CBC News
TONY BURMAN :
For media, Montreal shooting was history on the run
September 14, 2006 | More from Tony Burman

Tony Burman is former Editor in Chief of CBC News – which includes news, current affairs and Newsworld. He was CBC's chief journalist, in charge of editorial content on radio, television and the internet. With more than 30 years' experience, he has produced many award-winning news and documentary programs for both CBC-TV and Radio. He has covered stories in more than 30 countries, including the Ethiopian Famine of 1984, the fall of Communism in Eastern Europe and the release of Nelson Mandela in South Africa.

The sound of gunfire on a September afternoon crackling through a bustling downtown Canadian college campus, teeming with thousands of exuberant teenage students at the beginning what many undoubtedly believed was to be the most exciting year of their lives.

What can be more frightening?

The horrific shooting at Montreal's Dawson College evoked all kinds of awful memories.

For many of the young community college students, aged 16 to 19, the massacre at Columbine High School in the United States probably came most quickly to mind. That happened seven years ago as many of them were starting to think about high school.

But for most Montrealers — and Canadians everywhere — Wednesday's rampage evoked memories of 1989, and the cold-blooded killing by Marc Lépine of 14 women at Montreal's École Polytechnique engineering school.

For the media, it was both those incidents and more. In many important ways in this new "live" 24/7 world of ours, this is the worst type of story to cover.

It was history on the run, literally. Shortly before 1 p.m., when thousands of frightened students raced out of the college onto Montreal's downtown streets, word of the shooting first became known.

But what was really happening? Was there one shooter or more? Who was he killing, and why? Should people take immediate cover, or run? Was it over, or just beginning?

This was an explosive story — fraught with rumour, speculation and high emotion — that would unfold live over many hours on Canadian television, radio and online. And it would challenge both the media and the public.

Like many of my CBC colleagues watching this Montreal incident transpire, both as a journalist and as a parent of children not much older than those I was seeing on my TV set looking so terrified and vulnerable, I had the same sinking feeling I had five years ago when the incredible events of 9/11 started happening on that quiet September morning.

Where is this story going? And how can we get ahead of it?

In its most basic way, the role of the media in this kind of situation is to try to separate fact from fiction, to help our audiences understand what is happening and why — and to respond to the unfolding drama, as best we can under the circumstances, in a way that makes sense of it all.

But there are unique challenges when no one really knows what's happening. Or when it will end.

The CBC, like other news organizations, tried to be careful in reporting only confirmed information. But that is impossible when so much of what we all came to know was from eyewitnesses who themselves often gave fragmentary and conflicting accounts.

However, many of them proved to be superb "reporters." In fact, a unique feature of our television coverage of this incident was video provided by students who had captured the images on their cellphones.

We know from past experience that Canadians — viewers, listeners and readers — turn to the CBC in increasing numbers as the story unfolds. The audiences build as the minutes and hours go by, throughout the day and evening.

And so does the interest of international broadcasters.

CBC's coverage of this story from Montreal was seen and heard throughout the world. CBC pictures and sound — and reporters — were featured in newscasts in Europe and the Middle East. In the United States, CBC's reporting of the Montreal incident led NBC's nightly newscast with Brian Williams, and was the complete source of CBS coverage with Katie Couric.

In our live Canadian coverage on television and radio, there was a constant need for us to repeat, recap and summarize for "those of you who have just joined us."

This repetition can become quite annoying to those who have been with us throughout our coverage. And this means we're often accused of exploiting the drama with constant repetition — when, actually, all we are trying to do is to inform the growing numbers of new people who have just turned us on.

Only after many hours of reporting do certain confirmed details emerge, such as the number of victims (one killed, 19 injured) as well as the death of the gunman.

At the heart of what we want to provide in this type of situation — beyond a description of what's happening — is to extract some meaning from it all. To help Canadians make sense of it. To connect the dots, knowing full well that horrific events are rarely random.

Violence anywhere in society is distressing but never more so than in our schools. All adults — whether they're parents or not — share a strong desire to protect our young that's simply impossible to ignore. The depth of emotion and fear evident in so many of the Dawson College students was profoundly moving.

The contributions to CBC.ca's Your View have come from many students — past and present — of Montreal's Dawson College, and they make for stirring reading.

The overwhelming theme, told in very eloquent terms, is that Canadians should not judge Dawson College negatively because of this one incident. In one submission, Mary Ayotte writes: "Dawson is the place of my heart.…I'll go back as soon as those wonder-filled doors open. May this horror not change this amazing place."

I have never been to Dawson College, but I think I know what she means. It shone through in so many of the voices of Dawson students in our CBC coverage.

One of them on The National was particularly moving. She was a young lady who was working in the college's student union office, tearfully explaining that when the shooting started she shut the office doors rather than go outside.

"I feel I failed them," she said with great emotion. "I'm not a hero."

Well, she's wrong. She is a hero. She did what any sensible person should have done. Yes, it was an awful day. But with that kind of honesty and concern, I think Dawson College will recover just fine.



Your Comments


     
Sep. 20, 2006 | 17:55 PDT Victor Robichaud Prince Rupert, BC

Another tragic shooting - and another example of how impotent and ill-conceived the gun registry was and is (this happened long after the knee-jerk politicans reacted over Lepine).

After the BILLIONS mis-spent on the Boondoggle registry for Alan Rock to get more votes in Toronto - it still cannot stop another tragedy.

WE cannot solve all of society's ills by merely "legislating them away".

Maybe we should look at what's wrong with our urbanized lifestyles - and maybe engage and communicate with our youth in a more meaningful way. It's a start.

Victor Robichaud
Prince Rupert, BC

Sep. 17, 2006 | 12:42 EDT Scott Mills Toronto, ON

Condolences to everyone touched by this tragic event. The CBC coverage of this event has been responsible and informative from what I have seen. I invite anyone to check out the multi-disciplinary prevention strategy being used at 14 Division Toronto Police Service 'Project Internet-Truancy'. It is not perfect, but it is a start... We must focus on positive relationships with youth, and engage them in proactive conversation about their Internet usage to prevent further incidents. 'We cannot swim unless we are in the pool'

Sep. 15, 2006 | 14:54 EDT Marcus Sterzer Ottawa, ON

Pete Follter of San Jose, California commented on this webpage that the police officer who shot the gunman should be punished.

Are you insane Pete? I would rather give that cop a medal, and any emotional support necessary after he was forced to shoot the killer.

This police officer, whomever he or she is, will have to live with this horrible event in his or her memory for years to come. The last thing our cops need are armchair quarterbacks telling them how they should do their jobs.

Mr. Follter, I hope that should you ever be in need of a cop to save your life, they decide to use non-lethal (and less certain) means of neutralizing your heavily armed assailant.

Sep. 15, 2006 | 14:12 EDT Jason Todoroff Waterloo Ontario

I can't believe that some people are using this tradegy as a political tool to defend the usuless gun registry. It makes absolutely no sense that someone like Jean Charest has decided to fight Ottawa over plans to spend the money in areas where it actually might save lives. The fact that the guns used in this crime were registered is additional proof that the registry does not make our society safer. Why would Charest defend it? Last time he ran federally he vowed to scrap the registry saying it was useless and that more lives could be saved by spending the money on programs that do save lives, like healthcare. He was right then, but we all can see how wrong he is now. I suspect this new stance is a cheap political move in order to boost his re-election prospects in the next provincial election. Shame on him, and shame on the special interest of the anti-gun lobby who seemingly can't wait for these tradegies to occur so they claim how gun control saves lives and why we need more of it.

Sep. 15, 2006 | 10:12 PDT Ron Cumberland B C

Tony: Sensational coverage!U S networks watch in awe. I change channels when there are too many repeats, or details seem to overwhelming.

Sep. 15, 2006 | 12:43 EDT Dave Jones Ottawa

I find it distressing that every major media outlet in North America has chosen to repeatedly put the face of the criminal who shot innocent people in Montreal in their publications, never mind the featuring of amatuer cell phone video. What kind of message does this send to our society? If you want to be famous, well just shoot lots of people. I watched a canadian news broadcast last night where the on air personality asked the local reporter how the family of the murdered woman was doing. This is news? You have gone beyond voyeurism, this is a tactical decision to sell media advertising at the expese of ethics. Is this what is being taught in journalism school? It makes one wonder just how far the media will go in the pursuit of selfish goals. What will the media look like in 20 years? It is hard to be optimisitc in the face of this weeks news coverage. I would only ask that you aspire to be better than this.

Sep. 15, 2006 | 12:40 EDT Jackie Cotnam Toronto

Mary Ito's interview of the Student Union Co-ordinator of Dawson College in Montreal was heart-wrenching and powerful. The story is sad and shocking, but the interview was well done.

Sep. 15, 2006 | 11:13 EDT Phillipa Rispin Montreal

One thing that bothered me about the TV coverage was that, over the afternoon, the same 20-odd minutes of tape (people fleeing, being loaded into ambulances) was shown repeatedly without any indication that it was showing events that had happened earlier. People tuning in after events had begun might think that they were watching real-time footage.

I am relieved that those students interviewed were able to emphasize the peaceful nature of the college. I have two diplomas from Dawson; I worked there for several years in the Seventies; my ex-husband and several friends still work there. It has played and continues to play a large role in the life of Montrealers. It is a marvelous place.

Sep. 15, 2006 | 10:02 EDT Louise Lauzon Ottawa

My heart goes out to the familes and students of Dawson College. No child should have to go thourgh that kid of horror. The repetition is annoyingm but that's not the real problem. The problem is being saturated with the news, to the extent that other news is cast aside. I had to go to CTV on Wednesday to get other news. You can't extract something meaningful out of conflicting and often non-existing ifnormation.

Sep. 14, 2006 | 22:58 MDT ardyth Oseen Red Deer,Alberta

Time and time again we hear of these school shooters being relentlessly bullied at school for years. We had our warning with Columbine and Taber in 1999. When will the governments, school boards, teacher associations begin to seriously address the issue of bullying? How many more bullied children are waiting in the wings, when they too can buy a gun and vent their anger. Get involved, take a stand against bullying in all of its forms, or expect more of this.

Sep. 14, 2006 | 21:40 PDT pete follter San Jose, California

The Dawson College shooting is indeed tragic, even for the young man that is accused of doing the shooting. It is so sad to know that the police came in with guns ablazing against an obviously disturbed individual. With all the technology and training the police have to use non-lethal means, it is criminal to let the officer who shot the young man go unpunished.

Sep. 14, 2006 | 11:18 PDT Bob Crockett Coquitlam BC

Thanks for raising this topic. Do you think that the extensive coverage will encourage others to mimic the act for their few moments of fame? The shooter was into violent computer games and a gothic wbsite. Are these causes or merely symptoms of his behaviour?

Sep. 14, 2006 | 21:05 EDT Eric Trudel Lacolle, Qc

Bravo CBC, great job. But maybe it isn't very gracious to congratulate yourselves in a time like this.

Sep. 14, 2006 | 22:02 NDT fraser dwyer Corner Brook, Newfoundland & Labrador

I don't think gun control as previously practiced by the feds is the answer to the current or similar incidents. They spoiled it(poisoned it)by being to bureaucratic. In these kind of incidents there was apparently no red flags, like a previous criminal record, or medical indications(physical or mental.)It seems to be a perplexing problem that even a bit of common sense applied will not solve it.

Sep. 14, 2006 | 16:41 PDT Jean E Stewart Viuctoria BC

I think that the CBC did an anazing job covering shuch a horrific event and that they were able to capture the students feelings and comments was very meaningful. I always watch the CBC for their balanced news and in paticular enjoy Peter Mansbridge and Brian Stewart. I only hope that the CBC can continue their sensible news ans political coverage and that the present reform Prime Minister does not cut them off funding.

Sep. 14, 2006 | 16:00 MDT Noel Keough Calgary

i was disappionted in the CBC coverage. The webiste and television seemed to be throwing up information and interviews and rumours just to fill the airwaves in this '24/7' environment - trying to be new from minute to minute with too little regard for fact and accuracy and restraint. Just competing with the CNNs of the world. There is too much babble in this 24/7 media world.

Sep. 14, 2006 | 16:14 EDT Donna Lee Aprile Toronto

One caller to CBC Radio's Metro Morning put it so aptly. He remembers the name of Mark Lepine but he can't name one of his victims. And now, we've given the latest Montreal shooter exactly what a nobody wants. Fame. Recognition. Notoriety. The Internet got there first. And then Newsworld. The National,CBC News: Morning and The Current raced their anchors to the scene. Of course, we have to own these stories when they break, but do we have to blanket them so completely. How do we tell the story without tantalizing future perpetrators with the promise of the same reward? Is there some way we can temper that aspect of the coverage? Do we really need all that minutiae on the gunman?

Sep. 14, 2006 | 15:50 EDT Jean Koning 607-486 Donegal St., Peterborough ON K9H 7G3

As each student was interviewed, I began to realize that these young people, although experiencing terrible stress and anguish, were each speaking with intelligence, with good grammer and full sentences, and I couldn't help but feel proud - even of those experiencing great emotion - of how well-educated they sounded and with what dignity they were reacting to the interviewers. I think Dawson College can be very proud of its students- wherever they come from. Jean Koning.

Sep. 14, 2006 | 13:34 MDT Ian McBain Regina

I don't usually watch television. I get my news through CBC.ca and CBC Radio, among other sources.

Yesterday morning when I saw what was unfolding I pulled out my television and brought up a hazy, but legible, image of CBC television because I knew that would be the best place to find current information.

Sitting here, thousands of kilometres from Montreal, I felt a great deal of anxiety and sorrow for these young people of our country. However I was glad to have the story relayed to me from a source I trust.

I did not see sensationalism, and I did not see exploitation. I saw professional journalists wearing the same grave look of concern that I wore, who treated the unfolding events compassionately and delicately.

Top of Comments

Submit your comments

All fields are required.
privacy policy
Name:
E-mail:
Location:
Enter your comments (up to 2000 characters) in the space provided.

Disclaimer:
By submitting your comments you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of e-mails we receive, not all comments will be published. But all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.


^TOP

MENU
MAIN PAGE EDITOR IN CHIEF BIOGRAPHY MORE LETTERS FROM THE EDITOR IN CHIEF OMBUDSMAN JOURNALISTIC POLICIES