News in Review
                       
 

  o n l i n e

 

  November 1997

 

    SCOTLAND AND WALES: HOUSES OF THEIR OWN    
   Bravehearts or Heroes?    
                                           
     

One of the most popular Scottish heroes and patriots is Sir William Wallace of Elerslie, who was depicted recently in the Hollywood film Braveheart. Wallace desired freedom for Scotland, and he united the clans and gained the loyalty of the people. He struck fear into the hearts of Scotland’s enemies and defied the cruel hand of a warring and invading king. Today Wallace has been romanticized and portrayed with all the attributes of a chivalrous and courageous knight and as a leader of a divided and fractious land. For many, Wallace has become the personification of Scottish nationalism. As you read the following account of William Wallace’s life, consider the following questions:

What, in your opinion, are the qualities of national heroes? In what ways is Wallace a hero? A Scottish hero? What are some of the problems of hero creation and hero worship?

 

A Hollywood Hero?
William Wallace was born in 1272. Wallace carried a two-handed broad sword, approximately 168 cm in length, with the blade itself being about 132 cm long. Historians and military experts agree that for a man to carry such a sword, let alone wield it, he would have to have been of considerable physical stature. They estimate that Wallace must have been almost two metres tall. Today the sword is displayed in the New National Wallace Monument.

William Wallace witnessed Scotland’s defeat at the hands of the English in 1292 and, like all Scots of the time, endured the humiliation of English occupation in Scotland. When William was a young man, he had an encounter with the English that changed the course of his life. Dundee Castle was under the control of the English and overseen by an English constable named Selby. Selby had a son who was just slightly older than William, and this son had the misfortune and bad judgment to pick a fight with young William Wallace. Young Selby, accompanied by a number of his English friends, made some remarks to Wallace about his Scottish attire. Selby and his friends apparently berated Wallace and demanded that he hand over some of his valuable possessions. William’s response was swift and dramatic; grabbing the Englishman by the collar, he drew his blade and thrust it through his assailant’s heart. At this point William became an outlaw hunted down by the English. He thus became a symbol of defiance against English tyranny and control and began to lead Scottish forces on raids against English outposts and garrisons. The movie Braveheart, which you may have seen, portrays Wallace and his men as a rampaging band constantly attacking and ambushing anything with an English insignia and with quite a brutal and unforgiving anger. To what extent this portrayal of Wallace is accurate is not well documented. Historically, it is accepted that Wallace was a product of the chivalrous age in which he lived, an age that valued courage, strength, and prowess on the battlefield, but also an age of lawlessness and revenge. Wallace and his men did indeed attack at will and without provocation from many different places within lower Scotland. This is what gained him the reputation as a great warrior with his own people and a feared enemy with the English garrisons. No one ever knew where he would strike next or when. The Grolier Encyclopedia documents this historical figure in this way: “. . . Wallace led a group of men who killed the English sheriff of Lanark. In the same year [1297] he defeated John de Warenne, Earl of Surrey, the English governor of Scotland, near Stirling. Wallace went on to drive the English out of Scotland and invade southern England. He became guardian of the realm in the name of the imprisoned John Balliol. Many Scottish nobles did not support Wallace, however, and in 1298, Longshanks defeated him at Falkirk. Wallace went to France in an unsuccessful bid for assistance. After his return he was arrested, brought to London, and executed for treason.” Given the historical facts, one can understand why Wallace became a martyr to a cause and a national hero in the popular imagination.

 

Discussion

1. What is the lesson to be learned from the story of William Wallace? What is the role of individuals in the development of nationalism? Can you give some Canadian examples?

2. The day after the referendum a statue of William Wallace was unveiled in a town close to Edinburgh. The New York Times reported that the film Braveheart helped fan Scottish nationalism and a renewed fascination with Scotland’s culture and heritage. The statue is in the likeness of Mel Gibson. Do you think this is an accurate assessment of the film Braveheart? Have your own feelings of nationalism ever been affected by popular culture?

The Battle of Culloden

In 1746, a small band of Scots tried to restore the Stuart (Scottish) royal line to the throne of England, which had been overthrown in 1688 by William of Orange. This uprising is known as the Battle of Culloden, and today it stands as a symbol of Scottish nationalism and a symbol of resistance against English control. The following is an eyewitness account of the Battle of Culloden by Donald Mackay of Acmonie, Glen Urquhart. The passage is translated from Gaelic.

The morning was cold and stormy as we stood on the battlefield—snow and rain blowing against us. Before long we saw the red soldiers, in battle formation, in front of us, and although the day was wild and wet we could see the red coats of the soldiers and the blue tartans of the Campbells in our presence. The battle began, and the pellets came at us like hail-stones. The big guns were thundering and causing a frightful break-up among us, but we ran forward and—oh dear! oh dear!—what cutting and slicing there was and many the brave deeds performed by the Gaels. I saw Iain Mor MacGilliosa cutting down the English as if he was cutting corn, and Iain Breac Shiosallach killing them as though they were flies. But the English were numerous, and we were few, and a large number of our friends fell. The dead lay on all sides and the cries of pain of the wounded rang in our ears. You could see a riderless horse running and jumping as if mad.

The spot where the fiercest fighting of the battle took place is marked by a cairn—a large monument made from many stones. The cairn, built of rough stones mingled with soil, measures six metres high by 5.5 metres in diameter. It was erected in 1881 and bears the following inscription: “The Battle of Culloden was fought on this moor 16th April, 1746. The graves of the Gallant Highlanders who fought for Scotland and Prince Charlie are marked by the names of their clans.” The Scottish forces, made up of the many Highland clans, were led by “Bonnie” Prince Charlie and numbered approximately 5000 men. England, led by the Duke of Cumberland, was better equipped, with about 9000 men, consisting of 15 regular regiments of infantry and other militias. On that fateful day in 1746 the English forces sounded the death knell for the old Highland way of life. Shortly after the defeated Scottish army withdrew from the battlefield, the Duke of Cumberland rode into Inverness clutching a drawn sword to show he was the victor. It was a gesture full of menace for the Highland people. The battle was over, but the killing was not. The roads into the town from the east were scattered with the bodies of men, women, and children cut down at random by Cumberland’s advancing troops. On the battlefield, parties of English infantry remained, killing any wounded enemy who caught their attention. The days after the battle saw patrols hunting out and executing more than 100 Scottish infantry men and interrogating thousands of civilians in their search for Prince Charles.

How Prince Charles escaped the wrath of the English Hanoverian forces is the stuff of legends. With a price of £30 000 on his head, Prince Charles was hunted across the Highlands and throughout the islands of Scotland. He endured great hardships with considerable fortitude, and it is to the credit of the people of the North that no one gave him away. It was because of the ingenuity and courage of a young Highland woman named Flora MacDonald that Prince Charles was able to escape. When the English forces were closing in on him, Flora MacDonald helped Charles escape from South Uist and eventually to France, where he sailed on the French privateer L’Heureux on September 20, 1746. For decades afterward, the wearing of Highland kilts in clan colours was banned by London.

 

Questions

1. What emotions does the Battle of Culloden evoke, and how does it influence your feelings for both the Scots and the English?

2. Assess the impact of the defeat at Culloden on Scottish nationalism. Use evidence of other nationalist movements to support your answer.

3. What is the relationship between high drama, sacrifice, emotion, reason, and nationalism?

 

   

Suitable for Younger Viewers Indicates material appropriate or adaptable for younger viewers.



NiR - November 1997 - Contents
© CBC
News in Review