Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

Race in America: Obama's state of the union

Comments (93)
By Henry Champ

How often have you cringed or been embarrassed by a family member or a close friend who made disparaging remarks about some other group?

It is a predicament all of us, regardless of colour, sex or religion, have probably faced at some point or other in our lives. The instigator could be someone you admire and, while you cringed at what was just said, you cut that person some slack.

Barack Obama touched on that conundrum in his Philadelphia speech today while talking about his loyalty to his preacher, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whose fiery sermons, blaming white America for many of the evils in the world, have become a political lightning rod.

"I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community," said the man who would be president. "I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother — a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in the world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street and who, on more than one occasion, has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe."

But yesterday, Obama didn't cringe. In fact, rather than run from the issue, or hide behind easy denunciations, he delivered what might well become a monument of political speech on the issue of race in America today.

"Race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now," Obama said. "We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America — to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality."

"For the men and women of Reverend Wright's generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away. Nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years.

"That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table.

"At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician's failings. And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews.

"The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright's sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning."

White anger

Obama went on: "A similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working and middle-class, white Americans don't feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race.

"Their experience is the immigrant experience. As far as they are concerned, no one's handed them anything, they have built it from scratch.

"They've worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pensions dumped after a lifetime of labour. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away in an era of stagnant wages and global competition.

"Opportunity comes to be seen as a zero-sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense.

"So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear an African-American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot at a good college because of an injustice they have never committed; when they are told that their fears about crime in urban neighbourhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time."

"Like the anger in the black community," he added, "these resentments aren't always expressed in polite company."

History's lessons

I know what he was getting at here. In the late 1960s and early '70s, I spent a good deal of time reporting on what were then called "the troubles" in Northern Ireland.

The bombing and killing in that part of the world went on for years. Political leaders and most journalists always described the violence as a sectarian struggle, Roman Catholics against Protestants. And to a degree it was, but the far greater cause was basic bread and butter.

History had given Protestants an economic advantage. They controlled the country along with a few enfranchised Catholics.

Bernadette Devlin, a young, fiery Catholic leader in her own right, argued that Northern Ireland's working classes, both Protestant and Catholic, succumbed to stereotypical falsehoods that grew out of ignorance. And that the urban warfare they were waging only served to protect the status quo and harm themselves.

Devlin's tirades fell largely on deaf ears. But in delivering what is clearly the most important speech of this campaign, Barack Obama is echoing some of those themes.

Like Devlin, Obama argued that there are forces in America today that are happy that the anger of whites and blacks continues.

"Just as black anger has also proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle-class squeeze: A corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favour the few over the many.

"And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns, this too widens the racial divide and blocks the path to understanding."

Hitting a chord?

Obama went on to argue that unemployment, poor schools, lack of opportunity and lack of health care are common problems that do not answer to colour, sex or religion.

His address in Philadelphia was getting early rave reviews. Many saw it as continuing his campaign theme of inclusiveness. But it was probably also aimed at working-class white males who have been the hardest group for him to corral.

Let us understand who the real enemy is, he was saying, and let us work together.

Bernadette Devlin offered similar ideas in Northern Ireland. She won election to the British House of Commons at a mere 21 years of age. But her efforts to unite the working classes failed.

The battles between young, hard-luck Protestants and Catholics continued for 25 more years. She lost her seat, was a victim of a failed assassination attempt and then faded from public view.

The next few days will determine whether Obama reached his audience or if he even has an audience for his brand of inclusiveness.

« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »

This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.

Comments (93)

Andy Fielding

I think many people are missing the point. By electing Barack Obama, U.S. voters will show they are ready to choose their president based on his character and abilities, rather than his race. In that way, they'll finally be setting aside racial distinction, rather than emphasizing it. And that's splendid.

Posted November 4, 2008 09:23 PM

Robert Remillard

Athens

America is a continent.
The country is called the USA for United States of America.
Any good journalist should know that.

Posted November 4, 2008 07:21 PM

bernard murphy

thankyou for reporting with intelligence and compassion. obama brings a certain idealism that has been lost to american as well as canadian politics for too long. working to bring the country together with a united vision deserves our hearty appreciation and recognition...

Posted September 29, 2008 03:09 PM

Howard

So far, the most prominent references to race in the primaries, as well as in the general election have been from the Obama campaign ... usually in terms of the Obama campaign accusing anyone, and everyone of racism, who disagreed with Obama, or challenged his lack of credentials, or his lack of experience, as racism. Obama has also vocally predicted and anticipated racism, when nobody actually said or did anything racist. Obama also used the race card against Bill Clinton. And, now democrat, and Obama supporter Kathleen Sebelius is once again using racism as an excuse, in case Obama doesn't win in November. But, what about the other side of the coin? 90% of Blacks in America are voting for Obama simply because he is black. This is racism also, but it always gets swept under the carpet.
No Wright, no Farrakahn, no Rezko, no Pfleger, no Ayers,
no mean Michelle, and, NOBAMA !!!

Posted September 17, 2008 10:45 PM

karen Udrei

Obama-Sebelius... The November Ticket.

Kathleen Sebelius is going to make an outstanding VP. Her character, conviction, and overall personna will help direct this country towards our necessary direction.

Obama-Sebelius...Americans for America!!!

Posted June 4, 2008 09:15 PM

Mohamed Mehta

Toronto

Very good to read but hard to swallow and very hard to follow. But sometime bitter pill is the salvation. Hope we all become more human first then Black or White, Male or Female, Rich or Poor, Religious or Non Religious.
The elexir is in believing in God totally. Freedom with Decipline. Keep our baggage away specially anger and work together.
The most important we all here in N Ameria are too much materialistic let us go half way towards spirtuality and reach others share our time wealth food and energy instead of selfcentredness.
Hope sanity will prevail and as author mention way back by VICTOR HUGO SAID "History teach us everthing even the future" So we learn and remain togther.
Mohamed

Posted May 22, 2008 09:36 AM

David.E

TORONTO

Obama's speech will ever be remembered by generations yet unborn!
I salute his courage and boldnes for taking the bull by the horn,on the 'RACE ISSUE'.
Every sincere American knows that Obama will be the only true president the can bring about the long overdue "CHANGE" that Americans have always desired.The "CHANGE" that can unite Americans and take them to the next level.
Its quite clear that those who are vehemently aginst Obama's nomination are doing so based on racial resentments that has built up over time.


Posted May 14, 2008 08:00 PM

Maryam Moghbeli

Montreal

Overseas Canadian, you said it best.

And I would add that the discussion level should be raised to how do we solve this problem of racism in this 21st century, and not whose fault it is. Because we are all guilty by association to our parents, friends, co-workers, you name it.

Hatred has never solved any problem. Neither has expecting people to not see what is out there to see like blacks are black, the Irish are white, Indians are brown, Chinese are different.

In the end we've gotta learn that we are all in this together and we've gotta help each other and no this is not a Zero sum game. We all gain if we respect one another and treat each other kind.

Posted April 23, 2008 08:17 AM

Overseas Canadian

The speech on race by Senator Obama, in my opinion, transcended a simple attempt to stem political hemorrhaging, or present a nuanced argument to justify an arcane ideology well out-of-step with mainstream America. Whether or not these words accomplished any of these goals only history will decipher. One need only read chapter 7 from his book “The Audacity of Hope”, look deeply into his work as a civil rights activist and community organizer in Chicago’s inner south, or his breadth of work as a State Senator in Illinois, to understand his association with this particular church and why he has chosen the entirely politically dangerous but morally courageous step of NOT disavowing his membership. While I sincerely hope Obama wins the nomination and ascends to the presidency, a far more significant event happened and continues to happen with his very campaign and this is born out by the elightened discussion occuring on this blog. Beyond the eloquent rhetoric and the rhythmic cadence of his delivery, lay a man delivering a deeply personal message to not just Americans, but to Canadians and the rest of the world community. It is entirely amazing to me that race, class and gender discontinuity continue to underpin our eroding humanity. These are the central unifying themes behind EVERY SINGLE conflict in our world today. The speech, his campaign and I believe his presidency speaks to my utopian desire that a better society of true equality is possible. The question has been asked, the choices lay before us – shall we acknowledge our entirely human but misguided failings to transcribe our internal misgivings to others to justify hate. If we do, we heed the central theme of the speech and only then can we all move on. The dialogue he has commenced hopefully sustains and becomes infectious.

Posted March 24, 2008 11:43 PM

Zsolt

BC

When I listen to Re. Wright, I do not hear the hatred - but I do hear a lot of anger.

And I think that anger scares the crap out of many people. They react in fear - with ugly insults and nasty labels.

When you are scared, you are incapable of debating or even acknowleding injustices that people like Rev. Wright are angry about.

Either that or people like Robt. are Republican trolls who specifically target progressive sites to confuse and misinform the public.

Posted March 24, 2008 07:40 PM

Thomas

Maria
Montreal
says

Whether race exists or not is not the point. It's how important we choose to make it that matters, if it matters at all. Whether we want a colour blind society or something that is built upon black liberation theology. Obama's church, its crazy reverend and his extreme views on race are now out there for people to see. You can't blame the light for what it exposes. Instead of apologizing and outright condemning the reverend's not "controversial" but poisonous opinions, however, Obama seems to be blaming almost everyone and everything but himself and Wright. We'll see how far that gets him. I think most people are actually wiser than that.
Whether "rational or balanced" or more of the same blame game, his candidacy was already at risk due to his 20 year association with a mentor who espouses evil nonsense. That fact, he addressed only in an attempt to excuse Wright (and himself), even at the expense of his poor grandmother's reputation.

Posted March 24, 2008 11:06 AM

Robt.

Toronto

To Fred of Manitoba:

He is "Obama" not "Osama" but I can see how you would get them confused. They both hate the US which is why neither will ever be elected president.

But to reply more specifically, Obama has studiously avoided saying what the "controversial" statements were that he heard and didn't agree with. And it is very hard to believe, after 20 years of being a member of this Church and considering this pastor as his mentor, advisor and sounding board, that Obama didn't hear the racial hatred spewed by this pastor.

Whatever Obama says on his website has to be measured by what he as done and said in the past. He says he objected to the war in Iraq (before he was a Senator) and then has said (when he was a Senator) that his views and President Bush's views are not that different!

Posted March 24, 2008 10:53 AM

Gwen Bailey

Opposition is out to get Obama with every little knit-pick. Recently on T.V. news report was Barak Obama's middle name is "Hussein." How terrible I looked it up on DogPile under (Baby Names - Meaning of Names) (Baby Name Origins - [Arabic]
Hussein = good, small, handsome one

Posted March 23, 2008 05:50 PM

Maria

Montreal

Thomas, you are wrong if you think the race issue does not exist here in Canada. I think you may mean is that most people simply have not talked about it openly for 20 years, and all goes on unchanged. I commend the bravery to talk about it in an rational, balanced way at the risk of losing his candidacy.

Posted March 23, 2008 01:35 AM

Maria

Montreal

To Otis: He has not been allowed to talk about his policies because he keeps getting sandbagged by HRC's tactics. That is exactly her and Bill's (HillBilly's) plan, to dig up whatever they can (whether or not he is a Muslim (ha!), NAFTA, Rev. Wright, whatever they can scrape together) to keep the focus off the important issues, for fear she will be outshone and people will actually question her (ridiculous! and untrue) claims regarding her own suitability for president.

Posted March 23, 2008 01:16 AM

fred

Manitoba

Robt. of Toronto (and others):

Osama did not lie when he said that he never heard the comments before (or at least, he did not contradict himself on that count). When he said that he did hear the pastor's controversial comments, he wasn't referring to the ones which were played on the 24 hrs news networks, he was simply saying that, in the past, he's heard the pastor say things he didn't particularly agree with, not that he heard those comments in particular.

Also, I've heard a lot of people complain that they don't know what Obama's policies are. Look at his website, he has clear and concise explanations as to what he plans to do as president. It's frustrating to hear people complain about "a lot of sizzle but where's the steak?" when they haven't taken 5 minutes to actually find out. It's not as if any of the candidates actually mention what their plans are on rallies; this information is usually found on the candidate's website, and Obama is no exception.

Posted March 23, 2008 01:15 AM

JDBrowne

Just another clown in the circus. The Big-Top is deflating. The Americans with a brain can see the face paint. Oprah's make-up artists can't make this guy anything but a front man with a middle-name of 'Hussein'. The Greatest Show on Earth.

Posted March 22, 2008 02:27 PM

Otis

Winnipeg

Sure Obama is a great orator but what are his policies? Alot of sizzle but where's the steak?

Posted March 22, 2008 12:58 PM

Thomas

I'm saddened and slightly amused. So, one nicely written little speech absolves him of this mess? The good news to me is that the majority of American voters (and Canadian onlookers) have seemingly moved beyond race. However, the sad news is that this candidate apparently is not one of them. Anyone listening to Rev. Wright for almost 20 years, witnessing the glee in Wright's sermonizing about the evil whitey, getting his just desserts, who didn't walk out is more than guilty by association. They either agree with the assessment as many here (sadly) do or they're too stupid to lead a country of 300 million. We must look through the rhetoric and see the person's actions or lack thereof. This is how character is defined, not through a veneer of fine words, especially words written to cover one's butt and save one's electoral chances.

Posted March 21, 2008 10:06 AM

britt

Vancouver

This is the ONLY time I've ever wished I was an American, just so I could vote for Barack Obama. I was very moved by his speech.
Its been my sad observation, just from people around me that racism is surprisingly still alive. My grandson is Canadian-Jamaican on his father's side and Canadian-Welsh-Estonian on his mother's side. I have not spoken to my sister for an year because she said a racist joke that she thought was cute(?!) I'm afraid she might say an equally "cute" joke around my grandson. When I told her it disturbed me she said people get so uptight about things these days.
I can not understand how she could be this because this was not how we were brought up. Back in the '50s my parents became good friends with a man from Ethiopia. They met him because there was an article in The Vancouver Sun written by Jack Wasserman who was also his good friend. His name was Tafara, (I don't remember his last name)he was going to UBC to get a degree in business. He wanted to get a shave and a hair cut one day, but the barbershop refused him because he was black. (Yes, this was in Vancouver,Canada!) My parents were horrified and wanted to show him that not all Canadians were like this so they contacted him and invited him to dinner, they became good friends and even though he went on to be an international banker he continued to correspond with them for many years and tell them how much that small thing they did meant. He also kept a beard for years after to protest what that barber did.
I believe Tafara lived in Canada after he retired and his son and daughter at one time lived in Winnipeg. My parents both passed away a few years ago but I would love to hear from him or his family. They can contact me at bvolbek@hotmail.com

Posted March 21, 2008 12:56 AM

CBC Reader

Toronto

The fact that Obama has to talk about his race and give a speech about it tells you some of the difficulties that blacks, and other minority groups, face in all areas of life. He should have said ..well my friends if I was a white man, or woman, I would have been the president already..I mean he is far better speaker than Bill Clinton was, he is smarter than Bill Clinton came across as (or JFK came across as) and he has campaigned far better than G W Bush and he gives better speeches than the so-called great communicator, Ron Reagan, ..so here you have it why its even more impressive where Obama is given that he is a black man in America.

Posted March 20, 2008 06:32 PM

Bob

Comox

To Mr right in Alberta,

Your claim that Obama is getting preferential treatment in the media is patently absurd. As an example, televangelist Rod Parsley, one of McCain's self-proclaimed "spiritual advisers," espouses views at least as extreme and radical as Obama's Rev Wright, including his proclamation that "America was founded, in part, with the intention of seeing this false religion [Islam] destroyed." I don't see any of the Media taking McCain to task over this. Christian extremists like Jerry Falwell who blamed 9/11 on God's wrath was a regular visitor to the White House but the media never made an issue of that.
As for your statement about the Democratic Party being rooted in bigotry and hatred, I'm afraid you're confusing the Democrats with the Republicans. Why else would 80% of blacks traditionally vote Democratic? And as to wanting to see another Republican in the White House, McCain has said that America should be in Iraq for another 100 years if that's what it takes to achieve victory. McCain is another cowboy like Bush, just waiting for an excuse to "slap leather" with some Islamic bad guy. McCain would further erode America's standing abroad, which isn't such a bad thing except that it would come with a price tag of who knows how many more dead innocents around the world. Mr Right, you couldn't be more wrong about this.

Posted March 20, 2008 05:58 PM

art

toronto

"Historically, blacks have handled white society's presumption of innocence in two ways: they have bargained with it, granting white society its
innocence in exchange for entry into the mainstream;
or they have challenged it, holding that innocence hostage until their demand for entry (or other
concessions) was met.
A bargainer says, I already believe you are innocent
(good, fair-minded) and have faith that you will prove it.
A challenger says, If you are innocent, then prove it.

Bargainers give in hope of receiving;
challengers withhold until they receive. Of course, there is risk in both approaches, but in each case the black is negotiating his own self-interest
against the presumed racial innocence of the larger society." - Shelby Steele

Posted March 20, 2008 03:28 PM

Charlene Smith

Woodstock,Ontario

Robt.of Toronto,

if I recall correctly he stated he knows the good and bad of having a foot in both the white and black worlds.

I am summing up what I read a while back ago.

I have family for instance in the Native and White communities and I can also agree with his observations.

It takes a bigger person to be able to acknowledge that there is both good and bad.

It also takes a bigger person to also say,while I recognize the problems of both, it will also take both to solve them.

That is the message he is speaking and people are responding to.

The world wants to change for the better but it is more so with the younger generations who are growing up and see what hate in the world can do.

Posted March 20, 2008 12:59 PM

V. Williamson

Surrey,B.C.

I cannot understand that anybody can excuse any person of normal intelligence who could sit in a church of God and listen to his minister condemn his country his fellow citizens, blame the white people for everything, teach his congregation to hate, what good is that doing for anybody? Any body can write a speech, I would like to hear and see this man Obama , actually answer a question without hedging,or stuttering., what proof does anybody have that he even wrote the speech.

Posted March 20, 2008 11:50 AM

Robt.

Toronto

I cannot belive the rhapsodizing about this guy. He is a hypocrite and a liar!

He was among the first to denounce Dom Imus and demand he be fired for Imus's "nappy-headed hos" lame attempt at humour about a black woman's basketball team.

Yet he refused to "fire" his racial hate spewing pastor for statements that were far more incendiary (whites invented AIDS to kill blacks etc).

That's a one example of his overwhelming hyprocisy.

He has lied about what he knew about what his pastor said. First he said he never heard the "controversial" statements then he said he did. An outright lie.

But did nothing to condemn them until, of course, the media brought this to the public's attention. More hypocricy.

Hitchens has called the public's reaction to Obama "a tsunami of drool".

Reading these posts he couldn't be more right.

Obama is like any other politician (although a more talented speaker). He will say and do anything it takes to get elected.

Wake up people.

Posted March 20, 2008 10:03 AM

eholl1

Toronto

Obama's discussion of the commonalities that Americans share is an important reminder of what makes America great. Most of the countries of the world are divided by race, religion, ethnicity, and language. We see that here in Canada to a great degree with the creation of Nunavut and the constant threats of secession from Quebec. We see that in Europe with the formation of nations largely based upon language and ethnic difference. We see that most recently in Kosovo with the indepence of a breakaway republic that was not safe as a part of a greater Serbia. While racial and ethnic differences still challenge American society, it is commendable that Americans struggle with these differences and resist the temptation to separate from one another only to put off the conflicts for another time in the future. For all the criticisms laid at the feet of Americans, I think that what many people around the world truly don't like about us is that the vast majority of Americans have the desire to struggle to improve themselves and see beyond race, religion, ethnicity, etc... Obama's speech reminded me of this strength. His ideas are reflected in the youngest Americans who see these divisions and wonder why are people killing on another over such things. The Presidency of George Bush was the temporary success of a hateful religious philosophy disguised as a "kinder, gentler" philosophy which Americans turned to in an uncertain world. I feel that Americans now have the opportunity to move forward and be an example to the rest of the world. I can only hope that they take the opportunity. Obama is the leader that can help Americans set the example. Imagine: a black President. As Obama stated, "Where else in the world could this happen?" I, for one, will be voting for him in November.

Posted March 20, 2008 07:51 AM

Kirk Wilson

I see Obama as a person with great courage. Most politicans would try to put distance between himself and the Pastor with a condemnation of the man. Instead, Obama tackles the issue straight on, and tries to explain why the Pastor has these beliefs. With this he accepts the political risk amongst white voters of appearing sympathetic to the pastor's point of view. He jeopardizes his political future for the greater good of uniting us all; black,white,christian or muslim. In my years I've never seen a politican give a straight anwser on anything. My only hope is Americans recognise this next November.

Posted March 20, 2008 07:36 AM

Kevin

Halifax

Imagine that. A politician that speaks the truth. Even with the warts. You can't have 400 years of racism and have a forgive and forget party in 40 years. And both sides are still going to harbour feelings of resentment and anger as the social conscience of a nation grows.
And in one small speech, he admits that he knows a person that is wrong about some things but still admires him. The reverend isn't wrong, he just distorted the facts.

Obama indirectly points out that racism is learned. He points out that the people who use racism and segregation are the same people that benefit the most from it.

He is a true leader. He doesn't have to completely understand economics or foreigh policy. That is why he pays experts.

At least with this guy you know what you are going to get. Writing down economic plans on a piece of paper isn't going to get America out of this economic and social mess. It is going to take consensus. It is going to take a person that is willing to not accept the status quo.

He won't make it. There is just too much ammunition to take this guy down.

Posted March 20, 2008 06:40 AM

John Findlay

Edmonton

It is clear that Obama will be and should be the next President. The only thing that makes me sad about that is that with George Bush gone it will bump Canada up as one of the worst run nations in the world. Canada is falling behind the rest of the world when it comes to embracing change. Where is our Obama. Most people can see that the Bush government was the worst government in the past 100 years and yet why do we in Canada support a political party that models itself after this old tired and politicaly rigid machine.

We need to join the fight for justice that is occuring around the world right now by demanding much more from our politicians at home.

Posted March 20, 2008 04:17 AM

Arnold Miyagawa

Barack Obama's speech on the US race issue was truly remarkable in many ways, and may become a very historic event, depending on how the Democratic nomination and national elections proceed. A foundation speech for America in the new millennium (and maybe for the world). Obama got to the crux of not only America's, but, indeed, that of modern man's dilemma: that we all are very dualistic in our thinking and need to find a way to integrate ourselves. We do not know how to unify the opposing sides of our thought and feeling, the mind and the body, good and evil, black and white, and whatever else is at war within us. We project what we dislike about ourselves on to the other, while protecting what we like. Again, what Obama discussed is the matter of individuals each doing right for themselves. Unfortunately, the way a great number of comments to his speech go, it seems what he said just went clear thru from one side of the commentors' split minds past the other, leaving previously placed cynical elements intact in between. That is more than sad. But still, for individuals who understand this most important conundrum, they may then eventually find a way to bridge that gap so they can proceed with unified action (at least within themselves) as they go about their lives. Being dualistic makes for indecision and fear, not to mention, often wrong choices. So, even if Obama does not reach the presidency, hopefully what he said has helped a lot people in their private selves.

Posted March 20, 2008 04:12 AM

B Yhap

Vancouver

I have not heard or listened to the speech, only read about it on CBC's web site. What struck me was Obama's breathtaking humanity. His courage to admit to the the divides that exist in families, never mind nations, to the coexistence of legacies of love and hate that live within him. As a Chinese West Indian who has lived in Canada since 1973, I am no stranger to racism within my own family. I am also a practising Catholic. Do I always agree with what I hear from family members or from the pulpit? Hell no. Have I ever thought of quitting same? Oh yeah ... Why I haven't gone into exile from either — enjoying the luxury of not being in any political spotlight — is because it would amount to disowning myself to some degree. This is what struck me in what I've read of Obama's speech and seen of the man so far: that he is unafraid to embrace fear and contradiction. Yes, he is a politician, and there will always be spin doctors and pundits who sample his texts and delivery for their own top forty hits. It would be easy to disassociate himself from the ugliness that is racism, to disown it with all the standard pious rhetoric. What is refreshing is Obama is trying to get Americans to actually own the racism and prejudice they have compartmentalized for decades. At a personal level, recognition is the first step toward dealing with anything. Can it be so different for groups, even nations?

Posted March 20, 2008 03:45 AM

Refreshed

I think it's refreshing to see a Politician who is willing to take a deep hard look in the face of his country in the mirror, rather than be focused on failing foreign policy! Obama is addressing the grassroots problems which affect America and is one politician who, finally and refreshingly so, is not willing to turn away from these problems to appease certain segments of society!

For the first time in many years, Obama is a politician who does not seem to be using nasty tactics to defeat his opponents and wins the Presidential chair, but one who actually takes a mature and honest view (one not bought by the pharmaceutical industry, etc.) at the issues affecting America, domestically.

Whether or not Wright is right or wrong, the point is, this current issue more clearly denotes the necessity for more open dialogue in the U.S, rather than brushing things under the carpet which Obama is willing elicit.

Posted March 20, 2008 03:27 AM

Tantoo Cardinal

I Love that Obama had that experience of Rev. (not so) Wright, and that he handled it the way he did. He learned about one side of the scale. If he would have walked out he would be just another irate and self-righteous man. He would have made a judgement instead of listening to realities of where some people are at. This is what a natural Leader does.
We, as people in the street, have to understand energies and forces., how people are feeling and moving. Leaders have to understand the force moving toward and within the people. I trust Obama to do that, and that the family who raised him, gave him freedom in compassion.

But, what a task he has accepted in this lifetime! And the moment. We need someone who has vision and enough humility to hear Creative Force, and I do believe Obama is the only one in the crowd of candidates who would understand what I'm saying.

Peace

Tantoo

Posted March 20, 2008 02:41 AM

simpleman

Forget all the poly-sci, trying to one up the previous post, rhetoric and open your eyes and hearts. There is a great humanitarian in our midst and that should speak the loudest. White, black, female, male, pink, upside down; why do we continue to trample over the best opportunities? Is it because we won't have anything to grovel over at the water cooler or issues to curse on the morning radio.

We all know someone who's character will never grow or develop because they are too concerned of their monetary status or how they are percieved by others. In fact they usually end up an embarrassment. Wake-up America - everyone is talking behind your back.

Obama is your best hope.

Posted March 20, 2008 01:32 AM

Ranjith Kulatilake

Very powerful words, however, Obama forgets one thing: the evils of capitalism that made this 'Champion Democracy’ so divisive, polarised, inequality made systemic. Can he achieve the ‘change’ he professes so passionately, without addressing the root of all evil: capitalism and its neoliberal phase that sucks all facets of life into the all powerful profit maximising mechanism and reproduces anger, hatred, greed, poverty and what not?!

Posted March 20, 2008 01:24 AM

sunny

bc

How is that saying a truth is a lie. America is racist, that is why so many blacks are in jail. It have always been a land of opportunity but whites are treated better. For those who questions the pastor's sermons. He would say them if there was no truth to them. Their foreign policy is not based on human rights but economic gain. Blacks have come along way but in a way they are still slaves. I guess you have to be coloured to see that.

Posted March 20, 2008 01:12 AM

Alex

Montreal

Too all those that say Obama is not fit for the presidency because of what his preacher said I ask than who is? John McCain recently celibrated the endorsements of Rod Parsley and John Hagee. Parsley urges a war against all of Islam, due to it being a "false religion" as well as the usual scapgoats of the right (i.e. homosexuals,the entertainment industry, abortion providers). Hagee has attacked Catholics as the great whore and apostates. Now McCain has rejected Hagee's anti -catholic rants (and I have no doubt he is sincere is his rejection) but if he welcomes their support does that mean he is not fit for the presidency either? The Clinton's have a long history with Jesse Jackson, a great man in my personal opinon, but who has said anti-semetic remarks in the past. So if we exclude any candidate who has associated with a clergy memeber who has slandered another minority group (even if we ignore the fact that many preachers targert gays for persecution with seeming impunity) then the list of candidates is down to 0.

I beleve Obama handled this incident well, in a mature fashion. I congradulate Hillary for not exploiting this issue and showing why she is also a great candidate. I can only hope our neighbours can realize that either of these two is a better choice than McCain before it is too late.

Posted March 20, 2008 01:07 AM

Jessica

Burnaby

Senator Obama may lose votes for not 'disowning' his minister, but he has earned the respect of many people in the international community who have been waiting for the US to mature beyond George W. Bush's mentality of 'you are either with us or against us'.

Also, for the record, while the sound bite suggests the Minister said 'God damn America', he actually said 'God damn America for killing innocent people'. It was a reference to Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Context is everything.

I pray that Americans have the good sense to vote for this man. Given some of the attacks he has faced recently, I don't think they deserve his candidacy.

Posted March 20, 2008 12:52 AM

Eduardo Pabustan

Calgary

I read this remarkable speech. I found it moving, eloquent and inspiring.

It's no wonder he has inspired a young generation of Americans to be more informed and involved in politics again.

His concluding story about Ashley and the old black man working on his campaign in South Carolina was the perfect imagery of the unity he talked about. Brilliant.

Posted March 20, 2008 12:32 AM

Mr Right

Alberta

Am I the only one who noticed how the media is so sympathetic to Obama on this?

How many Conservatives are run out of town for their associations?

The media would be quick to attack a Republican if he happened to show up at the same event as a known racist.

Obama and his relationship with this Pastor just goes to prove that the Democrat party is still rooted in bigotry and hatred just like it always has.

Hope he wins the nomination, keep the White House in Republicans hands.

Posted March 19, 2008 11:47 PM

Adel

Ottawa

The most powerful political speech I've heard, ever! It is reminiscent of Cicero's and Churchill's; but is America, in 2008, populated by citizens ready to be transcended or by blind hordes accepting to vote yet again for the Bush's (and Mc Cain’s) of this world through clever Karl Rove type manipulation? Already all the born-again members are scratching their unforgiving heads wondering which parts of Obama's speech to take out of context to produce the brand of hateful and scornful TV adds they are used to airing and are convinced will score points with the non-committed blue collar workers! I can hear it next September: Obama loves racist pastor! Obama repudiates white grand mother for refusing to stroll alone in Harlem etc....Pity! For once America has a great man running!

Posted March 19, 2008 09:33 PM

George Hess

Can the US afford to ignore someone of such good sense?

Posted March 19, 2008 09:06 PM

Nathan Pardi

Detroit

How does being affiliated to a racist church and it's pastor make one a better canidate for the presidency or for that matter, a better human being? I must be missing something here. Obama either was too timid to confront his pastor or he agrees with Rev. Wright's basic tenets. Neither scenario makes him a better person no matter how glib and articulate his belated rationalizations may be. He may seem sincere, but actions speak louder than words.

Posted March 19, 2008 08:44 PM

Zsolt

As far as I can tell, the anti-semitic statement of Rev. Jeremiah Wright that people talk about consisted of:'...we have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians...".

To me, the refusal to recognize that such a statements has in fact a basis of truth is tinged with a large dose of racism itself. It fails to recognize that a group of people, based on their religion and ethnicity, are collectively punished on a daily basis by the US supplied Israeli army - they are starved, humiliated, and imprisoned, and are apparently not worthy of basic human rights.

Many people in Israel recognize this as an injustice and a root cause of Middle East conflicts. Apparently many people in the US do not.

Posted March 19, 2008 06:41 PM

alan

Obama used the words "race" or "races" 11 times, "racial" or "racially" 15 times, and "racism" or "racist" six times in this address.

The supposed divide between black and white is not the issue here; Obama's longtime association with Jeremiah Wright is. The problem, according to Obama, is not that Wright is wrong about America being a racist society, but that he "sees white racism as endemic." The problem is not that Wright has made statements that clearly seem anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli, but that he, as Obama puts it, "sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam." Obama's pastor of 20 years is nothing more than "imperfect," as Obama sees it. And so, "I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community." He won't quit this church where hate is spewed, and he doesn't explain why over all the years he has never tried to straighten Wright out. Obama’s own children sit in those pews, as well as a large number of children from other families. Did Obama ever speak out even once to challenge Wright’s views? If Obama can’t bring change he says is necessary to his own church, why should anyone trust him to bring change to the nation?

Posted March 19, 2008 05:09 PM

Jeremy Wood

Victoria

Obama showed honesty, character and, most of all, guts, by giving that speech yesterday. It's been a long time since I've felt that about a politician.

He could have told the American public that he would never associate with Reverend Wright again, but he didn't.

Instead, he challenged Americans - in mature, thoughtful language - to seek out that part of their identity that rejects the fear of others and contributes to a selfish existence revolving around that old, but stubborn ideology: what is good for one group must be bad for another.

Martin Luther King said the moral arch of the universe is long but it bends towards justice. Listening to Obama yesterday I felt that bend like never before.

If Americans elect this guy president our world will take a step towards a brighter future for all. I feel it in my bones. I hear it in his words. And I see it in the eyes of others.

Posted March 19, 2008 04:37 PM

Therese

As a Canadian living in the US, I am frequently saddened at the comments some people make that reveal an almost casual, bigoted attitude towards Blacks, Hispanics and Jews. At a dinner Tuesday night in "liberal" Seattle, fellow guests almost universally condemned Pastor Wright, unable or unwilling to accept that while some of what he said was not true, some of his words had a basis in fact, as they were reminded by my husband.

People did not want to hear that historically, black pastors were the only educated people in most black communities, the "go to" guys when people needed comfort and advice. As such, they absorbed as their own, the pain and suffering of their parishioners. It is not uncoincidental that it was religious leaders such as the Rev. Martin Luther King, the Rev. Ralph Abernathy and others who banded together to try to bridge the chasm between white and black America.

Today, Senator Barack Obama wants to appeal to the better angels of our nature. This means speaking truth to power, both temporal and religious, just as it means speaking to all of us to move beyond the stereotypes, to think for ourselves, to refuse to be manipulated by the media, by politicians, by our our families and peer groups, to take responsibility for our own lives.

Senator Obama has clearly touched a chord deep in the American soul that yearns for a politician who will treat voters as adults. Conditions in the country are so dire right now that the voters will follow a candidate like Obama whom they consider to be an honest man. He is trying to transcend race. Other campaigns, Clinton's, McCain's or both want to keep the emphasis on Obama's "blackness," keeping the racist pot boiling, appealing to people's basest instincts, and the worst aspects of America's past, and sadly, still, to some, its present.

Posted March 19, 2008 04:27 PM

Rick Jemmett

edmonton

Obama’s book Audacity of Hope revolves about a theme of common ground and shared objectives, rather than emphasizing divisions. His speech was consistent with his overarching philosophy of bridging gaps through commonality. He could have, at any point in the past 20 years, left Wright’s church, but this would not have been consistent with his worldview. I believe if Obama sees sufficient good in something - the country he lives in, or a man like Pastor Wright – his inclination is to seek areas where consensus can be found, using them as a foundation upon which to build a better reality. He understands that retreating to entrenched positions solves nothing, deepens polarization, and makes solutions more unlikely. He knows what all great leaders have known, that in order to solve complex social problems we reach out, we compromise, we demonstrate empathy for the other view.

Obama demonstrates a clear awareness of the complexities and frailties of human beings and thus of the nature of the problems which plague us. Often it is too easy, and too simplistic, to claim, based on a 90 second video, that someone is inherently evil. Who’s integrity could survive such a test, if somehow only the least impressive moments of our own lives were compiled and broadcast for all the world to pass judgment? It certainly makes for dramatic TV, and satisfies the attention-getting-at-any-cost cravings of Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter. However, such simplistic judgments solve nothing. Human beings and the problems we create for ourselves are complex and multi-layered.

Obama provided a clear and brilliant description of an alternative path, not just for America, but for all the world. It is a path grounded in tolerance, respect, empathy and love. There will be some who remain unprepared to join him on this path. For many others, his message rings with a truth and depth unheard of in contemporary politics.

Posted March 19, 2008 04:12 PM

A. C.

Edmonton

Thank you, Obama, for addressing this issue with such forceful and moving honesty!

There are so many African Americans alive today for whom racism is not just an issue of the past. They remember the name-calling, the physical violence, the discrimination, and there are some who still remember not being able to drink from the same water fountain as white citizens. Despite granting them legal equality, the damage done to individuals, families, communities, and subsequent generations has never been adequately addressed. Once the law recognized black Americans as being equal, the rest of the country tried to move on and forget that dark cloud in history, with some generations feeling they had done all that was necessary to rectify the problem, and younger generations feeling as if they shouldn't have to bear any responsibility because it wasn't they themselves who fostered such an oppressive environment.

Although we've made progress, racism is still alive, and we need to confront it head on. Only when younger generations are forced to address the issues left behind by their predecessors will they stop to consider how their own actions today will impact their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren. It is time to stop fearing the subject of racism so that we can all work together openly to find a proper solution. Obama has opened the gates of discussion, and even though I'm a Canadian watching this all from a distance, I hope to God he wins the presidency because I truly believe that he has the ability to change this world for the better.

Posted March 19, 2008 03:32 PM

doug gandar

calgary

I was transfixed by this speech as I listened via You Tube. Having read the comments below I feel truly sorry for those who cannot appreciate the depth and strength of this man's thinking, his ability to take on a very sensitive subject in a most profound way. His acceptance of his pastor despite this mans drawbacks speaks to Obama's breadth as a man - truly a statesman of great proportions.

Posted March 19, 2008 03:16 PM

Mark Chambers

Ottawa

Robt:

I am merely suggesting that if the American media wanted to find derogatory comments uttered by pastors of other, perhaps whiter, political leaders, I don't think it would be that difficult.

I couldn't agree more with you. I don't think Senator Obama is some transcendent figure who is going to somehow end racism, change US domestic or foreign policy or even end the war in Iraq for that matter. It's fairly clear he is not going to abrogate NAFTA, despite what he said to voters in Ohio. But to suggest he believes AIDS was invented to kill blacks, and that he thinks that the US is evil. That's a little much, no? I hope you don't actually believe that.
Though I suppose I should apologize, I didn't realize you had to believe everything your pastor tells you.

Posted March 19, 2008 02:33 PM

tattwa

Canada

Problem is...the elite 5% that DO own and control the U.S. really ARE "White"...whether we 'like' it or not.They maintained the close alliance with apartheid-era South Africa (it's own laws the mirror of (US segregation)propped-up countless extreme right-wing dictatorships since the fall of the Nazis(from the Philippines to El Salvador, Iraq to Franco's Spain) all ostensibly to "fight communism" at all cost, but more realistically; to eliminate ANY challenge to the Plutocracy-anywhere.An elite that was so luxuriously built up by 400 years of slavery.

Posted March 19, 2008 02:31 PM

Sandra D

vancouver

If Obama learned the patience, generosity, tolerance and passionate honesty he shows in this speech, from Reverend Wright, the reverend can't be all bad. And even if Obama didn't learn it there, he obviously learned it somewhere. Americans would be fortunate to have him as their president. If I could vote in this election, I would vote for him without hesitation. He is a man you can trust.

Posted March 19, 2008 02:29 PM

cr

toronto

This speach that Obama is getting all the credit for....are we supposed to think that he was the one that sat down and wrote it himself. Don't all these candidates have hired writers? All he gets credit for is the ability to read the words.

Posted March 19, 2008 02:26 PM

who's on first?

Barack Obama's speech yesterday was delivered up and executed like a grand slam home run.This speech could not have come at a better time or have been more elequently spoken.Just when the Clinton attack dogs are trying to bloody up and bring Obama down to give Hillary a chance to comeback and win the Democratic party's nomination Barack fights back with a zinger of a speech.Timing is everything isn't it? Barack is more than capable and able to rise up and take the fight to the dogs. Go Barack go !!

Posted March 19, 2008 02:10 PM

Jay

BC

Finally someone I can vote for.

Obama's Pastor '08

Posted March 19, 2008 02:08 PM

Zsolt

"Senator John McCain hailed as a spiritual adviser an Ohio megachurch pastor who has called upon Christians to wage a "war" against the "false religion" of Islam with the aim of destroying it." Mother Jones, March 2008

McCain's spiritual advisor has called for an global religious war that would pit billions against billions, and potentially set the world on fire. McCain went to his church and sought his endorsement.

Obama's pastor criticized the US for its militarism and racism. Obama in a major speech has renounced these comments as divisive.

The white guy is clearly better suited to win the US presidency.


Posted March 19, 2008 02:05 PM

ken

Woodbridge

If Obama doesn't get elected maybe he can become a Canadian and run for Prime Minister!!!

Posted March 19, 2008 01:26 PM

Paul

The part I laughed most about was when I watched David Letterman and they counted how many times he said "Uh".

Don't get me wrong: I don't think his speech was bad. If anything, it will probably strengthen him.

But I cannot forget that part. It was hilarious (oops... bit of a pun there).

lolololol

Posted March 19, 2008 01:04 PM

Thomas

If John McCain's preacher was caught saying similar (David Duke-like)things it would be all over for him. Obama should not get a free pass. 20 years of listening to this stuff makes him a believer in Wright's black liberation theology. Fine. However, it goes against everything he's been trying to pass himself off as, in this race that's supposed to be above race. Above race? Strangely enough, it seems the voters of America have actually reached that plateau well before this candidate.

Posted March 19, 2008 12:47 PM

I-Prinze

Toronto

What Obama states is exactly the truth. In order for American society to step out of its racial tensions, equality must be for all. Edcuation and healthcare are the most fundamental aspects of any society. When you have certain pockets within society that are disenfranchised not due to the people of the country, white or black, but because of mismanagement by the government, and greedy corporate agendas, then you will constantly have problems. As the realtiy remains those pockets tend to be filled with a majority of one or two minority races. Blacks and Hispanics. And since there has been very little to address that, resentment on the side of the Blacks remains as they see those in charge whom have the power are all of a different color. So ignorantly and based on memories from the past, they target their anger to that one group. And its the very same reason why Hispanics and Blacks have such a heavy beef in the US today is becuase trapped in that neglected society the two disenfranchised groups fight eachother for a limited amount of positions and jobs. And those whites whom never held a racist sentiment in their entire lives, end up getting upset because of lowsy attempts by the government to address the issue of equality, gives preferential treatment to those groups (blacks and hispanics) in order to place a bandaid on the societal neglect. Which does not work. And thus the whites slave owner or not, KKK or Human lover, end up having resentment towards the favored group for the special treatment. Thus just the corrupt government maintains the divide to which they can control and polarize a nation. Making each side think the problem is the ignorance and crying of the other side and anger is built up. All this blinding them from the real culprit the real enemy, the real person(s) to blame.... Our Elected Government Officials and policy makers.

Posted March 19, 2008 12:32 PM

Overseas Canadian

Geneva

So this leads to an interesting opportunity for the Democrats, namely to go back through McCain's pastor's sermons for the past 10 years. Will they do it? Probably not. Should they do it? Definitely not. It sure would be interesting though...

Posted March 19, 2008 12:09 PM

I-Prinze

Toronto

I will commend Mr Obama on what will be remembered as perhaps one of the most inspiring speeches on american society and its racial divide and woes, ever since perhaps Lincoln himself. He spoke to the american people like adults. Like humans with the power to control their own destiny. To some of us, we may question Obama and ask how dare he do so, as many of us here in Canada view the American public as weak minded and easily swayed by the manipulation tactics of its governmental powers. And as such, we find out just how rational and i guess enlightened americans really are. And that is the risk Barack took with his speech last night. If the fear tactics of the right end up swaying the conscious of the american people, by spinning and twisting an honest mans truth confession and observation of the country he lives in, then we may see McCain as president. Now the Democratic party itself will have to come to the very same decision if they hope to regain control of the white house. As it seems Superdelegates will determine the nominee, the leaders must choose whether they trust the American people to see through all the political manipulation on the right, or will they succumb to the same manipulative tactics used to blind them from the truth, as it has in yester-years.

Our Kingdom Our Empire, Our choice.

Posted March 19, 2008 12:06 PM

Keith Mitchell

All I have to say is; President Barack Obama!

I was literally in tears when I watched the speech, now being dubbed, "A More Perfect Union" Address. When is the last time a politician spoke so forthright? I think Obama brings so much of what America needs at this time in her history. A vision and hope for a better future. A future built by, and for, every citizen.

I think the un-necessary jabs against him not having the experience to be President are unjust and completely frivolous. The very fact he chose to deal with a subject matter so out of bounds in the public discourse of America - I believe - shows he can, and will, take on the difficult situations America finds itself in. And, more than likely, succeed in doing so.

I believe this Address will have many reverberations for quite some time to come.

Posted March 19, 2008 11:54 AM

Robt.

Toronto

To Mark Chambers:

I think you have missed the point.

The other ministers you have referred to (Falwell, Robertson, etc) were never the pastors of the presidents or indeed the presidential candidates at the time.

What makes Obama different is that Rev Wright was Obama's pastor, mentor, advisor etc for 20 years. He married Obama and baptized his children. Obama heard this man speak privately and publicly innumerable times for that period and never once (until it became politically damaging for him) did Obama object to or reject those comments or resign from Rev Wright's church. Why? Because Obama believes Wright's message as does Obama's wife.

The comparison in Obama's speech between his grandmother and Wright is an outrageous one.
You can't fire your grandmother but you can fire your pastor (especially once you are an adult and not a child) and you repeatedly hear hate speech. An elderly grandmother's racial stereotypes cannot compare to the racial hate in Rev Wright' sermons.

Obama is not the transcendant political figure he claims to be. He is a member of a group which believes blacks are justified in thinking the US is evil (i.e. invented AIDS to kill blacks).

I doubt that Americans want to have someone like that as their president.

Posted March 19, 2008 11:31 AM

Mollie

ottawa

I think Henry Champ's article on Obama's speech is over the top in one respect - the comparison with Bernadette Devlin. I realize that people disagree on her. There is a comparison in that both she and Obama are brilliant orators (although Obama far more so, I think). And Champ is probably right in the fact that those parts of Obama's speech that suggest that underprivileged blacks and whites are both victims, and have that in common, echo some of Devlin's comments. That said, comparing an American Presidential candidate to a person who served 6 months for incitement to riot (I'm going on memory here), and was refused admission to the United States in 2003 as a security risk is not exactly balanced.

Posted March 19, 2008 11:12 AM

Treena Hein

His speech was astounding.

That in itself is a sad fact, however, in that being honest, providing insightful analysis of root cause, displaying a masterful mix of candor and oratory - these things should be standard among our political leaders. Said another way, that this speech stands out ..is a tragedy.

Having said that, for all Obama's amazing qualities and that amazing speech, I must ask along with others:
Where are your ideas for moving forward? What path will you take? What must be done first, then second, then third, and how?
I implore Obama to give us another speech, and soon.

Posted March 19, 2008 11:02 AM

Don Shebib

I an not eloquent enough to fully articulate the admiration and esteem I have for this fine man. I only hope that he can continue to beat back the small minded and emerge as the leader of the US and in some degree all of us.

Posted March 19, 2008 11:00 AM

David Silver

That was history. The whole speech can be seen on Obama's website. It was a risk to assume that the american public can have an intellegent debate, and as long as thier media lets them, they finally will. He did not pander to any side, and expressed that we are ALL bigots, with demons to confornt and hard realities to face. Own up to it, and get started on the job of making things better,

Posted March 19, 2008 10:31 AM

Ganesh

Toronto

Excellent speech. Will make a great President's (Clinton's) speech writer.

Posted March 19, 2008 10:10 AM

rachel

uk

It is sad and shocking to hear discussion about race in a country that claims democracy and that claims spreading democracy to other countries. If such things happens in America, who knows what Americans are doing against other races in Iraq, Afghanistan and too many other countries????

Posted March 19, 2008 09:32 AM

ERW

Houston

A lot of the comments, I have read so far, are negative about this speech. It's understandable. Most begin with a variation of "don't blame me for this". And a condemnation of not only Pastor Wright, but of Barack Obama, because he remained in the church.

To understand the mindset, you should know the following:

Black History is taught in American schools, if at all, - one month of the year. February is Black History month. So, while not wanting to admit that we are a "segregated society," we have, for years, segregated history. Between Black and White.

It should also be mentioned that -- additionally we have Hispanic Heritage Month in America.

This is where the mindset in America, about race, is formed. From pre-K on.

Maybe when we actually begin a serious dialogue about such things, we can actually begin to change them.

That's why I am still choosing "Hope" over "Fear."

Posted March 19, 2008 09:30 AM

Dave

ON

Kudos to Obama for facing this head on. This shows REAL leadership and integrity!. Very refreshing after years what I have observed as partisan and opportunistic politics in the States. I hope Mr. Obama can steer this sentiment to overcome the tactics that will surely come from the Republican Camp; the attempts to undermine him personally while ignoring the principles he stands for.
This political test for the Illinois Senator is also a test for Americans to GROW UP! and overcome their differences.

Posted March 19, 2008 09:22 AM

mel

montreal

Great speech by Obama! He fills me with hope for the future of our world. An inspiration for our time!

To Jeff... if you want to go know about how Obama intends to do what he says needs to be done, go to his website... (www.barackobama.com). It is very clearly outlined, intuitive and brilliant. He definately does have a plan, however, if we expect the media to serve it up to us in sound bites we will not hear it. A small amount of research can go a long way!

Posted March 19, 2008 08:50 AM

Brian Borley

Barack Obama, in his account of his mother's fear of black men, reveals a good deal about how racial prejudice is learned as it surely is.

A mother, let's say she is Caucasian walking with a very small child encounters perhaps a Chinese of whom she has a mortal fear. She may have learned it from her mother. Instinctively, the mother will assume a defensive role, subtle though it may be. All the child learns is to fear, in this case, Chinese. If the child lives in a community where there is a general fear of Chinese, as he grows he will deal with his distress by adopting the rationalisation of the dominant community group.
This is how racial prejudice perpetuates itself. The child has no defense against this subtle unconscious teaching since prior to the development we often call the terrible twos, learning is an unconscious process.

But racial prejudice cannot be considered a moral issue to the degree that the behaviour is rooted in an unconscious condition. When we learn to teach better we may have better success in dealing with this social deficit when we deal with the issue as a learning problem rather than anything so esoteric as a moral problem, we will fare better.

Posted March 19, 2008 07:50 AM

k.s.

It is his mindful, patient thought and palpable emotion which has attracted so many.

He has displayed further traits with this treatise: bravery, loyalty and forbearance.

There are many who will still not vote for him...but it is understandable. It is now very likely that Obama will endure any further hardships, rise even higher and become the President of the United States; at which time, he will have to prove to his supporters and opponents of what he has promised.

His overriding message has been of hope, but it is steeped in his honest and empathic spirit.

I have never spoken of a politician in these terms, and the vote I cast for Obama has been the most important in my life. Barack truly is the real deal...

Any election is a roll of the dice, and I hope we give him the chance to fulfill his promises.


Posted March 19, 2008 07:47 AM

Mark Chambers

Ottawa

There is little doubt that the speech delivered today by Barak Obama was one that will not soon be forgotten. Rarely do politicians, let alone those seeking a presidential nomination, speak so eloquently and powerfully on the reality of racism in America, and for that he must be commended.

However, I cannot help but be saddened by the fact that Senator Obama felt he had to address and condemn Reverend Wright's comments due to media pressure. I have never seen similar pressure exerted on Anglo-American politicians when equally racist remarks have been made in the past by the likes of the Rev. Jerry Fallwell or members of the Christian Coalition. While the American media criticizes Senator Obama for not disassociating himself from his pastor, they have seldom, if ever, asked the same of any other politicians.

Is it now alright to punish the parishioner for the sins of the priest? I guess so, if he's an African-American trying to become the president.

Posted March 19, 2008 01:36 AM

Daniel De Groot

Toronto

I think those that remain sceptical of Obama's attempt to address the Wright matter are those that were already deeply unlikely to support him or any Democrat.

He elevated the discourse and treated people like adults, without pandering or focus tested phrasing. He apparently wrote that speech himself.

He is the real deal. I wasn't all that sure before but I am beginning to believe his rhetoric is not just an act.

He took an enormous risk here and it might not work, but damn am I proud to see someone make the effort. This kind of sincerity hasn't been done since maybe Adlai Stevenson and it didn't work so well in 1956. Maybe this is another moment where it can work.

Posted March 19, 2008 12:17 AM

Dee Kappos

Toronto

I was extremely impressed with his eloquence and the courage he had to make that speech. RFK would have been proud!

That said, my small window on the American media suggests to me continued unreasonble criticism of Obama over the former pastor's words. Interestingly, there was an actual clergyman running for president as a major candidate amongst the Republicans, and he got a free pass as to his words from the pulpit -- and those were his OWN WORDS!!!

Meanwhile, the Republican's standard bearer, Mr. McCain, seeks out and stands beside endorsements from some of the most repugnant right-wing "Christian" evangelical leaders, again with not so much as the semblance of critical questioning by the media.

Yes, the so-called "liberal" media in America!

Posted March 18, 2008 11:49 PM

Nick Van der Graaf

Toronto

A truly extraordinary speech. When was the last time any of us heard a public figure speak so intelligently and truthfully? He offered no easy answers, and made no excuses. Yet he still managed to take this prickly, intractable issue of race in America and discuss it in a way that led away from despair and towards hope.
He is doing something few other leaders have ever done; whatever the issue, he relates it to everyone's common experiences, and he says 'Don't believe in me - believe in yourself.'
That is the essence of democracy. I wish him and his countrymen the best of luck.

Posted March 18, 2008 10:34 PM

Chris

Sometimes, the privilege of speaking the truth in a free country is better than winning an election. Those that speak from their own hearts are better men and women than those who read the polls, and then pander to the average rather than remake our image of our average world. If they don't win, at least they sowed the good seed in the hearts of their countrymen. It is popular to boast of assured success in election as Gore did in Florida, but it seems a more sure predictor of defeat. That kind of boasting only makes the public groan. The level of discourse in public debate, our relatives and pastors aside, should inspire us, and thus make a better country. Thats what makes American Politics interesting to Canadians, but American Media seems more like a head bashing contest. Polarization is ugly, unreasonable and ignorant and remakes itself in its own image where who wins is everything. Those that support polarization through diatribe and invective are seriously angry at their own country for what will finally be taken from them, Peace.

Posted March 18, 2008 09:29 PM

GERRY BAYER

This man is a breath of fresh air. He deserves a chance to make his country more understanding and more understood by the world.

Posted March 18, 2008 08:59 PM

Alice in Coldstream

BC

Obama just raised the bar...he has taken a wild risk--and a brave one--to trust the intelligence of the American people. Politicians don't do that. His personal honesty about his family, his forthright confrontation of the demons of racism, his grasp of the historical background to our "wrongheaded thinking" demands our respect and awe. His personally crafted speech was a powerful lesson in leadership...what it could be like to have an honest President who would actually level with us. It's irresistible... particularly when you consider the alternatives. I think his speech was the pivotal part of the '08 campaign, more revealing than any of the debates, and it should pivot him right into the Presidency where he belongs.

Posted March 18, 2008 08:44 PM

Jeff Wilson

Winnipeg

Great speach Obama!

Great sentiments!

You are sooooo right: (If I may paraphrase) We are all (including Mother Nature) getting screwed - except for a very select few on top who are taking advantage of us - and so we are all in this together!

And so we must all work together, right?

OK! But how, man? HOW!?

Let's get practical, now!

Just exactly what do you want Americans to do?

And, just exactly what are you going to do for America?

How are you going to make all these wonderful and important changes?

How are you going to improve education, health care, innercities, and infrastructure?

How are you going to create and protect American jobs? How will you protect the savings and the pensions of American workers?

How will you protect the environment?

So far, the only concrete thing I've heard from you is that you will renegotiate NAFTA.

Is that it!?

Posted March 18, 2008 08:35 PM

Soulman

I am glad Obama said it in a way I can understand even though I am not an American,
I am sure Americans has a chance to undo all
the mistakes of their leaders If not all.
I like Mrs Clinton but she has been there
and supported the Wars that destroyed not only other people's lives but damaged most
of the American pride and leadership in the
21st century.
They can elect Obama and maybe.. He can undo..

Best luck to the American people for their
hard thinking of who will be the best to lead
them in peace.

Soulman

Posted March 18, 2008 08:09 PM

Terry

Barrie

I'm glad that Obama has finaly said something about the racial factor because honestly it is something that a lot of people are dwelling on. Now while I don't think that your ethnic background has anything do to with being able to run a country properly and to do the right thing I definitely think that Mr. Obama is the best choice not only for political change but social, environmental, economic and not to mention historical change. Hopefully the race between Obama and Clinton doesn't come down to black and white choices but right and wrong ones.

Posted March 18, 2008 07:17 PM

Robt.

Toronto

Based on what I have read about the speech I don't think he has dodged the bullet.

The Democrats want and need this issue to go away. They will happily exclaim that Obama's speech finally clears the air. It doesn't.

Obama has said at various times that:
a) he wasn't present when Rev Wright made his racist and anti-American diatribes (it is very hard to believe he was unaware of Wright's views over their twenty year close relationship);
b) before Wright's sermons were broadcast Obama found some of Wright's comments were "controversial".

OK. Which is it? You never heard these comments before or you heard them before and thought they were controversial? And what was controversial? Hate filled comments about whites and the US? What did he do about it? Resign from Rev Wright's church? Object publicly to these beliefs? Of course, none of the above.

Obama's wife has said that America was "mean" and that this was the "first time" she was really proud to be an American. As outrageous as these statements are they are consistent with the sermons of Rev. Wright blaming whites for all the ills of black America.

Obama wants to have it both ways. He claims to be above racial politics and then claims Rev Wright and other black Americans are entitled to feel the way they do.

I believe that Americans (except those who agree with Obama et ux. and Rev Wright) will reject the blatant inconsistency in these positions come election time.


Posted March 18, 2008 06:59 PM

Paul

Winnipeg

I suspect that the Republicans finally found the "Swift Boat" for this election. (Remember the "Swift Boat" incident in the 2004 election from which Kerry was never able to recover from and it cost him the election.)

This time the Republicans will capitalize on Obamam and Black racism. They will use the issue of black racism directed against whites to attack Obama. It doesn't matter if the attacks by the republicans are justified or not, the attacks will do the job, and will prevent Obama from being elected President. Just as the Republicans used the Swift Boat attacks to keep Kerry from the presidency, so they will use the issue of black racism directed at whites to keep Obama from the presidency.

Today marks the date Obama lost his bid for the presidency and the day the Democrats lost to the Republicans if they select Obama as their presidental candidate.

Posted March 18, 2008 06:56 PM

Doug Sherr

I am hoping that Obama wins the Dem nomination and then the presidency because it will show us that we are finally growing up. The strength of our system is that it was designed to survive fools and blackguards. We can and will improve ourselves and our situation and we will include everyone. If there was no hope for a future better than the present, there would be no America. The vote still rules the land, except in Florida, and money doesn't buy everything. We are a nation founded on simple and enduring ideas. Great ideas are hard to kill.

Posted March 18, 2008 06:55 PM

Al Maki

Burnaby

I read the speech and found it very powerful. I recommend it to anybody who doesn't understand the man's popularity. I think the enthusiasm he's aroused in the U.S. is evidence that he already has a substantial audience.
Not to slight Ms Devlin, for whom I have great respect, but Barack Obama has considerably more ability and experience and resources than she had. I don't think his fate, whatever it is, will look anything like hers.

Posted March 18, 2008 06:51 PM

keith

bc

yes, this one will go down in the history books as one of the better moments in America. However, if you'd like to see how American's view this speach I'd like to recommend this link and its blog:

Will Obama's Speech Work? at The Wall Street Journal, Mar 18

There is something very deeply wrong with that country and many of its people.

Posted March 18, 2008 06:11 PM

Julie I. Southerst

I feel very fortunate to have tuned in to CBC Newsworld this morning and to have heard the greatest part of Barack Obama's speech. His words were a masterpiece of oratory, and I think that those words or at least some segments of that speech could ultimately rank with other famous 'bits', such as "Friends, Romans,Countrymen"...."Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death".....or words uttered by a previous Democrat president..."Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country!" Those were words to remember, and words to live by. And they should be heeded not just by the people of the United States, but by people everywhere. I am truly sorry that I wasn't able to tape the broadcast of the speech...Mr. Obama's words were worth keeping! They were most inspirational, and as someone who is old enough to be his granny, I sincerely hope that for the sake of not only the United States of America, but for everyone else in this world, for every citizen on this planet, that he will be the next president of the United States. Mr. Obama clearly has a vision; he is not in this contest to see what he can get out of it, but for what he, with the help of his fellow citizens, can do to make things better, not just for a "chosen few" but for every citizen of his country. And by bettering the situation of his fellow countrymen,he will concurrently be making things better for everyone....everywhere.

Posted March 18, 2008 05:54 PM

« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »

Post a Comment

Disclaimer:

Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published, and those that are published will not be edited. But all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Privacy Policy | Submissions Policy

Washington File »

About the Author

Henry ChampHenry Champ is CBC Newsworld's correspondent in Washington, D.C., delivering Canadian viewers the latest developments in the U.S. political arena. Recently, he has been a leading Canadian voice on coverage of the war on terrorism, the war in Iraq and the growing concerns over the Canada-U.S. relationship.

Previous Columns

Recent Posts

If Obama wins, thank Howard Dean
Henry Champ
Monday, November 3, 2008
Majority government, U.S. style
Henry Champ
Monday, October 27, 2008
Oh no, not more chads!
Henry Champ
Friday, October 24, 2008
The numbers just don't add up for McCain
Henry Champ
Monday, October 20, 2008
Informative exchanges? That's debatable
Henry Champ
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
Subscribe to this blog

Recent Comments

I think many people are missing the point. By electing Ba...
Race in America: Obama's state of the union
America is a continent. The country is called the...
Race in America: Obama's state of the union
thankyou for reporting with intelligence and compassion. ...
Race in America: Obama's state of the union
So far, the most prominent references to race in the prim...
Race in America: Obama's state of the union
Obama-Sebelius... The November Ticket. Kathleen S...
Race in America: Obama's state of the union

Archives

November 2008
(1 postings)
October 2008
(6 postings)
September 2008
(10 postings)
August 2008
(6 postings)
June 2008
(3 postings)
May 2008
(6 postings)
April 2008
(3 postings)
March 2008
(4 postings)
February 2008
(5 postings)
January 2008
(7 postings)
November 2007
(2 postings)
October 2007
(7 postings)
September 2007
(1 postings)
July 2007
(6 postings)
June 2007
(5 postings)
May 2007
(6 postings)
April 2007
(6 postings)
March 2007
(5 postings)
February 2007
(7 postings)
January 2007
(8 postings)
December 2006
(7 postings)
November 2006
(8 postings)
October 2006
(10 postings)
September 2006
(9 postings)
August 2006
(9 postings)
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

World »

new Syrian killings continue as Annan flies to Damascus video
International outrage against Syria intensified Monday, with China and Russia speaking out against the massacre of 108 people, including 49 children, in the town of Houla.
updated Vatican corruption scandal widens
One of the Vatican's biggest scandals in decades appears to be widening with reports that an Italian cardinal may be part of a power struggle involving leaked documents, corruption and intrigue.
new Egypt presidential candidates allege vote fraud
Three top candidates in Egypt's presidential race have filed appeals to the election commission, alleging violations in the first round vote that they say could change the outcome.
more »

Canada »

new Quebec and university students to resume talks
Quebec's university students federation has confirmed that negotiations between student leaders and the provincial government will resume this afternoon.
new Baby boomer data will highlight upcoming policy challenges
New census data is expected to show how old Canadian society is becoming, effecting massive changes to the country's health-care and retirement systems.
Bullyproof: Video booth captures raw tales of teen bullying
More than 150 students share their stories about bullying and being bullied.
more »

Politics »

updated Canadian Pacific strikers face back-to-work legislation video
Labour Minister Lisa Raitt is poised to introduce legislation today to put an end to the Canadian Pacific Railway strike, after both CP and the union rejected a proposal for voluntary arbitration by the government-appointed negotiator on Sunday. Raitt will provide an update to the media this afternoon.
Western premiers to talk environment, energy and Tom Mulcair video
The environment, energy and federal NDP Leader Tom Mulcair are on the agenda Tuesday when leaders of the western provinces and territories get together.
N.L. premier 'at odds' with Peter MacKay audio
Kathy Dunderdale, the premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, tells CBC Radio's Evan Solomon she's growing increasingly frustrated with the Defence minister's handling of coastal search and rescue.
more »

Health »

Chronic fatigue may be reversed with exercise
Taking it easy is not the best treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome, rather exercise and behaviour therapy are, a large study finds.
AT&T buys T-Mobile USA for $39B US
AT&T Inc. said Sunday it will buy T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telekom AG in a cash-and-stock deal valued at $39 billion US, becoming the largest cellphone company in the U.S.
Milky Way home to 50 billion planets: NASA
Scientists have compiled the first cosmic census of planets in our galaxy: at least 50 billion planets are estimated to call the Milky Way home.
more »

Arts & Entertainment»

Love film a 2nd win for Cannes director
Michael Haneke won the Cannes Film Festival's top trophy for a second time with his film about love and death, Amour.
video Stratford prepares for new director as season opens video
As the Stratford Shakespeare Festival opens its 60th season, high profile artistic director Des McAnuff is preparing to hand to reins to his successor Antoni Cimolino. Deana Sumanac reports.
Quebec actress captures Cannes prize
Canadian Suzanne Clement has been awarded the Best Actress prize in the Cannes Film Festival's sidebar competition, Un Certain Regard.
more »

Technology & Science »

Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship video
Astronauts have entered the Dragon, the world's first commercial supply ship, which is docked at the International Space Station.
Chemicals in tsunami debris could pose coastal threat video
The spill and spread of industrial chemicals across the coastline of British Columbia is a possibility as slower-moving tsunami debris from Japan approaches the west coast, according to experts observing its movements.
South Africa, Australia to share world's largest telescope
South Africa and Australia will jointly host the Square Kilometre Array, which promises to be the world's largest telescope, the international consortium in charge of the project said Friday.
more »

Money »

new Canadians planning fewer home reno projects
Fewer Canadian homeowners are planning renovations this year, possibly reflecting increased concern over household debt, according to the Bank of Montreal's annual home renovation report.
analysis What a Greek euro exit could mean for Canada
A tumultuous Greek exit from the eurozone would have a harder impact on Canada's economy than the credit crisis recession of 2008 and 2009, a report from a major Canadian bank warns.
Bankia asks Spain for €19B video
The board of directors of Spain's troubled bank, Bankia, has asked the Spanish government for €19 billion ($24.5 billion Cdn) in financial support.
more »

Consumer Life »

Honda recalls Fit subcompacts
Honda Canada says it will recall 14,640 of its 2009 and 2010 Fit subcompact cars to replace lost motion springs.
U.S. travel fee proposal criticized by Harper
Prime Minister Stephen Harper says he doesn't think much of a new border tax that's being proposed by the United States, calling it a cash grab designed to help a budget crisis.
Bell class action suit approved by Que. court
A Quebec Superior Court judge has authorized a class action lawsuit to go ahead against Bell Mobility.
more »

Sports »

Scores: NHL NBA

5 stories, including Ryder Hesjedal's historic ride video
Canadian cyclist Ryder Hesjedal captured the 95th Giro d'Italia, the hosts won the Memorial Cup and it was Canadian vs. Canadian at the French Open. All this, plus more, in your top five stories from Sunday.
Shawinigan takes Memorial Cup in OT win over London
Anton Zlobin scored his second goal of the game 17:51 into overtime to lift the Shawinigan Cataractes to their first MasterCard Memorial Cup title with a 2-1 victory over the London Knights on Sunday night.
Spurs take Game 1 of West finals, win 19th straight
Manu Ginobili scored 26 points and the San Antonio Spurs won their 19th in a row to tie the NBA record for longest winning streak kept alive in the playoffs, beating the Oklahoma City Thunder 101-98 to open the Western Conference finals on Sunday night.
more »

Diversions »

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
more »