So let's ignore Washington
Comments (12)
Monday, October 15, 2007 | 04:33 PM ET
By Henry Champ
Let's check the statistics first.
According to the Pew Hispanic Centre, fully five per cent of the U.S. workforce was composed of illegal workers in the most recent year for which statistics are available, 2005.
Pew also listed those occupations with the highest proportion of illegal workers: agriculture, roofing, construction, landscaping, painting and cooks, all with at least 20 per cent.
In sum, according to Pew, 7.2 million illegal immigrants account for at least 10 per cent of all low-skilled U.S. workers and five per cent of the total American workforce.
That's one set of statistics. The second set deals with social security numbers.
Right from the time he took office, President George W. Bush has struggled with the problem of illegal immigration. His proposed overhaul of the law was rejected by Congress this past summer. So, to appease his supporters, he stepped up enforcement by, among other things, using social security numbers to verify an employee's status.
An employer would send a newly-hired worker's SSN to Washington to make certain the number matched with the employee's name and background. If there was a discrepancy, the employer must resolve it or fire the worker within 90 days.
Employers soon found out that attempting to resolve an error was time consuming and that the bureaucracy could seldom deal with any case within 90 days. So it became a matter of ignore Washington or fire the worker. Most ignored Washington.
The most common form of identity theft
The problem with this effort was the SSN itself. It is a notoriously weak level of proof.
American citizens use the SSN virtually every day while banking or renewing a driver's licence and the theft of SSNs is the most common form of identity theft in the country.
It is true, according to Pew, that millions of illegals get their jobs by using false SSNs. But the very nature of many of these jobs is often short term and by the time the false SSN is noted, they are working somewhere else.
This is also a problem for the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees this effort. Between June 2004 and May of 2006, the DHS sent notices to employers demanding they fire certain people whom DHS felt were working illegally. But it turned out that 11 per cent of those on the DHS list had every right to hold the jobs they did.
Even with this high level of error, Washington is in the process of sending out no-match letters, pressing employers to fire as many as 8.7 million workers with suspect SSNs.
Last Thursday, Judge Charles Breyer of San Francisco said enough.
Enough already
He granted a preliminary injunction barring the Bush administration from taking such action.
"There can be no doubt that the effects of the rule's implementation will be severe," he said, writing it would result in "irreparable harm to innocent workers and employers."
Judge Breyer had been convinced by the plaintiffs in this case who were small business owners, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and a number of trade unions that the social security administration's database included so many errors, that its use in firings would unfairly affect tens of thousands of legal workers.
The real importance of the judge's ruling, however, may be the way it illuminated the gap between Washington politicians, who argue for the need get a handle on illegal immigration, and the reality of many American employers, who rely on that illegal labour.
On one side you have the labour, farm and small business organizations. On the other, the Republican party and its historic big business allies.
Enforcement is not working. Judge Breyer's decision is highlighted by a case in the aptly-named community of Homeland in Florida.
Forget enforcement
Eighteen months ago, the Department of Homeland Security raided the IFCO Pallet plant in Homeland and arrested 38 workers on suspicion of illegal entry. It was one of a series of raids in 2006 to show Washington meant business.
But of those 38 workers, only three have been deported. Two others have disappeared and are fugitives. Eighteen were freed by the courts and deemed to have been in the country legally. Fourteen cases are still before the courts and a few are still waiting their first hearing.
So much for enforcement.
Of course, those who want to turn a blind eye to illegal immigration are ignoring several growing problems such as the growing demand for social services that many city managers say they can no longer afford. Even a rising crime rate in some areas.
Judge Breyer's ruling effectively freezes the playing field. But don't expect anyone to move quickly on this issue, unless it is towards an exit.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
This discussion is now Open. Submit your Comment.
« Previous Post | Main | Next Post »
Post a Comment
Washington File »
About the Author
Henry Champ is CBC Newsworld's correspondent in Washington, D.C., delivering Canadian viewers the latest developments in the U.S. political arena. Recently, he has been a leading Canadian voice on coverage of the war on terrorism, the war in Iraq and the growing concerns over the Canada-U.S. relationship.
Recent Posts
- Vapour ads create successful campaign smokescreens
- Henry Champ
- Thursday, September 11, 2008
- The parties are over
- Henry Champ
- Friday, September 5, 2008
- The attack dog fights back
- Henry Champ
- Thursday, September 4, 2008
- The plan for Sarah Palin
- Henry Champ
- Wednesday, September 3, 2008
- Paying a high price for Palin
- Henry Champ
- Tuesday, September 2, 2008
- Subscribe to this blog
Recent Comments
- Hey Jeff: Yup. ...
- So let's ignore Washington
- Fact is there is a need for immigrant workers, legal or i...
- So let's ignore Washington
- Hey! What's going on here! Where are all the other regula...
- So let's ignore Washington
- This is really a pointless debate. We have continuing co...
- So let's ignore Washington
- I am disappointed with the Throne Speech, in that it did ...
- So let's ignore Washington
Archives
- September 2008
- (6 postings)
- August 2008
- (6 postings)
- June 2008
- (3 postings)
- May 2008
- (6 postings)
- April 2008
- (3 postings)
- March 2008
- (4 postings)
- February 2008
- (5 postings)
- January 2008
- (7 postings)
- November 2007
- (2 postings)
- October 2007
- (7 postings)
- September 2007
- (1 postings)
- July 2007
- (6 postings)
- June 2007
- (5 postings)
- May 2007
- (6 postings)
- April 2007
- (6 postings)
- March 2007
- (5 postings)
- February 2007
- (7 postings)
- January 2007
- (8 postings)
- December 2006
- (7 postings)
- November 2006
- (8 postings)
- October 2006
- (10 postings)
- September 2006
- (9 postings)
- August 2006
- (9 postings)
Comments (12)
Anthony
Beijing
Hey Jeff:
Yup.
Posted October 27, 2007 05:50 AM
Charlene Smith
Woodstock,Ontario
Fact is there is a need for immigrant workers, legal or illegal to do the work nobody else will do.
Everybody screams about wages or optimum working conditions.
Everyone wants to do the easy jobs regarding little effort.
No one wants to do menial jobs such as pick strawberries, grapes, apples,etc.
No one wants to cook or wait on people so we have people to work for very little.
Coming from an area in Southern Ontario that has migrant workers,I know and have worked with, I know this is true.
They also send money and goods home to help to support their families.It means the difference between eating or not eating for many of their families back home.
When we decide we aren't too good to do these jobs, we won't need to depend on them any longer.
In reality, I don't believe that will ever happen.
Posted October 20, 2007 01:37 PM
Jeff Wilson
Winnipeg
Hey! What's going on here! Where are all the other regular posters?!
It's been a week!
Where is Allan from Kamloops?
Where is Roch from Winnipeg?
Where is K. Trudeau?
Where is Wa'el Darwish?
And so on...?
Can it be that I totally hit the nail on the head?
Am I really absolutely right in all your eyes?
Well, well... knock me over with a feather!
Posted October 20, 2007 01:28 PM
Joe
Halifax
This is really a pointless debate. We have continuing conditions in the US that create real labor shortages in certain areas and we have continuing conditions in Mexico and elsewhere that create millions who are more than willing to fill those places.
It doesn't matter one bit what various pundits have to say on the matter or what sort of policy is implemented because so long as those two situations exist, so too will large numbers of illegal immigrants choose to work in America doing the jobs Americans do not want to do and for low wages while American employers choose to look the other way. I do find it somehow odd thought that so many market worshipping conservatives believe they can simply legislate away this issue when there is hardly a more clear-cut case of supply and demand creating a labor relationship anywhere in the modern US.
If this is as significant a problem as some would have us believe then it seems an excellent candidate for a “market adjustment” rather than weak and ill advised market meddlings from the very people who claim those exact policies are ineffective to begin with.
Posted October 17, 2007 12:10 PM
Geoff Paterson
Toronto
I am disappointed with the Throne Speech, in that it did not include any plans for a wall to be built along the 49th parallel (to keep out the throngs of American illegals who will surely be invading our workforce in the near future).
Posted October 16, 2007 08:09 PM
Jeff Wilson
Winnpeg
Here's another thought: For all the sweat and toil illegal immigrants give for such paltry recompense, and for all the millions of them, wouldn't it be better if they would just stay, stand up, and fight to make their heartlands places of opportunities like ours?
Our ancestors fought, were killed and imprisoned for EVERYTHING we now take for granted! History tells us that it did not happen naturaly: The Farmers Revolt, the Northwest Rebellion, The Suffragettes Movement, The Winnipeg General Strike... Without their sacrifices, we would NOT have the vote for Women, Medicare, Welfare, Old-age pensions, a minimum wage...!
At some point in time, they are going to have to go through the same fight that our ancestors did. Otherwise, their heartlands will continue to be hopeless!
As hard as it may be to hear, illegal immigration only prolongs the suffering of the oppressed people.
And yes, I know "it's easy for me to say!"
That's because a multitude of Canadians before me MADE IT EASY FOR ME TO SAY!
That's why they spent their blood, personal comfort, and their LIVES!
My my late Grandfather was a WW II veteran. He said: "I went over there, so that you would never have to fight here." And he was right!
Thanks Grandpa!
And Thanks 19th century Farmers, thanks Suffragets, and thanks Metis, thanks strikers of Winnipeg, and thanks to so many more who I cannot mention because I am limited in space!
Look at what happened in South Africa after decades of struggle! In the end, fighting the good fight will triumph! It's a prooven, manifest, historical FACT!
I wish the oppressed would realize this!
Here is a rallying call oppressed workers in Victorian England chanted as they were stomped on for fighting for their rights:
RISE! AND SHAKE OF THIS DEW WHICH IN YOUR SLUMBER HAS FALLEN ON YOU. YEE ARE MANY, THEY ARE FEW!
And they won!
Good luck! History is on your side! History favours the BOLD!
Posted October 16, 2007 01:47 PM
Gary Dee
While Canadian productivity has been rising with the loonie (since that figure is calculated in US$), that Canada's work force is 99.999% legal is one factor that leaves us behind the US. Per unit production cost is lower when 5% of your labour pool is working with fake papers for the legal minimum wage and few or no benefits.
Posted October 16, 2007 11:37 AM
Adam van Sertima
Both Canada and the US saw their economies boom during periods of aggressive, open-door immigration. The question is do you want to strangle the economy by cutting-off workers(who produce wealth) or force business to pay higher wages to the needed legalised workers?
Either way higher wages are on the horizon, as labour shortages both raise wages and impede economic growth.
Legalising the the workers would discourage their recruitment in illegal activities.
But the current political climate favours symbol over substance.
Posted October 16, 2007 09:04 AM
Jeff Wilson
Winnipeg
It's not that Americans don't want to work in meat plants, nor landscape, nor wash dishes, nor do any of the other jobs that illegal immigrants do for so little money! It's just that Americans don't want to accept an unfairly low wage!
If there were no illegal immigrants, American employers would be forced to pay their fellow Americans a fair, living wage!
It's true that in such a fair world, Americans would have to pay more, but not that much more, because the employers would still have to compete against each other, and there would always be one who would lower the price of goods or sevices by paying him/herself less than the multi-millions now being paid. Then another would follow and so on!
Currently, ilegal immigration creates a "false" economy where workers get less than they deserve, and employers get way, way more than they deserve!
The solution is easy to arrive at intellectualy, but, it seems, very difficult to implement!
In the mean time, how do you feel about the fact that your children are draped in clothes made by other peoples' children?
Posted October 16, 2007 04:30 AM
Jerry
seattle
Three things are certain; 1) A federal judge from San Francisco will sign on to any liberal cause. 2) Without the illegal workers all fruit and veggies would cost the moon. 3) In two generations America will be an Hispanic country.
Ironically perhaps, the only way to get the illegals to go home (to Mexico) is to pass a universal minimum wage law because then they would not get hired.
Posted October 16, 2007 12:14 AM
Jin Akari
Toronto
The thin-grey-line between legal and illegal migrant workers is one of America’s greatest hypocrisies. Meat processing plants are especially blatant trespassers over this grey-line. Migrant workers are purchased for contract work through various memorandums between countries. If their papers don’t add up there is little incentive to blow the whistle. They aren’t stealing American jobs, their doing the jobs that no American in his or her right mind would take.
The Republican’s own (corporate) constituents realize this. I will not use the word slave labour, but migrant workers are what allow big-business to compete in the manual labour industries. The Land-of-the-Free does not have China’s totalitarian luxuries. A legal game of international Twister must be played in order to put your left foot on yellow and your right hand on profit. And just like playing Twister at home, if you have to park your rear by somebody’s head to win then so be it. That’s why many companies are ignoring Washington. You can’t spin the dial to “fire your labour force” and expect business owners to contort themselves.
It’s not that I think Bush is an idiot. I just think people like sticking their asses in his face. Especially when money’s on the line. Besides, many of the prime offenders are Republicans anyway. Anecdotally, I suspect it’s Joe-Republican on welfare who’s bitching about “them damn illegal aliens”.
Posted October 15, 2007 05:28 PM
James Careless
Ottawa
It is always easier for a politician to deal with the appearance of an issue than to tackle the substance. Clearly, this is yet another instance of this!
Posted October 15, 2007 05:01 PM