rollover

Batteries Not Included

A letter from Wayne Elliot, founder of Raw Materials Company

(Raw Materials Company recycled all the batteries collected in the Port Perry blitz, including the non-rechargeable ones)

Since Raw Materials Company was founded almost 18 years ago, approx 3 million tons of consumer, or "household" batteries have been buried in North America. Unfortunately, the huge majority of these small, innocent looking, corrosive, toxic metal batteries, continue to be landfilled as in the past, together with the balance of household trash, in our unprotected municipal landfills. Mixed consumer batteries contain metals including zinc, cadmium, lead, mercury & lithium. These "dry cell" batteries also contain corrosive electrolytes.

There are more than 250,000 tons of consumer batteries produced annually for North American consumption alone (10 large ships, or 9000 transport trucks loaded to capacity). Millions of tons are buried already & greater quantities are buried each year, in this age of high tech devices & electronics. As the metal carcasses are breached over time, the contents are set free into our environment, at a steadily increased pace & tonnage.

Although most batteries have greatly reduced mercury content today (compared to those mfg. in the past), many tons are still used. Mercury remains the most toxic metal to humans & many other species on earth.

Cadmium, (the earth's second most toxic metal to humans), continues to be used in many millions of devices today, powered by nickel cadmium batteries. Collection efforts to date fail to capture the majority of these waste batteries as well.

Collection presents some challenge, as consumer waste batteries are generated at the rate of less than 2 pounds, per household per year. Collection has been the favored excuse in the past, to ignore the problem.

Blue box programs to date have not been interested, as most of the battery cells are of no resale value. Space on collection trucks is another reason given for not collecting spent batteries via these programs. Notwithstanding, a small pail would likely suffice for each days collection of household batteries. We have long believed the blue box program could be a very efficient collection method. The average household would produce a small sandwich bag of battery cells approx twice each year.

It seems unreasonable, we put forth the effort to recycle valuable items (ie; aluminum cans, paper, glass), wisely sustaining natural resources & conserving energy, but continue to fail to protect ourselves from deadly toxins right in our communities, at local landfill sites.

Once collected, the miscellaneous battery types can be sorted & safely recycled, for approx. $2.00 per HOUSEHOLD per YEAR.

It remains our belief Canadians would be willing to pay $2.00 to $3.00 total cost, per household each year, knowing thousands of tons of corrosive metals are not leaching through to the groundwater, for future generations to suffer.

Humans cannot sustain themselves by eating these batteries, so why do we continue to accept that our children & grandchildren consume them in future?

As with other destructive behavior we have adopted (ie; overfishing, clear cutting forests, emissions causing global warming, etc), nature is unable to keep up & maintain our environment as it is meant to be, nor can it deal with concentrated pockets of corrosive toxins across the country & around the world.

Decisive action is long overdue & while we continue to wrangle over the issues, approx 600 tons of consumer batteries are landfilled in North America each and every day.


Wayne Elliott
Founder
Raw Materials Company
Div./ International Marine Salvage Inc.
Port Colborne, Canada.

Posted on October 31, 2007
•  •  Save on del.icio.us •  Post to Digg

Comments - Share your thoughts

Your program on dead batteries suffered from a serious omission. You did not mention that Toronto has had in place a program to collect dead batteries for many years now. During the summer months the councillors of each ward in the GTA have been hosting an Environment Day at a designated location for the collection of hazardous waste, specifically including dead batteries, also paint etc. for proper disposal or recycling as appropriate. Were you not aware of this? Posted by: Bernd Alsen | Nov 4, 07 10:09 PM
Wow, not only does Marketplace give this company screen time, but they give them web space to stump for a government contract. It's inexcusable that the company that owns the patent for battery recycling technology is given a biased opportunity to promote their product and advocate a $2 to $3 levy on the consumer. Where would that money go? Right in their pocket! 5 million people in the GTA alone at $2 to $3 dollars a head? I certainly hope Marketplace is getting in on this scam! Their producers could retire on even 1% of this cash cow! Posted by: Liana Kerzner | Nov 5, 07 01:03 PM
I'm not sure it was through subtlety or naivité, but the dry-cell recycling Marketplace episode (Oct 31) failed to emphasize the inherent silliness of letting the industry design and operate a recycling program. The essence of utility of a dry cell is portability and disposability, and anything that impedes its saleability is unlikely to be endorsed by industry. It would have been helpful to learn, either from the programme or his letter, details of issues other than supply faced by the commercial recycler you showed. Undoubtedly politics and economics are involved, judging by the vehemence of the negative spin put on the issue in Liana Kerzner's email. If indeed "the" (single) patent on "battery recycling technology" exists - an improbable prospect - it surely won't earn a fortune in royalties. By the way, your choice of potassium hydroxide as a typical noxious ingredient indicates a certain lack of scientific editorial expertise. This substance, exposed in a landfill, say, would quickly degrade into potassium carbonate, no more harmful than its close analogue, baking soda. In fact in its own miniscule way, it would act as a greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide) sink! Posted by: Owen Funnell | Nov 8, 07 11:32 PM
Solution=Charge a refundable deposit like on beer bottles. Posted by: sarahnofear | Nov 11, 07 01:22 PM
Someone want to tell that guy that carbon monoxide detectors go close to the ground since it's heavier than air? He'll probably be dead before that detector goes off on the ceiling. Posted by: Adam | Nov 21, 07 10:23 PM
I was very disappointed when I viewed your entire battery recycling program and found that you had failed to find one business that will take LeClanche cells (non-rechargeable) for recycling. As a radio amateur, I use a lot of battery-powered equipment. Yes, I use recyclable when possible, but some equipment does not convert easily to rechargeables. For instance, the life of Halogen flashlights is substantially reduced if you do not use the correct voltage on them, which will happen if you don't use alkaline or carbon-zinc cells. More halogen in the waste! A few years ago I spent a day phoning around to find out how to safely dispose of primary cells. I was astounded that the city of Toronto told me that I had to take them all the way out to the East York transfer station - at a time when I was saving the planet by not owning a car! The result of my research was the discovery of one retail outlet that takes all types of cells, and also those new mercury-containing compact fluorescent lamps that Stephen Harper is forcing on use (there is an idea for another program!). That store is IKEA, and we keep our cells in a bag in our apartment for our next visit. Do we have to have Swedes come to our country to show us how to recycle? Shame on us! Posted by: Nigel Johnson | Nov 26, 07 05:08 PM
The problem with batteries is the problem present in all fields of manufacturing. Everything we use eventually ends up in a landfill. If we as a society could work toward a cradle to cradle approach in which manufacturers would want back old products so they could reuse parts and refurbish old things to make new we would not have as many problems. Also I wonder the quality of the 'recycled' materials coming from batteries. More than likely it is downcycled and not really recycled like much of our recycling. The other one we don't ever hear about not going into landfill because of mercury content is flourescents, compact and otherwise. The inside of the glass is coated with the stuff to create the chemical reaction that causes the glow. Where is the program for their proper disposal? Posted by: Erin | Nov 30, 07 02:09 AM
Interesting how some people try to come up with solutions for a problem while others look for cracks and flaws in the original article. I tip my hat to you, Wayne Elliott for getting the ball rolling - The bottom line is that almost everybody uses batteries for something, and it is simply not convenient to recycle them. I work at a place where handheld GPS use is taught, so I see boxfuls of batteries being collected, but there is no program in our community to do anything with them, so into the garbage they go. We've tried rechargables, but they don't seem to have as much grunt as alkalines. We had a similar problem a few years ago with oil and oil containers, and it was solved by charging an extra fee at the time of sale based on the size of the container. It works great - there are people that come around and collect used oil, filters, and containers. Could we not use the same people for batteries of all types, including lead/acid automotive? Posted by: Mike | Dec 30, 07 08:17 AM
While visiting someone in the Credit Valley Hospital, I saw special containers placed in the hospital's hallways for used batteries. If more places did this sort of thing to make it easier for proper disposal, I'm sure most people would comply. Such stores as electronic (Best Buy, Future Shop, etc.) or where most batteries are sold like Wal-Mart, Canadian Tire, etc. should be willing to co-operate. It could make a difference. Posted by: H.Hussain | Mar 27, 08 10:53 PM
All the battery recycling boxes you are seeing at stores like Ikea and the hospitals...they are all going to this same company that is featured in the show. For those of you who are freaking out about the cost --- $2.00 A YEAR! Really! Of course the company has to make money...$2.00 a year is too much to spend on a cleaner environment? You spend that much on a coffee. This company has found a way to keep the toxins out of the ground, and you have people knocking them down and saying they are trying to rip people off? So, are the blue boxes a scam too? Those companies make money. Think before you speak!!! Posted by: anonymous | Aug 4, 08 11:06 AM
Recycling batteries is a novel idea, too bad Mr. Elliot hasn't pushed the effort in Port Colborne where his many industrial businesses are located. It is also unfortunate that Mr. Elliot doesn't have the same "environmental concerns" about corrosive metals leaching into the groundwater in relation to his ship scraping business located right along the Welland Canal...where Port Colborne and other municipalities get their drinking water from. Posted by: Ellen | Sep 2, 08 09:33 AM
Subscribe to the comments

Share your thoughts

Note: The CBC does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comments, you acknowledge that CBC has the right to reproduce, broadcast and publicize those comments or any part thereof in any manner whatsoever. Please note that due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be published, and those that are published may be edited. But all will be carefully read, considered and appreciated.