Lawmakers fume at excess of failed firm's execs
Comments (24)
Wednesday, October 8, 2008 | 03:27 PM ET
By Henry Champ
Just when you thought you'd heard it all on the U.S. financial crisis...
You'll remember that $85-billion US taxpayer loan to the American International Group (AIG). That was made on Sept. 16. In return, AIG surrendered 79.9 per cent of its stock to the government.
Former AIG CEOs Robert Willumstad, left, and Martin Sullivan take the oath before testifying to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday. (Lawrence Jackson/Associated Press)
Less than a week later, the company's executives, clearly to ease the mental strain they had been undergoing, pitched up at the exclusive St. Regis Resort at Monarch Beach in California.
It's not easy running a once-profitable insurance company into the ground, then waiting nervously for taxpayers to bail you out. The resort allowed these men and women to pull themselves together.
Unfortunately for some, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform got some copies of the bill.
In one week, AIG executives spent $440,000. There was $200,000 for rooms. Another $150,000 in food, $23,000 at the spa, $1,400 at the salon and $7,000 in green fees. Then there is the old favourite, the bar tab, which topped out at $10,000.
"They were getting facials, their manicures and their massages, while the American people were footing the bill," Maryland Democrat Elijah Cummings fumed during the oversight committee hearing.
Millions cushion the exit
Now for the kicker.
Joe Cassano was president of AIG's financial products division. That's the group that trafficked in credit-default swaps (CDS). It was this trading that most analysts say brought down the insurance giant.
Under the terms of his contract, the committee heard yesterday, Cassano and his executive colleagues were paid 30 cents on every dollar these CDS products made. All told, Cassano made $280 million running this division, a fact that raised the ire of many lawmakers.
Ruining is perhaps a better word than running, since the division lost $11 billion, which led to the near-collapse of the company. Cassano was fired Feb. 29 of this year, but was allowed to keep $34 million in bonuses.
How can anyone receive a bonus for this kind of track record?
The horror story does not stop here. Cassano was then kept on as an AIG consultant at a salary of $1 million a month. That's not a typo. One million dollars a month.
Committee members asked why. The response, from former CEO Martin Sullivan: "I wanted to retain the 20-year knowledge of the transactions."
Retirement savings vanish
Another House committee was also dealing with retirement yesterday.
But not the kind of windfall Joe Cassano received after his exit from AIG. Far from it.
The falling stock market has wiped out $2 trillion in retirement savings for ordinary Americans over the past 15 months, the House Education and Labour committee heard.
Peter Orszag, director of the Congressional Budget Office, told committee members that companies are struggling to make up obligations to employees as pension funds lose value.
According to Orszag, defined-contribution plans, such as the popular 401(k) program, have lost between seven and 11 per cent this year. These plans were heavily promoted by the government, giving employees a chance to invest in stocks and fixed-income investments. Over the long term, they hold out the prospect of greater return.
That's still the case. But as Orszag told the committee, some workers may be forced to stay on the job longer than planned. Younger workers in these plans can ride out the storm, but those in the 36- to 45-year-old category with longer terms of service will have suffered the steepest stock earnings decline.
No one will be offering them $1-million-a-month consulting contracts.
Useful exchange? That's debatable
Sadly, the committee hearings will get less attention than the second presidential debate, which by any standard was a disappointment. The town-hall rules that governed this debate left no possibility of followup questions.
As a result, when Obama suggested AIG should be forced to repay taxpayers for the resort/spa fiasco and the company's executives should be fired for authorizing the retreat, McCain ignored the issue, and it died.
Equally, when McCain said as president he would authorize the Treasury Department to buy up bad mortgages and renegotiate them at the current housing values — giving, he said, beleaguered homeowners a chance to remain in their homes — Obama said nothing and the moment passed.
It was the only concrete proposal or plan this writer heard all evening.
The best judgment on last night's program came in a CNN flash poll of debate viewers. More than 40 per cent of those polled said the candidates sidestepped many of the questions asked of them and a third of the viewers said they learned nothing from the debate.
(For the record, the flash polls gave the debate to Obama. CNN viewers said it was 54-30. CBS rated it 40-26.)
All in all, a depressing day in Washington yesterday.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
Post a Comment
Washington File »
About the Author
Henry Champ is CBC Newsworld's correspondent in Washington, D.C., delivering Canadian viewers the latest developments in the U.S. political arena. Recently, he has been a leading Canadian voice on coverage of the war on terrorism, the war in Iraq and the growing concerns over the Canada-U.S. relationship.
Recent Posts
- Informative exchanges? That's debatable
- Henry Champ
- Tuesday, October 14, 2008
- Lawmakers fume at excess of failed firm's execs
- Henry Champ
- Wednesday, October 8, 2008
- Now it's up to McCain for the game-changer
- Henry Champ
- Friday, October 3, 2008
- Strange bedfellows pulled the plug on bailout bill
- Henry Champ
- Tuesday, September 30, 2008
- Measuring McCain: The 'distraction' of a would-be dealmaker
- Henry Champ
- Friday, September 26, 2008
- Subscribe to this blog
Recent Comments
- It is time that the government - hopefully spurred on by ...
- Lawmakers fume at excess of failed firm's execs
- You see people thrown in jail for so much less and I can'...
- Lawmakers fume at excess of failed firm's execs
- Mark - No, it is "Graham" not "John". You had it right th...
- Lawmakers fume at excess of failed firm's execs
- No wonder Americans dislike paying taxes so much if this ...
- Lawmakers fume at excess of failed firm's execs
- Graham of Denwood: AMEN. Anthony of Ontario: I ...
- Lawmakers fume at excess of failed firm's execs
Archives
- October 2008
- (3 postings)
- September 2008
- (10 postings)
- August 2008
- (6 postings)
- June 2008
- (3 postings)
- May 2008
- (6 postings)
- April 2008
- (3 postings)
- March 2008
- (4 postings)
- February 2008
- (5 postings)
- January 2008
- (7 postings)
- November 2007
- (2 postings)
- October 2007
- (7 postings)
- September 2007
- (1 postings)
- July 2007
- (6 postings)
- June 2007
- (5 postings)
- May 2007
- (6 postings)
- April 2007
- (6 postings)
- March 2007
- (5 postings)
- February 2007
- (7 postings)
- January 2007
- (8 postings)
- December 2006
- (7 postings)
- November 2006
- (8 postings)
- October 2006
- (10 postings)
- September 2006
- (9 postings)
- August 2006
- (9 postings)






Comments (24)
Bernard
It is time that the government - hopefully spurred on by the outrage of the taxpayers - renames the selfproclaimed CEOs to what they really are: shameless criminals who get a kick out of the irreversible damage they have done to society.
Posted October 15, 2008 02:20 PM
Blair melanson
You see people thrown in jail for so much less and I can't emphathize enough on how much less.I mean it`s a far far far far away place.The`s peaple are treating the average american as if they were SOOOOOOO STUPID they would never know and even if they did, they`re too stupid to do anything about it.
Posted October 14, 2008 11:07 PM
Graham
Denwood
Mark - No, it is "Graham" not "John". You had it right the first time. Did I miss something? Who said anything about McCain? Not me surely!
You are implying that McC has been bought and paid for by business and lobbyists and you are right. So has OB and that is exactly my point! They're the SAME!! So how can "The Annointed One" claim that he's any different?!
At least McC and his people aren't trying to pass themselves off as something just short of the "Second Coming" and, to the extent that they are, no one really believes them.
Obama isn't going to change "the system" in the US for one simple reason. HE IS THE SYSTEM! He's as foul and crooked as anyone in DC and if all you sheep would try a little more research and a little less hero worship, you might discover that! He's a politician for .... sake!!
The Great Deception of 08 marches on!
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted October 9, 2008 11:32 PM
John F. Dunbar
No wonder Americans dislike paying taxes so much if this is what Government does with their money!
Greed and selfishness has broken the western, democratic capitalist system and, perhaps not a moment too soon. This system could never have done anything to cure the immense problems the world is facing as no elected official is ever going to propose anything that might work for fear of being thrown out of office.
Between this principle, the poverty, injustice and inequity that the same capitalist system has caused and the seemingly irreversible over-population of the Earth. I believe our descendants will be witness to a very hard end to the ability of the planet to support human life.
A chilling epitaph for a species that, for a time, showed such promise.
Posted October 9, 2008 10:15 PM
.OcO..
Montréal
Graham of Denwood: AMEN.
Anthony of Ontario: I already voted for the NDP. Sorry. I like Dion but the Sponsorship Party of Canada is so turn-of-the-century. Some of us still haven't forgotten and still don't approve...
As for the excessively greedy execs, this is a great article. It's important that this information is out there because it makes me wonder about all the excesses we DON'T know about. On the down side, who can really say that they're surprised? People don't really care enough to put a stop to it so... shrug.
Posted October 9, 2008 04:00 PM
JD
With all these execs getting away with grand larceny, one has to wonder who Conrad Black ticked off?
Posted October 9, 2008 02:10 PM
GP
Toronto
In the old days, these pariahs, scum of the Earth, would be dragged out of town drawn and quartered. Better yet, they would be shuffled off to the gallows or hung for all the village to see. Perhaps we are more civilized in this day and age, but how do these leeches get away with these despicable acts? Maybe more to the point, how can they possibly live with themselves? I include the long list of politicians who have reaped the spoils amongst these modern day robber barons.
Posted October 9, 2008 12:04 PM
John
Toronto
I'm not surprised!
This bailout is W's last thank you gift to his corrupt neo con friends, one last kick in the groin to the average working stiff from the rich and powerful under the Bush regime.
Yet a large number of these working stiffs who are being stiffed in the US, probably still care more about two men dating as they watch reality TV eating mac and cheese in their trailer home, than they do about getting hosed by their politicians.
A truly sad state of affairs.
Posted October 9, 2008 12:02 PM
Karen Backmann
Vancouver
I guess the only way for Americans to get any justice is for the stockholders to issue a class action suit against these CEOs. People laugh at the number of law suits in the USA but it is obvious that the government is owned by big businesses so what choice do they have?
How these CEOs can even live with themselves is beyond me. Enjoy your 35MM Joe while senior citizens are living on the streets.
Posted October 9, 2008 12:01 PM
Michèle
Montreal
Too bad it did not happen to a US Health insurance : now, with the state money involved, every american could be instantly covered. But this would sound too Disney like.
An old social sciences theory said : in times of economical crisis, the state should regulate. But common sense would say BEFORE the crisis, not during or after.
Posted October 9, 2008 10:13 AM
Joe
Halifax
When speaking to the Coady Institute recently on global poverty, former ambassador to the US, Frank McKenna quoted figures such as $6 billion to achieve basic education for all of humanity, $9 billion for sanitation and water and $13 billion for health and nutrition. Assuming these numbers are accurate then we could quickly wipe out some of the major scourges of the planet for a mere $28 billion.
If anyone were counting, that would be a paltry 32% of what has now been paid to a single company (AIG) and its thieving, immoral executives alone. According to some estimates (i.e. a total of a trillion dollars for the US bailout) the total funds required to eradicate many global problems would then also become a drop in the proverbial bucket.
So when we hear statements saying how global poverty, health and education, not to mention the greening of domestic industry, the lowering of the costs of secondary education and health care and any number of other issues are simply “too expensive” to pursue we now know that it is not actually a matter of prudent financial management but of social-economic priorities that favour the corrupt and the mega-rich and most often both.
The neocon brand of social Darwinism is a self-seeking, ineffective philosophy that needs to be purged from the mindset of America immediately. The world is changing rapidly and above all else North American needs a strong, visionary United States to chart a clear new course into a bright future for all of its citizens and for the larger world.
Allowing these criminals to ring up $23,000 spa bills and be paid in a million dollars per month contracts while many people are losing their homes and hard won retirement savings is not the sort of America that can do this. The wilfully dishonest mismanagement of the Bush/Cheney regime has set the United States back nearly a generation. I truly hope that whomever wins this election has the ability and drive to change the course.
Posted October 9, 2008 08:11 AM
Rob
Ottawa
Excellent comment John and Madeline. I am sending this to my American friends.
Posted October 9, 2008 06:54 AM
Chas
Kingston
If Graham from Denwood were correct the U.S. would be in deeper trouble than suspected, but to blame Obama! Graham, you must be smoking something. The hope of the future rests with Obama cleaning house, including a corrupt Republican administration - which by the way includes Senator McCain, and the Governor of Alaska.
Posted October 9, 2008 06:30 AM
Craig
Vancouver
Excellent work as usual Henry.
Posted October 9, 2008 02:12 AM
Craig
Vancouver
Well said John.
Posted October 9, 2008 02:10 AM
Bob Gordon
Simple:
Long term (life) prison terms for these criminals that sent the planet into financial hell. Take all their personal assets and profits , you know what I mean. Put their families on welfare. Harsh , you bet, look what they did world wide.
They make Al Capone look like the Easter Bunny.
thanks, Bob
Posted October 9, 2008 01:35 AM
Mark
Firstly, to Graham ... or should I say "John"?
If you are inferring the McCain campaign isn't in bed with Fannie and Freddie lobbyists, I suggest you look at who is on that campaign bus and what they've been doing most of their careers.
Obama supported the 'rescue package' because it was encumbent upon the American government to do something, anything. It wasn't a cure-all, but it would be a first step. His hands are tied by the fact that he is not yet president and cannot replace Paulson or any of the other Goldman Sachs cronies.
Republican hands, and yes many Democratic hands, are dirty, whether helping sow the seeds or by feeding at the trough with little care to the future of the country. It was a Me First generation.
I originally thought there must be a few individuals who should be brought to justice, but with everything that I've now heard, the rot is spread so far and deep, there wouldn't be enough cells in Club Fed to hold all those responsible.
So what should be done? Elect Obama. He has the intelligence, the insight, the connections and the ability to work over problems that will allow for the making of fundamental changes in Washington. He is going to run into obstacle after obstacle and he can't work miracles, but he represents the best chance for America to redeem itself.
Posted October 9, 2008 12:35 AM
Anthony
Ontario
Yeah, McCain and Obama aren't really inspiring a whole lot of confidence. McCain seems like a bumblng puppet (Maverick my aunt fanny) and Obama seems to be drifting toward the presidency on the strength of not being a Republican. Neither have done much to show true leadership, aside from the usual rhetoric. I hope Obama wins, but only because I think McCain will be another Dubya. That's not a very good reason, but I wonder how many Americans feel the same way?
In any case, Vote Dion!
Posted October 8, 2008 11:39 PM
Graham
Denwood
It's of the utmost importance to remember one thing about all of this. Obama, "The Great Saviour", pushed harder than anyone for this "uber-bailout" and, regardless of whatever half-hearted and transparently insincere protestations he might make for the cameras, he enthusiastically and whole-heartedly approves of everything you just read! Why? Because these are "his kind of people"!! Witness his financial adviser the former head of Fannie or Freddie or whichever one it was. "Change we can believe in?" The lemmings can believe whatever they want. I'm not buying his fraudulent act for one second!!
Posted October 8, 2008 10:30 PM
keith
there's no rocket science here...for the last several years we kept on hearing that the stock-market bubble was going to burst, generally US stocks were over-inflated. The US was spending huge sums of money to keep two armies alive in two wars for well over a half decade. Manufacturing was much cheaper in other countries. Housing prices going through the roof. Energy costs had increased exponentially. Why is anyone shocked? Everyone knew it was going to happen, but just kept on with the hopes that it didn't. Why were there no plans made for this obvious eventuality? This Bush governemnt is the stupidest government ever to govern the dumbest Americans in history.
Posted October 8, 2008 08:54 PM
Richard
Picton
Unfortunately, just another example of executive excess. It is no different to executives of any other large corporation taking care of themselves first.
The concept of limiting executive salaries to x times the average workers wage may not be viable, but boy it is tempting
Posted October 8, 2008 08:19 PM
John
Brampton
We are witnessing the GREATEST Bank robbery in history and we are allowing the thieves out the door with the loot. The "swaps" as pointed out on "60 minutes" were unregulated "insurance policies" supposed to cover the security of the mortgage securities offered to the world through ALL the big banks in the US and nobody can convince me that the likes of Paulson or Bush or Cheney did not know that these "swaps" were outside Federal regulation and NOT WORTH THE PAPER THEY WERE WRITTEN ON because there was no obligation to have the necessary funds to cover any losses. Now the World has to bail out these Thieves AGAIN whilst they languish in a holiday resort and I cannot afford a turkey for Thanksgiving. A POX on all of your houses, especially the White House.
Posted October 8, 2008 06:00 PM
Greg
Montreal
If Henry Champ ever runs for office, he'll have my vote. Always astute, insightful, poignant, and concise analysis. A great read.
Posted October 8, 2008 05:37 PM
Madeline
Ottawa
It never ceases to amaze me that ordinary hard-working Americans continue to vote for politicians that do not represent their interests, but instead protect the elite. Turns my stomach. Just want to scream WAKE UP!!!!!!! PAY ATTENTION!!!!! Who are you really voting for????
So immensely frustrating.
Posted October 8, 2008 05:34 PM