Add this to the list of problems with the government paying ransom to secure the release of Robert Fowler and Louis Guay, as the Wikileaks cables suggest it did.
It would be illegal.
Section 83.03 (b) of the Criminal Code of Canada says:
The terrorist group that was holding the two Canadian diplomats was Al Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb or AQIM. You can read all about them on the government's own list of banned terrorist organizations.
You might say that the law should be flexible enough to allow something as undeniably positive as securing the release of Robert Fowler and Louis Guay.
And if you made this argument you would likely have a lot of Canadian charities on your side who worry that the law puts them at risk of prosecution for doing things like providing famine relief in areas where terrorist organizations are also likely to benefit from the flow of funds. Somalia comes to mind.
It's not like Parliament was unaware of how broad the anti-terror finance legislation would be when it was debated.
U of T law professor Kent Roach told me "Parliament made a deliberate effort to define terror financing broadly."
Very broadly indeed. So broad, that even a government that is tough on crime can potentially find itself on the wrong side of the criminal code.
Of course, under s.83.24 the consent of the attorney general is required to lay a terrorist charge. So don't expect anything in the near future.
It would be illegal.
Section 83.03 (b) of the Criminal Code of Canada says:
Every one who, directly or indirectly, collects property, provides or invites a person to provide, or makes available property or financial or other related services
(a) intending that they be used, or knowing that they will be used, in whole or in part, for the purpose of facilitating or carrying out any terrorist activity, or for the purpose of benefiting any person who is facilitating or carrying out such an activity, or
(b) knowing that, in whole or part, they will be used by or will benefit a terrorist group,
is guilty of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than 10 years
The terrorist group that was holding the two Canadian diplomats was Al Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb or AQIM. You can read all about them on the government's own list of banned terrorist organizations.
You might say that the law should be flexible enough to allow something as undeniably positive as securing the release of Robert Fowler and Louis Guay.
And if you made this argument you would likely have a lot of Canadian charities on your side who worry that the law puts them at risk of prosecution for doing things like providing famine relief in areas where terrorist organizations are also likely to benefit from the flow of funds. Somalia comes to mind.
It's not like Parliament was unaware of how broad the anti-terror finance legislation would be when it was debated.
U of T law professor Kent Roach told me "Parliament made a deliberate effort to define terror financing broadly."
Very broadly indeed. So broad, that even a government that is tough on crime can potentially find itself on the wrong side of the criminal code.
Of course, under s.83.24 the consent of the attorney general is required to lay a terrorist charge. So don't expect anything in the near future.
More Stories under Politics
- Robocalls may need regulating, elections chief tells MPs May 29, 2012 1:22 PM ET — Elections Canada may recommend regulating robocalls following 1,100 complaints from the last election, the Chief Electoral Officer told MPs … 1:22 PM ET
-
Canada joins allies in mass expulsion of Syrian diplomats May 29, 2012 12:28 PM ET — Canada has joined its allies in a coordinated expulsion of Syrian diplomats, as the Assad regime continues to engage in brutal violence agai…
12:28 PM ET
- Social media websites ignore privacy laws, watchdog says May 29, 2012 1:38 PM ET — Canada's privacy commissioner said today she is concerned about some social media companies disregarding privacy laws, and Jennifer Stoddart… 1:38 PM ET
About the Author
More Inside Politics Entries
- UPDATED - Happy #CharterDay, everyone! (Just don't suggest amending it to mark the occasion!)
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - Happy 30th anniversary, Charter of Rights and Freedoms!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED: NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to RackNine Inc. and Matt Meier
Archives »
- 2012 (245)
-
April (36)
- UPDATED - Happy #CharterDay, everyone! (Just don't suggest amending it to mark the occasion!)
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - Happy 30th anniversary, Charter of Rights and Freedoms!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED: NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to RackNine Inc. and Matt Meier
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - So, whatever happened to the Prime Minister's Volunteer Awards?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Update: So, about that ban on inducements by non-resident non-Canadians ...
- UPDATED - Did American political tourists run afoul of Canadian election law by campaigning for Conservative MPs in #elxn41?
- Orders of the Day - Leaving -- again -- so soon, Prime Minister?
-
March (69)
- Event liveblog: Justin Trudeau vs. Patrick Brazeau
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Farewell, Angelo Persichilli: PMO loses its sixth director of communications in six years
- Orders of the Day - Fix teleprompters, ministers! There's an Economic Action! Plan to tout!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Committee Recap: Elections Canada looking into 800 complaints covering 200 ridings: Chief Electoral Officer
- Orders of the Day - Happy Budget/Chief Electoral Officer Speaks Out On Robocalls Day!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - NDP MP launches privilege complaint over government's non-answer on the Office of Religious Freedom
- Robocalls Watch: 5 questions for Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand (that he can actually answer at committee)
-
February (70)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - If those caucus room walls could talk ...
- Order Paper Watch: NDP wants info on government money going to RackNine, RMG and Campaign Research
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Vikileaks Watch: Pack your bags, Adam Carroll, you're going to (the wrong) committee!
- Orders of the Day - Pay no attention to the Vikileaking former Liberal staffer behind the curtain
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - Vikileaks30 Watch: (Now former) Liberal staffer revealed as creator of formerly anonymous twitter account
- UPDATED - Robocalls Watch: Conservative Party linked to calls directing voters to different polling stations
- Orders of the Day - Just another manic Monday. (Thanks, robocall story!)
-
January (70)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - Fate of NDP motion to investigate creeping in camera-itis at committee unknown
- Committee Liveblog: Former Liberal MP turned Lobbyist Joe Jordan talks Lobbying Act at Ethics
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day: Second day back and it feels like they never left.
- In Camera Watch: 'Wallace Manoeuvre' Back On The Agenda At Government Operations?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - Let the doors be opened!
- Liveblog: NDP Leadership Debate #2 - "Giving Families A Break" (Halifax)
- UPDATED - PMO InfoAlerteBot After Dark: "Foreign radicals threaten further delays"
- Question of the Day
-
