The following is an email response from RCMP spokesperson Sgt. Julie
Gagnon to questions from CBC News about the force's knowledge of the
Public Works Protection Act, a controversial regulation updated and
passed by the Ontario government giving police heightened powers during
this summer's G20 summit in Toronto:
Q: When was the RCMP made aware of the PWPA?
A: A few months before the actual event, the RCMP was made aware that TPS [Toronto Police Service] was considering using the PWPA however; the RCMP was not consulted on if TPS would use the PWPA during the Summits. It was not raised at any operational meetings and the RCMP did not approve the use of the PWPA, it was a TPS decision.
Q: How was the Act explained to the RCMP?
A: The Act was not explained to the RCMP. All we knew is that it was an old Act that would allow TPS special powers to protect property.
Q: Why did TPS need the PWP Act when the RCMP decided not to use it?
A: Each partner in the ISU [Integrated Security Unit, headed by the RCMP] was responsible for preparing their personnel and operations to meet their obligations during the Summits. Please contact TPS for their decision on using the PWP Act. The RCMP was confident that our planning, resources and available lawful authorities in place to protect the visiting International Protected Persons and the public during the Summits were sufficient.
Q: When was the RCMP made aware of the PWPA?
A: A few months before the actual event, the RCMP was made aware that TPS [Toronto Police Service] was considering using the PWPA however; the RCMP was not consulted on if TPS would use the PWPA during the Summits. It was not raised at any operational meetings and the RCMP did not approve the use of the PWPA, it was a TPS decision.
Q: How was the Act explained to the RCMP?
A: The Act was not explained to the RCMP. All we knew is that it was an old Act that would allow TPS special powers to protect property.
Q: Why did TPS need the PWP Act when the RCMP decided not to use it?
A: Each partner in the ISU [Integrated Security Unit, headed by the RCMP] was responsible for preparing their personnel and operations to meet their obligations during the Summits. Please contact TPS for their decision on using the PWP Act. The RCMP was confident that our planning, resources and available lawful authorities in place to protect the visiting International Protected Persons and the public during the Summits were sufficient.
More Stories under Politics
-
Body parts suspect may have filmed killing May 30, 2012 4:56 PM ET — Montreal police say Luka Rocco Magnotta is wanted in connection with the delivery of a human left foot to the Conservative Party of Canada h…
4:56 PM ET
-
'Oilsands fever' seen as Canada's Dutch Disease May 30, 2012 5:44 PM ET — On the eve of NDP Leader Tom Mulcair's visit to Alberta's oilsands, two new reports offer competing evidence about his claim that Canada's e…
5:44 PM ET
- Canadian wine may flow more freely if MPs get their way May 30, 2012 5:24 PM ET — A proposal by a B.C. backbencher to allow Canadians to buy wine outside their province is being rushed through the House after a squabble ov… 5:24 PM ET
About the Author
More Inside Politics Entries
- UPDATED - Happy #CharterDay, everyone! (Just don't suggest amending it to mark the occasion!)
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - Happy 30th anniversary, Charter of Rights and Freedoms!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED: NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to RackNine Inc. and Matt Meier
Archives »
- 2012 (245)
-
April (36)
- UPDATED - Happy #CharterDay, everyone! (Just don't suggest amending it to mark the occasion!)
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - Happy 30th anniversary, Charter of Rights and Freedoms!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED: NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to RackNine Inc. and Matt Meier
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - So, whatever happened to the Prime Minister's Volunteer Awards?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Update: So, about that ban on inducements by non-resident non-Canadians ...
- UPDATED - Did American political tourists run afoul of Canadian election law by campaigning for Conservative MPs in #elxn41?
- Orders of the Day - Leaving -- again -- so soon, Prime Minister?
-
March (69)
- Event liveblog: Justin Trudeau vs. Patrick Brazeau
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Farewell, Angelo Persichilli: PMO loses its sixth director of communications in six years
- Orders of the Day - Fix teleprompters, ministers! There's an Economic Action! Plan to tout!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Committee Recap: Elections Canada looking into 800 complaints covering 200 ridings: Chief Electoral Officer
- Orders of the Day - Happy Budget/Chief Electoral Officer Speaks Out On Robocalls Day!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - NDP MP launches privilege complaint over government's non-answer on the Office of Religious Freedom
- Robocalls Watch: 5 questions for Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand (that he can actually answer at committee)
-
February (70)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - If those caucus room walls could talk ...
- Order Paper Watch: NDP wants info on government money going to RackNine, RMG and Campaign Research
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Vikileaks Watch: Pack your bags, Adam Carroll, you're going to (the wrong) committee!
- Orders of the Day - Pay no attention to the Vikileaking former Liberal staffer behind the curtain
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - Vikileaks30 Watch: (Now former) Liberal staffer revealed as creator of formerly anonymous twitter account
- UPDATED - Robocalls Watch: Conservative Party linked to calls directing voters to different polling stations
- Orders of the Day - Just another manic Monday. (Thanks, robocall story!)
-
January (70)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - Fate of NDP motion to investigate creeping in camera-itis at committee unknown
- Committee Liveblog: Former Liberal MP turned Lobbyist Joe Jordan talks Lobbying Act at Ethics
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day: Second day back and it feels like they never left.
- In Camera Watch: 'Wallace Manoeuvre' Back On The Agenda At Government Operations?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - Let the doors be opened!
- Liveblog: NDP Leadership Debate #2 - "Giving Families A Break" (Halifax)
- UPDATED - PMO InfoAlerteBot After Dark: "Foreign radicals threaten further delays"
- Question of the Day
-
