ICBC ordered to pay refugee $400K for malicious prosecution

A British Columbia judge has awarded a woman who "experienced the wrath" of the province's insurance corporation nearly $400,000.

Refugees Danica Arsenovski and her husband were hit by a car shortly after arriving in Canada

ICBC has been found liable for malicious prosecution against a woman who filed an insurance claim after she and her husband were hit by a car. (CBC)

A British Columbia judge has awarded a woman who "experienced the wrath" of the province's insurance corporation nearly $400,000.

B.C. Supreme Court Justice Susan Griffin said in a written decision released Wednesday that the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia and one of its investigators are liable for malicious prosecution, and that their conduct in the case was high-handed and reprehensible.

Danica Arsenovski and her husband had recently come to Canada as refugees from the former Yugoslavia when they were struck by a car and injured while crossing an intersection in Burnaby in January 2000.

After the crash, Arsenovski gave a statement to ICBC through a translator because she does not speak much English.

The statement detailed the injuries she received and what she remembered about the crash, but did not specifically say whether Arsenovski herself had been struck by the car or whether she had fallen when her husband was struck and fell into her.

Arsenovski was later charged with making a false statement.

ICBC investigator 'cherry-picked' evidence

Griffin wrote in her decision that John Gould, the ICBC investigator in the case, wrote a misleading report to Crown counsel recommending the charge, intending to dissuade civil claims against the insurance agency.

The report alleged Arsenovski had "clearly" made a false statement "where she claimed she was knocked down and injured after her husband had been knocked into her."

The judge said Gould, a former police officer, "cherry-picked" evidence for the report and misstated what Arsenovski said in her statement.

She said Gould also encouraged other agencies, such as the health and immigration ministries, to take action against the woman, who was vulnerable, being new to Canada and unable to speak much English.

"Mr. Gould pursued Mrs. Arsenovski with a vengeance that was significantly out of proportion with any objectively reasonable concern he could have had as to whether or not she actually might make a claim," Griffin wrote.

The charge was eventually stayed on the day Arsenovski's trial for making a false statement was set to begin.

Judgement as 'strong message' to ICBC

But the effects of the experience have stayed with her, the judge said, noting how the woman "choked up in court" and how she has not told anyone, including her siblings and adult children, about the charge, even after it was lifted.

"The stain she feels on her character as a result of being charged criminally might never be erased," Griffin wrote.

She awarded Arsenovksi $387,225.34 in damages and costs.

Cases such as this could dissuade people who have valid claims from pursuing them, the judge said in laying out her reasons for the penalty.

"A strong message of denunciation must be sent to ICBC," she wrote.

Griffin also had harsh words for the Crown corporation and noted that one of the agency's key purposes is to provide compensation to people who are involved in accidents.

"The corporation does not serve the residents of this province when it uses tactics of intimidation to discourage civil claims," she wrote.

Comments

To encourage thoughtful and respectful conversations, first and last names will appear with each submission to CBC/Radio-Canada's online communities (except in children and youth-oriented communities). Pseudonyms will no longer be permitted.

By submitting a comment, you accept that CBC has the right to reproduce and publish that comment in whole or in part, in any manner CBC chooses. Please note that CBC does not endorse the opinions expressed in comments. Comments on this story are moderated according to our Submission Guidelines. Comments are welcome while open. We reserve the right to close comments at any time.