent over backwards for them by giving them more days off following west coast trips. However, this does nothing for them when the playoffs start. Solutions can't be made to benefit just a select number of teams but it is also unfair to tip the scales to benefit the East over the West.
teri springer
chester, NS
Posted November 30, 2007 10:50 AM
K
Vancouver
Then bring back the old Division names as well! Bring back some tradition to this game and go back to Smythe, Patrick, Adams, Norris Division and also add some names if they have to.
If I was part of the NHL marketing team, I'd be all over this.
NHL needs to show they're different then all the other pro leagues.
Posted November 30, 2007 10:49 AM
Louie
Hamilton
I love seeing all of the teams in the league come into Toronto or even Buffalo. I look forward to seeing Chicago with the new young players, the Ducks as the Stanley Cup winners, also Wayne Gretzky as coach of the Coyotes. I would love to see each team play each other at least once during the season. There are some teams that I just get tired of seeing as they just play each other too often with the current schedule.
Posted November 30, 2007 10:44 AM
Teri Springer
I agree with Mr. Nestransky. Why should the Eastern Conference teams dictate to the rest of the league to THEIR advantage. Presently there are two teams who suffer the most: Detroit and Columbus, being the only two teams in the Western Conference that are located in the Eastern time zone. This season the league has bent over backwards for them by giving them more days off following west coast trips. However, this does nothing for them when the playoffs start. Solutions can't be made to benefit just a select number of teams but it is also unfair to tip the scales to benefit the East over the West.
teri springer
chester, NS
Posted November 30, 2007 10:36 AM
Ron Campbell
Calgary
Get it right. The NHL needs to understand the bottom line is only for the owners. The game belongs to the players and the fans. Hockey Day in Canada was created for a reason and Bettman and the rest of the US owners ignored the bithplace of hockey and the pillars of the league. Last time I checked, Detroit is not a Canadian city. Make the full change back at least 2 games against each team.
Posted November 30, 2007 10:19 AM
Michele
Mississauga
Hoorah! Divisional rivalries are fine but meeting 8 times a season was overkill, especially if that meant you had to play Ottawa or Detroit eight times.
Posted November 30, 2007 10:15 AM
Graham Davis
Will the Wings be moved into the Eastern Conference too?
Posted November 30, 2007 10:11 AM
Stephanie
Edmonton
I Love the fact that the NHL has finally decided to have every team play each other once.
Posted November 30, 2007 10:04 AM
Darcy
Ottawa
About time they made this smart move.
The season gets pretty boring when you see the same teams over and over and over again. Plus the current system builds division conflicts and hype, but does nothing for conference build-ups, let alone for teams in the other conference. A great example is last year's Stanley Cup Final - Ottawa vs Anaheim. The last time those two teams played was 1.5 years ago. What kind of history or build-up can you make with that? The answer is none. I understand building division match-ups. But doing only that is very short sighted.
The current system builds good playoff hype for the first two rounds only. Beyond that its Team A vs Team B with little or no history or drive between the two.
The new (pre lockout) system will solve this and put the game history back to where is belongs.
Posted November 30, 2007 10:00 AM
alf
saskatoon
I would not want to be responsible for creating the scheduling for the NHL. I'm sure that there will be opposition from either side once any type of decision has been made. With that stated, it would be nice for every NHL fan to experience the outstanding skill level that some players have and are eager to display (enter your own examples here).
The issue for me is that the league has far too many teams (and outstanding players) to accomodate everyone. Reduce the league back to 20 teams, bring back the Smythe, Norris, Adams, and Patrick divisions - each team plays each other 4 times - ohhh thos were the days!!
Habs over Vancouver in 6 :)
Posted November 30, 2007 09:54 AM
Bobby Jones
London
Who cares? The world is coming apart at the seams and we are supposed to be worried about a bunch of pampered and overpaid athletes and owners who could care less about the game and the fans. Come on. Professional sports died years ago when everyone became so greedy. I wouldn't walk across the street to see these guys play. Waste of time and money. Golf is where it's at. Individual talents where there are no guarantees. Look at the events right now in Florida! Q-school. You do or die. No contracts guaranteeing that lousy golfers get paid millions for years on end.
Posted November 30, 2007 09:49 AM
Ron Campbell
Calgary
Still not good enough. Fans own the game not the owners of teams. Without us, there would be no league PERIOD!! Try to get a ticket to the Penguin's game in Calgary, you might as well mortgage the house, there are no seats left. The Sens, Habs and Leafs sell out when the come west. We want to see the stars!! As far as TV and Saturday night, I'm sick and tired of the Leafs and Habs or Leafs and Sens every weekend, TSN picked up a weekday game on Tuesday, Leafs and Habs.
Posted November 30, 2007 09:25 AM
David Jumeau
How about expanding the rink to international level to give more room for the skilled players to have better scoring chances?
Posted November 30, 2007 09:20 AM
Jason
Belleville
Oh look! the NHL schedule debate! What a surprise to see Morrison talking about this.....again. Please do NHL fans a favour and find some new material. The schedule is changing and it's going back to the old format...this certainly isn't anything we haven't heard a million times already.
Posted November 30, 2007 09:10 AM
Peter
Connecticut
Poor, poor pitiful John Ferguson Jr.?
Possibly only in Toronto where the press there is similar to the hounds who stalk Hellyweird and Royalty! Elsewhere in the NHL he is seen as a team builder! Just check and see where the Stanley Cup and other hardware is douled out. Our better yet do some personal R&D Leaf (Laughable) fans and see where your "gifted" players in limbo are headed or are now! Clue: They are not in a TML uniform for years to come.
The only reason that this organization (TML) EXSISTS is too make other teams shine, raise the Stanley Cup, etc.
Posted November 30, 2007 08:23 AM
Jim
Well its a step in the right direction, now the have to get rid of the saturday afternoon playoff games. Keep up the tradition of hockey NIGHT in Canada. My reasoning is, its spring/almost summer in Canada and people like to be outdoors. Leave the games to nights.
Posted November 30, 2007 08:18 AM
jake
porcupine
maybe this will help the leafs win a few more games. hahaha. All kidding aside, I think this is a fantastic idea. This will give the fans of other teams a chance to see them play. I would not mind if they also put the devisions back to what they were a few years ago, and maybe ease up on the penalty calls. And i do not like the restrictions placed on the goalies in regards to that stupid little line on the sides of the nets. Free the goalies.
Posted November 30, 2007 06:39 AM
Bobby Jones
London
Who cares? The world is coming apart at the seams and we are supposed to be worried about a bunch of pampered and overpaid athletes and owners who could care less about the game and the fans. Come on. Professional sports died years ago when everyone became so greedy. I wouldn't walk across the street to see these guys play. Waste of time and money. Golf is where it's at. Individual talents where there are no guarantees. Look at the events right now in Florida! Q-school. You do or die. No contracts guaranteeing that lousy golfers get paid millions for years on end.
Posted November 30, 2007 06:39 AM
Garry Nestransky
Edmonton
The NHL is National... meaning coast to coast. The East should not benefit in terms of schedule. If the issue is financial, then say so up front. Then the new proposed schedule becomes a compromise that the west is forced to live with.
Posted November 30, 2007 01:40 AM