Kelly VanBuskirk: A wrongful dismissal case that's making waves
- February 26, 2008 7:51 AM |
- By Michael Hlinka
Money Talks is a collection of daily columns from The Business Network, which airs weekday mornings on CBC Radio One at 5:45 a.m. ET (6:15 a.m. ET in N.L.).
By Kelly Van Buskirk, a lawyer with Lawson Creamer in Saint John, N.B.
(Listen to the original audio)
Well, employer circles are all abuzz about this week's hearing of the groundbreaking Honda case in the Supreme Court of Canada. Every business owner should be staying tuned over the next few months to find out how our country's highest court decides the issues which have been raised by the automaker and its dismissed employee, Kevin Keays.
In case you don't remember, Honda Canada fired Kevin Keays a few years ago, after his medical disability prevented him from complying with the company's attendance management program and after he questioned the utility of meeting with yet another company doctor.
The trial judge who presided over Keays' wrongful dismissal claim really threw the book at the company: he ordered Honda to pay close to one and a half months of salary compensation for every year that Keays had been employed, along with a huge punitive damages award of $500,000 and an award of legal costs and expenses which amounted to more than $600,000 more!
Although the Ontario Court of Appeal wound the penalty damages portion of the whole mess back to $100,000, the result was still bad enough that Honda put the case in front of the Supreme Court of Canada on February 20th. The company is asking the Supreme Court to erase much of the damage it suffered in the Ontario courts.
The Supreme Court story doesn't end there, however. Kevin Keays didn't take Honda's appeal lying down. Keays cross-appealed on several fronts, including a request for increased punitive damages and, more importantly, recognition of discrimination as a new basis of wrongdoing in the courts. Right now, the law says that only human rights boards can rule that an employer has discriminated against an employee. What Keays has asked the Supreme Court to do is to allow Judges to make those decisions, as well.
If that happens, then a long-standing legal rule which has protected employers will be changed, and companies across Canada will have to brace themselves for an added dimension to employee lawsuits.
Judging from the throng of interested parties and observers at the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa during the Honda case, this is a decision that will attract lots of publicity. Whatever the Supreme Court of Canada decides in the Honda case, I'm sure that Canadian companies will want to know about it, since the law which determines how employees can be treated by their bosses, and how much money they can be awarded in wrongful dismissal lawsuits, may change dramatically.
-- For the Business Network, I'm Kelly VanBuskirk in Saint John.
(Click on the comment link below to share your view)
Categories
- Andrew Wahl (19)
- Andrew Willis (13)
- Bob LeDrew (10)
- Dan Noel (1)
- David Baskin (18)
- David Berman (1)
- David Colman (14)
- Deborah Yedlin (29)
- Duncan Stewart (29)
- Ellen Roseman (90)
- Jacqueline Drew (10)
- Jim Bray (25)
- Jim Jubak (6)
- John Gilchrist (4)
- Kelly VanBuskirk (6)
- Kira Vermond (73)
- Loraleigh Kovacik (9)
- Michael Hlinka (183)
- Peter Vincent (16)
- Pierre Battah (1)
- Todd Hirsch (1)
All News blogs
Most Commented
Most Recommended
Money Talks
Most Commented
Most Recommended
Recent Entries
- Kira Vermond: Resolutions for Work
- New Year, new you. At least that's what you're shooting for in 2012 at your workplace. This is the year that you're going to ditch your wallflower ways, speak up in meetings and take the initiative.... Continue reading this post
- Ellen Roseman: Air Miles-Use them or lose them!
- If you're collecting Air Miles, you now have only five years to use them. And if you don't redeem in time, you'll lose them.... Continue reading this post
- Kira Vermond: New Year's resolutions
- Sure, Hanukkah has begun and Christmas is still a few days away, so it feels a little early to fast forward to the New Year. But that's exactly what you've got to do if your resolution is "find another... Continue reading this post
Comments (5)
The courts have been increasing the awards in employment litigation for some time. Most businesses are not listening though. One would think that after the Wallace decision that every lawfirm would be offering a coupon for an annual course in employment law to their clients.
This Honda matter is quite interesting as it touches on our Charter - and states we can not be discriminated against for what ever reason. Yes all judges should have the power to rule on such a decision of human rights.
We should not have to look at various tribunals time and time again when a wrong has been committed against us as it makes us a victim again and again.
Now if there was some way to make the courts affordable to the average citizen......
"The Courts have been increasing" This, is the problem not yet explored, which I believe has far reaching implications within our judicial system, which at present seems somewhat contorted by the litigating side of it, if not even sidetracked to some degree. Maybe the system to account for the fairness of these "increasing awards" needs to be revisited. Who knows maybe that will have an impact on the "affordability" of our legal system to the common user.
I think it would be great to see the courts more involved in hearing complaints of discrimination. My worry is the impact it would have on Human Right Commissions and Tribunals. While in some provinces these organizations ar dramatically underfunded and the rules they operate under leave complainants waiting years before receiving justice, they are still champions of Human Rights for rich and poor alike.
On the other hand I can see a streamlining of the system in that wrongful dismissal suits involving Human Rights violations can be heard in one venure instead of tying up both the Human Rights system and the court system.
I think we should wait and see, these companies have the big bucks and the same as when I was working for Canada Post, I won an award of 2 days pay (for a 5 day suspension I was awarded for a matter which was totally unavoidable because of management incompetence) and after I won Canada post just says Oh Well we'll pay it back when we feel like it, that was three or four years ago, Hahahaha, they never lose.
The real crime is the way that system works period. Mr Keays suffers from CFS, add to that strain on himself both physically as well as mentally. The body does react in a significant way when it is faced with uncertainty. There is no consideration for this individuals health only the protection of profits, which is discrimination in itself, most importantly though is fact that Honda is representing "ALL" businesses that want to know ......
HOW FAR CAN THEY GO !!!!! or what they are looking for is ...... How far over the line can their lawyers get them......
O.J