Ellen Roseman: How To Fix OAS
- February 23, 2012 2:07 PM |
- By Ellen Roseman
The federal and provincial governments worked together to strengthen the Canada Pension Plan for future needs. They looked at the sustainability of Old Age Security at the same time.
No one anticipated any problems. The cost of paying benefits to those over 65 would go up temporarily, but the government could get through it. There was no need to lift the eligibility age to 67.
I think it's irresponsible of Harper to raise the issue now, just after receiving a majority mandate. Nothing was said during the campaign. Canadians would have liked to know before casting their votes.
Moreover, he's preparing to introduce measures in the federal budget to be tabled in March. That's too early to start phasing in what could be a long-term restructuring of the retirement income system.
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tried to downplay the urgency by emphasizing that nothing would change until 2020 at the earliest. But a spokesman later said the minister hadn't revealed a timeline.
Old Age Security is already income-tested. If you're an affluent senior with a net income of more than $69,562, you start getting your benefits taxed back. You lose all your benefits once your income hits $112,772.
As an alternative to raising the eligibility age to 67, why doesn't the government change the tax rules for Canadians who are still working after 65 or still running their own businesses?
Here are a few solutions: Phase in the clawback at a lower income level. Don't adjust the clawback income levels for inflation each year. Use household income to determine the clawback, not individual income.
I think it's too soon to talk about across-the-board cuts for everyone. What about the people living on corporate or provincial benefits that are cut off at age 65? How will they fill the gap?
The age change could cost provincial governments millions of dollars. They're upset and they're telling Harper to rethink his plan. No one gains if there's a massive downloading of costs onto the provinces.
I'd like to see the federal government work harder to trim benefits for seniors who don't need them and keep them in place for those who do. That could help tame the cost of boomer retirements.
- Andrew Wahl (19)
- Andrew Willis (13)
- Bob LeDrew (10)
- Dan Noel (1)
- David Baskin (18)
- David Berman (1)
- David Colman (14)
- Deborah Yedlin (29)
- Duncan Stewart (29)
- Ellen Roseman (93)
- Jacqueline Drew (10)
- Jim Bray (25)
- Jim Jubak (6)
- John Gilchrist (4)
- Kelly VanBuskirk (6)
- Kira Vermond (75)
- Loraleigh Kovacik (9)
- Michael Hlinka (183)
- Peter Vincent (16)
- Pierre Battah (1)
- Todd Hirsch (1)
All News blogs
- Ellen Roseman: How To Fix OAS
- Prime Minister Stephen Harper set off an alarm last month, when he suggested that Canada couldn't afford to pay Old Age Security benefits for boomers who will be retiring in the next 20 years. Government finance experts were aghast.... Continue reading this post
- Kira Vermond: Humour on the job
- Hey, have you heard the one about the employee with a great sense of humour? Maybe he's on to something. Numerous surveys and studies tell us a good sense of humour is an asset on the job.... Continue reading this post