At first glance, it seems a sad story and perhaps nothing more. Stuart Langridge, a soldier based in Edmonton, having attempted suicide six times before, finally succeeded on March 15, 2008 when he hanged himself in his room at CFB Edmonton.
He was 28, a dangerous age for young men. His relationship had failed, his biological father had just died and he was addicted to alcohol and cocaine. He was also disillusioned with the army, an institution he had revered since he became a cadet when he was 12.
Corp. Langridge had served in Bosnia and Afghanistan. He suffered from chest pains, nightmares, night sweats, tremors, anxiety and depression, all symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder.
His parents - his mother Sheila and stepfather Shaun Fynes - claim the Army did not take their son's condition seriously, and are asking the Military Police Complaints Commission to report on whether the military police investigation into their son's death was inadequate, biased and meant to exonerate the Canadian Forces.
Amongst the volumes of documents tabled at the Commission are interviews the Fynes did with military investigators.
Sheila and Shaun Fynes' anguish spill out over the thousands of pages of evidence filed at the MPCC. In conversations that go on for hours, where they don't so much answer questions as finish each other's sentences, they keep repeating, "You don't understand how angry we are." They obsess over their dead son's possessions - a leather chair, a computer that was disabled, a Jeep that was so damaged in military storage after Langridge's death they spent thousands to repair it.
In many ways, they seem like grieving parents who, in the wake of the awfulness of a child's suicide, are looking for someone to blame.
And yet, throughout the dozens of white binders containing reports, emails, letters, videos and interviews piled on tables at the Commission, a story emerges of the military's callousness and ineptitude in dealing with a dead soldier's family.
Most egregious was the matter of Langridge's suicide note. It was short and yet it revealed multitudes:
But the note wasn't given to Langridge's parents until 14 months later. The military's reasoning was that the note was part of evidence in a sudden-death investigation, and could only be released through access to information. The military has since changed its policy on suicide notes.
Before he died Stuart Langridge changed his will and his next of kin designation so that his mother was his heir and his stepfather the will's executor. But these papers were lost, and this gave rise to the second outrage, in his parents' eyes.
The bitterness the Fynes bear about how they feel they were marginalized at their own son's funeral is monumental. There was no "family" funeral, but a full military send-off. Langridge's ex-girlfriend, whom he'd broken up with, was recognized by the Army as his next of kin.
At the funeral, the Fynes said, they were asked to move to the second row so that the ex-girlfriend's family could take the first pew.
The Fynes wanted a regimental flag given their son was so proud of his Strathconas regiment, but the Canadian flag was chosen.
"The flag was stripped from his casket and presented to someone else, right under our noses", Sheila Fynes told interviewers.
After Langridge's death his will and next-of-kin notice were found behind a filing cabinet in a military office.
The military has recognized how shabbily the Fynes were treated. "It was like we had the plague," as Shaun Fynes told a military interviewer. Both Chief of Defence Staff Walter Natynczyk and Defence Minister Peter Mackay have apologized about the debacle over Langridge's suicide note and next-of-kin designation.
But there is still the matter, for the Fynes, of why Stuart Langridge spiralled down so quickly into a desperate series of suicide attempts. In his interview with the military Shaun Fynes said, "This is a young guy who loved the Army and who was a model soldier right up to a year before his death."
The military takes the position that Langridge was a victim of depression as well as drug and alcohol abuse. The Fynes say their son's drug and alcohol addiction was "self-medicating" and is consistent with PTSD.
In an interview with military police, Shaun Fynes said he now regrets urging his stepson to go into the military, and that even the sight of a soldier on a street corner makes him angry. "I will be absolutely relentless ... Stuart's honour will be restored."
The hearing before the Military Police Complaints Commission is expected to last until June.
He was 28, a dangerous age for young men. His relationship had failed, his biological father had just died and he was addicted to alcohol and cocaine. He was also disillusioned with the army, an institution he had revered since he became a cadet when he was 12.
Corp. Langridge had served in Bosnia and Afghanistan. He suffered from chest pains, nightmares, night sweats, tremors, anxiety and depression, all symptoms of post traumatic stress disorder.
His parents - his mother Sheila and stepfather Shaun Fynes - claim the Army did not take their son's condition seriously, and are asking the Military Police Complaints Commission to report on whether the military police investigation into their son's death was inadequate, biased and meant to exonerate the Canadian Forces.
Amongst the volumes of documents tabled at the Commission are interviews the Fynes did with military investigators.
Sheila and Shaun Fynes' anguish spill out over the thousands of pages of evidence filed at the MPCC. In conversations that go on for hours, where they don't so much answer questions as finish each other's sentences, they keep repeating, "You don't understand how angry we are." They obsess over their dead son's possessions - a leather chair, a computer that was disabled, a Jeep that was so damaged in military storage after Langridge's death they spent thousands to repair it.
In many ways, they seem like grieving parents who, in the wake of the awfulness of a child's suicide, are looking for someone to blame.
And yet, throughout the dozens of white binders containing reports, emails, letters, videos and interviews piled on tables at the Commission, a story emerges of the military's callousness and ineptitude in dealing with a dead soldier's family.
Most egregious was the matter of Langridge's suicide note. It was short and yet it revealed multitudes:
Sorry but I can't take it anymore.
I love you mom, Shaun, James, Mike, Grandma, Aunti,Tom.
Please know that I needed to stop the pain.
PS. I don't deserve any kinda fancy funeral. Just family.
But the note wasn't given to Langridge's parents until 14 months later. The military's reasoning was that the note was part of evidence in a sudden-death investigation, and could only be released through access to information. The military has since changed its policy on suicide notes.
Before he died Stuart Langridge changed his will and his next of kin designation so that his mother was his heir and his stepfather the will's executor. But these papers were lost, and this gave rise to the second outrage, in his parents' eyes.
The bitterness the Fynes bear about how they feel they were marginalized at their own son's funeral is monumental. There was no "family" funeral, but a full military send-off. Langridge's ex-girlfriend, whom he'd broken up with, was recognized by the Army as his next of kin.
At the funeral, the Fynes said, they were asked to move to the second row so that the ex-girlfriend's family could take the first pew.
The Fynes wanted a regimental flag given their son was so proud of his Strathconas regiment, but the Canadian flag was chosen.
"The flag was stripped from his casket and presented to someone else, right under our noses", Sheila Fynes told interviewers.
After Langridge's death his will and next-of-kin notice were found behind a filing cabinet in a military office.
The military has recognized how shabbily the Fynes were treated. "It was like we had the plague," as Shaun Fynes told a military interviewer. Both Chief of Defence Staff Walter Natynczyk and Defence Minister Peter Mackay have apologized about the debacle over Langridge's suicide note and next-of-kin designation.
But there is still the matter, for the Fynes, of why Stuart Langridge spiralled down so quickly into a desperate series of suicide attempts. In his interview with the military Shaun Fynes said, "This is a young guy who loved the Army and who was a model soldier right up to a year before his death."
The military takes the position that Langridge was a victim of depression as well as drug and alcohol abuse. The Fynes say their son's drug and alcohol addiction was "self-medicating" and is consistent with PTSD.
In an interview with military police, Shaun Fynes said he now regrets urging his stepson to go into the military, and that even the sight of a soldier on a street corner makes him angry. "I will be absolutely relentless ... Stuart's honour will be restored."
The hearing before the Military Police Complaints Commission is expected to last until June.
Tags: Cpl. Stuart Langridge, MPCC
More Stories under Politics
-
'Very upset' Harper wants fast Senate spending reform May 21, 2013 2:02 PM ET — Prime Minister Stephen Harper told the Conservative caucus this morning that he's "upset" about the recent conduct of some senators and his …
2:02 PM ET
- PM's South America trip turns focus from turmoil to trade May 21, 2013 10:53 AM ET — Prime Minister Stephen Harper left today for South America for four days of bilateral talks and trade meetings, after addressing his caucus … 10:53 AM ET
- EI board appointees made banned donations to Conservatives May 21, 2013 9:20 AM ET — Dozens of people appointed to plum patronage jobs have been donating to the Conservative party, despite government rules that forbid it. 9:20 AM ET
About the Author
Other Inside Politics Entries
- Orders of the Day - Back to you, Supreme Court of Canada! (On copyright, not Etobicoke Centre, that is.)
- Storify'd: Tony Clement wades into the Great Cuba vs. China Communism Debate
- NDP Ad Watch: Is this the voice of a deputy opposition leader?
- Orders of the Day - Grind faster, wheels of (Supreme Court of Canada) justice!
- UPDATED - Scientists hold Parliament Hill rally to mourn the "Death of Evidence"
Archives »
- 2012 (379)
-
July (18)
- Orders of the Day - Back to you, Supreme Court of Canada! (On copyright, not Etobicoke Centre, that is.)
- Storify'd: Tony Clement wades into the Great Cuba vs. China Communism Debate
- NDP Ad Watch: Is this the voice of a deputy opposition leader?
- Orders of the Day - Grind faster, wheels of (Supreme Court of Canada) justice!
- UPDATED - Scientists hold Parliament Hill rally to mourn the "Death of Evidence"
- Orders of the Day - Let the Battle for Etobicoke Centre be joined!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Deputy Minister Shuffle Watch: Mandarins on the Move!
- UPDATE - NDP nixes Libs' bid to call Del Mastro to ethics committee
- Happy 30th Birthday, Access to Information Act!
-
June (66)
- Canada Day vs. Dominion Day - What do you call the July 1 holiday?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - Happy Day Before Canada/Dominion Day Eve, Everyone!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Info Commissioner unveils strategy to investigate national security exemption claims
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- 'If we want an effective inquiry...'
- Orders of the Day - Another round of job cuts, a final round of Royal Assent prep and Afghan detainees...
- UPDATED - Is that a (theoretical) constitutional (meta) crisis I see before me?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
-
May (73)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Committee Liveblog: Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson at Procedure and House Affairs
- Committee Liveblog: Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson at Procedure and House Affairs
- Orders of the Day - Whither the F-35 inquiry at Public Accounts?
- Liveblog: Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks to the National Fish and Wildlife Conservation Congress
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- House of Commons Liveblog: The CP Rail back-to-work bill (#C39)
- UPDATED | OotD - No Sleep Till ... 3rd Reading of the CP Back To Work Bill!
- Omnibudget Liveblog: C-38 goes to committee -- and subcommittee, too!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
-
April (57)
- HouseWatch: When it comes to Commons debate, silence isn't always golden
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - Let a new new era of parliamentary civility begin!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Storify'd: PM's off the cuff slam against NDP sparks #HarperHistory lesson
- Orders of the Day - Climb aboard the Canada-EU trade love train, hard-working [Insert Provincial Demonym here]!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- House of Commons Liveblog: The Great "Legal Definition of Human Being" Debate
- Committee Liveblog: Auditor General Michael Ferguson talks F-35 procurement at Public Accounts ... again.
- Orders of the Day - Let the conversation(s) begin!
-
March (47)
- Event liveblog: Justin Trudeau vs. Patrick Brazeau
- Farewell, Angelo Persichilli: PMO loses its sixth director of communications in six years
- Orders of the Day - Fix teleprompters, ministers! There's an Economic Action! Plan to tout!
- Committee Recap: Elections Canada looking into 800 complaints covering 200 ridings: Chief Electoral Officer
- Orders of the Day - Happy Budget/Chief Electoral Officer Speaks Out On Robocalls Day!
- UPDATED - NDP MP launches privilege complaint over government's non-answer on the Office of Religious Freedom
- Robocalls Watch: 5 questions for Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand (that he can actually answer at committee)
- UPDATED - Vikileaks30 Watch: Re-pack your bags, Adam Carroll, you've been re-invited to committee!
- Orders of the Day - One more sleep until the next next phase of Canada's Economic Action! Plan is revealed!
- Committee Recap: Anonymous vs .... Parliamentary Democracy itself? So says Vic Toews.
-
February (50)
- Orders of the Day - If those caucus room walls could talk ...
- Order Paper Watch: NDP wants info on government money going to RackNine, RMG and Campaign Research
- Vikileaks Watch: Pack your bags, Adam Carroll, you're going to (the wrong) committee!
- Orders of the Day - Pay no attention to the Vikileaking former Liberal staffer behind the curtain
- UPDATED - Vikileaks30 Watch: (Now former) Liberal staffer revealed as creator of formerly anonymous twitter account
- UPDATED - Robocalls Watch: Conservative Party linked to calls directing voters to different polling stations
- Orders of the Day - Just another manic Monday. (Thanks, robocall story!)
- Liveblog: NDP Leadership Debate (Winnipeg, Manitoba)
- Election Robocall Data Dump - 12 Conservative candidates on the 2011 RackNine client list
- Orders of the Day - Bad Robot!
-
January (68)
- UPDATED - Fate of NDP motion to investigate creeping in camera-itis at committee unknown
- Committee Liveblog: Former Liberal MP turned Lobbyist Joe Jordan talks Lobbying Act at Ethics
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day: Second day back and it feels like they never left.
- In Camera Watch: 'Wallace Manoeuvre' Back On The Agenda At Government Operations?
- Orders of the Day - Let the doors be opened!
- Liveblog: NDP Leadership Debate #2 - "Giving Families A Break" (Halifax)
- UPDATED - PMO InfoAlerteBot After Dark: "Foreign radicals threaten further delays"
- Question of the Day
- PMO InfoAlerte Watch: So, about that Old Age Security "media speculation"...
- Orders of the Day - See you Monday, 41st parliamentarians!
-
