<<back FRANCE: REVOLT IN THE
BIRTHPLACE OF WATER PRIVATIZATION Suez and Veolia Environnement (formerly Vivendi Environnement) are France's largest water companies. Suez’ roots in the water business go back to 1822. It now has more than 125 million customers around the world. Veolia provides water and wastewater services to more
than 110 million people around nearly 100 countries. During the nineties,
their revenue from water more than doubled to $12 billion a year.
Most of the waterworks in this area were/are controlled by a company called SA Compagnie des Eaux et de l’ozone, an affiliate of Compagnie Generalé des Eaux (CGE), later called Vivendi and now Veolia. The regional director was a man named Régis Calmels. DIRTY DEALINGS IN FRANCE Calmels decided in the spring of 1994 that Michel’s activities were becoming prejudicial to his company or, as one witness later said, were “getting in the way”. A fellow water executive, Louis Cunnac referred him to Bernard Cayron, who was the manager of a Paris-based company called la Société Export Trading Services. This company specialized in selling “special equipment” (weapons) to the French ministries of defence, the interior and justice and also offered security services. Cayron, a military veteran, had previously done some contract work for Cunnac and Vivendi that involved surveillance and screening for bugs. In July 1994, Calmels met with Cunnac and Cayron at the Hôtel St. James in central Paris where they discussed, as court judgments later concluded, a plan to intimidate Michel into closing down his company. CAUGHT IN THE TRAIN STATION The two men were carrying two bags containing wigs, gloves, handcuffs, a roll of tape, a sawed-off shotgun, a 9mm pistol, shotgun shells, brass knuckles, sunglasses, a truncheon or blackjack, smoke and tear gas grenades. They also carried 19,000 francs in bills of 500 francs and two train tickets to Béziers. A search of Jaubert’s flat turned up a loaded Smith and Wesson 357 revolver plus 50 cartridges, a Mossbert 12-gage shotgun, a Remington pump action shotgun with shells and 2 two-way radios. Under interrogation, Jaubert eventually told police that
he was on is way to Béziers to intimidate Jacques Michel on behalf
of a client whose name he claimed not to know. He said that he had been
contracted in July 1994 by his former employer Cayron to conduct surveillance
and intimidate Michel. His payment would be 40,000 francs cash. He claimed
he hired Pommier to help him because he is a big intimidating guy. Pommier
confirmed Jaubert’s story. Police arrested Cayron who originally denied any knowledge of Michel. But eventually he admitted that Cunnac had asked him to investigate Michel. He claimed that on his own initiative he hired Jaubert to investigate Michel as a business favor to CGE. He said the two thugs had carried out surveillance on Michel’s home in July or August and that he had written a report about this, which he mailed to Cunnac. He claimed that that marked the end of the affair and he paid Jaubert out of his own pocket. Whatever Jaubert and Pommier were up to on Sept. 1, 1994, was at their own initiative. CALMELS IMPLICATED IN THE PLOT Calmels admitted that he had met Michel during contract renegotiations with the city of Sainte Maxime in the Var. He even visited Michel’s home to give him documents. Initially, he claimed he never heard of Cayron or his company and never intended to investigate Michel, never mind intimidate him. Then he changed his story. He admitted he had called Cunnac to ask him if he knew anybody who could investigate Michel. Cunnac gave him Cayron’s number. He said however, that he was never able to contact him. He admitted he “toyed” with the idea of investigating Michel’s lifestyle. But he claimed he never followed through. Cunnac said he had been contacted by Calmels about finding somebody to investigate Michel. He had told him that Cunnac was worried about the role Michel was playing in audits that were being performed in the Var region on water contracts and that Michel was “getting in the way”. Cunnac stated that there was a plan to intimidate Michel hatched by Calmels, Cayron and Jaubert. He said the plan was first discussed at a meeting at the Hotel St. James Albany in Paris in July, 1994. He said he, Calmels and Cayron took part in the meeting and agreed to pay Cayron 100,000 francs cash. He denied receiving a report from Cayron and noted that if there was a report it would have been sent to Calmels because he ordered the operation. Cunnac later changed his story after meeting with the deputy director general of CGE – the number two man in the company. Cunnac claimed Calmels was not at the hotel meeting. But the judgment goes on to say that this change has no credibility because Cunnac and Cayron had frequently discussed the “Projet Michel” together and there would be no point in meeting at the hotel unless Calmels was present. CHARGES LAID AGAINST WATER EXECUTIVE Vivendi (Veolia) quickly shipped Calmels off to the Philippines. He is now working in Indonesia for Vivendi (Veolia). Both men were convicted at trial, fined and sentenced to two years in jail. The convictions were appealed. Both men lost and the appeals court imposed harsher sentences of three years in jail and increased the fines. They appealed two more times and their convictions were
upheld. He is still working for Vivendi (Veolia) in Indonesia. The conviction of Cayron was upheld. Jaubert and Pommier were both found guilty and sentenced to two years in prison. Police have never discovered who tried to burn down Michel’s home. Michel continues to advise cities on their water contracts
and his business is thriving. VIVENDI'S LAWSUIT AGAINST MICHEL Michel won the case in a judgment delivered in March 1999. The judges noted that his statement reflected current public opinion in France about the water companies and also reflected Michel’s own experience having been the victim of a crime perpetrated by a director of the water company that was suing him. In cities around France, the revolt against powerful water companies is growing. The protest is rooted in several proven cases of corruption and illegally elevated water rates. GRENOBLE: OVERCHARGING CUSTOMERS In 1999, a court concluded that Suez had fraudulently overcharged its customers in Grenoble for years to recover the cost of the takeover. Raymond Avrillier led a citizens’ protest against the private water deal. Raymond Avrillier: What happened at the time of the privatization in 1989 is what happens in all the French-style privatizations when public utilities are out-sourced, in French cities and foreign ones. There’s a huge increase in prices. Grenoble took back its water utility in 1999. Their water fees dropped dramatically and are now among the lowest in France. TOULOUSE: HIDDEN TAXES Anne Bouzinac: Our goal here in Toulouse is the return to a public service. Because you have to realize the official figures show that the cost of a publicly owned service is, on average, twenty per cent lower than a contracted out service CASTRE: QUESTIONABLE ACCOUNTING After a tribunal concluded that Castre’s water rates were illegally high, Castre mayor Pascal Bugis and his council voted to cancel its contract with Suez in June 2003. The transfer back to the city is set to happen in spring 2004. There is still a debate over whether Suez should repay the users for the money it overcharged them. This citizen and protest organizer explains. “We’ve seen the company’s methods and we don’t want it to stay here and continue to do what it’s doing, while it more or less hides its practices. We would prefer a return to a public service.”
the fifth estate: DEAD
IN THE WATER
|
||||||||