Should the airport screening rule requiring passengers to look like their gender be removed?
Categories: Politics
The Transport Committee voted down a motion to rescind an airport screening regulation that trans-rights activist say could be used to prevent transgender Canadians from flying.
NDP MP Olivia Chow brought in the motion after the regulations came to light in January. Blogger Christin Milloy from Mississauga, Ont., wrote about this section of the Identify Screening Regulations:
It's not clear if the regulation would be used to prevent transgender people from flying. Transport Canada says it is not aware of any case of a transgendered or transsexual individual in possession of a medical document who has not been permitted to board an airplane since the publication of the regulations.
Should Transport Canada screening regulations be amended to remove this section about appearance and gender? Why or why not? Let us know what you think.
(This survey is not scientific. Results are based on readers' responses.)
Related: Should transgender Canadians be protected by a new parliamentary bill?
My motion to stop discrimination against transgender people are being debated at Transport Committee now. #hw
-- Olivia Chow (@oliviachow) February 9, 2012
NDP MP Olivia Chow brought in the motion after the regulations came to light in January. Blogger Christin Milloy from Mississauga, Ont., wrote about this section of the Identify Screening Regulations:
5.2 (1) An air carrier shall not transport a passenger if ...The motion was defeated after Conservative members of the committee voted against it.
(c) the passenger does not appear to be of the gender indicated on the identification he or she presents....
In cttee Cons vote unanimously against motion to rescinddiscriminatory regulation that prevents transgendered Canadians from flying #ndp
-- Randall Garrison (@r_garrison) February 9, 2012
The Conservatives just voted against my motion to stop discrimination against traveling transgendered community. Shame. #canqueer #hw #fb
-- Olivia Chow (@oliviachow) February 9, 2012
It's not clear if the regulation would be used to prevent transgender people from flying. Transport Canada says it is not aware of any case of a transgendered or transsexual individual in possession of a medical document who has not been permitted to board an airplane since the publication of the regulations.
Should Transport Canada screening regulations be amended to remove this section about appearance and gender? Why or why not? Let us know what you think.
(This survey is not scientific. Results are based on readers' responses.)
Related: Should transgender Canadians be protected by a new parliamentary bill?
More Stories under Community
- Do blood-splattered enforcer hockey cards glorify violence? Dec 10, 2011 12:16 PM ET — The bereaved mother of a deceased NHL enforcer said she is disgusted by a new series of blood-splattered hockey cards meant to honour hockey… 12:16 PM ET
- What will come of the Moscow election protests? Dec 10, 2011 12:31 PM ET — Tens of thousands of demonstrators have flooded Moscow square to denounce the results of a federal election, which named Vladimir Putin the … 12:31 PM ET
- Citizen's arrests: Do you agree with the proposed new rules? Feb 19, 2011 11:56 PM ET — Citizen's arrests: Do you agree with the proposed new rules? 11:56 PM ET
Meet the Community Team
CBC News Community team, from left to right: Andrew Yates, Andrea Lee-Greenberg, Lauren O'Neil, John Bowman
If you're part of the CBC News community, you're likely to meet one of us: we're the folks working to produce and promote your stories. Read more about us.
More Your Community Entries
Categories
- Add category
- Arts & Entertainment (227)
- Ask CBC News (5)
- Ask Dr. Karl (5)
- Business (226)
- Canada (1767)
- Community (1421)
- Features
- Health (278)
- Interview
- News Promo (486)
- Politics (524)
- Science & Technology (298)
- Sports (76)
- Transparency
- World (793)
- Add category
- Arts & Entertainment (227)
- Ask CBC News (5)
- Ask Dr. Karl (5)
- Business (226)
- Canada (1767)
- Community (1421)
- Features
- Health (278)
- Interview
- News Promo (486)
- Politics (524)
- Science & Technology (298)
- Sports (76)
- Transparency
- World (793)
Archives »
- 2012 (1150)
-
May (102)
- Online dater sends out awkward post-date survey
- Should Nik Wallenda use a safety device to cross Niagara Falls?
- May photo contest: Fun Veggies
- How much would you pay for your own Tyrannosaurus?
- Canada's yearbook: Send us your graduation photo
- Should the Quebec government suspend classes?
- Should a sex exhibit be pulled from Ottawa's science museum?
- Skechers ordered to pay $40M over deceptive 'Shape-ups' ads
- CBC's Derek Stoffel on staying professional and stomaching injustice
- Hungry man protests all-you-can-eat restaurant
-
April (238)
- Should government seek clemency for Canadians on death row?
- Ugly Meter app worries cyber bullying activists
- And the winner of our April showers photo contest is...
- What would you add to Avery Canahuati's bucket list?
- Who is Titanic II backer Clive Palmer?
- Trending April 30: Titanic II, Conrad Black
- Should Conrad Black regain his Canadian citizenship?
- CBC's David McKie on investigative reporting
- Should rooftop missiles be installed for London Olympics security?
- Obama and Kimmel high-five at White House Correspondents' Dinner
-
March (321)
- March photo contest: the winner!
- Shatner-hosted 2012 Juno Awards inspire fanfare
- 10 readers share their Katimavik stories
- Katimavik defended 26 years after Hébert hunger strike
- Earth Hour, Mega Millions, angry 'Beliebers' in morning trends
- Maple syrup hoarders prepare for shortage
- Top 5 at 5: CBC North
- Would bigger tax exemptions encourage you to shop across the border?
- What were your happiest years?
- Should charities lose their status for protesting?
-
February (246)
- Community reaction to the Pierre Poutine revelations
- Top 5 at 5: Business stories
- Lady Gaga and Oprah Winfrey launch anti-bullying foundation
- Davy Jones honoured by fans on social media
- February photo contest: the winner!
- Women take the leap and propose marriage on Feb. 29
- Community reaction to closing of high Arctic lab
- Would you freeze-dry a deceased pet?
- U.S. storm watchers swap stories on social media
- Should Canada create an asbestos registry?
-
January (243)
- January photo contest: the winner
- Top 5 at 5: Montreal stories
- Should Peru's uncontacted tribes be left alone?
- Is Ashton Kutcher right to block journalists from his Twitter feed?
- Would you wear Dress Pant Sweatpants in your workplace?
- Where do you donate your used clothing?
- Could a UN resolution help end Syria's unrest?
- Top 5 at 5: Politics stories
- Do you trust a camel that predicts Super Bowl winners?
- Community reaction to the Shafia trial verdict
-
