Saskatchewan communities like their infrastructure money, but there sure are a lot of ways to cut the pie — 15 cities, more than 150 towns, 280 villages and hamlets and almost 300 rural municipalities.
And this is in a province where the population is only slightly more than one million people.
While some might argue a booming province that's awash in potash and oil revenues can afford as many roads, bridges and culverts as it wants, a Saskatchewan professor argues otherwise.
Continuing to pour billions of dollars into declining rural areas without any kind of restructuring is "grossly wasteful," says Rose Olfert, an economist with the Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy at the University of Saskatchewan.
Olfert has spent years thinking about fixing what's wrong with population-depleted rural Saskatchewan — and she says just throwing money at the problem isn’t the answer.
Economic regions proposed
In a major report on restructuring written for the Saskatchewan government a decade ago, Olfert and fellow U of S economist Jack Stabler argued that to try to save rural Saskatchewan, the province should be rearranged into 11 to 17 sustainable economic regions.
The regions would surround urban centres and would take over economic development, planning and services that are currently the responsibility of individual communities.
'You have tiny little dots that can’t really do anything on their own … and you have Saskatoon and Regina.' —Economist Rose Olfert
It would be an alternative to what Stabler and Olfert called the existing "fragmented and dysfunctional" municipal government structure.
The structure is this: more than 750 urban and rural municipalities, most of them with a few hundred people each. In comparison, Ontario, which has 13 times the population, has 444 municipalities.
About 150 of the villages and towns in southern Saskatchewan have fewer than 100 residents, according to census data.
"You have tiny little dots that can't really do anything on their own … and you have Saskatoon and Regina," Olfert said.Pense, a village of about 520 people, hopes to embark on a major infrastructure project next year.
The province of "tiny dots" is a legacy of a time, eight decades ago, when there were more than 100,000 farms and 600,000 people lived in rural areas.
Today, following a migration to towns and cities through much of the 20th century, only about 350,000 people remain in farm country.
But much of the infrastructure has stayed behind. There's about 26,000 kilometres of highway crisscrossing vast, sparsely populated areas.
Add in municipal roads and there are more kilometres per capita in Saskatchewan than any other province.
Highways a hot potato
It takes a lot of money to keep 26,000 kilometres of highway smooth and drivable, and when that doesn't happen, the public gets angry.
Petitions to fill potholes, to fix highways and to build new ones have been regular features at the Saskatchewan legislature. And for the politicians in the legislature, rural highways have pretty much been "the third rail" — touch them and you get fried.
Two decades ago, when the government rolled out a plan to convert 1,000 kilometres of little-used asphalt highway to gravel, there was a fierce public outcry and the scheme was quickly abandoned.
All this wasn't lost on politicians in the runup to the Nov. 7 election that returned Premier Brad Wall's Saskatchewan Party to power for another four years.
During the campaign, Wall promised to spend $2.2 billion on highways over the next four years — 64 per cent more, he boasted, than the former New Democrat government had spent in its final four years.
'Let's suppose that the transportation infrastructure is indeed in need of repair, rebuilding. To undertake this across the board is surely grossly wasteful.' — Economist Rose Olfert
The NDP, meanwhile, rolled out hundreds of millions of dollars worth of infrastructure promises of its own.
Growth centres the way to go: prof
However, Olfert says, politics and asphalt often don’t make a good mix.
Saskatchewan needs the best high-quality infrastructure it can build — but the emphasis should be in growth centres and corridors, she says.
Spreading infrastructure dollars around to remote rural communities is not going to stem the decline of these areas, she says.
"Let's suppose that the transportation infrastructure is indeed in need of repair, rebuilding. To undertake this across the board is surely grossly wasteful," she says.
That kind of talk doesn't faze Jim Reiter, Saskatchewan's highways and infrastructure minister.
'It's not like we're willy-nilly spending money.' —Saskatchewan Highways Minister Jim Reiter
Reiter insists that despite record highways budgets, the government is being responsible with taxpayers dollars.
"It's not like we're willy-nilly spending money," he said.
The priority is asphalt that boosts economic development, but there will also be money to maintain rural highways, he says.
Olfert's response is that every dollar spent on infrastructure in "declining or vanishing" regions is a dollar that could get a bigger bang in more economically viable centres.
Village looking to upgrade
Michele LeBlanc, the mayor of the village of Pense, says she tends to agree with Olfert that infrastructure money must be invested where it will do the most good.
However, she argues that Pense, located about 32 kilometres west of Regina, is one of those places.
Pense has a population of about 520, but LeBlanc points out it's growing, with new homes being built and more on the drawing board.
'If you have only 50 or 100 residents, the cost of replacing that infrastructure is astronomical.' —Pense Mayor Michele LeBlanc
Pense also has about $4 million worth of water, sewer and pavement construction it wants to start in the spring.
Raising all that money hasn't been easy. LeBlanc wonders how hundreds of smaller communities could possibly handle things like replacing outdated water systems or rusted sewer pipes.
"If you have only 50 or 100 residents, the cost of replacing that infrastructure is astronomical," she says.
But the alternative, saying no and winding down a village with a dwindling population, means wrenching decisions for somebody, she said.
And who’s going to do that?
"How do you tell someone their town's going to shut down?" she asked. "That's heartbreaking."
Palliative care for towns?
Olfert agrees that the province can't suddenly stop paving roads or abandon the people and businesses in remote, unconnected rural areas.
But the status quo is little more than "palliative care" for dying towns, she says.
A decade ago, Olfert and Stabler argued that the current system, with its hundreds of cities, towns, villages, hamlets and rural municipalities, "has proven incapable of addressing the problems for at least 50 years."
Olfert says those comments are just as relevant today, but she's not optimistic major changes in municipal governance are coming.
As a result, the era of tiny towns will likely continue, she said.
"It's a political hot potato," she said. "Nobody's going to talk about it."
'At this time, we're not hearing any kind of issue regarding [786 communities].' —Municipal Affairs Minister Darryl Hickie
Meanwhile, Municipal Affairs Minister Darryl Hickie says the current system is working fine and forced amalgamations are not in the government's plans.
Hickie noted that in recent years, there has been a lot more regional economic development work going on — so it's not just a case of small towns going it alone.
Hickie also indicated he doesn't think there's anything particularly wrong with Saskatchewan having more than 750 municipalities.
By his count, actually, the number is 786.
"At this time, we're not hearing any kind of issue regarding that," he said.