The parties are over
Comments (9)
Friday, September 5, 2008 | 11:58 AM ET
By Henry Champ
Friday morning, as everyone picks through the debris of two weeks of national conventions for the Democrats and Republicans, it does seem the advantage has tilted to the Democrats. But it is very close.
Both Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama and Republican standard-bearer John McCain can point to newly energized parties.
The Clintons, Hillary and Bill, put their grievances and hurt behind them and strongly endorsed Obama. There are still a few Hillary supporters saying they will vote for McCain or not vote at all, but their numbers are insignificant.
McCain's selection of Alaskan Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential running mate remains controversial, but it certainly succeeded in its main goal of keeping the conservative, evangelical wing of the party on board. You only had to watch the rising fundraising numbers for confirmation.
Both parties have their messages in place. Both know their difficulties and believe they are manageable.
McCain has to shed the assertion of the Democrats that his election only extends the policies of President George W. Bush's administration for another four years. Democrats will say that means a longer stay in Iraq, uncertainty dealing with Iran, Afghanistan and the Mideast peace process and continuing failure of the economy.
Obama has got to deal better with Republican assertions he is not ready for prime time. McCain and his surrogates have done well with the arguments that Obama's accomplishments are few, his experience wanting.
On Tuesday, McCain's campaign manager, Rick Davis, told the Washington Post, "We actually have to go find votes because right now if the election were held today, we probably don't have as many votes as Barack Obama."
Translation: We need the independents.
That's why McCain was talking Thursday night about country before party, why he stressed accountability and bipartisan co-operation. Polls show independents, above all else, are fed up with inter-party bickering.
His message, "I've done this before, reaching out to the other side, to find solutions, and I will do it again," is going to be the most-repeated mantra of his campaign.
For Obama, the watchword is judgment. He says he was right on Iraq so what good is nearly three decades of McCain service in Congress if he missed the boat on the war, if his record shows him supporting a terrible president and his failed policies, 90 per cent of the time?
What the polls are saying
Any convention bounce for McCain, if there is to be one, would not yet show Friday morning, when the polls are giving the national lead to Obama by 4.4 points. Recent polling has shown a steady gain for the Democrats, but it's not overpowering.
State by state, the story is different. As they did during the Democratic primaries, Obama's stronger on-the-ground organization, his voter registration efforts and his strength among youth are showing.
Iowa is now a Democratic pickup and Minnesota is a safe Obama state. Virginia, a guaranteed Bush victory, is trending Democrat. Obama won big during the primaries in North Carolina and is closing the gap here. New Mexico should be Obama's. All these states are forcing McCain to spend money defending what should be Republican strongholds and in the money game, Obama enjoys a big edge.
So we come down to the big four states. The must-win states. Florida is ever so slightly McCain's. Ohio is a tie. Michigan and Pennsylvania are close but Obama has a decided edge.
Most polling experts believe the winner will be the candidate who can win two-out-of-three of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Michigan. At the moment, that is Obama.
The deal breaker
It's the economy, stupid!
The 1992 election phrase of Bill Clinton's is certainly back in vogue and neither candidate or party has managed to seize the momentum.
Obama should have the advantage coming off eight years of a Bush administration that is largely blamed for the economic woes the country faces. But Obama has not closed the deal, offering neither solutions nor policies the voters can get their heads around.
McCain, who is fighting the image of the Bush legacy, has done no better.
It should be easy.
Friday morning, new figures were released showing 84,000 jobs have been lost in the past month. That brings this year's total job loss to 605,000. It raises the unemployment figure to 6.1 per cent, an unusually high figure for the United States and the highest in five years.
That's only one miserable statistic pointing up the country's economic woes. There are many others, yet neither Obama nor McCain, neither the Democratic nor Republican parties, have seized this issue, made it their own.
The voters say the economy is the issue, but so far, neither Obama nor McCain has won their trust.
That's the task for the next 60 days.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
Post a Comment
Washington File »
About the Author
Henry Champ is CBC Newsworld's correspondent in Washington, D.C., delivering Canadian viewers the latest developments in the U.S. political arena. Recently, he has been a leading Canadian voice on coverage of the war on terrorism, the war in Iraq and the growing concerns over the Canada-U.S. relationship.
Recent Posts
- Vapour ads create successful campaign smokescreens
- Henry Champ
- Thursday, September 11, 2008
- The parties are over
- Henry Champ
- Friday, September 5, 2008
- The attack dog fights back
- Henry Champ
- Thursday, September 4, 2008
- The plan for Sarah Palin
- Henry Champ
- Wednesday, September 3, 2008
- Paying a high price for Palin
- Henry Champ
- Tuesday, September 2, 2008
- Subscribe to this blog
Recent Comments
- CJ, The Democratic party elite was obsessed with putting ...
- The parties are over
- It is all over since mainstream media boycotted out Ron P...
- The parties are over
- Uhh CJ Kavanagh, I'm not stumping for the Democrats or th...
- The parties are over
- Sorry Peter in Boston, but your logic is a little twisted...
- The parties are over
- Obama has no experience, but McCain is setting us up to h...
- The parties are over
Archives
- September 2008
- (6 postings)
- August 2008
- (6 postings)
- June 2008
- (3 postings)
- May 2008
- (6 postings)
- April 2008
- (3 postings)
- March 2008
- (4 postings)
- February 2008
- (5 postings)
- January 2008
- (7 postings)
- November 2007
- (2 postings)
- October 2007
- (7 postings)
- September 2007
- (1 postings)
- July 2007
- (6 postings)
- June 2007
- (5 postings)
- May 2007
- (6 postings)
- April 2007
- (6 postings)
- March 2007
- (5 postings)
- February 2007
- (7 postings)
- January 2007
- (8 postings)
- December 2006
- (7 postings)
- November 2006
- (8 postings)
- October 2006
- (10 postings)
- September 2006
- (9 postings)
- August 2006
- (9 postings)
Comments (9)
Peter (ex-pat in the USA)
Boston
CJ, The Democratic party elite was obsessed with putting forward a historical candidate. So obsessed for their place in history that they shot themselves in the foot because they were over-confident that they would beat the Republicans in 2008.
The Republicans practically threw this election, not a single seriously interesting Republican candidate came forward for their nomination race.
McCain almost went bankrupt in the beginning. The Republican party was a stock car with flat tires, an old driver and no gas and not even caring about the race. You think the Republicans do not have a stable full of young, sauve speakers and politicians who could come onto the scene? They were saving them all for 2012 and didn't want to waste them in 2008 on what should have been a sure loss after Bush.
Once it was announced that HIlary Clinton would not be on the ticket as VP or Prez. A Republican like Karl Rove said " I can't believe how stupid the Democrats are. Lets turn the key on the Republican machine and really go for it, we can win it!"
The Pit crew came in, the tires came off, the gas tank was full and the engine is red line RPMed and now the tires are spinning in what in Sept is a statistical dead heat.
How is that even possible in anyone's wildest dreams with John McCain who was thrown away in 2000 by the Republicans and is 72 years old. It's possible because Sarah Palin is behind the wheel and has her high heels on the gas pedal, her eye on the finish line and a good grip on the wheel while John McCain is sitting beside her hanging on and going WHOOOO !!!
Meanwhile the Dem car is spinning out of control and headed for the wall. Obama is trying to tell the difference between the pedals on the floor and work the gear shift with Biden screaming "That is my knee Barack! Look out for the wall, The Wall, THE WALL!!!"
The women of America will decide election 2008 and ask yourself who they are cheering for now, you think women don't know how to drive eh ?
Posted September 6, 2008 07:49 PM
Vlad
It is all over since mainstream media boycotted out Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinic and Mike Gravel, the only America first candidates.
The rest is just one very expensive circus 'Israel first', 'war first', 'big business first'.
Posted September 6, 2008 07:41 PM
Peter (ex-pat in the USA)
Boston
Uhh CJ Kavanagh, I'm not stumping for the Democrats or the Republicans. I'm observing political tactics, voting patterns, polling stats and a political phenomenon called Sarah Palin who has brought an energy into the Presidential race. She just broke the Google record for hits in the last week. Do you want to try and tell me the Dems don't have a problem ?
CJ more than anything I am observing incompetent Democratic political strategy. They should be miles ahead in the polls at this point given this socio-political climate. The election should be a landslide for them not a tie at the conventions.
They are in trouble and my read is that they will not win the election because they did not put Hilary Clinton on the ticket. It is that simple...
Posted September 6, 2008 07:08 PM
CJ KAVANAGH
Sorry Peter in Boston, but your logic is a little twisted. You ask why Palin drew viewers? The same reason people slow down at the sight of a car wreck.
McCain has just taken his best club out of the bag when it comes to the argument against Obama. He can't convincingly go after Obama's experience (or lack thereof) when he has nominated someone with even less experience than Obama. Now let me address the arguments you are sure to make right now.
1) But, she's not the top of the ticket and Obama is so it's comparing apples to oranges!
Well this is true to a degree except that the Republican nominee is a 72 year old cancer survivor who was also a POW for 5.5 years and suffered horrible physical abuse. The odds of her becoming C in C during a McCain presidency are very high. As such, her experience becomes vital and any argument to the contrary is just plain silly.
2) She has executive experience! That's huge!
Well again, yes and no. Being the mayor of a town the size of a largish highschool and Governor of the 47th state (by population) for 20 months is no more executive experience than say running a national Presidential campaign in 50 states and 3 primaries for the last 20 months. To counter that, she has no national policy or issue experience. Senator Obama has slept, ate and breathed domestic and foreign policy non stop for 20 months. He has posted policy positions and plans on over 100 national issues on his website and participated in over 25 nationaly televised debates. Governor Palin is cribbing from Joe Lieberman.
Posted September 6, 2008 02:14 PM
Oscar the Grouch
Obama has no experience, but McCain is setting us up to have the least experienced (and first female) president ever by partnering with her despite health issues and the fact that he is the oldest first-term president ever.
Obama, at least, has the right idea. Bigger government might sound bad to the relatively rich, but better medical services to the poor and ther social programs is definitely a step in the right direction.
I'd still rather vote for Colbert.
Posted September 6, 2008 10:25 AM
Daryl
Edmonton
It's amazing, given the condition of the country, that the Republicans are even in it. I was particularly amused by Sarah Palin at the RNC talking about getting rid of the corrupt Washington insiders when most of the insiders were sitting up there in the gallery! And when McCain talked about targeting the me-first partisans when they were up there sitting with them!
Obama needs to keep people's minds on who they have to thank for their current economic mess, and he needs to do it in plain language without making it sound like a college lecture.
Posted September 5, 2008 06:33 PM
headstrong
All the Rethugs need to do is keep the difference close, and the disenfranchisement of legitimate voters, plus voting machine fraud, will win it for them again, just as in the previous 2 elections.
The neocons have spent 8 years inserting their own operatives at every level of the voting process, and it's show time!
However, it may be a pyrrhic victory, as polls indicate large gains for the Democrats in both houses. There may well be a large enough majority to override any presidential veto, which would make McCain a useless figurehead at best.
Posted September 5, 2008 05:20 PM
Peter (ex-pat in the USA)
Boston
Henry, I enjoy your articles, but I would suggest to you that this is a presidential election like nothing we have seen before.
The bump is going to be more of a launch that isn't going to come back down unless there is a HUGE gaffe. In states with support margins of less than 10 points for Obama you will see a significant shift for McCain, all of those states are in play now, if Obama is not more than 10 points ahead they can flip by November if McCain/Palin hold the momentum. Every state with less than a 10 point lead is going to be in play for a nation that has Obama overload.
All of those 18 million female Hilary Dems may not switch to McCain but at least half in the ballot box or more will, just to teach the Democratic party a lesson it will never forget about scuttling a better qualified woman from the ticket as Prez or VP. Although they may never admit it to anyone. Hell hath no fury etc.
My prediction is a "bump" of 5-7 points for McCain / Palin, a figure unheard of. Henry can you re-call a VP speech getting viewer ship almost equal to the Pres speech of the other party ?
I think that expert polling view of 2 out of 3 states (Michigan, Ohio, Penn) was pre-Palin. I think the landscape has completed changed and when the polls are made public, I think you will agree.
McCain/Palin have many paths to the white house now while Obama's only hope is to maintain his lead and win 2 of those 3 states. Even giving him the old analysis you present of winning 2 of the 3 states of (Michigan, Ohio, Penn) do you really think he can win them ? Have you been to Michigan, Penn ? In a hurting economy, why is a Dem not way past 10 points in these states which are traditionally Dem since Reagan and the economy is in such trouble ?
Personally, I don't see how Obama can win, he is already at his peak and been unable to seal the deal in what should be an ideal socio-political climate.
Posted September 5, 2008 01:29 PM
G. Lion Kelly
I have seen no mention made of the
obtrusive presence of the protesters
during McCain's GOP nomination
acceptance speech. If the McCain
camp is fueling their ship on
national security, could this
modest, but highly conspicuous,
breach not be seen as indicative
of a pretty porous core defense?
Posted September 5, 2008 12:25 PM