Real names-only policy on YouTube draws criticism
Google has begun rolling out a new, real-name commenting policy on its video website YouTube amidst debates about online decorum, free speech and privacy.
YouTube comments have developed something of a unique reputation all their own, up to the point where they have been lambasted and critiqued on several blogs.
An entry on Urban Dictionary defines YouTube comments as "insane, rambling argument[s]" and "the ultimate example of human stupidity."
In what some believe is an effort to curb the vitriol, Google has begun to synch users' profiles and usernames with their Google+ profiles - including their real name and display picture. By adopting the new policy, users' uploaded videos, comments, and up or down-votes on other videos will appear with their names as listed on Google +.
The change is still optional, allowing users to forgo the change by clicking "I don't want to use my full name" when prompted.
The change also includes content previously posted under their old username. Google included a "review your content" function that allows you to choose whether to associate them with your newly minted real name profile.
But is it working?
Gizmodo's Leslie Horn wrote that despite the initial prospect of a person's real identity helping to calm the level of rhetoric, comments on YouTube since the policy launched three weeks ago "continue to be just as horrendous and offensive as ever."
Beyond that, debates about how real names affect online privacy and free speech have arisen. A discussion thread on Reddit attracted more than 1,400 comments - some in favour of the policy, some against, and others who believe it won't change a thing.
"I'm so torn. I love usernames and anonymity, but YouTube comments are the one place that could really benefit from people feeling like their comments have consequences," wrote TheCodexx.
"People aren't awful on the internet because they can't be traced; people are awful on the internet because the chances are low they'll never interact with this person again," wrote undeadgoat.
And in an article on Electronic Frontier Foundation, Jillian C. York wrote that a real name requirement online would create problems for groups that feel safer using a pseudonym, including political dissidents, survivors of domestic abuse or members of the LGBT community, especially teenagers.
Past attempts to introduce mandatory real name profiles have yet to catch on when it comes to large online communities and networks. Google+ originally required real names only for users, but backed down in January.
When videogame development studio Blizzard proposed a mandatory Real ID system for all of its players and members on their discussion forums in 2010, players lashed back en masse, forcing the company to make it an optional feature instead.
If you have an account on YouTube, have you adopted the real name policy? Should it be made mandatory, kept optional, or erased entirely?
(This survey is not scientific. Results are based on readers' responses.)
Meet the Community Team
CBC News Community team, from left to right: Andrew Yates, Andrea Lee-Greenberg, Lauren O'Neil, John Bowman
If you're part of the CBC News community, you're likely to meet one of us: we're the folks working to produce and promote your stories. Read more about us.
Other Your Community Entries
- 2012 (1509)
- Do you feel safer now than you did 10 years ago?
- Real names-only policy on YouTube draws criticism
- N.Y. senate hopeful's blingy, hot-pink website goes viral
- Reaction to B.C. pipeline announcement
- How should government try to reduce gun crime?
- Book-smell perfume, typewriter noise app appeal to nostalgia
- July photo contest: Seattle gum wall
- UPDATE: Mysterious 'goat man' baffles wildlife officials in Utah
- U.S. mom charged with changing kids' grades
- The 2012 Hipster Olympics
- iPhone's 5th birthday prompts loving tributes
- Show us your colours through photos of gay pride
- PETA slams Olsen twins as 'Hairy Kate' and 'Trashley'
- June in Tune photo contest: The winner!
- Should we learn to love the unibrow?
- Is the loonie as important a symbol of Canada as the maple leaf?
- CBC readers dish on 'Canadian food' and Maple Syrup
- Are you financially prepared to live past 100?
- Should alcohol flow freely across Canada?
- Will you wait for BlackBerry 10?
- Do you avoid disturbing news coverage?
- Would you grow your own shoes from 'genetically manipulated stingrays'?
- Dozens of Justin Bieber fans injured in Norway
- I [Heart] NY logo revamp? Fuggedaboutit!
- Musical grill blasts beats through your teeth
- Reaction to Canada's 'unique strain of Dutch Disease'
- New York sugary drink ban bubbles over on Twitter
- Mountain Dew + Orange Juice = Taco Bell's new breakfast drink
- Dr. Ruth to launch low-alcohol line of wines
- Reaction to census data on seniors and toddlers
- Should government seek clemency for Canadians on death row?
- Ugly Meter app worries cyber bullying activists
- And the winner of our April showers photo contest is...
- What would you add to Avery Canahuati's bucket list?
- Who is Titanic II backer Clive Palmer?
- Trending April 30: Titanic II, Conrad Black
- Should Conrad Black regain his Canadian citizenship?
- CBC's David McKie on investigative reporting
- Should rooftop missiles be installed for London Olympics security?
- Obama and Kimmel high-five at White House Correspondents' Dinner
- March photo contest: the winner!
- Shatner-hosted 2012 Juno Awards inspire fanfare
- 10 readers share their Katimavik stories
- Katimavik defended 26 years after Hébert hunger strike
- Earth Hour, Mega Millions, angry 'Beliebers' in morning trends
- Maple syrup hoarders prepare for shortage
- Top 5 at 5: CBC North
- Would bigger tax exemptions encourage you to shop across the border?
- What were your happiest years?
- Should charities lose their status for protesting?
- Community reaction to the Pierre Poutine revelations
- Top 5 at 5: Business stories
- Lady Gaga and Oprah Winfrey launch anti-bullying foundation
- Davy Jones honoured by fans on social media
- February photo contest: the winner!
- Women take the leap and propose marriage on Feb. 29
- Community reaction to closing of high Arctic lab
- Would you freeze-dry a deceased pet?
- U.S. storm watchers swap stories on social media
- Should Canada create an asbestos registry?
- January photo contest: the winner
- Top 5 at 5: Montreal stories
- Should Peru's uncontacted tribes be left alone?
- Is Ashton Kutcher right to block journalists from his Twitter feed?
- Would you wear Dress Pant Sweatpants in your workplace?
- Where do you donate your used clothing?
- Could a UN resolution help end Syria's unrest?
- Top 5 at 5: Politics stories
- Do you trust a camel that predicts Super Bowl winners?
- Community reaction to the Shafia trial verdict
- July (122)