Appeal in Otter Lake landfill water quality case dismissed

A Nova Scotia Supreme Court judge has thrown cold water on a bid by the Crown to appeal a lower court ruling that found there was no evidence Halifax breached water-quality standards at its Otter Lake landfill.

Crown sought new trial and accused Halifax of breaching condition of approval

A Nova Scotia Supreme Court judge has dismissed an appeal calling for a new trial against Halifax related to water-quality management at the Otter Lake landfill. (CBC)

A Nova Scotia Supreme Court judge has thrown cold water on a bid by the Crown to appeal a lower court ruling that found there was no evidence Halifax breached water-quality standards at its Otter Lake landfill.

In February 2014 the city was charged under the Environmental Act, accused of allowing too much sediment in water being discharged from the landfill into nearby Nine Mile River. 

The province's Environment Department issued a $693.95 ticket against the city.

In January 2015, provincial court Judge Bill Digby tossed the charge and said there was no evidence to support allegations the facility had exceeded surface water standards.

The Crown appealed in July 2015 and asked for a new trial, alleging the city breached a condition of the facility's operations approval.

The condition in question outlines how often surface water samples should be taken and the allowed maximums of total suspended solids — or sediment. 

In a decision released Tuesday, Justice Patrick Duncan agreed with Digby — there wasn't proof that muddy surface water was entering Nine Mile River.

Duncan also questioned the wording of the condition the Crown had zeroed in on. In his decision, Duncan said the section "is not certain and not clear in its meaning."

"The text could support the interpretations offered by either the Crown or the respondent," he wrote.

Duncan dismissed the appeal and said the approval condition isn't specific enough to support the Crown's appeal.

He said the province can regulate Otter Lake's environmental conditions "without affixing quasi-criminal liability."

Comments

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.