Oops. Barack Obama has his very own Washington insider
Comments (6)
Thursday, June 12, 2008 | 07:24 PM ET
By Henry Champ
It is said that the selection of the vice-presidential running mate is the most important decision a presidential candidate will make.
Because it is the candidate's first public decision, it gets looked at, mulled over and much argued about.
So far, Barack Obama, the Democrat, has not done well on this front.
He started with a group of three prominent Washingtonians as his selection committee. Their job has been to oversee the many party lawyers who will delve into the backgrounds of prospective running mates and conduct interviews with those under consideration.
Jim Johnson was the selection committee chairman. But now he's been shown the door as a series of juicy revelations this week has caused him to be seen as the quintessential, overly-privileged Washington insider, the very animal that the crusading Obama has vowed to do away with.
A sweet deal
Johnson used to be the CEO of Fannie Mae, the government-sponsored organization that guarantees mortgages for millions of homeowners. He is now the boss at Perseus, a $2-billion private equity fund and had once headed up Lehman Brothers, the big investment bank.
Not bad for someone who earned his political chops working as a Senate aide and then policy chief to former vice-president Walter Mondale.
Johnson is someone who knows the power scene and where the bodies are buried in the Democratic party, which clearly recommended him to a freshman senator seeking high office. Still, he was an odd choice for a candidate like Obama who has been running a campaign of change and thundering from the platform that Washington insiders must go.
For his Republican opponent, Senator John McCain, Obama's selection of Johnson was the gift that wouldn't stop giving.
First, the Republican-friendly Wall Street Journal reported that Johnson received three mortgages totalling more than $2 million from Countrywide Financial Corporation.
The terms, said the Journal, appear to be below the current rate. But what really made the story stand out was that Countrywide was the largest customer of Fannie Mae and the central company, many would say culprit, in the current subprime lending crisis wreaking havoc across middle-class America.
There's more
The Journal also wrote that Johnson has been a central figure on compensation committees that have awarded huge payouts to corporate executives. He oversaw and approved executive pay packages, for example, at United Healthcare, a Minneapolis company that has become the newest flag bearer for corporate excess.
One United Healthcare CEO received a $124.8 million compensation payment.
The thing to keep in mind here is that one of Obama's key Senate initiatives has been legislation seeking to curb excessive executive compensation packages.
Johnson's troubles, now being happily trumpeted by the McCain camp, also includes his own pay when he was at Fannie Mae, a federal body.
In 1998, Johnson earned $21 million a year as CEO. Of course, the public never learned that until many years later when the mortgage giant was being investigated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Most of Johnson's earnings came from deferred stock ownership, which not included in the company's compensation table. The SEC ruled the company's 1998 earnings as "fraudulent" and said numbers were "intentionally manipulated to trigger management bonuses."
According to the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, no executives should have received bonuses that year. Johnson, however, took home a $1.9 million gift on top of his $21-million salary.
A multi-million dollar distraction
The ultimate Washington insider, Johnson left the CEO job at Fanny Mae in 1998 for Perseus but never really left the company.
Fannie Mae wanted Johnson's contacts and insider credentials. So he was hired on as a consultant and has earned $3.3 million dollars up to 2006 in retainer fees and other services. He is also supplied with two paid employees, a chauffer, company limo for him and his wife and an extra office in the Watergate complex.
With all this buzzing around, Obama picked Johnson as his very first high-level appointment. You have to wonder why.
Johnson has subsequently resigned. "I believe Barack Obama's candidacy for president of the United States is the most exciting and important of my lifetime," he said. "I would not dream of being a party to distracting attention from that historic effort."
On the charges swirling around him, he said, "I am extremely proud of my service to Fannie Mae and in the important dimensions of public service. This withdrawal should in no way imply that I accept the blatantly false statements and misrepresentations that have been written about me in recent days."
Misses the point
That in the minds of many people is not the point. Obama is the issue, not whether Johnson is guilty of indulging himself in the corporate trough.
Obama is going to pay for this choice, particularly when the Republican ads start running in the fall.
Even the kids playing basketball on the street in front of my house know Johnson is a backroom guy who got things done, for a price.
When many of the these details about Johnson came out at the beginning of the week, Obama displayed a trait that we've seen before that he probably needs to correct: He went into defensive mode, saying Johnson had only a "tangential" role in the campaign and that he, the candidate, couldn't be expected to hire people to "vet the vetters."
Eventually, though, Obama bit the bullet and Johnson was gone, with the candidate still seemingly in denial. "Jim did not want to distract in any way from the very important task of gathering information about my vice-presidential nominee, so he has made a decision to step aside that I accept."
For Republican strategists, like Mark Corallo, speaking to the Washington Post, this is a godsend. Obama, Corallo notes has "tagged himself as a different kind of politician. He's supposed to transcend party, transcend politics.
"He's exploited that more than anyone in recent memory, and it becomes demoralizing to all the starry-eyed Obamaphiles who are saying, 'I thought he was different.'"
There is a final word. Obama picked Johnson because he had worked on two other vice-presidential selections. He led the committee that picked Geraldine Ferraro for Mondale's presidential run. (That pick was a disaster.)
And he led the committee to select John Edwards for John Kerry's campaign in 2004. Edwards is much admired but did little to help the ticket.
It's not as if he had a sterling pedigree.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
Post a Comment
Washington File »
About the Author
Henry Champ is CBC Newsworld's correspondent in Washington, D.C., delivering Canadian viewers the latest developments in the U.S. political arena. Recently, he has been a leading Canadian voice on coverage of the war on terrorism, the war in Iraq and the growing concerns over the Canada-U.S. relationship.
Recent Posts
- Vapour ads create successful campaign smokescreens
- Henry Champ
- Thursday, September 11, 2008
- The parties are over
- Henry Champ
- Friday, September 5, 2008
- The attack dog fights back
- Henry Champ
- Thursday, September 4, 2008
- The plan for Sarah Palin
- Henry Champ
- Wednesday, September 3, 2008
- Paying a high price for Palin
- Henry Champ
- Tuesday, September 2, 2008
- Subscribe to this blog
Recent Comments
- By picking Biden, Obama has chosen somebody who has vast ...
- Oops. Barack Obama has his very own Washington insider
- After all, if Champ were really trying to highlight Obama...
- Oops. Barack Obama has his very own Washington insider
- I'd just like to comment on the comments posted by Mark M...
- Oops. Barack Obama has his very own Washington insider
- I appreciate that Champ is holding Obama to a higher stan...
- Oops. Barack Obama has his very own Washington insider
- Mr. Champ, I want to comment on something not relat...
- Oops. Barack Obama has his very own Washington insider
Archives
- September 2008
- (6 postings)
- August 2008
- (6 postings)
- June 2008
- (3 postings)
- May 2008
- (6 postings)
- April 2008
- (3 postings)
- March 2008
- (4 postings)
- February 2008
- (5 postings)
- January 2008
- (7 postings)
- November 2007
- (2 postings)
- October 2007
- (7 postings)
- September 2007
- (1 postings)
- July 2007
- (6 postings)
- June 2007
- (5 postings)
- May 2007
- (6 postings)
- April 2007
- (6 postings)
- March 2007
- (5 postings)
- February 2007
- (7 postings)
- January 2007
- (8 postings)
- December 2006
- (7 postings)
- November 2006
- (8 postings)
- October 2006
- (10 postings)
- September 2006
- (9 postings)
- August 2006
- (9 postings)
Comments (6)
Wayne R. Serbin
By picking Biden, Obama has chosen somebody who has vast experience in international issues. Obama has been ctiticized for not having enough experience in in international affairs.
Posted August 23, 2008 01:22 PM
Ben is right
Toronto
After all, if Champ were really trying to highlight Obama's taste in advisers, he would have mentioned that another member of the Vice Presidential selection group is Eric Holder, a former deputy Attorney general who was heavily involved in some of Bill Clinton's more questionable last-minute pardons.
Posted June 18, 2008 11:53 PM
Ben
I'd just like to comment on the comments posted by Mark M above. I think the Champ is doing a commendable job by reporting on both sides of any candidate - the good and the bad. If Obama's picking shady characters for his team this should be highlighted at all costs. Kudos Champ for highlighting this side of the story too and keep on with the good work.
Posted June 18, 2008 08:49 PM
Mark M.
I appreciate that Champ is holding Obama to a higher standard in response to Obama's stated aims. But to cast him as a villain in a vacuum is to do him a disservice and to mislead the Canadian reader about Obama's merits. Obama represents the best hope for America and for the rest of the world. If you are going to hold Obama's feet to the fire, I hope you give equal treatment to his opponent, John McCain - or is he too easy a target?
Posted June 16, 2008 06:02 PM
W. Darwish
Montreal
Mr. Champ,
I want to comment on something not related to this article. ( It is not for publishing unless you decide) Is there cover up on the death of Mr. Tim Russert? I did not hear any comment from his private doctors.
An autopsy report has been made public and it puts the cause of death as a severe heart attack. Subsequently his doctors have said Mr. Russert was being treated for cardiovascular problems. In April he had passed a stress test and at his time of death he was dieting on the doctors advice....h
Posted June 16, 2008 10:04 AM
W. Darwish
Montreal
Thank you Henry. First, what is the meaning of the Insider? Then all the Politicians in Washington have to be insiders. Third, you cannot bring a complete brand new staff from outside Washington telling them not to contact any insider from Washington. If Obama would avoid all the insiders; he could not do any thing. If it was a mistake; Obama should defend himself 100%. But, I'm sure Obama knows very well who the coming Vice President is. His decision to create the committee was to avoid Hillary Clinton's demand to take the position of the Vice President.
Posted June 14, 2008 08:44 AM