PMO spokesman
Dimitri Soudas had this to offer in scrum earlier this morning on the resignation of Sebastien Togneri,
over his meddling in at least four different access-to-information
requests to Christian Paradis' department while the minister headed the Public Works portfolio:
Soudas: Ministers are responsible to Parliament for their ministry, their department and everything else. Individuals are also accountable for their own personal responsibilities and Mr. Togneri in this case offered his resignation.
Reporter: unintelligible
DS: In this case the staffer resigned therefore he's no longer an employee, therefore no longer works, therefore that's the responsibility that the minister is holding accountable. See staff are accountable to their ministers and ministers are accountable to parliament. Therefore Mr. Togneri in this case is accountable to his minister, correct? That's what we've been saying all along. Therefore Mr. Togneri resigned. So for example, the news organization that you work for is accountable for everything it publishes, everything it writes, correct? Now if you write something that is offline, offside, wrong, well then you would be accountable to the organization that you work for. It's exactly the same thing.
Reporter: What has Paradis done towards Parliament to be accountable?
DS: Well if Parliament has any questions they can ask him in the House of Commons.
Reporter: The Conservatives never asked for the resignation of a cabinet minister over the actions of their staff?
DS: I'm not sure what you're...
Reporter: When John Baird, he explained that he was testifying because he was the one responsible, not his staff...
DS: Correct. So if the committee for example would like to hear Mr. Paradis on the actions of Mr. Togneri, they can invite him to appear.
Reporter: Right, but to finish my question he wouldn't allow Mr. Togneri or any other staffer to testify...
DS: Correct, because staff are accountable to their ministers.
Reporter: ...so how has Paradis been held accountable for what has happened in this particular instance.
DS: Well in this case, like I said, staff are accountable to their ministers and ministers are accountable to ministers, correct? So in this case Mr. Togneri, the consequences of his actions is that he tendered his resignation for his actions. So if Parliament, which is where ministers are accountable, has any questions on this issue, if they'd like to invite this minister to appear at committee, ask questions in the House of Commons...like I'm not going to comment on behalf of the opposition here guys.
Reporter: But it sounds like you're cherry-picking of when a minister is responsible...
DS: No, not at all. No, the minister is responsible to Parliament. So if Parliament and if parliamentarians have any questions, they can invite the minister to committee to explain the actions of his staffer. LIke I'm not sure...you're not following.
Reporter: No I'm not.
DS: Well clearly not, clearly not. Like I said when your media organization makes errors, if you make an error, you're accountable to the people you work for. And the people you work for, in this case the CBC, is accountable to the public.
Reporter: So why didn't he resign last spring when we learned about the first case?
DS: You know human error occurs all the time. In this case Mr. Togneri, and there was a story yesterday by the Canadian Press, that there were two or three or four more occasions and he tendered his resignation on it.
Soudas: Ministers are responsible to Parliament for their ministry, their department and everything else. Individuals are also accountable for their own personal responsibilities and Mr. Togneri in this case offered his resignation.
Reporter: unintelligible
DS: In this case the staffer resigned therefore he's no longer an employee, therefore no longer works, therefore that's the responsibility that the minister is holding accountable. See staff are accountable to their ministers and ministers are accountable to parliament. Therefore Mr. Togneri in this case is accountable to his minister, correct? That's what we've been saying all along. Therefore Mr. Togneri resigned. So for example, the news organization that you work for is accountable for everything it publishes, everything it writes, correct? Now if you write something that is offline, offside, wrong, well then you would be accountable to the organization that you work for. It's exactly the same thing.
Reporter: What has Paradis done towards Parliament to be accountable?
DS: Well if Parliament has any questions they can ask him in the House of Commons.
Reporter: The Conservatives never asked for the resignation of a cabinet minister over the actions of their staff?
DS: I'm not sure what you're...
Reporter: When John Baird, he explained that he was testifying because he was the one responsible, not his staff...
DS: Correct. So if the committee for example would like to hear Mr. Paradis on the actions of Mr. Togneri, they can invite him to appear.
Reporter: Right, but to finish my question he wouldn't allow Mr. Togneri or any other staffer to testify...
DS: Correct, because staff are accountable to their ministers.
Reporter: ...so how has Paradis been held accountable for what has happened in this particular instance.
DS: Well in this case, like I said, staff are accountable to their ministers and ministers are accountable to ministers, correct? So in this case Mr. Togneri, the consequences of his actions is that he tendered his resignation for his actions. So if Parliament, which is where ministers are accountable, has any questions on this issue, if they'd like to invite this minister to appear at committee, ask questions in the House of Commons...like I'm not going to comment on behalf of the opposition here guys.
Reporter: But it sounds like you're cherry-picking of when a minister is responsible...
DS: No, not at all. No, the minister is responsible to Parliament. So if Parliament and if parliamentarians have any questions, they can invite the minister to committee to explain the actions of his staffer. LIke I'm not sure...you're not following.
Reporter: No I'm not.
DS: Well clearly not, clearly not. Like I said when your media organization makes errors, if you make an error, you're accountable to the people you work for. And the people you work for, in this case the CBC, is accountable to the public.
Reporter: So why didn't he resign last spring when we learned about the first case?
DS: You know human error occurs all the time. In this case Mr. Togneri, and there was a story yesterday by the Canadian Press, that there were two or three or four more occasions and he tendered his resignation on it.
More Stories under Politics
-
Body parts suspect may have filmed killing May 30, 2012 4:56 PM ET — Montreal police say Luka Rocco Magnotta is wanted in connection with the delivery of a human left foot to the Conservative Party of Canada h…
4:56 PM ET
-
'Oilsands fever' seen as Canada's Dutch Disease May 30, 2012 5:44 PM ET — On the eve of NDP Leader Tom Mulcair's visit to Alberta's oilsands, two new reports offer competing evidence about his claim that Canada's e…
5:44 PM ET
- Canadian wine may flow more freely if MPs get their way May 30, 2012 5:24 PM ET — A proposal by a B.C. backbencher to allow Canadians to buy wine outside their province is being rushed through the House after a squabble ov… 5:24 PM ET
About the Author
More Inside Politics Entries
- UPDATED - Happy #CharterDay, everyone! (Just don't suggest amending it to mark the occasion!)
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - Happy 30th anniversary, Charter of Rights and Freedoms!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED: NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to RackNine Inc. and Matt Meier
Archives »
- 2012 (245)
-
April (36)
- UPDATED - Happy #CharterDay, everyone! (Just don't suggest amending it to mark the occasion!)
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - Happy 30th anniversary, Charter of Rights and Freedoms!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED: NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to RackNine Inc. and Matt Meier
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - So, whatever happened to the Prime Minister's Volunteer Awards?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Update: So, about that ban on inducements by non-resident non-Canadians ...
- UPDATED - Did American political tourists run afoul of Canadian election law by campaigning for Conservative MPs in #elxn41?
- Orders of the Day - Leaving -- again -- so soon, Prime Minister?
-
March (69)
- Event liveblog: Justin Trudeau vs. Patrick Brazeau
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Farewell, Angelo Persichilli: PMO loses its sixth director of communications in six years
- Orders of the Day - Fix teleprompters, ministers! There's an Economic Action! Plan to tout!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Committee Recap: Elections Canada looking into 800 complaints covering 200 ridings: Chief Electoral Officer
- Orders of the Day - Happy Budget/Chief Electoral Officer Speaks Out On Robocalls Day!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - NDP MP launches privilege complaint over government's non-answer on the Office of Religious Freedom
- Robocalls Watch: 5 questions for Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand (that he can actually answer at committee)
-
February (70)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - If those caucus room walls could talk ...
- Order Paper Watch: NDP wants info on government money going to RackNine, RMG and Campaign Research
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Vikileaks Watch: Pack your bags, Adam Carroll, you're going to (the wrong) committee!
- Orders of the Day - Pay no attention to the Vikileaking former Liberal staffer behind the curtain
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - Vikileaks30 Watch: (Now former) Liberal staffer revealed as creator of formerly anonymous twitter account
- UPDATED - Robocalls Watch: Conservative Party linked to calls directing voters to different polling stations
- Orders of the Day - Just another manic Monday. (Thanks, robocall story!)
-
January (70)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - Fate of NDP motion to investigate creeping in camera-itis at committee unknown
- Committee Liveblog: Former Liberal MP turned Lobbyist Joe Jordan talks Lobbying Act at Ethics
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day: Second day back and it feels like they never left.
- In Camera Watch: 'Wallace Manoeuvre' Back On The Agenda At Government Operations?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - Let the doors be opened!
- Liveblog: NDP Leadership Debate #2 - "Giving Families A Break" (Halifax)
- UPDATED - PMO InfoAlerteBot After Dark: "Foreign radicals threaten further delays"
- Question of the Day
-
