CBCnews

Online Panel Blog

Meet our online political panel, three Canadians from different backgrounds who follow federal politics closely and are not affiliated with any party. They will be meeting regularly online to share their views and observations of recent events. We invite your comments.
Friday, October 10, 2008 | 01:42 PM ET

Pauline: Nik, Sarah, in my experience of covering elections, each one has a heartbeat, a way of unfolding that is unique — and that's part of the fascination. This election has arrhythmia!

Historically, campaigns have momentum in one direction or the other. Early on, the Conservatives were worried about peaking too soon. A couple of days ago, it looked like that was happening, with the Liberals beginning to rise and the Conservatives dropping.

But the turmoil in world markets has altogether changed the calculus. And if you factor in social networking and strategic voting, today it feels as if almost anything could happen. What do you think?

Nik: Polling aside, in trying to anticipate what will happen, a very simple rule of thumb hasn't let me down. Ask yourself who an election is about on the weekend before the vote and you can usually see who is in trouble.

In 2004. the closing days of the election were about the Harper Conservatives and they lost. In 2006 the closing days of the election were about the Martin Liberals and they lost.

The Conservatives need a strategy that will pivot the attention of voters to the Dion Liberals. I was a bit surprised not to see their advertising campaign launch with their platform.

Considering their war chest and campaign bricks and mortar, I expected a big push for the close.

My sense is that the Conservative campaign has had difficulties with the economy turning from a positive to a negative issue for them. In football terms, one could say they have a problem "reading the blitz."

Read the Full Article »

Monday, October 6, 2008 | 10:39 PM ET

Nik: As I write this, the TSX on Monday is down over 1,000 points, the Dow has plunged below 10,000 and the price of a barrel of oil is below $90.

At the beginning of the campaign, the initial Conservative support was partly due to the message that the Liberals would be a risky choice on the economy. The first Wall Street meltdown validated the Conservative message.

However, Harper has been firm in saying that the economic fundamentals in Canada are good and that the Conservative strategy of tax cuts set a strong foundation.

The challenge for him is that if the perception unfolds that Canada must be more proactive on the economy, this initial advantage may turn into a vulnerability.

When Canadians see wild fluctuations in the value of their RRSPs or the savings for their children's education fund, they get nervous. Looking south, it's clear that even the right-wing Bush administration is being proactive.

The opposition party leaders touched on this in the two debates.

In addition to the economy playing out as an issue, Tuesday's Conservative platform launch will be critical for their campaign.

Sarah: Given the current crisis, I think Harper has some significant challenges.

His social policies don't really mesh well with Canadian values, but he managed to do well in the past due to a healthy economy. Now it's all changing and the average person is feeling panicked, wondering if it was such a good idea to blow our surplus without strengthening jobs or Employment Insurance programs.

Read the Full Article »

Friday, October 3, 2008 | 01:31 PM ET

Sarah: Hi Pauline, Nik

I just finished watching the English leaders' debate without flipping to the vice-presidential debate, and I must admit my self-discipline was well rewarded. I found the debate interesting and illuminating. In particular, I though Elizabeth May was a terrific addition. Her responses were complex and I appreciated the historical context she provided on several occasions. I was hoping her presence would add depth to the debate and it definitely did.

There was a surprising amount of corroboration of ideas amongst the opposition. The biggest surprise for me though came when Layton, Dion, Duceppe and May all demanded greater protection for Canadian jobs and industries through a "made in Canada" policy. This flies in the face of all free trade agreements. Amazing.

In this debate all parties were leaning left, I'd even go so far to say that socialism was being reinvigorated. How many times was Sweden cited as an example of good economic management — at least two. Even Harper was doing everything he could to distance himself from American conservative policies. I'm interested in what you two have to say about this evening, but first I wanted to share my favourite lines of the night.

"Mr. Harper, where's your platform? Under your sweater?" Jack Layton, referring to the fact that the Conservatives have not released a platform.

Read the Full Article »