Russia has explained its decision to put an end to the U.S. Agency for International Development's two decades of work in Russia by saying the U.S. government agency was using its money to influence elections.
The U.S. State Department announced Tuesday that Russia has demanded USAID leave the country, a culmination of years of resentment over what Moscow sees as American interference aimed at undermining President Vladimir Putin's hold on power.
'The people who make these decisions intend to crack down on dissent and criticism in a way that is as harsh as possible.'—Grigory Melkonyants, Golos
"We are talking about attempts through the issuing of grants to affect the course of political processes, including elections on various levels, and institutions of civil society," foreign ministry spokesman Alexander Lukashevich said Wednesday.
Nearly 60 per cent of the aid agency's $50-million annual budget this year has been allocated for the promotion of democracy and civil society in Russia. Some of this money has gone to support Russia's only independent election monitoring group, Golos, which fielded thousands of observers in last winter's parliamentary and presidential elections, and compiled reports of widespread vote fraud in support of Putin's party.
Crackdown on dissent
Putin had accused Western governments of trying to influence the December parliamentary vote through their grant recipients, and a state-owned television channel directly denounced Golos, showing suitcases full of dollars that the group supposedly had received. After those elections set off an unprecedented wave of protests, Putin accused the demonstrators of being in the pay of Washington.
"All of this is part of a series of moves aimed at toughening policy toward protests, the internet, NGOs and freedom of speech," said Grigory Melkonyants, the deputy director of Golos. "The people who make these decisions intend to crack down on dissent and criticism in a way that is as harsh as possible. It is frightening even to think about what may happen tomorrow."
Since Putin returned to the presidency in May, the Kremlin has taken a tougher stance against the opposition and Russia's nascent civil society. Non-governmental organizations that receive foreign funding and engage in vaguely defined political activity must now register as "foreign agents," a requirement that is intended to destroy their credibility among Russians.
Rights organizations face shortfalls
But few sources of funding are available within Russia for organizations whose work, even if not directly political, can be seen as providing a check on the government. The Moscow office of Transparency International and two of Russia's oldest and most respected human rights organizations, Memorial and the Moscow Helsinki Group, are among those that have come to depend on foreign money. It is unclear how these groups will survive.
Arseny Roginsky, who heads Memorial, said his group will revert to Soviet times and rely on the work of volunteers.
More than a third of USAID funding, however, has gone toward programs in health and the environment, which generally have been welcomed by the Russian government.
State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland expressed the hope Tuesday that the Russian government will now assume responsibility for all of USAID's initiatives.
The Foreign Ministry has imposed an Oct. 1 deadline for the aid agency to end its activities in Russia, but U.S. officials have said they will wind down its programs in an orderly fashion. They also have made clear they are scrambling to find new ways of getting money to the Russian organizations that have received USAID funds, potentially setting up a further showdown with the Kremlin.