Through the Olympics so far, The New York Times has fostered a strange obsession with the Canadian psyche.
By Dan Kaszor, National Post
Through the Olympics so far, The New York Times has fostered a strange obsession with the Canadian psyche.
It was most obvious this Wednesday with Timothy Egan's piece "
Allez Canada!" analyzes Canada's somewhat awkward and self-aware sense of sense of itself during the games.
He then goes on to start pumping up Canada as if we were some sort of model with body-dysmorphic disorder:
Why the lack of self-esteem? Canada -- snap out of it! You're gorgeous, baby, you're sophisticated, you live well. No need for an apology.
Followed by a litany of what makes Canada great: high medal count per capita, universal health care (can't have a love fest for Canada without mentioning universal health care), low murder rate and safe banks (yes, in this day and age that is a selling point). And he finishes it off by calling Vancouver Manhattan with mountains.
The strange thing was that it cast the story from the Canadian perspective; even though the American's are mentioned in the headline, the story isn't about how Scooby Doo U.S. has triumphed over Old Man Canada, it's about specifically how Canada has done in the games. With a little bit less background on some of the Canadian athletes mentioned it could have been something written for CBC.
Finally, the
Times ran a piece on Saturday about the American disappointment about televised Olympic coverage ...
from Canada. One of the unintended effects of Olympic coverage moving from CBC to CTV was that many northern U.S. cities which get CBC to their cable boxes don't get CTV. And have to deal with infuriating NBC tape delayed coverage.
In all it seems as if the Gray Lady has a bit of an infatuation with Canada. Maybe after they Olympics she should stay. We hear it's just like Manhattan, but with mountains.