Homo naledi species discovery raises fresh questions about evolution

Scientists have unveiled the first evidence that early humans co-existed in Africa 300,000 years ago with a small-brained human-like species thought to already be extinct on the continent at that time.

Small-brained Homo naledi may have been driven extinct by early humans, some scientists believe

A replica of the skull of Homo Naledi, a newly discovered human-like species, is displayed Tuesday at an exhibit in Maropeng, near Johannesburg, in South Africa. (Gulshan Khan/AFP/Getty Images)

Scientists today unveiled the first evidence on that early humans co-existed in Africa 300,000 years ago with a small-brained human-like species thought to already be extinct on the continent at that time.

The findings, published in three papers in the journal eLife, raise fresh questions about human evolution, including the prospect that behaviours previously attributed to humans may have been developed by hominin precursors of Homo sapiens.

Scientists say Homo naledi may have lived alongside humans 0:58

Hominins are an extinct group of the same genus as humans, the only surviving members of that category today. Man's nearest living relatives, chimpanzees and gorillas, are further removed from Homo sapiens biologically than hominins are.

The species in question is Homo naledi, named in 2015 after a rich cache of its fossils was unearthed near Sterkfontein and Swartkrans in South Africa.

These treasure troves, some 50 km northwest of Johannesburg, have yielded pieces of the puzzle of human evolution for decades.

Scientists initially thought Homo naledi's anatomy suggested the fossils might be as much as 2.5 million years old and were startled by evidence that suggested the species may have buried its dead, a trait long believed to be uniquely human.

Possible toolmaker

Another surprise found in the Homo naledi discovery was the possibility of the species building tools.

Dr. Tracy Kivell, a Canadian who is an assistant professor of biological anthropology in the University of Kent in the U.K., specialized in analyzing hand fossils to determine the behaviour and lifestyle of Homo naledi.

"Both caves showed aspects of the wrist bones and thumb that are features only found in humans and Neanderthals," she said. "It could be interpreted as toolmakers because of their hand dexterity."

Kivell was quick to say there is no evidence of tools used or created by Homo naledi, but it is an educated guess from the bones. At the same time, the species changes the assumption that only "big brained humans" were capable of creating such implements, as it lived around the same time as modern humans did.

Kivell said it could change how ancient stone and wooden tools are interpreted, as they could have been formed by other "archaic human-types" like Homo naledi.

Searching for elusive DNA

But dating of the sediments in which the fossils were found and teeth of the specimens showed that the species was roaming the African bush between 236,000 and 335,000 years ago, around the time that modern humans were emerging.

"No one thought that a small-brained, primitive hominin could extend down through time this long and that period is exactly the moment when we thought modern humans were arising here in Africa," said Lee Berger, project leader for Johannesburg's University of the Witwatersrand.

Berger said the dating may force scientists to rethink their understanding of the emergence at that time of new technologies such as ochre production and bead work for adornments.

There is archeological evidence from that period but little in the way of fossils to suggest who exactly made such things.

"Now that we know that modern humans or at least the earliest forms of them were not alone during this expansion of the tool kit, it makes us now have to get better and better evidence to say who made what," Berger told Reuters.

The question of when Homo naledi went extinct, and why, remains unanswered, Berger said. Those pre-humans could have survived until 200,000 years ago or even more recently as the fossils uncovered so far do not indicate "an extinction event."

Homo sapiens may have been the culprit. Some scientists believe early modern humans drove other hominin relatives — for example, Neanderthals in Europe — to extinction elsewhere.

"All we know is that Homo naledi is extinct today. Could Homo sapiens have driven them extinct? Yes," Berger said.

Scientists also know from DNA evidence that Homo sapiens interbred with Neanderthals, so it could have mated with Homo naledi as well, though it was a more primitive hominin.

"Could there have been gene exchange between Homo naledi and early Homo sapiens? It's entirely possible," Berger said.

He said one of the next steps in this quest was to obtain Homo naledi DNA, which has so far proved elusive, but researchers are trying.

"If we had Homo naledi DNA, not only would we be able to answer the question of a biological exchange with humans, but we would gain a window back millions of years.

"We would actually be looking at DNA from the split with humans. And that would be cool," Berger said.

with files from Tyler Choi

Comments

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.