Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

Afghanistan: The politics of sending in the marines

Comments (12)
By Henry Champ

The Pentagon today announced it will send 3,200 marines to Afghanistan. They will be deployed in May, in the southern provinces near where the Canadians are, to counter an expected spring offensive by Taliban fighters.

Bush administration officials are now saying publicly that they have given up trying to get more troops for Afghanistan from their recalcitrant NATO allies in Europe.

What they were not saying is that four of their closest allies in this campaign — Canada, Britain, Australia and the Dutch — have all complained that the U.S. must take on a greater combat burden itself. That their losses have been proportionally greater than those of American forces.

The troops from these countries operate mostly in the troubled southern part of Afghanistan, unlike the relatively quieter eastern portion where most of the U.S. troops are based. What's more, they do not place combat restrictions on their soldiers, as other NATO countries do, to keep them out of battles.

The timing of this announcement is no accident, coming as it does not long before the report of the independent panel Prime Minister Stephen Harper created to help determine whether Canada should extend its Afghan mission beyond February 2009.

That report, from former Liberal minister John Manley's group, is expected later this month. From Washington's perspective, it is hoped that sending in the marines will have a positive influence on Canada's parliamentary debate.

Is this enough?

But the Pentagon announcement may have the opposite effect in Ottawa, as it emphasizes that the marines will be sent to the southern region to combat a spring offensive by the Taliban — and then they are to leave, seven months later, with no plans to be replaced.

Canadian Lt. Gen. Andrew Leslie was widely quoted in Washington last month when he said recent Taliban gains are a "serious challenge." So having the marines on hand for what is planned to be only a short period may not satisfy Canada's needs.

Officials here in Washington say commanders in Afghanistan want even more troops but have been denied them as deployments in Iraq have strained the American military. "This proposal is pre-emptive," underlines Geoff Morrell, the Pentagon press secretary. "It does not represent a deterioration in the security situation."

From Washington's point of view, this decision to add another 3,200 troops to the Afghanistan theatre was not easy. But when weighed against the continual complaining from valued NATO allies, it had to be made.

The complaints, for the most part, have been mostly polite, particularly at the highest of levels such as when Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier visited U.S. Secretary of States Condoleezza Rice a few weeks ago.

But in the ranks, the grumbling suggests American commanders are under instructions to keep their troops out of harm's way whenever possible. The Pentagon is clearly conscious about not wanting to add to the dead and wounded totals already coming out of Iraq.

Silence on the campaign front

The U.S. provides about 26,000 of the estimated 54,000 foreign troops in Afghanistan. Their special forces operate in all regions. The Americans have lost 478 soldiers in Afghanistan, while Britain's total stands at 86, Canada's at 76.

In every country, the issue is politically contentious. Though on the presidential campaign trail, it should be noted, not much has been said.

The four main Republican candidates — Rudy Giuliani, Mike Huckabee, John McCain and Mitt Romney — have virtually the same position. All supported the summer troop increases in Iraq and are opposed to any timetables for withdrawal from there. None have an official policy on Afghanistan.

Of the three main Democratic contenders, Hillary Clinton wants a measured withdrawal of troops from Iraq that would end in 2013, and has no official policy on Afghanistan.

John Edwards wants the troops out of Iraq, beginning immediately and ending within 10 months; no official policy on Afghanistan. Barack Obama wants much the same for Iraq: An immediate withdrawal but allowing 16 months to complete.

He has also officially endorsed the re-deployment of some Iraqi-based troops to Afghanistan. The only one to do so.

When polled, the American public generally favours more military for Afghanistan but it is not a priority.

« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »

This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.

Comments (12)

Phil

Part 2:
So rather than point the finger, blame the Americans, withdraw our troops and call it a day and pretend nothing ever happened, let's face the reality of the situation:

-The US military is in Afghanistan fighting a war and providing some type of reconstruction.
-The Canadian Forces are in Afghanistan fighting a war. They were previously doing reconstruction work but the mission changed to counter-insurgency. Why did it change? Because there is a need to fight the bad guys. Pulling out the Canadians is not going to make the bad guys go away.

As much as Henry Champ would like to believe that the infusion of Marines into the fight in Afghanistan is not a coincidence and that it's part of a political agenda to appease some allies, this can't be any farther from the truth.

We knew as early as September that the Marines were going to Afghanistan. Pentagon briefings were mentioning all last fall. The Commandant of the Marine Corps was talking about it all last fall. This was not a military secret. To me, the media is piecing the facts together just to make it a more dramatic story.

Additionally, the reason there could be a shift from Iraq to Afghanistan is due to the fact that we are winning over the insurgents in Iraq. Since the war has changed in Iraq and things have quieted down in certain parts of the country, we can now re-allocate our resources for the fight elswhere.

Now, why has it quieted down in Iraq, because we are gaining the trust of the Iraqis and they are working with us to get rid of the insurgents. This means that the US strategy is working and a similar strategy can work in Afghanistan as well.

In the end, the Marines are going in. The bad guys know it and the bad guys are running for their lives.

Posted February 29, 2008 10:21 AM

Phil

It is obvious that many of the responses on this page are based only what the mass media is reporting about Afghanistan. Has anyone talked to a Canadian Soldier or US service member in that country? Well, I have and what is being reported in the media is not overly accurate as to what is taking place on the ground. The US and other allies are not only performing reconstruction, but they are training the Afghanis to provide their own security while at the same time fighting some fairly intense battles.

Some of my fellow Marines who have returned from Afghanistan can attest to the fact that, despite no media coverage, there is a war going on in that country.

In my view, we should think beyond whether the war in Afghanistan or even Iraq is wrong or not legitimate or for whatever reasons anyone wants to cite. We must face that fact that we are there now, despite whatever original reason, and that we have an obligation to turn this war, which is a bad situation, into a good situation. Leaving the middle east is not going to fix the fundamental Islamic extremist situation.

In case no one has been watching, these people kill each other because they don't agree. They teach their children to hate. It doesn't matter what they hate, it's fundamentally wrong to raise children that way. And that's just the tip of the iceburg.

If 9/11 would not have happened, then we would just be supporting some other internal faction to throw over the Afghanis government. The reality is that 9/11 did happen. That event and our reaction to it has changed the world and there is no going back. End of part 1.

Posted February 29, 2008 10:20 AM

don

Mississauga

Why aren't you people talking about the real war and not this nonsense about an isolated incidence of terrorism or whatever it was that got the ball rolling most recently? Why aren't you talking about the profit potential this war machine means for our industries, our economies? Why do you insist on talking about a non-existent reconstruction effort when it clearly is no such thing? Afghanistan is now the world's leading exporter of high quality heroin: the war lords to the north are back in charge as they were before the Russian occupation, except now they're far more brutal, far worse than before. Why does no one mention that under the Russian occupation the standard of living was far higher than it is now and that girls attended school without restrictions? Now what do they have except for horror after horror and no one is safe anywhere.

What is it about burying your heads in the sand and refusing to even acknowledge the truth of this invasion, instead debating some jingoistic blather about whose troops are better trained or which country is more "in the right?" The call to support our troops is an empty slogan and means nothing whatsoever: support them how? For what purpose? In what way? Do we pay their mortgages for them, let them go to the front of the line for movie tickets, buy them dinner, fix them up on blind dates? What? If they murder thousands do we still have to "support them?" Is this what you all want, unending war and occupation? Is this what our soldiers are there for? Fighting to further our economic advantage over entire peoples?

Posted January 17, 2008 05:23 PM

Ed

Toronto

Writing about Afghanistan often seems to be full of fiery emotion (love or hate) about Americans.
When we debate pulling our troops from Afghanistan, I hope (maybe a forlorn hope but a sincere one) that our feelings for the US don’t frame the discussion.
Before 9/11, I signed a petition protesting the policies of the Taliban demanding something be done. I signed even though I suspected it was pointless. The Taliban were unlikely to throw up their hands & admit the error of their ways because of a petition.
I don't remember the exact words, but the gist was that the barbaric & medieval treatment of women/girls must stop (i.e. punishing rape victims for being raped, “honour killings” of young women by their male relatives, Vitamin D deficiency deformities from enforced wearing of Burkhas, refusing to educate girls, stunning rates of death in childbirth).
I know that Canadians can't stop all the evils in the world, that many governments are as brutal as the Taliban, & that we’ll never do more about most of them than send a strongly-worded petition; then there’s Afghanistan.
No matter the original political reason, our brave soldiers are now in Afghanistan where they’ve used violence to defend against the Taliban’s violence. Their sacrifices & courage have reduced (sadly not ended) many of the evils that the Taliban routinely inflicted on Afghani women, men & children.
I don’t know if keeping our troops in the battle for Afghanistan’s future will lead to a real time of peace, equality for women, or prosperity in that suffering country. I do know that our citizens in uniform have undertaken an incredibly difficult & maybe futile moral struggle on behalf us petition-signers.
Whatever decision we make about our Afghanistan commitment let us make it by weighing the good our nation’s heroes are bringing to ordinary Afghanis (our fellow human beings after all is said & done); against the price they heroically & selflessly pay for us & our willingness to let them pay it.

Posted January 17, 2008 03:12 PM

Don

Mississauga

Blaine, from Carberry Manitoba

What on Earth are you talking about, liberals disbanding and the NDP as Taliban? Are you retarded? The Taliban allowed OBL into the country because he had millions to invest and he had a track record of supporting the Mujahadin during the Russian war. His family made their billions in construction in Saudi Arabia and helped Afghanistan with roads and highways. Mullah Omar worried about his terrorist agenda and growing popularity to the point where he had OBL take up resdience where he could keep an eye on him. It is extremely doubtful that Omar knew of the 9/11 attacks before they happened and a certainty he would never have permitted them if he had. Why? Because he wasn't an idiot and he knew straight up what the US would do following that sort of attack. America's response was what OBL wanted: it was most certainly NOT what the Taliban wanted.

OBL doesn't hate us because of what our woman do or do not wear, he hates the secularism he sees creeping into Muslim life and institutions. His war is with the Arab states, not the west. He attacked the west knowing that America would invade "sacred" Muslim soil and hoping that Islam would rise up en masse to defeat the infidel as a result, then sweep aside secular Arab leaders and return the land to an Islamic state. That it never happened goes to show what a boner he is altogether. It amazes me that people here buy into GWB's drooling nonsense about Arabs "Hating freedom". They love freedom and wish they had more of it, including the freedom of not having to put up with us stealing their land, raping their resources, and killing their people by propping up one dictator after another.

Posted January 14, 2008 07:37 PM

Blaine

Carberry,Manitoba

Ok, so the Americans are attacked by terrorists organized, trained and sheltered in Afghanistan and they "initiated trouble"? The Taliban were the government that provided that protection. So with UN approval, see Resolutions 1373 and 1378 the Americans with their allies (pretty much the whole democratic western world if you remember)cheering them on, invade and topple the taliban. So lets not forget, the couple of thousand american dead on September 11th plus all the victims of the Taliban too. But jeez, the Taliban and the warlords just don't want to give up the chance of power, just like the NDP i guess. With that logic why doesn't the Liberal Party disband because they lost the last election! No it doesn't work like that in Canada why would it in Afghanistan. So they fight, and what are we going to do? Blame the Americans for getting us in when Osama hates us too because our women don't wear the burqa and we don't pray to mecca five times a day! Wake up and smell reality!

Posted January 13, 2008 10:25 AM

Ron Sadler

As usual, every post here is rife with anti-American sentiment. We Canadians have a unique talent for acting sanctimonious and pointing the finger at others, as we judge from our rickety ivory tower. As a soldier myself, and one with many friends serving in the south in and around Kandahar, I am just relieved to have the help and reinforcement. I have served with many American soldiers, and they are excellent soldiers who consider us brothers and will lay their lives on the line just as quickly for a Canadian soldier as they will for one of their own. God Bless the US!

Posted January 13, 2008 09:56 AM

Braad

Correct me if I'm wrong...but wasn't the invasion of Afghanistan all about getting rid of Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda? It was all about the so-called "War on Terror" and routing out the people that were involved in the whole 9-11 fiasco. Now the spin doctors have us believing that it's about fighting the Taliban - and you NEVER hear mention of Bin Laden or Al-Qaeda over there. The war on terror has somehow shifted to getting rid of "Al-Qaeda in Iraq", which never existed there in the first place! The US has made this a battle on two fronts - with NATO doing its work in Afghanistan, and their military dealing with Iraq - which is what they really wanted to do all along.

Posted January 12, 2008 10:06 AM

Steelcity Steve

Hamilton

Whenever anyone says that Afghanis should take more responsibility for their own security its no different than blaming a beating victim for his own plight. It wrongly implies that Afghanis somehow formed a consensus in 2001 and invited the US to bomb their villages, invade their country, mine their lands, and convert them politically, socially, and economically at the point of a gun. Could anything be farther from the truth?

Let's never forget that the innocent people of Afghanistan were forced to accept the political will of Washington under pain of death. The fact that they did not and do not want the US takeover of their land is made quite clear by the fact that another 3500 US marines are needed to subjugate them again, and again, and again until the west finally learns the lesson that the Russians learned in the 90's. Afghanis know how to survive the game of invader and defender better than anyone on the planet.

If Afghanis were to truly able to take charge of their own security I would wager all the poppies in Afghanistan that they would try to throw out the US and NATO forces first, and then take on the Taliban.

Posted January 11, 2008 08:43 PM

B. L. Webb

As usual, the yankee doodles swagger about and talk tough, while they get somebody else to do the dirty work.
Canadian forces were committed in a non-combat role during the hysteria following 9/11, and should not have been sent in the first place.
This was never our fight to start with. Up to then, no one was mad at Canada - but they are now.
All Canadian forces should be withdrawn immediately, and no more Canadian blood should be spilt to support 20 years of arrogant and disastrous foreign policy bumbling by our mutant neighbours to the south!

Posted January 11, 2008 05:49 PM

Dona

Hudson,QC.Canada

Canada along with the British and the Dutch have done heroic duty in southern Afghanistan.
Now it is time for other NATO countries to make the hard decision to deploy their troops in the dangerous south.
Canada should stand firm on their planned withdrawal of February 2009. They could be redeployed to other duties such as training and reconstruction. The Afghans must begin to take some responsibility for protecting their own country. With Canadian training and assistance.

Posted January 11, 2008 03:53 PM

Charlene Smith

Woodstock,Ontario

As usual,the U.S. iniates trouble,then retreats,leaving someone else to clean up their messes.

Canada would be wise to get out of Afganistan as civil wars are going to erupt in the coming year.

If the U.S. keeps going the way it has been expect an"invasion"of Iran under the guise of"terrorism."

Only thing so far that has been stopping him was Putin's warning to basically "not be Foolish" but since when has Bush ever listened to logic and reason?

Posted January 11, 2008 01:37 PM

« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »

Post a Comment

Disclaimer:

Note: By submitting your comments you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published, and those that are published will not be edited. But all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.

Privacy Policy | Submissions Policy

Washington File »

About the Author

Henry ChampHenry Champ is CBC Newsworld's correspondent in Washington, D.C., delivering Canadian viewers the latest developments in the U.S. political arena. Recently, he has been a leading Canadian voice on coverage of the war on terrorism, the war in Iraq and the growing concerns over the Canada-U.S. relationship.

Previous Columns

Recent Posts

Vapour ads create successful campaign smokescreens
Henry Champ
Thursday, September 11, 2008
The parties are over
Henry Champ
Friday, September 5, 2008
The attack dog fights back
Henry Champ
Thursday, September 4, 2008
The plan for Sarah Palin
Henry Champ
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Paying a high price for Palin
Henry Champ
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Subscribe to this blog

Recent Comments

Part 2: So rather than point the finger, blame the ...
Afghanistan: The politics of sending in the marines
It is obvious that many of the responses on this page are...
Afghanistan: The politics of sending in the marines
Why aren't you people talking about the real war and not ...
Afghanistan: The politics of sending in the marines
Writing about Afghanistan often seems to be full of fiery...
Afghanistan: The politics of sending in the marines
Blaine, from Carberry Manitoba What on Earth are ...
Afghanistan: The politics of sending in the marines

Archives

September 2008
(6 postings)
August 2008
(6 postings)
June 2008
(3 postings)
May 2008
(6 postings)
April 2008
(3 postings)
March 2008
(4 postings)
February 2008
(5 postings)
January 2008
(7 postings)
November 2007
(2 postings)
October 2007
(7 postings)
September 2007
(1 postings)
July 2007
(6 postings)
June 2007
(5 postings)
May 2007
(6 postings)
April 2007
(6 postings)
March 2007
(5 postings)
February 2007
(7 postings)
January 2007
(8 postings)
December 2006
(7 postings)
November 2006
(8 postings)
October 2006
(10 postings)
September 2006
(9 postings)
August 2006
(9 postings)
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Story Tools: PRINT | Text Size: S M L XL | REPORT TYPO | SEND YOUR FEEDBACK

World »

new Syrian killings continue as Annan flies to Damascus video
International outrage against Syria intensified Monday, with China and Russia speaking out against the massacre of 108 people, including 49 children, in the town of Houla.
updated Vatican corruption scandal widens
One of the Vatican's biggest scandals in decades appears to be widening with reports that an Italian cardinal may be part of a power struggle involving leaked documents, corruption and intrigue.
new Egypt presidential candidates allege vote fraud
Three top candidates in Egypt's presidential race have filed appeals to the election commission, alleging violations in the first round vote that they say could change the outcome.
more »

Canada »

new Quebec and university students to resume talks
Quebec's university students federation has confirmed that negotiations between student leaders and the provincial government will resume this afternoon.
new Baby boomer data will highlight upcoming policy challenges
New census data is expected to show how old Canadian society is becoming, effecting massive changes to the country's health-care and retirement systems.
Bullyproof: Video booth captures raw tales of teen bullying
More than 150 students share their stories about bullying and being bullied.
more »

Politics »

updated Canadian Pacific strikers face back-to-work legislation video
Labour Minister Lisa Raitt is poised to introduce legislation today to put an end to the Canadian Pacific Railway strike, after both CP and the union rejected a proposal for voluntary arbitration by the government-appointed negotiator on Sunday. Raitt will provide an update to the media this afternoon.
Western premiers to talk environment, energy and Tom Mulcair video
The environment, energy and federal NDP Leader Tom Mulcair are on the agenda Tuesday when leaders of the western provinces and territories get together.
N.L. premier 'at odds' with Peter MacKay audio
Kathy Dunderdale, the premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, tells CBC Radio's Evan Solomon she's growing increasingly frustrated with the Defence minister's handling of coastal search and rescue.
more »

Health »

Chronic fatigue may be reversed with exercise
Taking it easy is not the best treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome, rather exercise and behaviour therapy are, a large study finds.
AT&T buys T-Mobile USA for $39B US
AT&T Inc. said Sunday it will buy T-Mobile USA from Deutsche Telekom AG in a cash-and-stock deal valued at $39 billion US, becoming the largest cellphone company in the U.S.
Milky Way home to 50 billion planets: NASA
Scientists have compiled the first cosmic census of planets in our galaxy: at least 50 billion planets are estimated to call the Milky Way home.
more »

Arts & Entertainment»

Love film a 2nd win for Cannes director
Michael Haneke won the Cannes Film Festival's top trophy for a second time with his film about love and death, Amour.
video Stratford prepares for new director as season opens video
As the Stratford Shakespeare Festival opens its 60th season, high profile artistic director Des McAnuff is preparing to hand to reins to his successor Antoni Cimolino. Deana Sumanac reports.
Quebec actress captures Cannes prize
Canadian Suzanne Clement has been awarded the Best Actress prize in the Cannes Film Festival's sidebar competition, Un Certain Regard.
more »

Technology & Science »

Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship video
Astronauts have entered the Dragon, the world's first commercial supply ship, which is docked at the International Space Station.
Chemicals in tsunami debris could pose coastal threat video
The spill and spread of industrial chemicals across the coastline of British Columbia is a possibility as slower-moving tsunami debris from Japan approaches the west coast, according to experts observing its movements.
South Africa, Australia to share world's largest telescope
South Africa and Australia will jointly host the Square Kilometre Array, which promises to be the world's largest telescope, the international consortium in charge of the project said Friday.
more »

Money »

new Canadians planning fewer home reno projects
Fewer Canadian homeowners are planning renovations this year, possibly reflecting increased concern over household debt, according to the Bank of Montreal's annual home renovation report.
analysis What a Greek euro exit could mean for Canada
A tumultuous Greek exit from the eurozone would have a harder impact on Canada's economy than the credit crisis recession of 2008 and 2009, a report from a major Canadian bank warns.
Bankia asks Spain for €19B video
The board of directors of Spain's troubled bank, Bankia, has asked the Spanish government for €19 billion ($24.5 billion Cdn) in financial support.
more »

Consumer Life »

Honda recalls Fit subcompacts
Honda Canada says it will recall 14,640 of its 2009 and 2010 Fit subcompact cars to replace lost motion springs.
U.S. travel fee proposal criticized by Harper
Prime Minister Stephen Harper says he doesn't think much of a new border tax that's being proposed by the United States, calling it a cash grab designed to help a budget crisis.
Bell class action suit approved by Que. court
A Quebec Superior Court judge has authorized a class action lawsuit to go ahead against Bell Mobility.
more »

Sports »

Scores: NHL NBA

5 stories, including Ryder Hesjedal's historic ride video
Canadian cyclist Ryder Hesjedal captured the 95th Giro d'Italia, the hosts won the Memorial Cup and it was Canadian vs. Canadian at the French Open. All this, plus more, in your top five stories from Sunday.
Shawinigan takes Memorial Cup in OT win over London
Anton Zlobin scored his second goal of the game 17:51 into overtime to lift the Shawinigan Cataractes to their first MasterCard Memorial Cup title with a 2-1 victory over the London Knights on Sunday night.
Spurs take Game 1 of West finals, win 19th straight
Manu Ginobili scored 26 points and the San Antonio Spurs won their 19th in a row to tie the NBA record for longest winning streak kept alive in the playoffs, beating the Oklahoma City Thunder 101-98 to open the Western Conference finals on Sunday night.
more »

Diversions »

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
more »