Same-sex marriages must be recognized: Ontario court
Last Updated: Saturday, July 13, 2002 | 4:34 PM ET
CBC News
Related
Internal Links
Audio
-
Derek Stoffel reports for CBC Radio
(Runs: 2:52)
play: RealMedia »
Video
- Ron Charles reports for CBC TV (Runs: 2:48)
- CBC Newsworld's David Gray speaks with Michael Leshner who has been fighting for the recognition of same-sex marriages (Runs: 5:42)
- CBC Newsworld's Jennifer Gates speaks with Joe Varnell and Kevin Bourassa about their reaction to the same-sex ruling (Runs: 6:16)
- Martha McCarthy, a lawyer for same-sex couples comments on Ontario courts ruling that the Ontario government must register same-sex couples (Runs: 5:38)
- Douglas Elliott, lawyer for the Metropolitan Community Church of Toronto, comments on the Ontario court ruling (Runs: 2:41)
- Cynthia Petersen, lawyer for EGALE, comments on the Ontario court ruling (Runs: 1:42)
play: RealMedia »
play: RealVideo »
play: RealMedia »
play: RealMedia »
play: RealMedia »
play: RealMedia »
play: RealMedia »
"We're no longer second-class citizens in this country and the time has come for change," said Joe Varnell, one of the people who sued for the right to marry another man.
"My relationship is validated and nobody can say we're not a real family anymore."
In a unanimous ruling, the panel of three judges said that prohibiting gay couples from marrying violates the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Kevin Bourassa and Joe Varnell
Some constitutional experts predicted the decision would have a ripple effect across the country.
"Certainly it is an historic decision and it is unprecedented," said Roslyn Levine, counsel to the federal attorney general.
"It means marriage is no longer limited to one man and one woman to the exclusion of all others."
Martha McCarthy
Friday's ruling dealt with two Toronto couples – gay men and gay women – who had sued the government of Ontario for not accepting their marriages as legally valid.
- FROM JAN. 15, 2001: Ontario won't register homosexual couples' marriages
Both couples wed during a joint service at a Toronto church in January 2001. They had used the old Christian tradition of reading banns – formally asking the congregation if anyone objected to the couple's marriage for three consecutive Sundays – in order to get city-issued marriage licences.
But when the couples tried to have their unions registered with the province, the minister of consumer affairs refused.
Ontario and other provinces have argued that federal law stipulates a marriage must be between a man and a woman.
- FROM JULY 23, 2001: Gay couples challenge federal Marriage Act
Varnell and his partner Kevin Bourassa cried and kissed outside a Toronto courthouse Friday after winning their legal battle.
"We've finally come to the point in this country where all families are going to be treated equal," Varnell said. "The courts heard us. They have finally made it clear that this country can't continue to discriminate."
"Some may believe that this is a courageous decision," said the couple's lawyer, Martha McCarthy. "But it is the obvious and correct one."
But not everyone agrees with the ruling. Derek Rogusky's group Focus On the Family, a coalition of Conservative and religious groups, intervened in the cases and opposes any redefinition of marriage.
"What's really happening is, I think, people are trying to force upon others acceptance of their relationship. And the reality is that many Canadians still find same-sex relationships morally offensive," he said.
The Ontario Superior Court has given the federal government two years to extend marriage rights to same-sex couples. Justice Heather Smith acknowledged that Parliament needs time to redefine "marriage" in applicable legislation.
Lawyers disagreed over what might happen if Ottawa refused to change the definition. Some said the ruling would still force the province of Ontario to register same-sex marriages in two years, even if Parliament did not act.
The federal government has 15 days to decide whether to appeal Friday's decision.
A ruling against gay marriages in British Columbia is expected to be heard by the Court of Appeal of British Columbia early next year. A judge in Montreal is also to rule on a similar case.
Some legal experts believe the Supreme Court of Canada will eventually be asked to settle the matter.
Share Tools
Top News Headlines
- Air Canada confident it can reach deal with pilots
- Travellers flying Air Canada can keep booking their flights as negotiations continue with a new federally appointed mediator to help resolve an ongoing contract dispute between the airline and its pilots. more »
- Legalize pot, say former B.C. attorneys general
- Four former B.C. attorneys general are joining a coalition of health and justice experts calling for the legalization of marijuana. more »
- Whitney Houston's funeral to be held Saturday
- Pop star Whitney Houston's funeral service will be held Saturday in the New Jersey church where she first showcased her singing talents as a child. more »
- Online surveillance bill targets child porn: Toews
- A bill that would give police and intelligence agencies new powers to access Canadians' electronic communications is needed to protect against child pornography, says Public Safety Minister Vic Toews. more »
- Legalize pot, say former B.C. attorneys general
- Botox injected by unlicensed practitioners
- Toronto NBA fans experience 'Lin-sanity'
- Homicide follows Vancouver family argument
- Tires slashed on more than 100 cars in Surrey
- Trudeau says sovereignty less of a bogeyman now
- Online surveillance bill targets child porn: Toews
- Adults told B.C. teen had taken ecstasy
- B.C. Mountie drank to 'calm nerves' after fatal crash


