CBC In Depth
INDEPTH: FEDERAL ELECTION 2004
Paul Martin - on probation
CBC News Online | June 28, 2004


Paul Martin watches results come in (CP photo)

In the beginning, it looked like 2000 all over again. Liberals, strong in Atlantic Canada and hanging on – even adding slightly to seats they held under former prime minister Jean Chrétien.

And as polls closed from Quebec to Alberta and the wave of results poured in, it became clear that predictions of a very close race were off the mark.

"Holy cow. This is stunning. The polls were wrong. This is unexpected."

University of Calgary political scientist Lisa Young says Conservative Leader Stephen Harper didn't deliver.

The Conservatives hoped for a breakthrough in Ontario. But they fell well short of the 40-seat minimum they wanted. The united right couldn't match the 38 per cent of the vote that the Alliance and the Progressive Conservative party achieved in Ontario in 2000.

"Coming in with the neighbourhood of 20 seats in Ontario might have been a breakthrough had they not merged with the [Progressive] Conservative party," Young told CBC News.


Bloc Quebecois Leader Gilles Duceppe flashes a victory sign following on June 28. (CP photo)

In Quebec, the Liberals were punished - but not as severely as the pundits had predicted. The Bloc made big gains, but did not sweep the province. The NDP fell short of its goal of holding the balance of power.

"All parties have a serious obligation to try to make things work," said former NDP leader Ed Broadbent, once more an MP after a 15-year break from politics.

"It's in the self-interest of all the parties right now to be seen to be working together," said Broadbent, who was the NDP caucus chair in the 1972-74 Trudeau minority government.

Conservative Peter MacKay said the government's survival depends on all of the parties. He said the level of co-operation depends on the issues and whether the Liberals follow through on their promises.

About the only thing the pollsters got right was the next government would be a minority. But there was no doubt about who would sit in the prime minister's office.

Donna Dasko, senior vice-president with Environics Research, said it's clear that the messages coming from Paul Martin in the final days of the campaign – that the Conservatives would radically change the country – reached voters.

"It had to be an important factor as people went to cast their ballots," Dasko said.

It was definitely a factor in Atlantic Canada, according to Peter Boswell, a political scientist at Memorial University in St. John's.

"Certainly the new Conservative party is much more right wing than the old Progressive Conservative party was, and this has alienated some people -- the so-called Red Tories," Boswell says.

Voters were worried that had the Conservatives won, Boswell suggests, they would have moved to drop regional economic development programs such as the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency.

This will be the first minority government since former prime minister Joe Clark tried to govern as though he had a majority, 25 years ago. That experiment lasted nine months.

Nancy Jamieson was an executive assistant to Clark at the time. She says some minority governments may be productive, but it's very difficult to make them work.

"I think people reflect on them with a sort of wistfulness and nostalgia because they think back to the kind of social progress that was made in the early '60s under a Pearson government. But if it doesn't work well, if it's contentious, if it disturbs the social order, if it's fractious with people fighting, I'm not sure that Canadians are going to want that again."


Stephen Harper in Calgary (CP photo)

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper conceded that he was disappointed with the party's showing. The University of Calgary's Young says some elements of the party may also show their disappointment with him.

"I don't think [Harper] will resign, but I think the old Progressive Conservative party and the Canadian Alliance were very different parties, with very different cultures and very different policy stances," Young said. "They put their differences aside because it looked like they would make serious electoral gains. They haven't. Their percentage of the popular vote has gone down. Once they get two years to stew on things, old PCs are going to try to oust Harper, try to blame it on him."

Yes, the Liberals did win a new mandate. But despite a campaign that highlighted what many considered stark differences between the Liberals and Conservatives, voter turnout was again a problem, barely budging from the recently revised 64 per cent who turned out in 2000.

"Real choice is not much of a predictor of [voter] turnout," Donald Green, a political science professor at Yale University who has done extensive research on voter turnout, told CBC News Online. "[It's good for] maybe a percentage-point or two. Not something that would reverse a long-term slide, which is what Canada and other Western democracies currently confront."

Consultant Allan Gregg says it's not enough to invite people every four years to mark an X on a ballot with a pencil.

"You've got to engage them in the political process. People aren't feeling like they are a part – and it's particularly true of younger voters."

Liberal strategist Mike Robinson says the election unfolded as it should have.

"In the end, the electorate got what it wanted. They didn’t want to be held hostage by the Bloc. They wanted a workable government."

In the end, the electorate got the ninth minority government since Confederation. If history is any indication, Canadians can expect to pass judgment on the government that emerges from this election in about 17 months.




^TOP
MENU

MAIN PAGE MINORITY RULES QUOTES RECOUNTS

MORE:
Print this page

Send a comment

Indepth Index