- Case title: U.S. v. Black et al, No. 05 CR 727, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (Chicago).
- Trial began: March 20, 2007.
- Verdict delivered: July 13, 2007.
- Sentencing: Dec. 10, 2007.
- Presiding judge: Amy St. Eve
The charges
Conrad BlackFormer CEO of newspaper publisher Hollinger International
- Five counts of mail fraud
- Four counts of wire fraud
- One count of racketeering
- One count of obstruction of justice
- Two counts of tax fraud
- (One count of money laundering was dropped)
Black was found guilty on July 13, 2007 of three counts of mail fraud and one count of obstruction of justice. He was found not guilty on nine other charges, including mail fraud, wire fraud, racketeering and tax fraud.
He was sentenced on Dec. 10, 2007 to 6½ years in prison and served 28 months in a Florida correctional institution before he was granted bail on July 19, 2010. On Oct. 29, 2010, a U.S. appeals court threw out two of the fraud convictions and upheld one fraud conviction and the conviction for obstruction of justice. Sentencing on those two convictions is set for June 24, 2011.
Jack BoultbeeFormer chief financial officer of Hollinger International
- Five counts of mail fraud
- Four counts of wire fraud
- Two counts of tax fraud
Boultbee was found guilty of three counts of mail fraud. He was found not guilty on the remaining charges, sentenced to 27 months in jail and fined $152,000. He served 11 months.
Peter AtkinsonFormer executive vice-president of Hollinger International
- Five counts of mail fraud
- One count of wire fraud
- One count of tax fraud
- (A second count of tax fraud was dropped)
Atkinson was found guilty of three counts of mail fraud. He was found not guilty on the remaining charges. He was sentenced to 24 months in jail, fined $3,000 and served about 11 months.
Mark KipnisFormer corporate counsel of Hollinger International
- Six counts of mail fraud
- Three counts of wire fraud
- Two counts of tax fraud
He was found guilty of three counts of mail fraud and not guilty on the remaining charges. Kipnis was sentenced to six months home detention and five years probation.
David RadlerFormer Hollinger chief operating officer
He pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud in return for testimony against Black and others, and was given a 29-month sentence and a fine. He was sentenced on Dec. 17, 2007, and served time in a Pennsylvania jail until he was moved to a Canadian prison the following September. He was granted parole in December 2008.
The allegations
Non-compete payments
Conrad Black arrives at the federal courthouse in Chicago for closing arguments in his fraud and racketeering trial. (M. Spencer Green/Associated Press)
Hollinger International started selling off its extensive newspaper assets in the late 1990s in a series of transactions. The U.S. government - and star prosecution witness David Radler - alleged that Black devised a scheme to improperly divert $60 million US from those sales to himself, and to Radler, Boultbee, Atkinson or companies they had an interest in. Kipnis, the prosecution alleges, facilitated the diversions. The prosecution said the money should have gone to Hollinger International and its shareholders, but instead, was dressed up as non-compete payments. This is money the buyer of a business pays a seller in return for promising not to start up a competing business. The government alleged the non-compete deals in this case were frauds - cover stories invented to allow Black and the co-defendants to transfer tax-free money into their pockets. The fraud allegations around the sale of these newspapers were the heart of the prosecution's case.
The defence argued that non-compete agreements are routine in the newspaper business. In all these transactions, it said the payments arising out of them were legal, appropriate, disclosed to Hollinger International auditors and authorized by the board. If there was any wrongdoing, defence lawyers said, it was by Radler, who had already pleaded guilty to fraud and who the defence accused of lying to fulfill the conditions of his plea bargain with the prosecution.
The trip to Bora Bora
In the summer of 2001, Black and his wife, Barbara Amiel Black, took the Hollinger International jet to the South Pacific island of Bora Bora for a holiday. The prosecution called that an abuse of corporate funds, since Hollinger paid for the entire cost of the plane trip - which the prosecution put at $565,000 US.
The defence said the government's calculation of the trip's cost was grossly inflated because the hourly charge for the plane included fixed costs that would be paid even if the plane sat on the ground. The defence also said Hollinger's plane policy did not differentiate between personal and business travel. Black's lawyers further argued that their client took the plane because the Hollinger audit committee had told him to because of safety and terrorism concerns.
The birthday party
In December 2000, Black threw a lavish birthday party for his wife at a posh New York restaurant. On Black's instruction, Hollinger International paid two-thirds of the $62,000 US cost. The prosecution called that yet another example of Black using Hollinger International shareholders' money to fund his lavish lifestyle.
But a defence witness testified the party was more a business event than a private party and said some of the guests were not close friends of the Blacks.
Black's Manhattan apartment
In 2000, Black arranged to buy his Park Avenue apartment from Hollinger International for $3 million US - a price far below its true market value, according to prosecutors.
The defence said Black spent $2 million US of his own money renovating the apartment and that was factored into the below-market purchase price.
The 13 boxes
On May 20, 2005, Black, with the help of his chauffeur, loaded his Cadillac with 13 boxes of documents from his Toronto office. At the time, an Ontario court had ordered no documents be removed from the building without the approval of the court-appointed monitor, KPMG. The removal also came the day after the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission had told Black's U.S. lawyers that it would be seeking documents as part of its investigation of the company.
The removal of the boxes - which was captured on video and played for the jury - amounted to obstruction of justice, the prosecution claimed.
The defence said Black's U.S. lawyers never told their client about the letter from the SEC. Black returned the boxes when told to by the court.
What was at stake
Black faced the possibility of more than 90 years in prison if he had been convicted on all charges. Under U.S. federal law, offenders must serve at least 85 per cent of their sentences before release is possible. Canadians jailed in the U.S. are allowed to seek a transfer to a Canadian prison, where release is possible after serving as little as one-sixth of the sentence. Black renounced his Canadian citizenship in 2001 to accept a British peerage. He is a citizen of the U.K.
Menu
- Main page
- Charges at a glance
- Trial at a glance
- The rise and fall of a media baron
- Conrad Black in his own words
- Timeline
- Can Black regain Canadian citizenship?
- Lord Black and Canadian too?
- Closing arguments: CBC's Andy Barrie talks to Globe and Mail reporter Paul Waldie
- Coverage
Trial coverage: From the inside
- August 3, 2007
- July 23, 2007
- July 16, 2007
- June 22, 2007
- June 15, 2007
- June 8, 2007
- June 1, 2007
- May 25, 2007
- May 18, 2007
- May 11, 2007
Trial excerpts:
Interactives
Columns:
- Letters from the Editor in Chief: Tony Burman
- Media overkill of Conrad Black
RELATED
External Links
(Note: CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of external sites - links will open in new window)
Conrad Black arrives at the federal courthouse in Chicago for closing arguments in his fraud and racketeering trial. (M. Spencer Green/Associated Press)