Tory MPs seek $250K for legal costs in robocalls case
Legal challenge backed by Council of Canadians centres on allegations of voter suppression
By Leslie MacKinnon, CBC News
Posted: Sep 18, 2012 5:08 AM ET
Last Updated: Sep 18, 2012 5:31 PM ET
Seven Conservative MPs' 2011 election victories are being challenged in court by voters backed by the Council of Canadians. The MPs, clockwise from top-left: Kelly Block, John Duncan, Jay Aspin, Joyce Bateman, Joe Daniel, Lawrence Toet and Ryan Leef. (Conservative.ca/CBC)
Conservative Party lawyer Arthur Hamilton says a challenge of the 2011 federal election results in seven Conservative ridings is a "zero-sum game" being fought by people who can't accept the fact the Conservatives won the last election.
Hamilton was arguing in Federal Court in Ottawa Tuesday, where a group of voters backed by the Council of Canadians are alleging a systematic campaign of voter suppression took place during the last federal election.
"All they are doing is saying, 'I want another election'," Hamilton said later in an interview outside the court.
"Because it's a zero-sum game, and it's the applicant that's bringing this forward, it's not in the public interest, it's a very narrow interest to defeat the person who won the election in favour of having a new election."
The challengers claim that live calls and robocalls purporting to be from Elections Canada directed non-Conservative voters to the wrong polls, and that a small but significant number of voters in their ridings didn't vote as a result — and they want the results in those ridings thrown out.
The seven Conservative MPs whose election victories are being challenged are asking that $260,000 be set aside by the applicants to help cover their legal fees.
The Canada Elections Act specifies that $1,000 is all a voter need put up in order to contest an election in court, however the Act does allow some leeway for that amount to be increased.
If the court grants the MPs' request, the deposit would ostensibly be borne by the Council of Canadians, whose lawyers are representing the seven voters.
Council of Canadians lawyer Steven Shrybman argued Tuesday that the voters challenging the results don't stand to gain anything, but are fighting for democracy in the public interest.
Public interest
Shrybman told the court it would impede access to justice if voters are required to deposit large amounts of money in order to contest an election. The Canada Elections Act states that "any" voter can challenge the results of an election if there are grounds to do so.
He also argued that its clients are public-interest litigants and money raised for a defence fund for them comes from donors' pockets with no hope of a tax receipt, unlike the Conservative MPs, whose legal bills are being paid by the Conservative Party, which can issue generous tax receipts.
"They're asking the court to order that the individual applicants who have come forward in the public interest actually post security for costs in the aggregate amount of $260,000," said Shrybman in a interview. "That would likely crush the life out of these applications."
But Hamilton noted the voters in this case aren't paying their own fees; rather, he said, the COC has promised to cover all their costs.
In an interview, Hamilton said that the COC has "infinitively more avenues to raise that money. There's circumstances where unions are looking to park their money, so big labour, as a sponsor of the Council of Canadians, would be looking for other places to park their money to become engaged in the political debate of the day."
Garry Neil of the Council of Canadians discusses his organization's support for a court challenge of 2011 federal election results in seven Conservative ridings, as the Council lawyer Steven Shrybman looks on. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)Hamilton also argued the COC has produced only one witness in all seven ridings who says that he or she didn't vote because of a misleading phone call. The other voters in the case have all filed affidavits saying they received misleading or harassing calls but don't say they didn't vote as a result.
The Canada Elections Act specifies that fraudulent activity must be shown to have affected the results of an election if the results are to be thrown out.
The federal court reserved judgment on the motion about security deposits until further notice. The case itself that will decide the fate of the seven incumbent MPs will be heard in federal court on Dec. 10.
The seven ridings where election results are being contested are: Don Valley East and Nipissing-Timiskaming in Ontario; Elmwood-Transcona and Winnipeg South Centre in Manitoba; Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar in Saskatchewan; Vancouver Island North in B.C.; and Yukon.
Share Tools
Power & Politics Ballot Box question by Rosemary Barton May. 24, 2013 4:48 PM Does Rob Ford's statement put an end to the allegations of crack use?
Top News Headlines
- Toronto mayor's brother says he never dealt drugs
- The brother of Toronto Mayor Rob Ford has vehemently denied allegations in Saturday's Globe and Mail that he was involved in the illicit drug trade in the 1980s. more »
- Hockey Canada votes to ban bodychecking in peewee hockey
- Hockey Canada's board of directors voted to eliminate bodychecking from peewee-level hockey on Saturday in Charlottetown. more »
- Neil Macdonald: How serious is Obama about curbing the drone surge?
- In a key speech this week, the U.S. president set out a host of supposed new safeguards for America's controversial practice of remote-controlled rough justice. But as Neil Macdonald writes, the underlying rationale for drone use has not fundamentally changed. more »
- Ontario man lost in Australian mountains has survival skills
- The sister of an Ontario man who disappeared in Australia's Snowy Mountains nearly two weeks ago says she remains hopeful he will be found, partly because of his training as a Canadian Forces reservist. more »
Must Watch
Latest Politics News Headlines
- Ethics probe comes with limits, federal watchdog says
- As the federal ethics commissioner readies for a third look at Prime Minister Stephen Harper's former chief of staff Nigel Wright, Mary Dawson is reminding Canadians her office can only look so far. more »
- PM's credibility at stake in growing Senate expenses crisis
- With the prime minister's credibility at stake in a growing political crisis, has Stephen Harper done enough to explain his former chief of staff's $90,000 cheque to Senator Mike Duffy? Listen to CBC Radio's The House with Evan Solomon here. more »
- Wallin may be forced to repay thousands in travel expenses
- Pamela Wallin, the Senator from Saskatchewan, was back in the news this week, refusing to tell CBC News if she had repaid any travel expense money. more »
- B.C. election proved campaigns matter more than ever
- The surprising majority win by Premier Christy Clark in this month's B.C. election showed that campaigns matter, especially in the last days leading to election day. And for the pollsters, it was strike three, writes the CBC's Bob Weiers. more »
The National
The House
- Harper's credibility at stake in growing Senate expenses crisis May. 25, 2013 2:21 PM This week on The House, Conservative MP Michelle Rempel and Liberal Senator James Cowan on the Senate expenses scandal. Former chief of staffs Keith Beardsley and David McLaughlin on Nigel Wright's $90,000 gift to Senator Mike Duffy. Plus, Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall on his plea to abolish the Senate. All that and much more!
- Toronto mayor's brother says he never dealt drugs
- 3 more suspects arrested in slaying of U.K. soldier
- McDonald's CEO chastised by 9-year-old B.C. girl
- NYPD investigating Amanda Bynes sex assault allegations
- Dog snared on baited hooks near Vancouver's Grouse Grind trail
- Ontario man lost in Australian mountains has survival skills
- Retired police officer killed in Mexico remembered as animal lover
- Canadian mine giant Barrick fined a record $16.4M in Chile
- Black bear breaks into North Vancouver chicken coop


