The Butterfly Effect and the St. John River
- May 2, 2008 12:19 PM |
- By Quirks
By Bob McDonald, host of the CBC science radio program Quirks & Quarks.
Edward Lorenz, a famous American mathematician, once posed the question, “Does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas?” He was referring to an effect seen in chaos theory, where a small effect has huge consequences later on, a condition known as “sensitive dependence on early conditions.” Well, the butterfly-to-tornado effect has not been observed directly yet, but a similar long chain of events, beginning months ago on the other side of the world, has led to the flooding of the St. John River.
It’s a prime example of how far-reaching environmental effects can be.
The sequence began not quite with a butterfly’s wing, but it did involve a breeze. Quite a steady breeze actually, as the trade winds blew westward this year across the Pacific Ocean from Central America towards Asia. The winds carried the warm upper layer of ocean water over to the other side of the Pacific, which drew cold water up from the depths along this side of the ocean to replace it.
This cold body of water sitting off the west coast of the Americas is La Nina, an effect that comes along every three to five years. It’s the opposite of El Nino, which is a warm current, and both are part of a general sloshing back and forth across the Pacific called the southern oscillation. The large blob of cool water sitting along the West Coast this year altered the weather patterns to the north, especially the position of the jet stream.
The boundary between the cold air at the top of the world and the warm air around the middle of the planet is a meandering river of fast moving air that circles the globe. You see the jet stream on national weather maps as a broad curving line that either dips up or down across the continent.
This year, La Nina pushed part of the stream northwards towards Alaska, which forced the stream east of that to dip downwards over the central part of the continent, then back up again towards the east. It looked like a big “S” on its side. This huge tongue of cold air hanging down over the land was responsible for the record cold temperatures on the Prairies this winter.
Storms tend to follow the course of the jet stream, so while it sat stalled over the continent, just about every major winter storm was steered from the central U.S. up towards southern Ontario, along the St. Lawrence Valley and on to the Maritimes, leaving behind record amounts of snow.
Well, spring comes, snow melts, rivers flood. The St. John River has a huge drainage area covering 55,000 square kilometers, which can hold onto a lot of snow, which then turned into lot of water, which is now trying to squeeze through the narrow river channel.
Who would have thought that wind over the Pacific would cause flooding in a river that flows into the Atlantic?
By the way, the flooding of the river is not a natural disaster; it’s a human problem. Flooding is a necessary part of river ecology. It replenishes soils and rejuvenates wetlands. But people like to live near water, so we build walls and dykes, hoping to keep the water under control, which is, of course, next to impossible. The real ecological disaster will come from all the old paint cans, and packages of chemicals and fertilizers people keep in their garages and basements, as well as sewage and other waste that will be picked up by the flood waters, creating a contaminated plume downstream.
John Muir, a conservationist in the early 1900s wrote, “Tug on anything at all and you will find it is connected to everything else in the universe.”
The butterfly effect continues.
- Bob McDonald
Categories
All News blogs
Most Commented
Most Recommended
Quirks and Quarks
Most Commented
Most Recommended
Recent Entries
- Chris Hadfield's fall from space
- The final segment of Canadian Astronaut Chris Hadfield's mission, the return to Earth on Monday evening, will be the most difficult of all. As he plunges into the atmosphere, he will transform from a free floating body to a heavy prisoner of gravity. Continue reading this post
- Glimmer of hope even as planet hits CO2 climate milestone
- A new record level of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere has been recorded at the Mauna Loa observatory on the island of Hawaii, the world's premier atmospheric monitoring station. Continue reading this post
- Celebrating 60 years of DNA
- A ceremony at Cambridge University in England this week unveiled a memorial to Dr. Francis Crick, co-discoverer of the structure of the DNA molecule. His co-author, Dr. James Watson, now 85, attended the ceremony for a discovery many consider to be as important as Darwin's theory of evolution and Einstein's theory of relativity. Continue reading this post
Comments (18)
In watching the news reports from the St. John River, I am particularly struck by the relative calm of affected residents. These people have lived there for many years. They know they live on the floodplain at their peril.
So Flooding and the Green House Effect is a human problem that could have snowballed from any length of time, including months, years and centuries?
Thanks Bob, your simple explanation of complex issues is always appreciated. Moral...dispose of your junk in your basement, in case of a flood..
The interdepence of everything upon everything else in physical existence is well-illustrated by the St. John river flood. Distance and time elapse between cause and effect can obscure the connections but they are surely there and will surely manifest themselves eventually.
Somewhat like the Industrial Revolution of three centuries ago in Europe has the connections we can trace to the imminent melting of the polar icecaps.
Object all you want to the idea of Global Warming, it is happening and its effects in the near future will make life very unpleasant for all of us, effects in many instances which we cannot even begin to imagine.
Bob, as you know, Lorenz thought that he could use meteorological models to accurately predict weather and then realized it was impossible because even a few variables can cause vastly different results. Hence, he up with chaos theory.
The theory of man-made Global Warming is also predicated on models, more complex than Lorenz's weather prediction models. Yet we are supposed to believe these models accurately predict warming of the earth decades into the future.
Yeah, right.
Let's look at some facts about so-called global warming:
1) the amount sea ice in the south and north hemisphere is the highest since 1979 when records started to be kept.
2) the temperature of the world's oceans is dropping, not increasing as the global warming models predicted.
3) the temperatures in the troposhere (taken by satelllites) are not increasing, as the global warming models predicted.
4) When NASA recently standardized temperatures in the US it found the warmest decade in the last 100 years was ... the 1930s.
5) The prediction of more and more severe hurricanes has been proven wrong - in the last two years NO hurricanes have hit the continental US.
6) The ice covering the north pole is back to normal size and thickness
7) No communities have been drowned by rising sea levels - if there were any, boy, would we have heard about it.
8) the polar bear populations in Canada are increasing not decreasing as Al Gore would have you believe.
9) CO2 represents only .054% of the atmosphere and is a naturally occurring substance not some toxic gas.
10) paleo-climatologists (yes, they do exist) study the climate in the past and they have found that high levels of CO2 (before humans walked the earth, such as from volcanoes) have not caused increases in temperature.
11) etc.
Calm down everyone. The world is not coming to an end.
A very interesting theory, Bob, but I have a couple of questions?
Don't the trade winds happen every year, creating an annual blob of cool water?
How does this blob of water push the jet stream around?
Love your show.
I don't know which fairy tales Robt. from Toronto has been reading. Just to refute two of his points rather than take on the whole shebang, check out his No.1 and No.5 --
Sea ice is very, very different than either glacial ice or the semi-permanent Arctic and Antartic icecap. Sea ice forms in the winter over open waters. The more open water there is (because of Global Warming) in the summer season the more sea ice is formed the
following winter. The measured thickness of the sea ice is now noticeably thinner each year, with much more undulation observed. It only looks like there is more sea ice since the volume of the ice is decreasing though the area covered may appear to be greater.
Tornado and hurricane damage in the continental U.S. has been extensively reported by the various news media and I don't think they make up that kind of 'news.' After Katrina there was more devastation recorded in Central America, a district not as populated as New Orleans. Several tornadoes recently hit Virginia, a state not usually in the line of fire. And the news this week is the tragedy which struck Myanmar, not a part of the U. S. of course, but still connected to the rest of the world despite the military junta there not acknowledging the relevance of disaster.
The other points Robt. tries to make are just as irrelevant, but I won't take the space to contradict his wishful thinking that all is right with the world.
To Des,
And your sources are?
I am not an expert and it sounds like you are not either. However, unlike you, I do not believe everything the UN tells me to think. I read widely and check various sources in forming my opinions.
Using the storm that hit Myanmar is a real sign of deparation.
The global waming catastrophizers like to believe that there were fewer storms or less powerful storms before global warming which is, of course, complete nonsense.
There are various websites which show the worst weather (measured in deaths) over the last 100 plus years. The worst decade worldwide was the 1930s which corresponds to the warmest decade in the last 100 years.
As for your theory that there is more open water and therefore more sea ice there are also websites that show the ice in the polar ice cap has returned to normal size and thickness. Therefore, there is less open water.
Unfortunately, it is global warming which is the fairy tale.
Let's see...I read the news, watch the news, listen to the radio, check out the opinions of people who are much more expert than am I, and even read the naysayers' reactions to the general warnings of Global Warming (which words seem to carry automatic anathema for certain people).
What I don't do is jump to conclusions that because there is more snow there must be Global Cooling, not Global Warming. I don't dig out extraneous data to try to 'prove' a particular situation applies to general cases.
I can't recall a single UN missive telling me what my opinion should or should not be. I do know that university researchers have connected the pine beetle infestation in B.C. and other places to global warming, warmer winters allowing numbers of the beetle larvae to survive what would have otherwise been killing frosts. And other university research has shown that red squirrels in the northern forests are mating and nesting more than a week earlier that usual, measured over a period of several years. And I believe the inuit who have reported seeing robins, other migrating birds, insects, and even growing plants in the north where these species have never before been recorded.
Unfortunately, I do not keep a catalogue of websites or other sources to prove the reality of that which is obvious. There are none so blind as those who will not see...
Des,
Then you and I are in the same boat.
Here are some websites for starters:
www.climateaudit.org (a Canadian site)
www.arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/index.htm(University of Illinois). Click on 'compare' to see satellite photographs of the polar ice at one year intervals back to 1979. You will see that the ice this year is as large in area as in any past year.
I hope that one conclusion you come to is that the science is NOT settled as Gore, Suzuki et al would have us believe.
Robt. I wasted a good half-hour checking out your websites. Do me a favour and check out Quirks and Quarks archives. Specifically, Mar/07 under Polar Peril. Also Sept/06, under Climate Change, Tipping Point. And try Amundsen, the ship which is doing research in the Arctic. And last Saturday, Bob had a discussion about the plight of the Adele penguins in the Antarctic, suffering from more than one season of warming climate which prevents their normal nesting habits.
Look at your computer and pull down some recent pictures of the arctic, not obtuse graphs which make pretty pictures but not much sense.
Des:
You must haven't looked at the University of Illinois website becuase it shows actual satellite photos. No 'obtuse' graphs there.
The other website did have plenty of evidence including graphs (I am sorry you found them to be 'obtuse') which show global warming is not happening.
Unlike you, I do not rely exclusively on the CBC for information on global warming. If I did, I would be slitting my wrists.
The CBC has been a shameless promoter of the
global warming fairy tale and Bob, bless his heart, is the head cheer leader. However, there is plenty of evidence global warming is not happening. If it were, the thousands of communities along Canada's coastline (one of the longest in the world) would be drowning. They are not.
If they were we would have heard about it - from the CBC.
Instead, Bob talks about penguins in Antartica which have exerienced real climate change (warming and cooling) for millenia and survived. I'm not worried. And neither should you.
What should worry you and the CBC is that global warming hysteria (promoted by their heroes AL Gore and David Suzuki) is causing widepread starvation through the diversion of corn and other foodstuffs for 'biofuels'.
Gore voted for this when he was VP of the US and has promoted and invested in this.
Instead of being worshipped and idolized (as they are by the CBC) Gore and Suzuki should he charged and convicted of crimes against humanity.
La Nina is not a butterfly!
Hey Robt. light up another Marlboro...life is good!
I have been reading this series of posts and could not help but jump in. As a student graduating this spring with a degree in Atmospheric Science, I find it appalling that people can continue to ignore global warming, even go as far as to state that "Gore and Suzuki should be charged with crimes against humanity". There has not been one, NOT ONE, scientific and peer reviewed article that has denied human-driven global warming in years. And yet, half of media articles continue to question the validity of the concerns. Reputable sources (not climateaudit.org - anyone who gets there scientific data from a blog is seriously misguided) for this claims are easy to find for anyone who is not hell-bent on denying the truth. I will ask, even if you are right (which you aren't, Robt from Toronto), what would be the harm in finding more environmentally friendly ways to live our lives? It is something we should all be doing anyway, even without the threat of a global disaster. History will not be kind to those who ignored this threat, especially considering the irrefutable evidence. It's embarrassing that someone living in a country with such easy access to accurate information would be so uninformed.
Kat, if your point is that everyone should reduce pollution in the air, lane and sea, I am sure no one would disagree.
However, if your point is that the science proving man-made global warming is 'settled' the facts inconveniently get in the way.
Global warming is a prediction based on complex computer models which contain as sorts of assumptions which may or may not be biased by the modeller. Plus, models are notoriuosly inaccruate and unreliable, Just ask Edward Lorenz.
But if you are looking into the past to determine if golbal warming is happening or not it depends where you start.
If you start at a cold year (such as 1978) then the 1990s will appear warmer. If, however, you start at a warm year (such as 1935) well the world is getting cooler.
I note you didn't dispute the 'facts' set out in my first post. They all suggest the earth is not warming but instead is cooling.
But don't take my word for it, the head of the UN IPCC recently admited that the earth has not warmed this century (actually since 1998) and will continue to cool until at least 2015 (almost twenty years).
That puts a fairly sizeable hole, not in the ozone layer, thank God, but in the 'theory' of global warming.
global warming. cause and effect. la nina and butterfies. First, all, count 'em, all our man-made probs r about over population solely. second, if chaos theory is ur thang, u'r all nickel and diming w' ur myopic squabbling. for some real fun just google "2012" :)
Thankyou Lorenz, we often, if not always, ignore the invironment hazards that come with our attempts to have ultimit control of water sheds.
The human contamination from our "I deserve" attitude is all to often over looked. How could one witnes cars floating away, along with work shop contaminates go unspoken.
Also too be noted are the industrial lands in said water encrouchment areas.
Good work.
Max