While two men, chafing under the restrictions of security certificates, were in court today MPs further debated a new version of those certificates.
Bill C-3 is the government's answer to a Supreme Court of Canada ruling last year.
The justices decided the old system was unconstitutional because it was too secretive. They gave Parliament one year to draft something better.
But the proposed new law isn't thrilling many MPs.
The NDP plans to vote against it. So does the Bloc Quebecois.
As for the Liberals, some say they're not comfortable with the bill but want the party to present a united front on this issue. Last year the Conservative Party accused Liberals of being "soft on terror" when they joined the NDP and BQ in striking down two provisions of the 2001 anti-terrorism law investigative hearings and the preventative arrests of suspected terrorists.
Among their concerns with this new bill is that it remains a secretive process and that lawyers representing suspects still won't be able to share evidence with their clients.
One MP said the issue of security certificates was a very tough issue for the entire Liberal caucus.
The vote is expected Monday.
- The "Welcome to the Cheque Republic" buttons were popular at last weekend's Parliamentary Press Gallery Dinner. And now there's a website. Today, the Liberals launched www.chequerepublic.ca. It seems the oversized novelty cheque story has had an entirely unanticipated stimulus effect --... Continue reading this post
- Just a Small Detail
- What a curious omission. Yesterday, CBC contacted the office of Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt to ask about the lobbyist who helped organize a fundraiser on her behalf on Sept. 24. Michael B. McSweeney is vice-president of the Cement Association... Continue reading this post