When it comes to the legislative-work-in-progress that is the bill to
dismantle the gun registry, it seems that the Conservative Party isn't
going to let the government's still somewhat inexplicable decision to leave the bill in question languishing on the Order Paper in pre-report stage stasis daunt its perennial penchant for free coverage.
On Sunday afternoon, the party sent out a press release to tout the new address for a not-technically-new website scraptheregistry.ca, which was originally created back in 2010, when it was used to muster up support for Bill C-391, ostensibly a private members' bill put forward by backbench MP Candice Hoeppner, which eventually went down to defeat in the last parliament.
The website has now been rebranded as scrappedtheregistry.ca -- which was registered in October, for those of you who care about that sort of thing -- despite the fact that the registry has not, in fact, been scrapped, and to suggest that it has could be seen as a wee bit presumptive - and possibly even a contempt of Parliament, according to former Ontario attorney general Michael Bryant.
On Sunday afternoon, the party sent out a press release to tout the new address for a not-technically-new website scraptheregistry.ca, which was originally created back in 2010, when it was used to muster up support for Bill C-391, ostensibly a private members' bill put forward by backbench MP Candice Hoeppner, which eventually went down to defeat in the last parliament.
The website has now been rebranded as scrappedtheregistry.ca -- which was registered in October, for those of you who care about that sort of thing -- despite the fact that the registry has not, in fact, been scrapped, and to suggest that it has could be seen as a wee bit presumptive - and possibly even a contempt of Parliament, according to former Ontario attorney general Michael Bryant.
(Interestingly, the script for the accompanying radio ad that the party claims will be rolled out this week characterizes the registry as "almost gone," thus nicely skirting any potential complaints of misleading advertising.)
Back in 1989, then-Commons Speaker John Fraser thwapped the Progressive Conservative government of the day for running newspaper advertisements that suggested the adoption of the GST was a fait accompli months before it had even passed the House, let alone the Senate.
In his ruling, in which he found no technical breach of privilege, Fraser warned that he would "not be so generous" if such a controversy presented itself in future:
I expect the Department of Finance and other departments to study this ruling carefully and remind everyone within the Public Service that we are a parliamentary democracy, not a so-called executive democracy, nor a so-called administrative democracy.[...] I believe it is in the interest of our parliamentary system of government to have a clear statement from the Speaker which cannot be misinterpreted either in debate or by a vote. A vote on this issue might not support the very important message which your Speaker wishes to convey and which I hope will be, well considered in the future by governments, departmental officials and advertisement agencies retained by them.This advertisement may not be a contempt of the House in the narrow confines of a procedural definition, but it is, in my opinion, ill--conceived and it does a great disservice to the great traditions of this place. If we do not preserve these great traditions, our freedoms are at peril and our conventions become a mockery. I insist, and I believe I am supported by the majority of moderate and responsible members on both sides of the House, that this ad is objectionable and should never be repeated.
In this instance, it is, of course, the governing party, not the government, who is responsible for the ad in question, but that may not be enough to stave off a privilege claim when the House returns in January, since third parties can, in theory, be found guilty of a prima facie breach of privilege as well, although given the numbers in the Chamber, any such finding would be unlikely to be upheld by its occupants.
Then again, perhaps the whole thing is a cunning plan -- a procedural booby trap that the government hopes will lure the opposition into raising a ruckus when the House resumes sitting after the winter break, thus putting the registry - and its imminent demise - back in the headlines.
In any case, stay tuned!
UPDATE: Courtesy of the Library of Parliament by way of the Speaker's Office, the complete text of the Fraser decision:
More Stories under Politics
- Robocalls may need regulating, elections chief tells MPs May 29, 2012 1:22 PM ET — Elections Canada may recommend regulating robocalls following 1,100 complaints from the last election, the Chief Electoral Officer told MPs … 1:22 PM ET
-
Canada joins allies in mass expulsion of Syrian diplomats May 29, 2012 1:56 PM ET — Canada has joined its allies in a co-ordinated expulsion of Syrian diplomats, as the Assad regime continues to engage in brutal violence aga…
1:56 PM ET
- Social media websites ignore privacy laws, watchdog says May 29, 2012 1:38 PM ET — Canada's privacy commissioner said today she is concerned about some social media companies disregarding privacy laws, and Jennifer Stoddart… 1:38 PM ET
About the Author
More Inside Politics Entries
- UPDATED - Happy #CharterDay, everyone! (Just don't suggest amending it to mark the occasion!)
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - Happy 30th anniversary, Charter of Rights and Freedoms!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED: NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to RackNine Inc. and Matt Meier
Archives »
- 2012 (245)
-
April (36)
- UPDATED - Happy #CharterDay, everyone! (Just don't suggest amending it to mark the occasion!)
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - Happy 30th anniversary, Charter of Rights and Freedoms!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED: NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to RackNine Inc. and Matt Meier
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - So, whatever happened to the Prime Minister's Volunteer Awards?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Update: So, about that ban on inducements by non-resident non-Canadians ...
- UPDATED - Did American political tourists run afoul of Canadian election law by campaigning for Conservative MPs in #elxn41?
- Orders of the Day - Leaving -- again -- so soon, Prime Minister?
-
March (69)
- Event liveblog: Justin Trudeau vs. Patrick Brazeau
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Farewell, Angelo Persichilli: PMO loses its sixth director of communications in six years
- Orders of the Day - Fix teleprompters, ministers! There's an Economic Action! Plan to tout!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Committee Recap: Elections Canada looking into 800 complaints covering 200 ridings: Chief Electoral Officer
- Orders of the Day - Happy Budget/Chief Electoral Officer Speaks Out On Robocalls Day!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - NDP MP launches privilege complaint over government's non-answer on the Office of Religious Freedom
- Robocalls Watch: 5 questions for Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand (that he can actually answer at committee)
-
February (70)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - If those caucus room walls could talk ...
- Order Paper Watch: NDP wants info on government money going to RackNine, RMG and Campaign Research
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Vikileaks Watch: Pack your bags, Adam Carroll, you're going to (the wrong) committee!
- Orders of the Day - Pay no attention to the Vikileaking former Liberal staffer behind the curtain
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - Vikileaks30 Watch: (Now former) Liberal staffer revealed as creator of formerly anonymous twitter account
- UPDATED - Robocalls Watch: Conservative Party linked to calls directing voters to different polling stations
- Orders of the Day - Just another manic Monday. (Thanks, robocall story!)
-
January (70)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - Fate of NDP motion to investigate creeping in camera-itis at committee unknown
- Committee Liveblog: Former Liberal MP turned Lobbyist Joe Jordan talks Lobbying Act at Ethics
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day: Second day back and it feels like they never left.
- In Camera Watch: 'Wallace Manoeuvre' Back On The Agenda At Government Operations?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - Let the doors be opened!
- Liveblog: NDP Leadership Debate #2 - "Giving Families A Break" (Halifax)
- UPDATED - PMO InfoAlerteBot After Dark: "Foreign radicals threaten further delays"
- Question of the Day
-
