Andrew Willis: Cleaning up the oil sands mess
- May 12, 2008 8:03 AM |
- By Michael Hlinka
Money Talks is a collection of daily columns from The Business Network, which airs weekday mornings on CBC Radio One at 5:45 a.m. ET (6:15 a.m. ET in N.L.).
By Andrew Willis, a columnist with the Globe and Mail
(Listen to the original audio)
There are days I wish I had studied environmental engineering - not journalism - back at university. I'd be Alberta-bound right now. There's good money to be made in mining the oil sands and there's even better money to be made in cleaning up the mess.
It took the deaths of 500 ducks last week to wake people up to the dirty little secret of the oil sands - they're a bit of an environmental nightmare. The ducks died in what's known as a tailings pond run by Syncrude. It's the muck that's left over, after the oil is separated from the sand.
There are a lot of tailings ponds around. If that means a lot of dead mallards, there's obviously problem.
You've got alarmist saying environmental issues are going to stop development of the oil sands. With all due respect, that's just nonsense.
The oil sands are central to North America's energy needs. The U.S. ambassador to Canada talks about Alberta oil all the time. These projects are important - we just have to come to grip with the environmental costs.
That's where the engineers come in.
There are companies springing up in Alberta that focus on cleaning up the soil and the water after the oil is gone. No-one talked much about these companies in the past, but they will be star performers in the future.
And here's an interesting little deal you probably didn't hear much about: One of the biggest players in oil patch waste got bought last year. The company was called CCS Income Trust. It fetched a hefty $3.5 billion.
The buyer was a constorium led by Goldman Sachs, the big investment bank. The smart money has already figured out there's more than one way to make a fortune in oil.
Categories
- Andrew Wahl (19)
- Andrew Willis (13)
- Bob LeDrew (10)
- Dan Noel (1)
- David Baskin (18)
- David Berman (1)
- David Colman (14)
- Deborah Yedlin (29)
- Duncan Stewart (29)
- Ellen Roseman (90)
- Jacqueline Drew (10)
- Jim Bray (25)
- Jim Jubak (6)
- John Gilchrist (4)
- Kelly VanBuskirk (6)
- Kira Vermond (73)
- Loraleigh Kovacik (9)
- Michael Hlinka (183)
- Peter Vincent (16)
- Pierre Battah (1)
- Todd Hirsch (1)
All News blogs
Most Commented
Most Recommended
Money Talks
Most Commented
Most Recommended
Recent Entries
- Kira Vermond: Resolutions for Work
- New Year, new you. At least that's what you're shooting for in 2012 at your workplace. This is the year that you're going to ditch your wallflower ways, speak up in meetings and take the initiative.... Continue reading this post
- Ellen Roseman: Air Miles-Use them or lose them!
- If you're collecting Air Miles, you now have only five years to use them. And if you don't redeem in time, you'll lose them.... Continue reading this post
- Kira Vermond: New Year's resolutions
- Sure, Hanukkah has begun and Christmas is still a few days away, so it feels a little early to fast forward to the New Year. But that's exactly what you've got to do if your resolution is "find another... Continue reading this post
Comments (2)
Keep dreaming. There will be no clean up of the environmental castrophe called the tar sands.
This is a disaster that governments are permitting and people are blindly supporting. Only the naive would believe that the tar sands disaster will or ever can be cleaned up.
These are the same people who support the US War of Terror, which has been the main cause of increased commodity prices around the world. Not bad for a bunch of conservative hacks who have created an entire war industry based on fabricated evidence, lies about who all was involved with 9/11. Dream on about cleaning up this mess.
If we want to clean up the mess, start by voting out all war mongering right wing governments and can journalistic hacks who fail to understand modern realities or pursue the real truth about 9/11.
I agree with Bob, there are not enough tough and smart public who want to focus on the REAL problem. Most people are only in it for the money, and care less what happens to the environment - as long as their trusty Wal=Mart is open.
We compliment them by calling them "smart". There is a real difference between "smart" and "clever". The real smarts are those who can see the problem and willingly challenge it. The clever only pretend, then return to their never-ending self gratification; never for a nano second willing to do anything corrective.
Mark me down for negative. Politicians are always LAST off the mark; needing to be pushed. The media-programed headonistic public dont have the vaguest idea on their own - if they aren't told what to think, they are on auto-shopping pilot. If they can't CONSUME their way out, forget it!