rollover

Calorie Confidential

How to stay healthy eating restaurant food

Restaurant meals will probably always be a little richer than what you would make at home. Here are some ways to make healthier choices when dining out.

  • When you get to a restaurant, ask for nutrition information before you order.
  • Ask yourself: How frequently do you eat food away from home? The more often, the more you need to make healthy choices.
  • Ask for a doggy bag: If you’re trying to lose weight, set aside half or nearly half your meal right when it’s served.
  • Don't be afraid to request food the way you want it: ask for dressings, sauces, gravy, butter and mayonnaise on the side.
  • “I’ll start with the salad, please.” Research shows that you consume fewer calories when you begin your meal with soup (not cream-based), or salad (with lower-fat dressings). If you partially fill up on foods packed with nutrition, you're less likely to overeat on the stuff that may not be so good.
  • Look for cooking terms: Order baked, roasted, poached, grilled, broiled or steamed.
  • Beware of battered, fried, or in sauces of butter, alfredo, cream, rich cheese, rose, Bearnaise, Hollandaise or pot pies, hash and creamy casseroles. They are synonyms for one thing: fat.
  • Hold the salt: Soups and cold cut sandwiches are often high in sodium, as is restaurant prepared rice.
  • Beware liquid calories: Instead of choosing pop, alcohol or designer coffee, opt for real juice, milk and especially water.
  • Parents don’t want unhappy, unruly children at a restaurant. Chances are if you give them pop, a chicken fingers and fries, they’ll be happy and behave. Nutritionists worry children will associate junk food with having a good time. Not so bad when you're only eating out occasionally. When you dine out twice a week (the average), it heavily influences their attitudes to food.
  • While kids' meals might offer milk or veggies, the main dish is often deep fried. And they’re pretty much the same from restaurant to restaurant. For any kid regularly eating out, it’s hard to eat healthy. Instead of pop, let them have chocolate milk. Stick to skim milk if your child's over two years of age. At least they’ll get some calcium. If you order juice, dilute it with some water to cut down on sugar content. Also, try to get some steamed veggies with their dishes, and cut down on the fries.

Posted on November 7, 2007
•  •  Save on del.icio.us •  Post to Digg

Comments - Share your thoughts

Just the mere fact that the head of the restaurant association was being so evasive was proof that things are drastically wrong. My suggestion is to fire his sorry ass immediately and go back to parliament and start protecting Canadians. After all starting with this worthwhile information can only help in everyone's decision to eat responsibly and thus decrease long term health care expenses. Posted by: John Gallagher | Nov 7, 07 08:03 PM
This is probably one of this century's biggest issues. Obesity is at an all time high and everyone is pointing their finger at someone else. It's time the restaurant industry stood up. Posted by: Don Beaulieu | Nov 7, 07 08:04 PM
If you're so worried about the strain of obesity on our health care system with the intake of restaurant food, consider the cost to the health care system when the government allows the sale of cigarettes causing lung cancer instead of BANNING the sale of cigarettes. Furthermore, why don't you test the average sit down meal at home and show us the results. Posted by: Beatty Gould | Nov 7, 07 08:18 PM
I was very shocked at the calorie counts and sodium amounts in the foods that were tested tonight. I know that when I do eat out if I could see the calorie content of the items I would definitely make better choices. Posted by: Ellen | Nov 7, 07 08:21 PM
I can't believe this show! And I can't believe that guy! I am very overweight and have to fight everyday about what to eat and how to eat healthy. I just went to Boston Pizza with a friend today and i'm sure I had over 2000 cal in one meal! I think they should have the cal's on the menu's. I know people won't buy any of the high cal stuff, which equals less money in his pocket! This makes me sick! I'm just about a nurse and I see the health problems on a daily basis! Posted by: Alana Larson | Nov 7, 07 10:02 PM
I am so glad you brought up this isssue. I don't think this is really looked at closely enough. The sodium is as important as the calories, if not more so. If you are looking out for sodium, there is usually a serious health issue. The most common being heart failure. The options should be out there to allow the consumer to make an informed decision without needing to give up being a consumer all together. Posted by: Cecile | Nov 7, 07 10:11 PM
Just the way the PR flack was so evasive and wanting to get his point across was a red flag. It was irritating that he said they were proud that they defeated the bill. Posted by: jason andrews | Nov 7, 07 11:03 PM
I couldn't believe the fellow that was interviewed at the restaurant association. What an ass. He has no idea what he is talking about. And if they really care about customers like he says, then they would make sure that the restaurants do something about listing calories, fat and sodium content. Posted by: Holly | Nov 7, 07 11:06 PM
It is really a shame when the consumer is not offered the choice to make an informed decision. With accurate information at our disposal, consumers will talk with their pocket books and this seems to be why they want to ban or hide this information. Interesting that McDonald's freely posts this information. Maybe it is not such a bad place to go to after all. Posted by: Rusty | Nov 7, 07 11:58 PM
Appreciate the tips, but milk and juice are high calorie too, maybe not the best way to avoid liquid calories. Posted by: m | Nov 8, 07 07:19 AM
I was shocked at the amount of calories in the food items that you showcased. I think it should be mandatory for all restaurants to post the nutritional information. You are still going to get people that just don't care but for the most part it will help customers make an informed choice. The head of the Canadian Restaurant and Food Association should be embarrassed about his poor interview. He did not give any solid answers and was completely evasive. One restaurant that is definitely making a difference is the Pickle Barrel restaurants. On their website they list 44 pages of menu items and their nutritional content. Also, they have partnered with Rose Reisman (a leading nutritional expert) to offer meals and desserts under 500 calories. They are not offered at all their restaurants so check the website. As a person that has to watch her weight I would pick a restaurant that had lower fat menu items and nutritional information available. Posted by: Tanya | Nov 8, 07 01:24 PM
I would love to see that information added to the menus at all restaurants. I would also like to see the amount of carbs in each item. I found out in May that I have Diabetes and I have to keep a close eye on the amount of carbs I eat. Posted by: Linda | Nov 9, 07 01:47 PM
The caloric information is invaluable. It's up to each one of us to stay informed and to make the requests when we dine out. Franchise owners will have no other choice but to comply with our requests. I had always paid attention to the calories but never the sodium. The results were outstanding. Unless I missed it, how much sodium should we be intaking on a daily basis? Posted by: Brenda | Nov 9, 07 08:28 PM
It was appalling to see the arrogant and yet suave attitude of the head of the restaurant association. How smooth can you get? It is time to get the legislation before the government again and get the public involved in speaking and applying pressure, to their member of parliament. If the Restaurant Association can use such pull as they did to defeat the bill, how much more pressure the public could exert, we far outnumber them. Posted by: Johanna | Nov 10, 07 04:17 PM
Making the restaurants behave is not going to work if we are all going out and eating ON AVERAGE twice a week. We need to make consumers more responsible... not hurt the restaurants for doing what we ask them to do: feed us more, feed us rich and feed us often! We're the ones paying for the food, eating it and coming back! Posted by: Annie | Nov 11, 07 06:18 AM
It's too that the gentleman being interviewed wouldn't listen nor acknowledge the menu idea. That's all you need: calories, Fat and Sodium. I don't to know what causes rain, I just need to know it's going to rain. Same with my food. I don't care what makes it fatty, i just want to know that is fatty. Posted by: aron finn | Nov 11, 07 12:31 PM
This sounds like just another reason for people to blame obesity on someone else. It's reminiscent of those lawsuits people filed against McDonald's, claiming that their food made them fat. Of course chain restaurant food contains high calories and fat, why do you think it tastes so good? You have the choice to eat there or not. Why not prepare your own food at home? It will contain a lot less fat and cost a lot less. Posted by: Kevin Columbus | Nov 11, 07 12:47 PM
What about the small ma and pa restaurants? they can't afford to send off all their food to be teated to find out all this information. The big chains have the money but most restaurants don't make huge profits. They are run on a very small margin. To force the guys to come up with all this info is not fair. It is up to people to learn what they need to know. Its no shock that a dish made with goat cheese or any cheese or deep fried is going to have a high calorie count. What's next? A bill to force everyone to go to the gym? Posted by: brisdon | Nov 11, 07 01:40 PM
We are conscious of our caloric intake, and often wonder about calories/fats when going out to eat. I know the responsibility ultimately rests with the individual to ask and choose wisely(the old adage of buyer beware is true here as well), but the restaurants need to find their social responsibility to educate and inform patrons. I was completely appalled at the way the individual from the Can. Restaurant Ass'n refused to engage in the interview about the value of minor changes to menus. It is obvious that he is being 'well fed' by his restaurateurs. Posted by: Frank MacAulay | Nov 11, 07 02:32 PM
To be forewarned is to be forearmed! I couldn't believe the arrogance of the spokesperson for the restaurant association. When he stated that the consumer did not need this information placed before him/her because all the information would not be presented properly, he really overstepped the line. Canadians are basically intelligent and informed and why did he depict us otherwise? If he were a vaudevillian, he would have been given the "hook" and yanked off the pedestal that he had placed himself on. He really showed his omnipotence - he was above and beyond the crowd. We, the lowly consumers, were expected to swallow the gruel he was dishing out!! The nerve. Posted by: Bev | Nov 11, 07 06:31 PM
I have checked the internet several times and have been unable to find any nutrition information for Montana's, Kelseys', Applebee's or any Chinese Restaurants. Red Lobster, McDonald's,Tim Horton's, Subway and KFC were readily available. I feel all restaurants should be able to give nutritional information. I think they are afraid they will lose business but they would probably gain business. It is like when they went non smoking - the restaurants are busier now than they have ever been. People want to eat healthy and be healthy. Posted by: Dawn | Nov 11, 07 08:47 PM
It is good to know calorie amount, however, it is important to know WHY the calories are so high... preparation or type of food? i.e. chicken fajitas. I think this type of information will make the restaurants think twice about preparation techniques and make them more accountable for the quality of food they are serving. Posted by: Bonnie | Nov 11, 07 09:44 PM
As a person who is watching her weight and trying to lose before it gets totally out of hand, I was shocked. I knew things were bad when we eat out, but I didn't realize how bad. Posted by: Sue Strueby | Nov 12, 07 12:15 AM
All one would have to do it would seem to lose weight, if that was one's goal, is stop eating out at restaurants. If one made the exact same meal at home, one would likely be more careful about making it with less fat, sodium and calories. A fettucine alfredo sauce made at home, for example, might be made with something like 2% evaporated milk rather than whipping cream. Posted by: Kathy | Nov 12, 07 05:09 PM
As a consumer, I have the right to know the information about a product or service I am buying. There should be a legislation that would require the restaurants to share the nutrition information. The manufactures provide information on the food or clothes we buy in the store, so I don't see why restaurants should be any different. It is very disappointing that the government was so short sighted not to see the benefit of the bill. I would absolutely positively sign a petition to support the bill. Posted by: Vira | Nov 14, 07 10:51 PM
I travel for work for a living. I log 60,000 kms a year on my truck and my travel is almost bi-weekly. I am overweight, and am on weight watchers and I've been educating myself about food. Just try to order vegetables in any of these restaurants, and if they have any, try to get them steamed with no sauces or sodium or butters. Good luck. When you try to get something healthy, they always saturate it with something flavour enhancing. Posted by: Scott | Dec 3, 07 07:26 PM
I'm a new diabetic. When people invite me out to dinner at a restaurant I look up the nutrition facts on the internet to find out what I can eat. (I count carbs.) I spent the last while trying to look up info on Kelsey's restaurant and couldn't find any. This makes eating out difficult for me. If only these big restaurants would catch up to the fast food chains, because almost all of the have nutrition facts on most of their food. Posted by: Heather | Dec 17, 07 06:29 PM
Great thought provoking show. The resistance from the restaurant industry is reminiscent of the resistance from the food industry for mandatory food label data. Such info is commonplace now - allowing us to make informed choices at the grocery store. We strongly endorse - and would gladly use such info on menus. We still want to eat out and indulge but allow us to make informed decisions about what we decide to consume. It should be mandatory. I thought our government was intent on restricting sodium content in food. I cannot understand the shockingly high sodium content in some foods. Reducing sodium alone would make us a healthier country. Let's convince our politicians to bring this issue to parliament again - for input from citizens rather than just the restaurant industry. Posted by: Paul | Dec 23, 07 12:53 PM
As a life-time member of Weight Watchers (WW), I have become much more informed about nutritional information for restaurant meals. WW members can purchase books with "points" for many restaurant meals to help make healthy choices (points are calculated based on calories, fat and fibre). I am on frequent business trips and WW has been a life-saver, since many restaurants I end up at are unable / unwilling to provide nutritional information. PS The man being interviewed was probably just doing his job, and being loyal to the organization who pays his paycheque. Posted by: Donna Jung | Dec 31, 07 01:05 PM
As a graduate student of nutrition, I'm always interested in what people assume makes food healthy or acceptable. Some of the calorie counts are astoundingly high and, I agree, consumers should have the information that will allow them to make informed choices. However, I also partially agree with the CRFA spokesperson who pointed out that calories are not the ONLY measure of a food's nutritional value. Several previous posters mentioned WW and one in particular (Donna J) mentioned fiber as being one factor of a food's level of acceptability on the WW plan. Let's not forget that many of the food assessed, while high in calories, also contained vitamins and minerals, fibre and some "good" fats that contribute to our overall health. The perfect food choices are those that are nutrient dense and low calorie, but I would rather eat a food that nutrient dense and high-calorie than something that's nutrient *poor* and high-calorie. Posted by: Cynthia F | Jan 28, 08 04:30 PM
I think the idea of calorie and nutrition information on menus is a fantastic idea. I think that guy representing the Restaurant Association is a complete idiot. His views are more harmful than helpful. Posted by: Alex Doidge | Feb 7, 08 07:32 PM
I recently had lobster poutine at a sit-down restaurant in Halifax. LOBSTER poutine! French fries, curd cheese, fresh lobster--all smothered in a rich gravy. It was fantastic! I don't know the calorie count, but I am sure it was through the roof. Now, the restaurant wasn't a chain, so in a Marketplace world, its owners would not have to go the the expense of calculating calorie count for this dish, nor any other item on their extensive menu--but the chain restaurant next door would. And there is why the bill was defeated and Marketplace is blowing hot air. There currently is a level playing field for sit-down restaurants, chain and non-chain alike. For a government to subject one competitor to regulation and expense not required of another competitor, both of whom are competing for same customer, is unfair. This is why the government rightly defeated the bill. And for the producers of Marketplace, many the posters above, who cannot fathom a world without government intervention in restaurant menus, I have two words: Weight Watchers. Follow their system and anyone can have the occasion lobster poutine and still maintain a healthy body weight. Posted by: Murray W. | Aug 19, 08 10:51 PM
Subscribe to the comments

Share your thoughts

Note: The CBC does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be published, and those that are published may be edited. But all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.