November 27, 2000
I read recently that Americans are murdering the English language. I
sincerely hope not.
Regarding the use of a and an, I was taught that a is used before words
starting with a consonant and an is used before words starting with a
vowel, but I had never before head of the "h factor" that was mentioned in
your column. I discussed this with my high school age grandsons and they
were of the same opinion.
We also discussed the use of "thee" and "the" and I am happy to say that they
were taught that the is pronounced "thee" when it proceeds a vowel. I believe
that at least in Wisconsin schools are teaching proper English.
We went on to talk about the correct pronunciation of either (eyether.) I
have noticed that "eyether" is being used more often then either. What
happened to the rule, "when two vowels go walking, the first one does the
talking?" I am not comfortable using "eyether", but I am trying. Both boys
think "eyether" sounds too uppity.
I wish that sometime you would discuss the words, done and finish. Is it
incorrect to say," I am done using the scissors"? Are done and finish
sometimes interchangeable? While I'm at it, I would like to ask, is snuck
a word? I was taught that sneaked is the past tense of sneak, but lately I
have heard radio and television announcers using snuck.
Kathryn Flynn
Madison, Wisconsin
Editor's Note: According to the Canadian Oxford Dictionary, the
past participle of "do" (done) is synonymous with finished.
So you wouldn't be done for if you interchanged them.
Snuck first emerged as a synonym for sneaked in the
American South in the late 1800s. Although it appears in most major
dictionaries today, some people still refuse to accept the word as
legitimate.
It's now very common in speech and informal writing throughout
North America, according to the Oxford Guide to Canadian English
Usage which predicts the word "may even sneak into formal
writing in the next few years."
September 14, 2000
Thanks for the interesting article on a/an historic(al).
I had a small e-mail skirmish with Veterans Affairs Canada on this topic.
Their web-site was plastered with a graphic title containing the words "an
historic". When I objected (reasonably calmly), I got a non-committal reply.
However, when the web-site was redesigned, the "hilarious" words were gone.
I hope we have seen the last of them, but I agree that it may take a while
until popular usage is consistent.
If you are looking for a similar topic, may I suggest the pronunciation of
"the" before vowels. At least two popular CBC personalities make me snarl at
the radio . . . . (with phrases such as) "thuh English army" . . . "thuh
elephants" . . . "thuh other day" and "thuh only thing".
We hear that Canadian actors have to take lessons to lose their accents if
they have ambitions to work in the States. I really hope that "thuh apple"
is not part of the standard TV American English kit.
It's not universal. Bill Clinton still addresses "thee" American people.
But my kids seem remarkably tolerant of what I would call errors. Their
schools seemed to have skipped the lesson about "thee umbrella" and "thuh
unicorn".
John Batchelor
Ottawa
Editor's Note: Many of CBC's senior editors and producers agree with you. But
there's sometimes a difference between what's in "thuh rule book" and what's on
"thee air".
Here's an excerpt from a chapter of the 1999 CBC Television Style Guide.
Use "thuh" in front of a word that begins with a consonant, including "h". Use
"thee" in front of a word that begins with a vowel. An exception is when describing
something that is the main quite often the (thee) only thing or
concept that deserves attention:
For example, "The (thuh) royal reception was considered to be the (thee)
party of the season.
The advice is based on a language guide used for years by CBC Radio.
June 8, 2000
Surely, since the CBC is for the most part a vocal medium, the deciding factor on "a" vs. "an" is the ease of pronunciation.
"An historical document" fairly rolls off the tongue compared to the stilted "a historical document."
Just a half penny's thought.
Steve Liversidge
June 5, 2000
Thank you for clarifying "a" and "an."
Even though I'm a university professor, and an author of many books, I've never known the convention and always relied solely on how it sounded. Lazy, I never consulted Fowler's as I should have, but have now read Fowler's with interest after your very useful commentary.
You've performed an admirable service to those of us who are supposed to be custodians of proper form, and yet too lazy to know what that proper form is.
Peter C. Emberley, Ph.D.
Professor of Political Science and Philosophy
top | main index | archived letters | contact us