Public inquiry into deadly Grenfell Tower fire begins
MP criticizes 'us-and-them' divide implicit in inquiry venue 'dripping with chandeliers'
A public inquiry into the Grenfell Tower fire in London that killed at least 80 people in June held its first session on Thursday, with its chair promising to explain the causes of "a tragedy unprecedented in modern times."
The 24-storey social housing block, home to a poor, multi-ethnic community, was destroyed in an inferno that started in a fourth-floor apartment in the middle of the night and quickly engulfed the building.
The inquiry, overseen by retired judge Martin Moore-Bick, started with a minute's silence to honour the victims. The exact number of victims remains unknown because of the devastation inside the tower.
The inquiry "can and will provide answers to the pressing questions of how a disaster of this kind could occur in 21st-century London, and thereby I hope to provide a small measure of solace," Moore-Bick said in his opening statement.
- Fire started in fridge freezer, criminal charges considered
- Grenfell Tower fire death toll rises to 80
Grenfell Tower was part of a deprived housing estate in Kensington and Chelsea, one of the richest boroughs in London, and the disaster has prompted a national debate about social inequalities and the neglect of poor communities.
The inquiry will examine the cause and spread of the fire, the design, construction and refurbishment of the tower, whether fire regulations relating to highrise buildings are adequate, whether they were complied with at Grenfell Tower, and the actions of the authorities before and after the tragedy.
He said the inquiry was not there to punish anyone or to award compensation, but to get to the truth. A separate police investigation is underway, which could result in manslaughter charges. There have been no arrests.
But critics warned of a disconnect between the technical, legalistic inquiry process and the ongoing ordeal of traumatized former Grenfell Tower residents still awaiting new homes.
Many residents in temporary housing
U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May pledged that all families whose homes were destroyed in the fire would be rehoused within three weeks, but three months later most still live in hotels.
Just three out of 197 households that needed rehousing have moved into permanent homes, while 29 have moved into temporary accommodation.
"We lost everything. It's difficult for the other people to be in our shoes," Miguel Alves, who escaped his 13th-floor apartment in Grenfell Tower with his family, told the BBC.
"Now I'm without anything, I'm in the hotel, I have to cope with my family. My daughter, she just started school. They need some stability and that I cannot give to my family," he said.
Emma Dent Coad, a MP from the opposition Labour Party who represents the area, said the inquiry's terms were too narrow and would fail to address the blaze's deeper causes such as failings in social housing policies.
She also criticized the choice of venue for Moore-Bick's opening statement, a lavishly decorated room in central London.
"We were sitting in a ballroom dripping with chandeliers. I think it was the most incredibly inappropriate place to have something like that, and actually says it all about the us-and-them divide that people see," she told the BBC.
Many of those affected have also expressed disquiet about the fact that Moore-Bick and the other lawyers appointed to run the inquiry are all white and part of a perceived "establishment" far removed from their own circumstances.
"The experience of many residents of that tower is that they were ignored because of their immigration status," lawyer Jolyon Maugham, who is advising some residents, told the BBC.
"We need someone on the inquiry team that can speak to that experience and at the moment on the panel we have a bunch of white privileged barristers," he said.
One of the difficulties facing the inquiry is that it needs former residents to give evidence, but some fear possible deportation.
The government has said it would grant a 12-month amnesty to anyone affected by the fire who was in Britain illegally.
Supporters say only permanent residency rights will persuade people to come forward.