UPDATED - GuergisJafferWatch: And that, Prime Minister, is how you submit an official request to the Ethics Commissioner
Karen E. ShepherdCommissioner of LobbyingOffice of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada255 Albert Street10th FloorOttawa, Ontario K1A 0R5Dear Commissioner Shepherd:I am writing to you in support of calls for you to conduct an investigation into possible violations of the Lobbyist Act involving GPG - Green Power Generation Corp. and its principals Rahim Jaffer and Patrick Glémaud.I aware that my colleague, Marlene Jennings, our caucus' Government Ethics Critic, sent you a request for such an investigation on April 12, 2010, but additional information that would seem to be relevant has come to light since that letter was sent.There have been recent media reports which allege that Mr. Jaffer told a group of businessmen last September that his company can help clients obtain government funds. "I can get it, no problem ... I have access to a green fund, " an April 8, 2010 Toronto Star article quotes him as saying.More recent media reports indicate that the green fund in question may be the Government of Canada's Green Infrastructure Fund which is administered by the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities. An April 14, 2010 article in the Chronicle Herald states that Mr. Jaffer and Mr. Glémaud met with Mr. Brian Jean, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, regarding the $1 billion Green Infrastructure Fund - a fund for which Mr. Jean, in his role as Parliamentary Secretary, had been delegated the authority for approving projects.An April 14, 2010 article in the Toronto Star reports Mr. Jaffer and Mr. Glémaud's meeting with Mr. Jean took place in June 2009 in Mr. Jean's Ottawa office. The article states that Mr. Jaffer and Mr. Glémaud later submitted three projects to Mr. Jean involving kinetic energy, solar power and a biomass drying system.I note that Section 5 and 7 of the Lobbying Act requires individuals to file a return with the Commissioner of Lobbying if, acting either as a consultant or on behalf of their corporation, that "individual, for payment, on behalf of any person or organization ... undertakes to communicate with a public office holder in respect of the awarding of any grant, contribution or other financial benefit by or on behalf of Her Majesty in right of Canada"I also note that anyone who undertakes lobbying of public office holders of any kind - be they politicians or government officials - must provide an initial registration when they take on new clients.There is no current or inactive registration listed on the public lobbyist registry for Mr. Jaffer or Mr. Glémaud or any other representative acting on behalf of GPG - Green Power Generation Corp. for any meetings with Mr. Jean or any other public office holder.I note in media reports that Mr. Jaffer and Mr. Glémaud have apparently claimed that meetings they had and the proposals for funding that they submitted do not constitute lobbying.In my view, your office is best suited to determine whether or not there has been a violation of the Lobbing Act and the Lobbyist Code of Conduct and I support Ms. Jennings' request that you use your authority to conduct a formal review.Yours truly,Mark Holland, MPAjax-Pickering
Snowdy: I was contacted by the Toronto Star, with respect to some information relating to Rahim Jaffer's -- the night of Rahim Jaffer's impaired-driving arrest. And I held a conversation with Kevin Donovan about that situation. And Kevin took the ball and ran with it. And he's done a hell of a job from my point of view in terms of putting our information together. I didn't provide him with any documents -- I was not in a position to provide him with any documents -- and I only spoke with him after getting consent from my client to discuss certain matters related to Mr. Gillani, in terms of who was present at certain meetings, and to give him the direction to go in.
Seglins: But why is he calling you?
Snowdy: Well, I asked him that. He said he received some information from someone who knew and had been investigating the case, and was on top of it. So, I mean, Kevin had a mutual acquaintance -- actually, several -- and he felt comfortable to call me and ask.
Seglins: OK. So take me through it. What happened?
Snowdy: Kevin called probably, I guess, about a month ago, and I advised him that I'd have to speak with my client. He was very interested in finding out who my client was. I spoke to the client, I got a little bit of direction. I gave him information, and he went off on his investigation. And as I tried to assist him through my client with questions that he had during the course of it. And really, he pursued it. We actually had no idea if he was going to publish anything or when it was going to come out. [...]
Seglins: One of the things you just said was that Mr. Gillani was claiming that Mr. Jaffer was going to have a large equity stake in one of his ventures.
Snowdy: Yes.
Seglins: Did Mr. Jaffer have business interests with Mr. Gillani?
Snowdy: I think you probably have to run that through Kevin Donovan, to be honest with you. Kevin took the business issues and the Jaffer connection to whole new levels of investigation. I have no interest in Mr. Jaffer's business dealings, none at all. And neither do my clients. My clients have interest in Mr. Gillani.
CONFIRMATION:
Late Friday, Dawson's office confirmed its receipt of Davies' letter, with this post on the ethics commissioner's web site:
April 16, 2010--Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson has confirmed that she has received a request from Libby Davies, Member of Parliament for Vancouver East, in relation to the Honourable Helena Guergis. The Commissioner continues to monitor allegations related to Ms. Guergis and is considering the appropriate actions to take. She cannot comment publicly on any actions she is considering.
Under the Conflict of Interest Code for Members of the House of Commons, inquiries can be commenced at the request of a Member or on the Commissioner's own initiative. In either case, an inquiry can only commence after a Member named in a request has had 30 days to respond to the issues raised, and only if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Member has failed to comply with the Code.
The Commissioner is not permitted under the Code to comment any further at this time.
More Stories under Politics
- Back-to-work bill for rail workers clears Commons May 30, 2012 8:03 AM ET — The Harper government has pushed back-to-work legislation through the House of Commons to end a week-long strike by Canadian Pacific Railway… 8:03 AM ET
-
Human body parts mailed to Ottawa to be tested May 30, 2012 8:18 AM ET — Two human body parts found in Ottawa — a foot mailed to the Conservative Party of Canada headquarters and a hand found at a Canada Post term…
8:18 AM ET
-
Vic Toews promises new RCMP discipline legislation May 30, 2012 2:45 AM ET — Federal Public Safety Minister Vic Toews says the government will be introducing new legislation dealing with RCMP discipline.
2:45 AM ET
About the Author
More Inside Politics Entries
- UPDATED - Happy #CharterDay, everyone! (Just don't suggest amending it to mark the occasion!)
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - Happy 30th anniversary, Charter of Rights and Freedoms!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED: NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to RackNine Inc. and Matt Meier
Archives »
- 2012 (245)
-
April (36)
- UPDATED - Happy #CharterDay, everyone! (Just don't suggest amending it to mark the occasion!)
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - Happy 30th anniversary, Charter of Rights and Freedoms!
- Follow politics live on our Hill tickers
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED: NDP MP Pat Martin apologizes to RackNine Inc. and Matt Meier
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day - So, whatever happened to the Prime Minister's Volunteer Awards?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Update: So, about that ban on inducements by non-resident non-Canadians ...
- UPDATED - Did American political tourists run afoul of Canadian election law by campaigning for Conservative MPs in #elxn41?
- Orders of the Day - Leaving -- again -- so soon, Prime Minister?
-
March (69)
- Event liveblog: Justin Trudeau vs. Patrick Brazeau
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Farewell, Angelo Persichilli: PMO loses its sixth director of communications in six years
- Orders of the Day - Fix teleprompters, ministers! There's an Economic Action! Plan to tout!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Committee Recap: Elections Canada looking into 800 complaints covering 200 ridings: Chief Electoral Officer
- Orders of the Day - Happy Budget/Chief Electoral Officer Speaks Out On Robocalls Day!
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - NDP MP launches privilege complaint over government's non-answer on the Office of Religious Freedom
- Robocalls Watch: 5 questions for Chief Electoral Officer Marc Mayrand (that he can actually answer at committee)
-
February (70)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - If those caucus room walls could talk ...
- Order Paper Watch: NDP wants info on government money going to RackNine, RMG and Campaign Research
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Vikileaks Watch: Pack your bags, Adam Carroll, you're going to (the wrong) committee!
- Orders of the Day - Pay no attention to the Vikileaking former Liberal staffer behind the curtain
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - Vikileaks30 Watch: (Now former) Liberal staffer revealed as creator of formerly anonymous twitter account
- UPDATED - Robocalls Watch: Conservative Party linked to calls directing voters to different polling stations
- Orders of the Day - Just another manic Monday. (Thanks, robocall story!)
-
January (70)
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- UPDATED - Fate of NDP motion to investigate creeping in camera-itis at committee unknown
- Committee Liveblog: Former Liberal MP turned Lobbyist Joe Jordan talks Lobbying Act at Ethics
- UPDATED - Orders of the Day: Second day back and it feels like they never left.
- In Camera Watch: 'Wallace Manoeuvre' Back On The Agenda At Government Operations?
- Power & Politics' Ballot Box question
- Orders of the Day - Let the doors be opened!
- Liveblog: NDP Leadership Debate #2 - "Giving Families A Break" (Halifax)
- UPDATED - PMO InfoAlerteBot After Dark: "Foreign radicals threaten further delays"
- Question of the Day
-
