House essay: Decorum or boredom in Question Period?
by Evan Solomon, CBC News
Posted: Feb 3, 2013 9:18 PM ET
Last Updated: Feb 3, 2013 11:56 PM ET
NDP House Leader Nathan Cullen speaks about expanding the powers of the Speaker of the House of Commons, Tuesday, January 29, 2013 in Ottawa. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)
Evan Solomon, host of CBC Radio's The House, reflects on the debate over the lack of decorum during Question Period, as heard in his weekly radio essay on Feb. 2, 2013.
It's a zoo that needs a strict zoo keeper.
Well, that's what you might think about Question Period if you listen to Cullen. After all, he's put forward a motion to deal with members who use "harassment, threats, and personal attacks."
He's also proposing new punishments like suspending a member's sessional allowance.
The decorum debate has very deep roots.
During the early years of Confederation, historians talk about "throwing of paper, books and other missiles, including firecrackers."
You don't get a lot of firecrackers these days, you're lucky to even get verbal firecrackers.
Cullen is right. Sometimes MPs from all sides do go too far. But isn't that the exception, not the rule?
'When we fail to do our jobs with respect and civility, MPs should lose that privilege'— NDP House Leader Nathan Cullen
And MPs are usually quick to apologize.
And doesn't the Speaker already have tools to deal with those who don't?
In 1987, Speaker John Allen Fraser refused to recognize MP Jim Fulton for three weeks until he finally withdrew his offending remarks.
Is Question Period really worse today?
Compare that to, say, what it sounds like in the UK Parliament.
In the UK, there are rapid fire exchanges, no notes, no reading, heckling, and it's well... riveting.
It makes you wonder, is the problem with QP in Canada really bad behaviour or is it boring behaviour?
I mean MPs here are not supposed to read from prepared notes but they do it all the time.
Does it turn the cut and thrust of debate, which is the point of QP, into a slow swapping of talking points?
Committee meetings are there for more considered debate.
John F. Kennedy once said Winston Churchill marshaled the English language and sent it into battle.
Language is a weapon of politics. Why muzzle it in its best arena?
After all, people do love going to zoo but not if the lions are never allowed to roar.
Share Tools
- Power & Politics Ballot Box question by Evan Solomon May. 23, 2013 4:32 PM What's the best way to get to the bottom of the Senate spending scandal?
Top News Headlines
- How was the Mike Duffy report 'whitewashed?'
- Opposition parties pushed the government on Thursday to answer questions about the "whitewashed" Duffy report while the RCMP is also seeking more information from the Senate as part of its review of questionable expenses. more »
- 2nd suspect in Tim Bosma murder case to plead not guilty
- The lawyer for Mark Smich says the Oakville, Ont., resident will plead not guilty to first-degree murder in the death of Tim Bosma, the Hamilton man who disappeared earlier this month after taking two men on a test drive of his truck. more »
- Accused Via terror plotter wants Qur'an cited in defence
- Two suspects charged in an alleged plot to bomb a Via Rail train appeared in a Toronto court by video link Thursday morning. more »
- Canada Post campaigns against 'no flyers' mailbox signs
- Canada Post has been mailing more than 900,000 letters across the country to people to try to convince them to remove "no flyer" signs from their mailboxes. more »
Must Watch
Latest Politics News Headlines
- Duffy expense claims reveal more about campaign travel
- Election spending records show additional days Senator Mike Duffy spent on the campaign trail in the 2011 election, including days he told the Senate he was on business, and days on which Deloitte auditors couldn't track him. more »
- 'Mistaken' Duffy asked Senate committee how much he owed
- Letters between Senator Mike Duffy and Senator David Tkachuk, head of the committee looking into his expenses, reveal that Duffy was at times an active participant in the Senate investigation. more »
- Neil Macdonald: Harper no Obama when it comes to dealing with scandals
- Beset by three so-called scandals at the moment, Barack Obama has been meeting his accusers and the press head on, Neil Macdonald writes. The same cannot be said for how Stephen Harper operates. more »
- Compare the draft and final Duffy Senate reports
- Read the draft version of a Senate committee report into the expenses claimed and then repaid by Senator Mike Duffy and compare it to the committee's altered final report. more »
The National
The House
- Questions mount for Harper and chief of staff Nigel Wright in Senate scandal May. 18, 2013 1:15 PM This week on The House, with Senators Wallin and Duffy now out of the Conservative caucus, we get reaction from NDP Ethics critic Charlie Angus. We also hear directly from Senator Patrick Brazeau who says the Conservatives have thrown him under the bus. Plus we speak with B.C. Premier Christy Clark after her stunning victory.
- 2nd suspect in Tim Bosma murder case to plead not guilty
- Toronto Mayor Rob Ford fires chief of staff
- 2 more arrests linked to hacking death of British soldier
- How was the Mike Duffy report 'whitewashed?'
- Chained-teen's mom wants man who pleaded guilty 'to suffer'
- Vancouver man abandons Porsche on B.C. ferry
- Neil Macdonald: Harper no Obama when it comes to dealing with scandals
- B.C. teen saves pet dog in 'terrifying' cougar attack
- Mike Duffy's primary home not P.E.I., unedited Senate report says


