Hot off the PMO InfoAlerteBot presses comes a lengthy dispatch on Old
Age Security, which opens with the unnamed writer grumbling about "media
... speculating that the government may make changes" to the current
system -- which is not, strictly speaking, untrue, but omits the perhaps
pertinent fact that said speculation was sparked by the prime
minister's own words during his speech at the World Economic Forum in
Davos.
In any case, the hoped-for lowest common denominator message takeaway for even the most attention-challenged recipient is likely the fourth line -- "To be clear: there will be no changes to the benefits seniors currently receive" -- but it's definitely worth reading the missive in its entirety, if only to admire how carefully it avoids giving any further details on what might be simmering away on the policy back burner.
It is also the first instance that I can recall of the inclusion of defensive talking points -- or, as the InfoAlerteBot puts it, "lines to define the expected opposition attack" -- specifically, the attack expected from the New Democratic Party which, it seems is not only "irresponsible" and "reckless", but also too "dangerous" for Canadians planning their retirement. (Interestingly, the Liberals didn't even make the cut.)
Here's the full text:
In any case, the hoped-for lowest common denominator message takeaway for even the most attention-challenged recipient is likely the fourth line -- "To be clear: there will be no changes to the benefits seniors currently receive" -- but it's definitely worth reading the missive in its entirety, if only to admire how carefully it avoids giving any further details on what might be simmering away on the policy back burner.
It is also the first instance that I can recall of the inclusion of defensive talking points -- or, as the InfoAlerteBot puts it, "lines to define the expected opposition attack" -- specifically, the attack expected from the New Democratic Party which, it seems is not only "irresponsible" and "reckless", but also too "dangerous" for Canadians planning their retirement. (Interestingly, the Liberals didn't even make the cut.)
Here's the full text:
From: Alerte-Info-Alert [PMO]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 11:46 AM
To: Alerte-Info-Alert [PMO]
Subject: Old Age Security
Old Age Security
Media are speculating that the federal Government may make changes to Old Age Security.
Our Government is committed to ensuring the retirement security of Canadians.
The Harper Government will ensure that seniors maintain ALL the benefits they currently receive.
To be clear: there will be no changes to the benefits seniors currently receive.
We will ensure any changes are done with substantial notice and adjustment period and in a way that does not affect current retirees or those close to retirement, and gives others plenty of time to adjust and plan for their retirement.
In Canada, there are two important programs that provide financial support to older Canadians: CPP/QPP and OAS.
CPP is funded through premiums that working Canadians pay with each paycheque and is on a secure and sustainable path. It does not need to be changed.
OAS is funded primarily through taxes on working people and is unsustainable on its current course.
For example:
- The number of Canadians over the age of 65 will increase from 4.7 million to 9.3 million over the next 20 years.
- The OAS program was built when Canadians were not living the longer, healthier lives they are today.
- Consequently, the cost of the OAS program will increase from $36B per year in 2010 to $108B per year in 2030.
- Meanwhile, by 2030, the number of taxpayers for every senior will be 2 - down from 4 in 2010.
If we do nothing, OAS will eventually become too expensive and unsustainable.
Our Government will act to protect OAS.
We will not put the financial security and well-being of our seniors at risk.
We will take balanced, responsible, and prudent action to ensure OAS remains sustainable for future generations of Canadians.
Background - Retirement Security
Since 2006, we have:
- Increased the Guaranteed Income Supplement for the most vulnerable seniors
- Introduced pension income splitting and increased the age credit
- Introduced innovative new programs such as the tax-free savings account and the PRPP to help Canadians save for retirement.
As a result of our actions, seniors can individually earn approximately $19,000 per year or $38,000 as a couple before paying federal taxes.
Lines to Define the Expected Opposition Attack
We know the Opposition will attack any adjustments to the OAS program.
We know their approach. It's the same tired (failed) approach to deficits and debt that led to the economic crisis in Europe.
The NDP prefers a "head in the sand" approach - ignore the problem until it is too late to save OAS benefits.
Their irresponsible, reckless, and dangerous approach to Canada's finances would put the entire OAS program at risk.
The NDP would put at risk the financial security of millions of middle aged working Canadians - all future generations - who are planning on OAS being there when they need it.
It demonstrates that the NDP is too dangerous for Canadians planning for their retirement.
More Stories under Politics
-
Harper chief of staff resigns amid Senate expense scandal May 20, 2013 1:21 AM ET — Nigel Wright has resigned as Prime Minister Stephen Harper's chief of staff, following revelations he wrote a $90,000 cheque to repay living…
1:21 AM ET
- Email is proof Senate greenlit expenses, Brazeau says May 18, 2013 5:33 PM ET — Senator Patrick Brazeau, in an interview with CBC Radio's The House, says the Senate gave him the green light to claim expenses for an apart… 5:33 PM ET
-
Senator Pamela Wallin leaves Conservative caucus May 18, 2013 3:52 PM ET — Senator Pamela Wallin says she is recusing herself from the Conservative caucus while her travel expense claims are under scrutiny. Wallin's…
3:52 PM ET
About the Author
Other Inside Politics Entries
- Elections Commissioner won't investigate US political consultant for hitting the 2011 campaign hustings with two Conservative candidates
- Orders of the Day - Back to you, Supreme Court of Canada! (On copyright, not Etobicoke Centre, that is.)
- Storify'd: Tony Clement wades into the Great Cuba vs. China Communism Debate
- NDP Ad Watch: Is this the voice of a deputy opposition leader?
- Orders of the Day - Grind faster, wheels of (Supreme Court of Canada) justice!
Archives »
- 2012 (380)
-
July (19)
- Elections Commissioner won't investigate US political consultant for hitting the 2011 campaign hustings with two Conservative candidates
- Orders of the Day - Back to you, Supreme Court of Canada! (On copyright, not Etobicoke Centre, that is.)
- Storify'd: Tony Clement wades into the Great Cuba vs. China Communism Debate
- NDP Ad Watch: Is this the voice of a deputy opposition leader?
- Orders of the Day - Grind faster, wheels of (Supreme Court of Canada) justice!
- UPDATED - Scientists hold Parliament Hill rally to mourn the "Death of Evidence"
- Orders of the Day - Let the Battle for Etobicoke Centre be joined!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Deputy Minister Shuffle Watch: Mandarins on the Move!
- UPDATE - NDP nixes Libs' bid to call Del Mastro to ethics committee
-
June (66)
- Canada Day vs. Dominion Day - What do you call the July 1 holiday?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - Happy Day Before Canada/Dominion Day Eve, Everyone!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Info Commissioner unveils strategy to investigate national security exemption claims
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- 'If we want an effective inquiry...'
- Orders of the Day - Another round of job cuts, a final round of Royal Assent prep and Afghan detainees...
- UPDATED - Is that a (theoretical) constitutional (meta) crisis I see before me?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
-
May (73)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Committee Liveblog: Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson at Procedure and House Affairs
- Committee Liveblog: Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson at Procedure and House Affairs
- Orders of the Day - Whither the F-35 inquiry at Public Accounts?
- Liveblog: Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks to the National Fish and Wildlife Conservation Congress
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- House of Commons Liveblog: The CP Rail back-to-work bill (#C39)
- UPDATED | OotD - No Sleep Till ... 3rd Reading of the CP Back To Work Bill!
- Omnibudget Liveblog: C-38 goes to committee -- and subcommittee, too!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
-
April (57)
- HouseWatch: When it comes to Commons debate, silence isn't always golden
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - Let a new new era of parliamentary civility begin!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Storify'd: PM's off the cuff slam against NDP sparks #HarperHistory lesson
- Orders of the Day - Climb aboard the Canada-EU trade love train, hard-working [Insert Provincial Demonym here]!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- House of Commons Liveblog: The Great "Legal Definition of Human Being" Debate
- Committee Liveblog: Auditor General Michael Ferguson talks F-35 procurement at Public Accounts ... again.
- Orders of the Day - Let the conversation(s) begin!
-
March (47)
- Event liveblog: Justin Trudeau vs. Patrick Brazeau
- Farewell, Angelo Persichilli: PMO loses its sixth director of communications in six years
- Orders of the Day - Fix teleprompters, ministers! There's an Economic Action! Plan to tout!
- Committee Recap: Elections Canada looking into 800 complaints covering 200 ridings: Chief Electoral Officer
- Orders of the Day - Happy Budget/Chief Electoral Officer Speaks Out On Robocalls Day!
- UPDATED - NDP MP launches privilege complaint over government's non-answer on the Office of Religious Freedom
- Robocalls Watch: 5 questions for Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand (that he can actually answer at committee)
- UPDATED - Vikileaks30 Watch: Re-pack your bags, Adam Carroll, you've been re-invited to committee!
- Orders of the Day - One more sleep until the next next phase of Canada's Economic Action! Plan is revealed!
- Committee Recap: Anonymous vs .... Parliamentary Democracy itself? So says Vic Toews.
-
February (50)
- Orders of the Day - If those caucus room walls could talk ...
- Order Paper Watch: NDP wants info on government money going to RackNine, RMG and Campaign Research
- Vikileaks Watch: Pack your bags, Adam Carroll, you're going to (the wrong) committee!
- Orders of the Day - Pay no attention to the Vikileaking former Liberal staffer behind the curtain
- UPDATED - Vikileaks30 Watch: (Now former) Liberal staffer revealed as creator of formerly anonymous twitter account
- UPDATED - Robocalls Watch: Conservative Party linked to calls directing voters to different polling stations
- Orders of the Day - Just another manic Monday. (Thanks, robocall story!)
- Liveblog: NDP Leadership Debate (Winnipeg, Manitoba)
- Election Robocall Data Dump - 12 Conservative candidates on the 2011 RackNine client list
- Orders of the Day - Bad Robot!
-
January (68)
- UPDATED - Fate of NDP motion to investigate creeping in camera-itis at committee unknown
- Committee Liveblog: Former Liberal MP turned Lobbyist Joe Jordan talks Lobbying Act at Ethics
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day: Second day back and it feels like they never left.
- In Camera Watch: 'Wallace Manoeuvre' Back On The Agenda At Government Operations?
- Orders of the Day - Let the doors be opened!
- Liveblog: NDP Leadership Debate #2 - "Giving Families A Break" (Halifax)
- UPDATED - PMO InfoAlerteBot After Dark: "Foreign radicals threaten further delays"
- Question of the Day
- PMO InfoAlerte Watch: So, about that Old Age Security "media speculation"...
- Orders of the Day - See you Monday, 41st parliamentarians!
-
