EMAIL
| PRINT
| REPORT TYPO
| SEND YOUR FEEDBACK
|
Should transgender Canadians be protected by a new parliamentary bill?
- February 1, 2012 3:20 PM |
- By Community Team
UPDATE, Feb. 2: As members of the CBC Community have pointed out in the comments below, the former Bill C-389, the trans rights bill, that died when the election was called last year, has been reintroduced in the current session of Parliament. Twice, in fact.
Liberal MP Hedy Fry introduced it as Bill C-276 and NDP MP Randall Garrison brought it in as Bill C-279, both on June 2.
Original post:
A section in recently instituted airline screening regulations appears to prohibit transgender people from boarding airplanes in Canada, an Ontario blogger has found.
The Identity Screening Regulations were introduced in July 2011 (PDF file). Blogger Christin Milloy from Mississauga, Ont., wrote this week about this unusual section:
Milloy points out that changing one's designation of gender on a passport requires proof that gender reassignment surgery has taken place or is scheduled to take place within a year - but that not all transgender persons choose to have surgery. She also objected to the decision about an individual's gender being left up to an airport screener.
Transport Canada says its procedures to identify passengers apply "to all passengers, regardless of their culture, religion or sexual orientation." It also said that it was not aware of anyone being refused boarding because of the rule.
Since Milloy wrote the blog post, the story has been picked up by higher profile blogs and national media in Canada and the U.S. Thousands of people have left digital signatures on petitions to remove the section from the screening regulations.
Before last year's federal election, NDP MP Bill Siksay introduced a private member's bill - C-389, known as the trans rights bill - which would have made it illegal to discriminate against transgendered people. The bill passed the House of Commons but died in the Senate when the last election was called.
Such a law could strike down this section of the screening regulations if passed.
Should Parliament reintroduce the trans rights bill? Why or why not? Let us know what you think.
(This survey is not scientific. Results are based on readers' responses.)
Liberal MP Hedy Fry introduced it as Bill C-276 and NDP MP Randall Garrison brought it in as Bill C-279, both on June 2.
Original post:
A section in recently instituted airline screening regulations appears to prohibit transgender people from boarding airplanes in Canada, an Ontario blogger has found.
The Identity Screening Regulations were introduced in July 2011 (PDF file). Blogger Christin Milloy from Mississauga, Ont., wrote this week about this unusual section:
5.2 (1) An air carrier shall not transport a passenger if ...
(c) the passenger does not appear to be of the gender indicated on the identification he or she presents....
Milloy points out that changing one's designation of gender on a passport requires proof that gender reassignment surgery has taken place or is scheduled to take place within a year - but that not all transgender persons choose to have surgery. She also objected to the decision about an individual's gender being left up to an airport screener.Transport Canada says its procedures to identify passengers apply "to all passengers, regardless of their culture, religion or sexual orientation." It also said that it was not aware of anyone being refused boarding because of the rule.
Since Milloy wrote the blog post, the story has been picked up by higher profile blogs and national media in Canada and the U.S. Thousands of people have left digital signatures on petitions to remove the section from the screening regulations.
Before last year's federal election, NDP MP Bill Siksay introduced a private member's bill - C-389, known as the trans rights bill - which would have made it illegal to discriminate against transgendered people. The bill passed the House of Commons but died in the Senate when the last election was called.
Such a law could strike down this section of the screening regulations if passed.
Should Parliament reintroduce the trans rights bill? Why or why not? Let us know what you think.
(This survey is not scientific. Results are based on readers' responses.)
Categories
Your Community
Most Commented
<
Recent Entries
- Do you agree with the direction Environment Canada is taking?
- Environment Minister Peter Kent announced Thursday that Canada has pledged $3 million to programs to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases other than carbon dioxide in developing countries. Do you agree with the direction Environment Canada is taking? Continue reading this post
- Jim Curran's retirement drives traffic on social media
- For nearly four decades, Jim Curran has helped commuters dodge gridlock as CBC Toronto's traffic reporter. The online reaction to his retirement proves he was no middle-of-the-road broadcaster. Continue reading this post
- Should the immigration minister alone decide which countries are 'safe'?
- The federal government introduced immigrations reforms Thursday that would include scrapping a committee that was to advise the immigration minister on which countries should be named on Canada's "safe country" list. Should the minister alone have that authority? Continue reading this post
All News blogs
Most Commented