| |
<<back
THE fifth estate: No Way Home > Printer
Version
Broadcast
March 10, 2004
INTRODUCTION
While youth homelessness is not a new phenomenon, it has become more severe
in Canada over the past two decades.
How many youth homeless are there?
No one is quite certain of the total number of homeless – both adult
and youth – that exist in Canada. The National
Homelessness Initiative (NHI) was set up by the federal government
in the late ‘90s as a response to the burgeoning homelessness crisis
seen in major urban centers. But the five years since its inception, the
NHI admits there’s no accurate number for Canada’s homeless.
The figure that is used in media accounts is that 200,000
Canadians are homeless at some point during any given year, of which about
one third are youth (25 years and under) – or about 50,000 to 66,000.
On any given night, this means approximately 33,000 Canadians are homeless,
of which about 8,333 to 11,000 are youth.
|
THE NUMBER OF
HOMELESSNES:
On any given night, approximately 33,000 Canadians are homeless,
of which about 8,333 to 11,000 are youth. |
In the City of Toronto – which has the largest
homeless population in Canada – one indication that youth homeless
problem is getting worse can be seen in the growth of beds in the shelter
system.
Today, in Toronto, there are 12 shelters for youth, offering
up 522 beds. In 1979, there were only two youth shelters in the city,
with a total of 95 beds. In the past 25 years there has been a 450% increase
in youth shelter beds.
In Toronto, a good estimate suggests there are at least 10,000 different
youth who are homeless at one point on any given year – and anywhere
from 1,500 to 2,000 on a given night.
Read more about Toronto’s
homeless shelter system at the city's website.
A
way out: Operation Go Home
One organization that will pay the travel costs for street youth who
wish to return to their homes is Ottawa-based Operation Go Home. It’s
Canada's only organization that reunites runaways, street youth, and
or youth at risk. Operation Go Home was formed in 1971 and is a not-for-profit,
national charity. It is not government funded.
It is recognized by the RCMP, "Our Missing Children's" (which
is a group consisting of RCMP, Customs, Immigration, Justice Dept.
Dept. Foreign Affairs.) The organization has reunited over 450 youth
since 2000. They have a national crisis/support line that is 24hrs
a day 7 days a week, 365 days a year, and is 1-800-668-4663.
Operation Go Home’s mandate is to “reunite runaway youth
(age 16 and 19) with their parents/guardians; or to connect them with
appropriate agencies that can best suit their needs” as well
as “to foster self-esteem and self-confidence through front-line
interaction with street youth, with the goal of employability, empowering
these youth to become contributing members of society.” |
WHO ARE HOMELESS YOUTH?
Young men: 64% of homeless youth (youth are under 25) are male.
91% of these men and 72% of females are between the ages of 19 and 25.
Studies have shown that these youth generally leave home around the age
of 15.
Heterosexual: 70%
are heterosexual, 14.1% define themselves as bisexual, 4.6% as gay and
2.3% as lesbian and less than 1% as transgendered.
Poorly educated: Most men - 56% -have grade
11 or less, 31% have grade 12 and 12% have university or college or technical
school. For women, 60% have grade 11 or less, 33% have grade 12 and 6%
have university, college or technical school.
Of those who attended school and were assessed by counselors,
25.6% were diagnosed with anger management problems, 19.1% with ADD, 15.2%
with hyperactivity and 4.5% with dyslexia.
TROUBLED
YOUTH:
Of those who attended school 25.6% were diagnosed with anger management
problems, 19.1% with ADD, 15.2% with hyperactivity and 4.5% with
dyslexia. |
Working class background: The fathers
of 45% of street youth work in primary, processing, construction or transportation
jobs, 21% working in clerical, sales or service and 22% in managerial or
professional occupations.
Mothers are a different matter. Only 7% work in primary, processing, construction
or transportation, while 40% are in clerical, sales, or service, 17% in
managerial or professional and 29% as homemakers.
Parents’ education skews downward:
for both fathers and mothers, 30% have less than high school education.
For fathers, 17% have high school, 18% are university graduates, and 10%
are postgraduate. For mothers, 23% have high school, 18% university and
8% post-graduate.
LIFE ON THE STREET
When youth become homeless, they don’t all automatically
end up sleeping on street grates or in doorways. In fact, they end up
staying in a variety of places.
A 1999 survey found that:
60% of street youth are staying in one of Toronto’s
youth shelters
25% staying in an apartment (92% were staying with friends
and 'couch surfing')
15% staying on the street of which 4% were living in
squats, and 9% in parks, alleys, and doorways.
Most experts agree that homeless shelters are a band-aid
solution that offer little more than a bed and hot meal.
Yet some youth shelters are quite innovative. One that the
fifth estate found, under the umbrella of Eva’s
Initiatives, combines housing with training. They place youth in jobs
in the construction and movie industries. Eva’s shelters have a
high rate of success and is a model that is soon to be transported to
other communities.
Currently, the occupancy rate among youth shelters is about
80%. While there has been a slight dip in the number of youth using shelters,
many youth would rather live under bridges, in squats or on the streets
than indoors.
HOW THEY EARN MONEY
In 1999, the most comprehensive study about how street kids making their
money was conducted by the Shout
Clinic which offers health care to homeless youth. Among the findings:
36% of street youth earn money by panhandling or squeegeeing
19% do break and enters or sell drugs
18% receive social assistance
17% by have paid employment
10% do sex trade work
Some find legitimate work: Homeless youth had worked
at an average of 3.1 legitimate jobs in the previous 12 months mainly
in general labour, painting, welding, as bike couriers, cooks, cashiers,
telemarketing, in baby sitting and retail sales.
Most have worked in the sex trade: 31% - including men
and women - reported engaging in either street prostitution, phone or
Internet sex, or massage/stripping at least once in their lives. Agencies
like Street
Outreach Services (SOS) focus on helping street youth out of prostitution.
Background determines how youth earn money: On average,
sex workers left home at a younger age, had been on the street the longest,
were most likely to have grown up in at least one foster homes, had the
lowest educational credentials and left home because of problems pertaining
to both physical and sexual assault.
In contrast, those who did property crimes or sold drugs were predominately
male, were likely to have grown up in Toronto and were least likely to
have experienced physical or sexual assault at home.
Would they like to work? When asked if they would like
to find paid employment, 83.4% of males and 87.8% of females said yes.
This indicates that street youth are unhappy about making money the way
they do and would like paid employment instead.
Asked more specifically about under what conditions they would find accept
a job:
53.7% said they would take any job if paid $20 an
hour
35.5% would do just about any job
51.8% felt that any job was better than welfare
18.7% felt they would rather take welfare rather than
a job they didn’t like
18.% said they would not mind being unemployed for
awhile
Again, these results suggest a majority of street youth want a job,
although they were not willing to accept any job offered.
When asked what was preventing them from getting jobs, reasons cited
included:
no fixed address (45.2%)
lack of work experience (43.3%)
no phone (44.5%)
no money for transportation for job search (40.2%)
don’t have the right clothes or appearance
(34.7%)
legal problems (21.3%)
lack of motivation (21.3%)
other problems which included waking up and keeping
a schedule, health, and literacy problems
Most young homeless people were optimistic they would find work,
with 46.6% very hopeful, and 35.7% somewhat hopeful.
THE HAZARDS OF HOMELESSNESS
Living on the street is no picnic. While it’s
true that some youth seek the streets for adventure –
and are derisively labeled “weekend warriors” or
“twinkies” – and eventually return home, most
street youth are there simply because there’s nowhere
else to go. And on the street there is the constant threat of
violence, exploitation, drugs and illness.
In one 2002 study:
45.7% of street youth reported being attacked
in the past year, as compared to 6.3% for their non-homeless
peers,
52.8% reported being threatened with an attack,
42% had been sexually assaulted or threatened with
sexual assault.
Police harassment: In provinces like
Ontario, Quebec, Alberta and BC, police harass street youth relentlessly,
ticketing and arresting them for panhandling, squeegeeing or loitering.
In 1999, the Ontario government passed the Safe Streets Act, which gave
police the power to arrest youth for simply approaching people for money
or squeegeeing their car windows. Youth complain about police harassment
as being one of the biggest hazards they face. One study done by a Toronto
legal clinic, Justice
for Children and Youth found that 11.5% of street youth reported
their worst victimization was at the hands of the police.
Sickness and death: Street
youth are more likely to get sick and even die on the streets.
RISK
OF DEATH:
A Quebec study found the mortality rate was 11 times higher
for street youth -mostly caused by suicide or drug overdose.
|
A recent study that examined the mortality rate
among homeless youth was carried out in Montreal between 1995 and 2000,
and looked at 1,013 young people between the ages of 14 and 25. Originally
the study was designed to examine rates of HIV and Hepatitis infection
among youth. But the researchers began to realize that some of their
subjects were disappearing. They began checking the coroner’s
records and discovered an alarming rate of deaths – mostly caused
by suicide and drug overdose.
By June, 2001, 26 of the 1,013 participants – 22 boys and 4 girls
– had died, or a mortality rate of .89% per 100 person years.
NOTE: The
total figure is really 29 but three were not included in the above number
because they had not been on the street for two years or more.
The homeless youth mortality rate was 11 times higher than the rate
of the general population of Quebec.
The causes of deaths were: suicide (13), overdose
(8), accidental death (2), Hepatitis A (1), unidentified cause (1),
with one case pending.
Four of 31 HIV-infected youth died of suicide, Hepatitis A, and one
unknown.
The study concluded that “mortality is very high among street
youth. Those at highest risk of dying are youth who are HIV-infected,
youth who are daily drinkers, those who are homeless and those who are
injecting drugs. While the role of HIV infection in the mortality of
street youth is still not clear, substance misuse and suicidal thoughts
and attempts, in the context of homelessness, clearly play direct causal
roles.”
Street youth pregnancies: A
study conducted in 1997-98 by the Hospital for Sick Children and the
Shout Clinic among 93 street-involved females found that an alarming
number of street children have pregnancies. There was a total of 118
pregnancies among the women. The study found that:
59% reported having been or currently were pregnant.
The average age of first pregnancy was 16.7 years.
At the time of the first pregnancy, 29% of youth
were living on streets, 27% in shelters, and 43% with friends or family.
32% of all pregnancies were miscarried, 22% were
terminated electively, 34% delivered and 12% were still pregnant.
Street youth women are more likely to get pregnant
than women who are not homeless at a rate two to three times greater.
The younger someone became homeless and the longer
they stayed on the street the greater probability they would become pregnant.
Miscarriages were two to four times higher among
street youth than the general population. This was attributed to poor
nutrition, increased rates of substance abuse and sexually transmitted
disease.
The study concluded that the reasons for higher rates of pregnancy among
street youth is connected to socio-economic status and self-esteem: many
feel it may bring a dramatic change to a hopeless situation, giving them
access to more emotional and financial support, more sense of empowerment
by the responsibility of caring for a child, a sense of family where they
don’t otherwise have one, and the hope they will be treated with
more respect.
THE
NEXT GENERATION:
Street Youth are 2 to 3 times more likely to get pregnant. Their
babies are often born smaller and malnourished. |
Health risks to the children:
Evergreen, a drop-in center for homeless youth in Toronto, finds that
homeless young women tend to have smaller babies than the norm and a
higher number of preemies. Consequently, babies are stunted in their
physical development.
Because the bottles used for feeding are often not cleaned
properly, and the infants are regularly handed around to other teenagers,
the babies end up with fungal infections in their mouth, which results
in diaper rash. Indeed, skin rashes, mouth and diaper rashes and feeding
problems are common.
Babies are often malnourished when they are born. This
is often because the placenta of the mothers is unhealthy and the baby
won’t have received enough blood.
The babies see and experience a lot more violence than
the norm. The children are apprehended at a much higher rate than average
infants. The babies are more likely to be physically punished, and suffer
from neglect.
What is the long term impact?
The biggest impact is with mental developmental problems, with developing
poor attention spans and tending to walk and crawl a bit later than
babies from non-homeless population.
“The body is very forgiving but the brain, because it develops
within the first few years of life, because these kids don’t have
the right kind of interaction or right kind of stimulation, or right
kind of play or because they witness as much violence as they do, my
grain of fear is for their brain development,” says Ruth Ewart,
a nurse at Evergreen. “So they will be another group of kids who
will struggle in schools because of various brain and brain developmental
issues.”
THE CAUSES OF HOMELESSNESS
People become homeless for a wide variety of reasons –
loss of job, marital breakdown, mental illness, and alcohol and drug
addiction. But when it comes to youth and children, the reasons tend
to revolve around the family.
Missing child reports: Overall,
a total of 66,532 missing-child reports were made to Canadian police
agencies in 2002, of which 52,390 were classified as runaways. About
75% return to their homes within a week.
These are not 52,000 individual children, but simply reports, and 73%
of the children will run away again. More females (59%) than males are
categorized as runaways. 96% of the children were between the ages of
12 and 17 years old.
Over half of these children - 56% - report they were “thrown
out” by their parents. When youth were asked whose decision it
was to leave home, 47% noted it was “their decision”, 18%
said it was the decision of one or both parents and 30% indicated it
was a joint decision by themselves and their parents.
Abuse in the home: Ultimately,
experts say that the vast majority of youth or children rarely leave
happy homes for the streets. Several studies have indicated that 70%
of youth have experienced some form of sexual, physical or emotional
abuse. Many of the rest simply felt neglected.
One Toronto study showed that 40% of girls and 19% of
boys left home because of sexual abuse. Physical abuse was a factor
among 59% of females and 39% of males. Violence and parents’ drug
and alcohol abuse were also huge factors.
SEXUAL
ABUSE CASES RISING:
Between 1993 and 1998 a study found cases of physical abuse jumped
from 4,200 to 8,000. There was also an 870% increase in emotional
maltreatment. |
The number of confirmed victims of child abuse
and neglect nearly doubled in Ontario between 1993 and 1998, according
to a University of Toronto study published in 2002. Substantiated
cases of physical abuse jumped from 4,200 cases to 8,000, while cases
of neglect rose from 4,400 to 8,900. The study also found an 870%
increase in cases of emotional maltreatment, largely as a result to
exposure to domestic violence. The number of investigations completed
by children’s aid societies in Ontario has increased by 36%
from 1998 to 2002.
Social factors: Various
studies have identified some key social factors besides sexual and
physical abuse.
Many children simply have a poor relationship with their
parents. 56% of youth characterized their relationship with their mothers
as poor or fair, and 49% said they had a poor or fair relationship with
their fathers. Another 19% of street youths said they had no contact at
all with their fathers. 28% had a poor relationship, 21% fair, 17% good
and 14% excellent.
A higher-than-average portion of the youth come from single
parent homes: 17% from homes where one parent is deceased and 64% of from
homes where the parents have split up.
One report indicates that street youth are much more
likely to be lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered (20-40%) than the
general population (10%).
A staggering portion – nearly 50% - have
had some involvement with the child welfare system. In other words,
a huge number were once wards of state, living in foster homes or
youth shelters and have now fled to the streets.
A shortage of good jobs and affordable housing:
A recent study by the Children’s Aid Society
of Toronto (CAS) found that in 2000, housing was a factor in one in five
cases where children were taken into care by the CAS – a dramatic
60% increase over a similar study in 1992.
And a lack of inadequate housing caused a delay in the return of children
to their parents in more than 10% of cases. During a community social
audit carried out last year, Ontario’s religious leaders heard testimony
from low-income mothers who spoke about losing, or the fear of losing
their children because they couldn’t afford housing and were being
evicted from their homes.
Indeed, while the loss of income and of affordable housing
would seem to affect why adults become homeless, it would be naïve
to believe these factors don’t also affect youth. After all,
the reason many youth end up on the streets is because their families
were made homeless, or they themselves can’t find affordable
housing or a steady source of income to get off the street.
The housing crisis: Here
are some facts about the housing crisis in Toronto:
Between 1996 and 2001, Ontario lost 44,780 rental units,
of which 17,515 were in the greater Toronto area, where the population
increased by 9.6% over that time period.
Between 1997 and 2001, Toronto rents rose by 31% - more
than double the 14% rate of inflation for the same period. Today, only
20% of private rental apartments rent for less than $800 a month.
Since 1997, the increase in monthly rent for an average
two-parent, two-child family rose $225. Among conventional one-bedroom
units, average rent rose $220 over six years, to $894 in 2002.
In the past three years, 873 new rental-housing units
were built in the Toronto area (3% of new housing construction), as
compared to 28,492 for the home-ownership market (97% of new housing
construction).
In Toronto, 49% of all households are tenants.
Since 1996, the overall supply of rental housing actually decreased
by 5,000 units.
While vacancy rates in Toronto have climbed
to about 2.4% this is not as heartening as it may appear. For units
at the low end ($400 to $800) the vacancy rate is at about 1%, while
the vast bulk of the vacancies are in the $1,200 to $1,600 range.
As an indication of how tight the rental market has become, in 1996
units under $800 made up more than 65% of the market; today they make
up only about 20% (49,100 of 250,500 units).
| ENTIRE
FAMILIES IN SHELTERS:
There are now 71,000 households on waiting lists for social
housing. 200% more families have had to visit homeless shelters
over the last decade. |
As a result of this shortage of affordable housing
71,000 households are on waiting lists for social housing.
In the mid-‘90s, both the federal and most provincial governments
stopped funding the construction of social housing. The federal government
has offered up $245-million to resume building housing, but some provinces
refused to match the federal money, thereby stalling the program.
One City of Toronto report indicated that even if this housing was
built, it might still not be affordable for the poor.
In 2002, 32,000 different people stayed in one of Toronto’s
emergency homeless shelters – of which 4,779 were children –
an increase of 21% since 1990 and a 200% increase in two-parent families.
Falling incomes:
At the same time incomes have not kept pace with the cost of living
increases. Although median household income went from $40,443 in 1995
to $49,345 in 2000 in the nineties economic boom, when inflation is
taken into account, household income remains below 1990 levels.
Of Toronto’s children aged 17 and under,
34% were living in low-income families in 2000. The number of low-income
children increased from 152,000 in 1996 to 176,000 in 2001.
Between 1997 and 2002, weekly earnings in Toronto rose
from $618 to $685, a change of 11%. However, average rents grew by 30%
during that same time frame.
The median income for youth is $9,100 a year, while their
unemployment rate is about 16%.
In 1995, Ontario’s provincial government cut welfare
rates by 21.6%. A single parent with one child receives a maximum of
only $511 per month for shelter, making the vast majority of two-bedroom
and even most one-bedroom apartments financially out of reach. For two-parent,
two-child families they were $1,178 a month, of which $602 is allotted
for rent. By August of 2003, the impact of these cuts meant a reduction
of 35% in the purchasing power for the poorest families in the province.
THE COST OF HOMELESSNESS
While many Canadians feel empathy for the homeless, they don’t
see it as a problem costing them much more than the few dollars they may
give to panhandlers. This is an erroneous conclusion.
A rough estimate suggests Canadians are spending about $1-billion a year
in taxes to deal with the homelessness crisis.
Most experts agree that homeless shelters are a band-aid solution, as
they usually offer little more than a bed and hot meal. The City of Toronto
and the Ontario government spend roughly $120-million a year to fund the
65 permanent shelters and Out of the Cold programs in Toronto.
The city’s per diem formula is $53 per bed per night. The shelters
are funded depending on their usage – the more residents, the more
heads, the more money they receive from the city.
Difficult to assess a full cost:
It's difficult to pinpoint exactly what it costs to maintain
a large homeless population. Homeless people use services to varying
degrees. For example, one study revealed that 15% of the people staying
in Toronto’s shelter system use 50% of the resources. That’s
because this 15% are the hardcore homeless – often chronic long-term
people who are using the shelter system all the time, as compared to
most homeless who use it a short period of time before finding a place
to live.
Other chronic members of the homeless population use publicly-funded
services very rarely, living outdoors all year round and being self-sufficient
financially, earning money through panhandling.
| GREATER
HEALTHCARE COSTS:
The average homeless person uses $4,714 a year in healthcare
compared to the average Canadian citizen at $2,633. |
Homeless people use more goverment services:
In 2001, the BC
Ministry of Community, Aboriginal and Women’s Services published
a study examining the causes and effects of homelessness in BC. It's one
of the few studies that attempts to put a dollar figure on what it costs
taxpayers to support the homeless population. It found the following:
It cost the BC government 33% more to provide health care,
criminal justice and social services to a homeless person than to a socially
housed unemployed individual ($24,000 a year, compared to $18,000 a year).
The combined service and shelter costs of the homeless
people ranged from $30,000 to $40,000 on average per person for one year
(including the cost of staying in a homeless shelter). In contrast, the
combined costs of service and housing for housed individuals ranged from
$22,000 to $28,000 per person per year, assuming they stayed in supportive
housing.
For homeless individuals, the major category of cost that
they entail is in the criminal justice system, and averaged $11,410 a
year. The average taxpayer spends $362 a year to maintain the Canadian
justice system.
The cost for providing social services for a homeless
person was $7,893 a year. On average, Canadian taxpayers spent $179 a
year on social services.
The health care costs of homeless person averaged
$4,714 a year. An average Canadian citizen uses $2,633 per year in
publicly financed health care services.
EMERGENCY
SHELTERS ARE EXPENSIVE
It costs $60-80 to house someone in an emergency shelter
and less than $35 in supportive housing.
|
It costs more to house homeless people:
When it came to housing, Canadians spend an average of $11,200 a year
on their own shelter. In contrast, housing the homeless is calculated
on a per diem basis (The BC study showed shelter costs ranged from
$6,000 to $16,000 a year). For example, it costs:
Per night in a provincial correctional facility - $155-$250
Psychiatric hospital - $380 average
Emergency homeless shelter, which included meals and services
- $60-$85
Detox centers $80-$185
Mental health residential facilities - $140-$191
In contrast, supportive housing is cheaper:
Enhanced self-contained apartment with support on site
- $67-$88
Self-contained apartment – mini-suite/bachelor -
$14-$20
Self-contained apartment - no support - $25-$35
It has been estimated that to virtually eradicate
homelessness, it would cost all levels of government in Canada $3.5
billion to achieve this, which would go to pay for affordable housing,
income support (like welfare) and some support services.
TOP
the
fifth estate: No Way Home
MAIN - WHO
ARE HOMELESS YOUTH? - LIFE ON
THE STREET
THE HAZARDS OF HOMELESSNESS
THE CAUSES OF HOMELESSNESS
THE COST OF HOMELESSNESS
|