Friday April 14, 2017
Analysts question U.S. strategy over massive bomb strike in Afghanistan
On April 13, the U.S. dropped the so-called "the mother of all bombs" on an eastern Afghanistan province, and it came as a surprise to everyone, including — perhaps — even Donald Trump.
"We have the greatest military in the world … so we have given them authorization. And frankly that's why they've been so successful lately, " U.S. President Donald Trump said after announcing the strike.
The intended target was ISIS and its network of tunnels and caves.
The bomb, officially known as the GBU 43 Massive Ordnance Air Blast, is one of the U.S.'s most powerful conventional weapons, with a blast power of more than 11 tonnes of explosives.
It was the first time the U.S. has used this size of conventional bomb in a conflict.
University of Bradford professor Paul Rogers says the move was symbolic.
"This is basically to show the ISIS faction in Afghanistan what the Trump administration can do. It's very much part and parcel of the attitude of the administration as a whole," Rogers tells The Current's Friday host Dave Seglins.
"Trump has given the military more or less carte blanche to go their own way and probably he didn't even know this was going to happen."
The GBU 43 has "a radius of very severe effects of probably … nearly 300 metres," Rogers explains. "You do not survive against a weapon like this."
The bomb is not designed to penetrate into rock or concrete or bunkers as the name implies, Rogers says. But the effect of the explosives, "will hugely damage shallow tunnels, shallow bunkers."
While it has devastating effects, it's not the most powerful bomb in the world, Rogers says.
"The Americans also have what is known as the massive penetrator and essentially that is a device which is a true earthquake bomb."
He tells Seglins this bomb has not been used in combat yet, but "given the attitude of the Trump administration I wouldn't be at all surprised if that was used as well in the near future."
Bomb a symbolic message
He says that message was not only meant for ISIS, but also other insurgent groups that have gained momentum recently in Afghanistan.
"[It] demonstrates to all the militant groups in the area that this is the kind of capability that the U.S. can bring to bear if it wants."
Reports say that 36 ISIS militants were killed in this recent bomb strike by the U.S. but Schmitt tells Seglins, "it may not just be the number of …. those killed but the things[militants] were doing in those tunnels and caves that the American command was trying to eliminate."
Chief foreign correspondent for The Sunday Times Christina Lamb adds the U.S. may have also been targeting a possible training camp in the area.
Although she says, her concern lies with the assumption that the target was a sophisticated set up, as if it's "a James Bond set up."
"Actually it was just a few caves and tunnels. So it does seem a bit odd that something of this size and that expense to do this."
Taliban the priority in Afghanistan
Lamb tells Seglins that ISIS is not a priority for the government in Afghanistan, "the real threat … continues to be the Taliban who are widespread through the country."
But the government knows that ISIS will get more international attention than the Taliban, Lamb says, "so if they talk about attacks being carried out by ISIS, they're more likely to get help from outside."
"The real issue in Afghanistan is that people are fed up with corruption, with the government, that they're not getting legal cases sorted out. That there's no employment," Lamb explains.
She says young men in villages have nothing to do so they join the Taliban or ISIS.
"ISIS has been paying people to join. And that's the one link … to Iraq and Syria, that money has been apparently coming from there to pay for recruitment in Afghanistan."
Listen to the full segment at the top of this web post.
This segment was produced by The Current's Howard Goldenthal, Ines Colabrese and Sam Colbert.