Government House Leader Peter Van Loan will take the rare step of invoking closure -- not time allocation, but straight closure -- later this afternoon in order to force a vote on his proposal to extend the sitting hours until the House rises in June.
It's worth noting that, if Van Loan's bid to lengthen the sitting day had stopped there, he may well have garnered the grudging support of the opposition, who would be mindful of the need not to appear to be shirking their parliamentary duties by objecting to the notion of sitting until midnight -- or later -- every night but Friday.
Instead, the government chose to up the ante by including heavy, if temporary, restrictions on the ability of other parties to focus the attention of the House on non-legislative business -- specifically, concurrence motions and emergency debates.
This, not surprisingly, went over like a lead balloon with the New Democrats, who dubbed it 'superclosure', and fired back with an amendment that would give Van Loan his extra hours, but scrap the additional -- and, it could be argued, somewhat unnecessary -- limitations on debate, while simultaneously doubling the time allotted for Question Period from 45 to 90 minutes.
That amendment will, of course, almost certainly fail when it comes to a vote, which, under the aforementioned closure motion, will likely happen later today, although there are still a few procedural tricks left in the box that could delay the inevitable until Thursday.
While that battle rages in the Commons, the Senate expense scandal continues to consume the Other Place, where Government Leader Marjory LeBreton is expected to unveil her vision for a more stringent regime later this afternoon.
Hit the jump for the full post.