<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Political Bytes</title>
      <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>2009-10-26T14:00:44Z</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.3-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>First Reading (10/26/09)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<span lang="EN">
<p>Today's essential political reads:</p></span>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/first-reading.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/first-reading.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:00:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Ka-Cheque!!!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The "Welcome to the Cheque Republic" buttons were popular at last weekend's 
Parliamentary Press Gallery Dinner.&nbsp; <br /><br />And now there's a website.&nbsp; <br /><br />Today, the 
Liberals launched <a href="http://www.chequerepublic.ca/">www.chequerepublic.ca</a>. It&nbsp;seems the 
oversized novelty cheque story has had an entirely unanticipated stimulus effect 
-- making the Liberals get all artsy-crafty.&nbsp; ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/ka-cheque.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/ka-cheque.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:19:20 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Just a Small Detail</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="raitt-w-7498041.jpg" src="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/raitt-w-7498041.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" width="584" height="328" /><br /><br />What a curious omission.<br />
<br />
Yesterday, CBC contacted the office of Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt to ask about the lobbyist who helped organize a <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/just-a-small-detail.html">fundraiser on her behalf on Sept. 24</a>. <br />
<br />
Michael B. McSweeney is vice-president of the Cement Association of Canada.&nbsp; <br />
<br />
Both he and the association are registered with the Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada. And a search of the registry shows that on Sept. 24, the Cement Association reported having lobbied
Raitt directly.&nbsp; <br /><div><br /></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/just-a-small-detail.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/just-a-small-detail.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:11:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Hon. Member for Pottymouth</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<span lang="EN">
<p><em><img class="mt-image-none" height="492" alt="hill2.jpg" src="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/hill2.jpg" width="582" />(Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)</em></p>
<p>Having <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/the-tale-of-the-tape---bill-c-311-version.html">blogged earlier</a> about the merits of watching the House of Commons live, or at least watching the videotape later, I must confess that sometimes Hansard can be better than the real thing.</p>
<p>The official transcribers of the proceedings sit in the middle of the room, and hear things that aren't that clear on the audio and video recording.</p>
<p>A case in point:</p>
<p>Yesterday, an MP Twitter'ed that Government House Leader Jay Hill said a naughty word in the House at around 1530.</p></span>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/the-hon-member-for-pottymouth.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/the-hon-member-for-pottymouth.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:22:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The tale of the tape - Bill C-311 version</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<span lang="EN">
<p>The ultimate record of who votes yay and nay on every House of Commons Bill and Motion is contained in the official Hansard lists.</p>
<p>But sometimes, it's interesting to attend in person, or at least watch the videotape, for a sense of the mood and body language as a House vote unfolds.</p></span>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/the-tale-of-the-tape---bill-c-311-version.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/the-tale-of-the-tape---bill-c-311-version.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:04:00 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Great -- now how do we privacy filter our brains?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font><em>&nbsp;Louise Elliott, CBC News</em>.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"></font>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/great----now-how-do-we-privacy-filter-our-brains.html"><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 20px 20px 0px" height="132" alt="berryscreen2b.jpg" src="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/berryscreen2b.jpg" width="200" /></a>The bright minds at 3M may be on to something -- something that MPs and journalists on the Hill could really use.</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">In the mail this week I received my very own sample "privacy filter." It's a piece of transparent grey plastic from the famous makers of Post-It notes and just about anything sticky.</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Once peeled, said plastic will adhere to any Blackberry screen (after you haul out the scissors and cut it to size - something I haven't yet mustered the energy to do.)</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">The pitch? The plastic contains microscopic Venetian blinds built right in, so that the person sitting next to you on the Parliamentary bus, on the Prime Minister's plane or even your seat-mate in Question Period can't read the treatise you are frantically banging out with your thumbs.</font></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/great----now-how-do-we-privacy-filter-our-brains.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/great----now-how-do-we-privacy-filter-our-brains.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:33:04 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Hey Libs: Pick one and go with it!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><span lang="EN"><img class="mt-image-center" style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 20px; TEXT-ALIGN: center" height="457" alt="ignatieffsized.jpg" src="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/ignatieffsized.jpg" width="584" />Running communications for a political party is a trying task at the best of times. </span></p>
<p><span lang="EN">Even more so when you're competing with...yourself. </p></span>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/hey-libs-pick-one-and-go-with-it.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/hey-libs-pick-one-and-go-with-it.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:53:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Twoops!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<div></div>
<div>A twitter gaffe, and apology. Both firsts, we think, by a Member of Parliament.</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Ujjal Dosanjh <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/clips/mov/dosanjhtwitter.mov">rose on a point of order after question period today to apologize</a> ''for tweeting about matters that ought not to have been tweeted about.''</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
<div>Seems the Liberal MP from Vancouver South let his fingers do the talking about&nbsp;what&nbsp;was taking place at&nbsp;an in-camera, closed-door, for MPs-ears-and-eyes-only session of the Commons Defence Committee:</div><br /><img class="mt-image-left" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0pt 20px 20px 0pt" height="110" alt="dosanjhtweet.jpg" src="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/dosanjhtweet.jpg" width="250" /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/twoops.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/twoops.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:36:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>White-Collar Redux (x2)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<img alt="nicholson7262190_2.jpg" src="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/nicholson7262190_2.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" width="584" height="328" /><br /><br />Justice Minister Rob Nicholson held his fourth media event on the government's proposed white-collar crime law today in Ottawa.&nbsp; <br /><br />Again, he was unable to flesh 
out many of the details because the legislation still hasn't been tabled. That 
will happen tomorrow.&nbsp; <br /><br />But Nicholson did release a few details, including a two-year mandatory jail term for fraud over $1 million.<br /><br />
Just as he did 
at <a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/09/toughoncrime_redux.html">last month's "announcement on white-collar crime legislation,"</a> Nicholson 
surrounded himself with what he called "victims of fraud."&nbsp; One of the women 
present at today's announcement is a member of the Earl Jones Organizing 
Committee.&nbsp; <br /><div><br /></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/white-collar-redux-x2.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/white-collar-redux-x2.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:05:52 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>What do you mean the word &quot;ethics&quot; doesn&apos;t appear in the Conflict of Interest Act? - (Sort of) Liveblogging the Ethics Committee</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/what-do-you-mean-the-word-ethics-doesnt-appear-in-the-conflict-of-interest-act---sort-of-livebloggin.html"><i>Kady O'Malley, CBC News</i></a><br /><br /><b>8:36:32 AM</b> 
Greetings, fans of slightly time-delayed semi-livebloggish reporting! 

As noted yesterday, at the moment, I'm not yet able to post just-this-side-of-realtime dispatches from the parliamentary front, but the girl who sat through a seven-hour filibuster over the in-and-out affair isn't going to let a niggling detail like that stop her from covering what could turn out to be a surprisingly lively Ethics meeting. Yes, I'm back at Ethics -- oh, how I've missed it -- and on the agenda today is an appearance by the commissioner herself, Mary Dawson (last seen -- or at least liveblogged -- before the finale Oliphant policy forum over at the University of Ottawa. 

<br /><br />This morning, she'll be discussing her annual report on the Code of Conduct for Public Office Holders, which I confess to not actually having re-read before scrambling my way here to the Hill this morning, so the contents will be just as much of a surprise to me as to any committee members who failed to do their homework last night.<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/what-do-you-mean-the-word-ethics-doesnt-appear-in-the-conflict-of-interest-act---sort-of-livebloggin.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/what-do-you-mean-the-word-ethics-doesnt-appear-in-the-conflict-of-interest-act---sort-of-livebloggin.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:22:18 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Flyer Fight</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Making accusations of excessive partisanship is a dangerous game.</div>
<div><br />First of all, you have to find issues that average Canadians will care 
about.&nbsp;</div>
<div>&nbsp;</div>
Second, you have to make sure you can't be accused of doing the same thing. 

<div>&nbsp;</div> ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/flyer-fight.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/flyer-fight.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:13:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>A Message from Kady</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<i>Kady O'Malley, CBC News.</i><br /><br /><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">Greetings from the CBC Hill 
bureau newbie! <br /><br />Okay, so the original plan was to have me lay comparatively low 
for the first week, since the new blog won't be up and running until next 
Monday, but due to my visible wilting from the enforced temporary withdrawal 
from my beloved political interwebs, the Powers That Be have agreed to let me to 
file the occasional dispatch to Political Bytes. <br /><br />Due to boring technical 
limitations, there won't be any liveblogging until I'm happily ensconced in my 
new corner of the universe, but until then, I'll do my best to keep y'all posted 
on the latest happenings in and around the parliamentary precinct. (Hey, it was 
either that, or come up with increasingly sneaky ways to get around that 
capricious 140 character limit over on Twitter.) <br /><br />Oh, and feel free to drop me a 
line at my new address: </span><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(255, 0, 0); text-decoration: underline;"><a href="mailto:kady.omalley@cbc.ca">kady.omalley@cbc.ca</a></span><span style="font-family: Tahoma; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">. </span> ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/a-message-from-kady.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/a-message-from-kady.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:24:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Welcome Back, Coderre!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[What do you know? Denis Coderre is back in the House of Commons. <br /><br />You may 
remember that little bit of trouble he stirred up when he quit his job as the 
Liberal Quebec lieutenant and then proceeded to diss his leader for running 
things "out of Toronto." <br /><br />Well, after laying low for a couple of weeks...he's back. <br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/welcome-back-mr-coderre.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/welcome-back-mr-coderre.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:19:59 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Do You Know What AECL Stands For?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[




<div><i>Susan Lunn, CBC News. </i><br /><br />Do you know what AECL stands for?<br /><br />If you can't answer that, don't worry. You're not alone.<br /><br />An Ipsos Reid poll done last February and March show that nearly 70 per 
cent of respondents admitted they didn't know much about the Crown 
corporation.<br /><br />The union representing the engineers and scientists who work at 
AECL held a news conference today, in part to spread the word about what it 
is they actually do.<br /><br /></div>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/do-you-know-what-aecl-stands-for.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/do-you-know-what-aecl-stands-for.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:28:14 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Novelty Cheques, Novel Portrait?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/a-pictures-worth-a-thousand-cheques.html"><img alt="harpermosaic.jpg" src="http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/harpermosaic.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" width="584" height="328" /></a><br /><br />The giant novelty cheque story appears to have inspired the the Liberal party's artsy side.<br /><br />Today at a news conference, Liberal MPs David McGuinty and Marcel Proulx announced the party is launching 47 complaints with Canada's ethics commissioner, saying that they've found 181 examples where Conservative MPs have taken credit for taxpayer-funded Government of Canada funding announcements through the use of "personalized partisan cheques" since 2007. <br /><br />Why 47 complaints? One for each Tory MP the
Liberals say handed out the cheques.<br /><br />Today's news conference also featured a crafty multi-media presentation, which included an image of Prime Minister Stephen Harper made up of a collage of those oversized cheques. <br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/a-pictures-worth-a-thousand-cheques.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/politicalbytes/2009/10/a-pictures-worth-a-thousand-cheques.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:02:22 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
